Writing the material wavelength as and its phase velocity as gives . This follows by differentiating and using . If instead the independent variable is vacuum wavelength , then gives
Substituting vacuum wavelengths into the material-wavelength derivative formula gives an erroneous result beyond first order in dispersion. The two coordinates describe the same dispersion relation, but their derivatives differ by the chain rule.
On the punctured plane , consider the vector field
With , its partial derivatives satisfy
Thus the field has zero scalar curl everywhere it is defined. Nevertheless, on any counterclockwise circle with ,
The radius cancels exactly.
Applying Green theorem to the enclosed disk would be invalid: is undefined at the origin, inside that disk. Zero curl on the path alone is insufficient.[ref]
Now take the annulus . Its positive boundary orientation is counterclockwise on the outer circle and clockwise on the inner circle. The complete boundary line integral is therefore
Here Green theorem applies: an open set containing the closed annulus can avoid the origin. The inner contribution remains even for an arbitrarily small positive inner radius. Decreasing the hole's area does not decrease this line integral.
Figure 1.
Zero curl away from an excluded origin: the outer circle contributes two pi, the clockwise inner circle minus two pi, and the annulus boundary sum is zero
. Details.
The cancellation has a useful proof picture. Cut the annulus along two radial segments into two half-annuli. Each piece has a single simple closed curve as its boundary; along each cut, the two induced boundary orientations oppose, so those line integrals cancel when the two applications of Green theorem are added. Only the outer and inner circles remain.[ref]
Locally, a choice of angle in polar coordinates has gradient . Globally, following a circle once increases that angle by , so it cannot be a single-valued potential of a conservative vector field on the punctured plane. The nonzero closed-path line integral also rules out such a potential by the fundamental theorem for line integrals.
On a simply connected open region, a continuously differentiable planar vector field with zero scalar curl does have a global potential. The hole is what separates the local derivative condition from the global conclusion.[ref]
Take the vector field . Its scalar curl is the constant , so Green theorem predicts that its positively oriented boundary line integral is five times the enclosed area. This one field makes both a round and a rectangular calculation transparent.
For the circle , choose the counterclockwise parametric equations , . Direct substitution in the line integral gives
The interior double integral is shorter: the disk has area , hence . Reversing the boundary orientation gives .
For the rectangle , traverse its bottom, right, top, and left edges in that order. The four line integrals are respectively
Their sum is , agreeing with . In both examples the path geometry changes the separate contributions, while constant curl makes only area matter to the final answer.
Figure 1.
One vector field, two positively oriented boundaries: scalar curl five gives circulation twenty pi around the radius-two circle and thirty around the three-by-two rectangle
. Details.
Gradient of a radial function by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-25
For , the multivariable chain rule gives
Indeed, . Thus the gradient points radially outward when , inward when it is negative, and vanishes when it is zero.
At the origin the displayed quotient does not apply. If has a finite right derivative at zero, the radial function is differentiable there exactly when , in which case its gradient is zero. Necessity follows by comparing opposite directional difference quotients: their linear parts cannot both equal a common nonzero radial slope. Sufficiency follows from , the definition of differentiability with zero linear part.
For with , differentiation gives . The positive stationarity equation has a unique solution because its left side increases strictly. Moreover , so it is the global minimum. Substituting the stationarity equation gives the displayed negative energy. The only positive zero is ; is only a limiting zero, since the limiting constant trial is not a square-integrable function. The Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle therefore proves a negative-energy bound state for every positive well depth. For weak depth, the simpler choice yields an explicit upper bound with
This is a variational upper bound, not an equality for the exact weak-depth coefficient.
Full-line Gaussian moment recurrence by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For integer , integration by parts gives . The boundary term vanishes at both infinities because Gaussian decay dominates every power. The full-line initial values are and , the latter by odd symmetry. Hence
Unlike the half-line Gaussian moment recurrence, full-line odd moments vanish and even moments are twice their half-line values. The domain of integration must be retained when transferring a recurrence between the two settings.
For , the displayed function solves the heat equation and has initial condition . Set . Direct differentiation gives
These identities prove the equation. The total integral is , independent of time. The real smooth formula is valid for , including a finite interval of negative time for this particular initial profile. For nonzero , its value at diverges as the lower time endpoint is approached. The superposition principle combines finitely many such profiles with different centers or widths.
For the Gauss-Seidel iteration for a two-variable positive-definite system, define the forward error by and . Subtract the two exact solution equations from the two update equations:
The fresh first coordinate passes the old second-coordinate error through two successive factors. The iteration matrix is therefore
Its eigenvalues are and , as seen from the determinant. The zero eigenvalue explains why the old first-coordinate error disappears completely: the first row overwrites it. After one sweep, every remaining forward error lies on the eigenvector line spanned by .
For this zero start, , so the exact vectors for are
The Euclidean norm of the forward error decreases by exactly per sweep from onward. The first decrease is different because the initial error has not yet reached that eigenvector line. Each row update moves horizontally or vertically in the coordinate plane; sweep endpoints then approach the solution along one straight line.
Figure 1.
Computed row-by-row Gauss-Seidel method trajectory and exact forward error contraction for the original two-variable linear system
. Details.
The linear-system residual is an independent way to check the calculation. Completing a sweep satisfies the second row exactly, but changing disturbs the first row:
Thus a zero residual in the last updated row alone does not certify a solution; inspect the complete linear-system residual.
For the same matrix, the stale schedule of the Jacobi method gives the iteration matrix
Here its eigenvalues are , whereas the fresh schedule gives . This comparison belongs to this particular linear system; it is not a universal relation between the two methods' spectral radii.
An invertible matrix and nonzero diagonal entries make the update well defined, but do not guarantee convergence. For the original linear system
the Gauss-Seidel method updates and . Starting at zero gives , then . The second-coordinate forward error is , and the iteration matrix has spectral radius . The linear system has a unique solution while this particular stationary iterative method for a linear system diverges.
For a bound Kepler orbit, specific orbital energy is negative. Therefore . A projected separation and a systemic-motion-corrected line-of-sight speed give the displayed lower bound. One position and one spectral velocity already constrain the mass in this model; a fitted orbit gives much more. The bound assumes a bound orbit in a point-mass potential; it is not an unrestricted enclosed-mass formula for an arbitrary extended potential.
Choose , arcseconds, years, and degrees. The small-angle conversion gives . Taking one model year as days gives and .
Dividing by the nominal solar mass parameter, , gives nominal solar masses. The nominal parameter is an exact conversion convention, rather than an assertion that the Sun's measured mass is exact.[ref]
The chosen periapsis radius is . Its corresponding Schwarzschild radius, , is about . Thus this illustrative orbit remains roughly Schwarzschild radii from the centre at closest approach. Inferring a very concentrated mass from such an orbit is different from directly resolving its event horizon. Every number here follows from the chosen orbit, not from a fit to the actual Galactic-centre measurements.
Angular astrometry determines the combination displayed by substituting into Kepler's third law. Keeping the fitted shape, orientation and orbital period fixed, the rescaling
leaves the entire angular time series unchanged. A longer physical orbit around a larger mass can trace precisely the same angular path. More angular samples improve the fitted combination; by themselves they cannot break this scaling symmetry of the model.
The radial-velocity semi-amplitude is
For , combining it with the angular fit gives the orbital parallax distance
The spectral velocity scale supplies the missing physical ruler. For a face-on orbit, , this radial signal vanishes and that method cannot supply a distance. In a partial or noisy data set, fitted orientation and systemic motion also correlate with the inferred scale.
Figure 1.
Identical angular orbits can have different spectral velocity amplitudes
. Original chosen-model family with fixed angular scale, period, eccentricity and orientation. Changing distance changes inferred mass cubically and the line-of-sight velocity amplitude linearly. The coloured velocity curves are predictions, not measured spectra or historical data. Source. Details.
Let increase away from the observer, with spanning the sky plane. A rotation sends the orbital-plane coordinates to . Here is orbital inclination, the longitude of ascending node, and the argument of periapsis. For distance , the small-angle model gives angular positions , in radians. Doppler spectroscopy instead supplies the line-of-sight velocity , with a fitted systemic offset .
Define , the angular scale of the deprojected fitted orbit. It is not generally the semi-major axis of the apparent ellipse on the sky. Projection also need not send a true focus to a focus of the apparent ellipse. Fitting the rotated orbit preserves that distinction; measuring a bounding ellipse alone loses it.
Figure 1.
A true stellar orbit and its apparent path on the sky
. Original Newtonian orbit with chosen , years, , degrees, degrees and degrees, viewed from . Markers are equally spaced in model time. This is not a reconstruction of S2 or historical astrometry. Source. Details.
For a complex irreducible representation of a finite group , the sum commutes with every : conjugation sends its summands to , merely permuting the summation index. Schur's lemma gives . Taking the trace yields , proving the identity. Here is the Frobenius-Schur indicator. For a reducible representation the sum is still central in its image, but need not be one scalar on all irreducible constituents.
Brewster's angle by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
For an interface between two lossless, isotropic, nonmagnetic media with unequal refractive index values , Brewster's angle is the incidence angle at which the reflected amplitude in transverse magnetic polarization vanishes. The Fresnel equations and Snell's law give ; the reflected and transmitted rays are perpendicular there. The usual formula assumes equal magnetic permeabilities.
For the regular isothermal Lane-Emden equation, the first fixed-mass pressure turning point occurs at . Thus the boundary radius there is , where is the squared isothermal sound speed. The approximate choice gives coefficient . Comparing with the Jeans length requires specifying the reference density and remembering that the latter is a wavelength rather than a boundary radius.
Sine eigenvectors of the fixed-end spring chain by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
For identical masses between fixed walls with equal springs, the dimensionless stiffness matrix has diagonal entries and adjacent entries . Its normalized eigenvectors and eigenvalues are
Extend each vector by . The sine addition identity gives , including the fixed-end rows. The finite sine orthogonality identity supplies the normalization and makes distinct vectors orthogonal. The normal mode angular frequencies are for mass and spring constant . This complements the fixed-end spring-chain determinant and its repeated-root limit with the spatial mode shapes.
Three-dimensional free-electron density of states by Codex 0 Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For the uniform noninteracting electron model with two spin states and kinetic energy of nonrelativistic particles , count all available one-particle states up to an energy :
This extensive density of states has units of inverse energy; is the density of states per unit volume. Availability and occupation are different: is positive above , but at zero temperature those states are empty. The occupied energy distribution is , with the Fermi-Dirac distribution reduced to below and above it. The convention at the exact boundary does not affect a continuum integral.
Figure 1.
At zero temperature occupation cuts off at the Fermi energy although the density of available states keeps growing
. Details.
With the dimensionless quantity , the occupied count per , divided by the total particle number, is for . Its area is one. Weighting this by gives the internal energy and its mean per particle:
Thus the highest occupied energy and the mean energy differ. For the Fermi energy of a model electron gas, . At fixed , , so the derivative gives the electron degeneracy pressure . The same state-counting geometry therefore predicts a nonzero pressure at zero temperature.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact