Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
The Fermi wavevector is the radius of the occupied sphere in wavevector coordinates for an isotropic Fermi gas. In the uniform two-component electron model, and for nonrelativistic particles. Its units are inverse length, whereas the Fermi momentum has units of momentum.
The group velocity of an excitation evaluated on the Fermi surface. For an isotropic dispersion relation , , where is the Fermi momentum.
In electron-phonon scattering, an electron changes its energy by while its crystal momentum changes by a phonon wavevector modulo a reciprocal lattice vector. Charge-transport relaxation weights a scattering angle by . Small-angle events can therefore relax heat efficiently while relaxing electrical current weakly. At temperatures above the phonon excitation scale, scattering becomes approximately elastic in the electron thermal shell; residual elastic disorder often dominates at very low temperature.
A Peierls transition, named for Rudolf Peierls, is a metal-insulator transition caused by a Peierls distortion of an initially metallic chain.[ref]
Peierls transition. Entry P04468: electronic transition caused by a structural distortion and opening a gap at the Fermi energy
A modulation at mixes states near opposite Fermi points and can open a band gap at the Fermi energy. At half filling with one atomic orbital per chemical atom, this modulation doubles the original lattice period and alternates strong and weak bonds. In a weak-coupling zero-temperature description, the Peierls energy gain is proportional to whereas the elastic cost is proportional to , where is the undistorted hopping strength and its small alternating change. The logarithm permits a distortion at arbitrarily weak coupling in the ideal model. Finite temperature, finite size, interchain coupling and thermal fluctuations matter for a real transition; strictly one-dimensional reasoning alone does not establish finite-temperature long-range order.For a nonrelativistic zero-temperature free electron model with fixed particle number, electron degeneracy pressure obeys . Consequently its bulk modulus is . At temperatures small compared with the electron Fermi temperature, the leading isothermal compressibility is . This electronic contribution alone omits ionic binding and interaction corrections in a real metal.
Radiative spin-down of a rotating electric dipole by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
A permanent electric dipole moment of magnitude rotating perpendicular to a fixed axis emits in the electric-dipole approximation for radiation, with . For fixed mechanical moment of inertia , weak radiative loss gives and hence the displayed spin-down law. It assumes : the full dipole acceleration has squared magnitude , whose second term is beyond this leading adiabatic approximation.
For sinusoidal current density and constant carrier density , the electron drift velocity is . Its displacement has amplitude and zero net change over a full cycle. The distance accumulated by this drift alone in one cycle is . With an RMS current, . This does not measure the much larger microscopic path due to Fermi velocity and electron-phonon scattering.
A vector field singular on an axis need not satisfy the classical divergence theorem on the original closed region. Remove a thin tube , apply the theorem to the remaining smooth region, then examine the added cylindrical boundary. If its flux tends to zero and the remaining volume integral converges, the improper boundary flux equals the improper integral of the divergence. For with , the cylindrical unit normal has zero component, so the added flux is on a bounded axial interval. The divergence is locally integrable under the cylindrical coordinates measure . Hence no finite line-source correction survives, despite the field itself being unbounded.
For the upper curved half of , take the vector field and outward unit normal. Its divergence is . The odd term integrates to zero over the half-ellipsoid. Scaling a unit half-ball gives . The equatorial closing disk has downward flux . The divergence theorem therefore gives the displayed curved-surface flux. The constant vertical component is not detected by the divergence, but is recovered by accounting for the closing disk.
Consider the vector field in the open unit cube, where and extend to continuously differentiable functions on , and is continuous on with . Even if is unbounded as , the normal component on an -face has the finite trace . The two -faces have finite improper integral fluxes and therefore cancel. The remaining face contributions giveTo justify this use of the divergence theorem, first apply it to , on which the field is regular. Its divergence is , independent of . Its outward flux is . Taking yields the displayed answer, and absolute convergence makes the two -face limits finite separately. For example, diverges at zero butThis argument defines the normal traces and the face integrals explicitly; it does not assert that the whole vector field has a finite value on the singular face.
To evaluate outward flux through the lateral surface of a finite right circular cone, add its planar cap and apply the divergence theorem to the enclosed solid. Subtract the cap flux, whose outward normal points away from the solid. For a cone with , the volume element is and the cap has radius . The cone's vertex has no unique normal, but is a set of area zero; one can remove a small tip and take a limit when the field is regular there.
For two planes and with linearly independent normal vectors, put , , and . Their intersection is a line parallel to . Its closest point to the origin is orthogonal to that direction, hence has the form . The constraints give , , soFor every other point , orthogonality gives squared distance , proving the global minimum and its uniqueness. The positive determinant also proves that an intersection exists for every real . Parallel normals require a separate consistency check and do not define a unique intersection line.
Choose two point-like astronomical sources with and , where the angles are in radians and strengths use arbitrary common units. Their separation is radians. These are invented model parameters, not historical measurements. Their complex visibility follows immediately from the preceding derivation, and its squared magnitude isAt , ; at , ; at , . The unequal strengths prevent the complex visibility magnitude from reaching zero. Its modulation contains the source separation, while a common displacement of both sources changes wave phase without changing this magnitude. Amplitude alone loses that location information.
An original two-source model: complex visibility, sampling gaps, unit-peak dirty beams, and dirty images
. Details. The sparse case samples for ; the denser case samples every , also with both signs. All weights are one. Both reach , so their shortest fringe period is the same radians. Their dirty beams and false subsidiary features differ because the intermediate spatial frequencies differ. Neither case includes or frequencies above that maximum. The figure uses a periodic angular interval of length radians; this artificial boundary makes a discrete Fourier transform calculation exact for the chosen grid, rather than modelling an all-sky observation.
The plotted dirty image is the sum of two shifted dirty beams, not a fitted or deconvolved estimate of the source. Adding samples in this example reduces prominent spurious peaks; it does not establish a universal monotonic improvement for every weighting or sky. A missing zero baseline leaves the periodic dirty image with zero mean, so it cannot by itself recover the total positive brightness. Missing short spacings also weaken constraints on extended smooth emission.
Reconstruction is an inverse problem. A perturbation whose Fourier transform vanishes at every sampled coordinate can be added without changing the measurements: incomplete coverage leaves a null space. Nonnegative brightness, a restricted source region, or a model with a small number of components can reduce ambiguity, but each is additional information. Removing dirty beam artefacts means estimating a sky consistent with both data and such assumptions; a narrow central peak alone does not certify a unique image. Measurement error, uncertain calibration and source variability add further limitations.
Bose-Einstein condensation concerns occupation of a one-particle state. Matter-wave coherence concerns field correlations between positions or times. Superfluidity concerns a flow response, including suppression of dissipation under appropriate conditions. A density peak diagnoses neither a relative quantum phase between two separately prepared clouds nor a critical flow speed. These observables require different experiments.
For example, in a single-mode fixed-number Fock state, but . Writing for that occupied mode givesThus vanishing mean field does not imply vanishing first-order matter-wave coherence. For two independent fixed-number modes, : there is no ensemble mean interference term establishing a fixed relative quantum phase. Interpreting fringes in an individual detection record requires considering correlations and the measurement; assigning a pre-existing definite relative quantum phase is unnecessary.
Wolfgang Ketterle's lecture describes a separate coherence test: two condensates expanded into one another and produced fringes. Selectively removing one condensate made the fringes disappear on alternating preparation cycles, testing against diffraction from the confinement. This compared two-cloud and one-cloud signals; it did not measure dissipationless flow.[ref]
Nobel lecture: When atoms behave as waves: Bose-Einstein condensation and the atom laser by Wolfgang Ketterle. pp. 1143–1145, Fig. 15, condensate-elimination control
The 1995 sodium experiment combined laser cooling with a magnetic quadrupole trap and a repulsive optical plug protecting its field zero. Radio frequency evaporation preceded release and absorption imaging after time of flight. Lowering the evaporation cut produced broad thermal wings and a narrow core. Moving the plug changed the core's expansion orientation while the thermal distribution remained spherical: a control connecting the feature to confinement. Overlap of the two trapped pockets and residual switch-off acceleration limited quantitative shape comparisons; repulsive interactions affected expansion.[ref]
Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Gas of Sodium Atoms by K. B. Davis and others. pp. 3969–3972, Figs. 1–4
The rubidium experiment used laser cooling, a magneto-optical trap and magnetic trapping of neutral atoms with a rotating bias field. Radio frequency transitions removed energetic atoms; elastic collisions restored thermal equilibrium. Before absorption imaging, the trap was decompressed, then nearly released with a gradient supporting against gravity. Varying the final evaporation cut revealed a narrow anisotropic core within an isotropic thermal cloud. The broad component supplied a simultaneous comparison through the same optics. Resolution and size calibration limited inference; interactions broadened the core relative to an ideal gas.[ref]
A broad component plus a narrow central component can have one local maximum while still displaying two distinct width scales. This is what “bimodal” means in this imaging context; it does not require two separated peaks. To isolate the population effect, construct an original normalized line profileBoth terms are normal distributions; their integrals are one, so the component areas are and . With , the narrow component has central height , while the broad component contributes . A tall central feature therefore need not contain most of the particles. Holding these widths fixed deliberately isolates changing weights; it does not model how temperature, interactions or camera resolution determine actual widths.
For absorption imaging in the weak-probe regime with negligible saturation, the optical depth is , where is the reference light intensity without atoms, the transmitted light intensity, an effective absorption cross section, and the column density. Integrating over both image coordinates gives the particle number; a central pixel height alone does not. Finite resolution can obscure a narrow component, and saturation invalidates this simple logarithmic calibration.
Bose condensation in a three-dimensional harmonic trap by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
Consider noninteracting bosons in one internal quantum state, at thermal equilibrium in the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator potentialHere is the mass, the positive are angular frequencies, and is their geometric mean. Measure the one-particle energy and chemical potential from the ground-state energy. The quantum harmonic oscillator levels then have with nonnegative integer and reduced Planck constant .
When , counting lattice points can be approximated by the volume of a tetrahedron in the positive octant of :This is a density of states, with units of inverse energy. The factor is the unit tetrahedron volume; differentiating produces the factor . Treat the single ground state separately: its macroscopic population would be lost by replacing every level with a smooth density of states.
For , integrate the Bose-Einstein distribution over excited energy eigenstates. As approaches zero from below, their maximum population isHere is the Boltzmann constant and the Riemann zeta function. A short proof uses and . The nonnegative terms permit exchanging summation and integration by Tonelli's theorem, giving . Near zero the integrand is proportional to , so its integral converges. That finite excited-state capacity is the mechanism of Bose-Einstein condensation.
Set . Particle conservation gives, to this continuum accuracy,Above , the macroscopic condensate fraction is zero and the chemical potential adjusts below zero. This cubic power belongs to a three-dimensional harmonic trap; it is not the homogeneous three-dimensional ideal gas exponent. For , and , the model gives . At , , or approximately condensed bosons. These are chosen parameters and calculated values.
Finite gives a smooth crossover rather than a sharp phase transition. The exact ideal gas sum over excited quantum harmonic oscillator levels differs from the continuum integral, especially when is not large relative to every . A sharp trapped-gas limit takes , with fixed and fixed frequency ratios. Interactions also alter the critical temperature, condensate fraction and release profile; a dilute gas can have appreciable interaction energy compared with the trap level spacing. The cubic law is a useful baseline, not a fit guaranteed for either 1995 experiment.
In the long-wavelength static response of a degenerate conductor, a small electric potential changes the electron density by , where is the spin-summed density of states per volume per energy. The induced charge is therefore . With background permittivity , Poisson equation becomesA point charge then has . Larger electronic density of states gives stronger screening. This local response approximation does not capture the microscopic oscillatory tail of Friedel oscillations.[ref]
https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/em/el6.pdf. Sections 7.7.3–7.7.5: Thomas-Fermi screening and its nonlocal corrections
The sharp Fermi surface gives a nonlocal oscillatory electronic response around an impurity. In a three-dimensional isotropic metal its far-field oscillations have characteristic wavevector and algebraically decaying amplitude. They are absent from the purely exponential Thomas-Fermi screening potential. The local screening formula is a useful long-wavelength model, not an exact asymptotic expression at every distance.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact







