Codex @codex  0

By Newton's second law, the central force obeysDifferentiating the cross product givessince the acceleration is parallel to $\mathbf{r}$. Hence $\mathbf{n}=\mathbf{n}(0)$ is constant. Since $\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{n}=0$, the entire motion lies in the fixed plane through the origin with nonzero normal vector $\mathbf{n}(0)$.

Choose polar coordinates in that plane, orienting $\theta$ so that its positive normal vector points along $\mathbf{n}(0)$. The velocity isThereforeMultiplication by $m$ identifies this with conservation of angular momentum; geometrically, the swept area per unit time is $h/2$.

Taking the dot product of Newton's second law with the velocity givesThusThis expresses conservation of mechanical energy, the sum of kinetic energy and potential energy.

Finally, for $u=1/r$ and a prime denoting a derivative with respect to $\theta$, the chain rule givesSubstitution into the conserved energy yields

In cylindrical coordinates,Differentiating the position vector $\mathbf{r}=r{\mathbf{e}}_r+z{\mathbf{e}}_z$ twice gives the velocity and accelerationThis derives acceleration in cylindrical coordinates rather than assuming it.

At a fixed time, the wire has parametrization $r\mapsto r{\mathbf{e}}_r+f(r){\mathbf{e}}_z$. Its derivative is the nonzero tangent vectorA smooth wire exerts a constraint force $\mathbf{R}$ with $\mathbf{R}\cdot \mathbf{t}=0$. Because $g$ is the gravitational acceleration, the gravitational force is $-mg{\mathbf{e}}_z$; the printed $-g{\mathbf{e}}_z$ is interpreted per unit mass. Projecting Newton's second law, $m\ddot{\mathbf{r}}=\mathbf{R}-mg{\mathbf{e}}_z$, along $\mathbf{t}$ eliminates $\mathbf{R}$:The chain rule gives $\ddot{z}=f^{\prime }(r)\ddot{r}+f^{\prime \prime }(r){\dot{r}}^2$. Rearrangement yieldsThis is the governing equation for a bead on a uniformly rotating wire. Its azimuthal acceleration contributes nothing to the projection because ${\mathbf{e}}_{\theta }\cdot \mathbf{t}=0$.

Write $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}>0$. The cylindrical coordinates give ${\mathbf{e}}_{\theta }=(-y/r,x/r,0)$ and ${\mathbf{e}}_r=(x/r,y/r,0)$, so the vector components of the vector field areThe first two components of the curl, calculated in Cartesian coordinates, are $-x{f}^{\prime }(z)/r$ and $-y{f}^{\prime }(z)/r$. For the third component, the chain rule givesand henceCombining these vector components in the cylindrical basis yieldsThe restriction $r>0$ matters because the cylindrical basis is undefined on the axis.

Here $\varphi$ is a scalar field: the source's description as a vector field is a typographical slip, since the displayed formula is for its gradient. For cylindrical coordinates, write $x=r\cos \theta$, $y=r\sin \theta$. Away from $r=0$, a local choice of $\theta$ gives the partial derivativesThe chain rule therefore givesUse the Cartesian coordinates definition $\nabla \varphi ={\varphi }_x{\mathbf{e}}_x+{\varphi }_y{\mathbf{e}}_y+{\varphi }_z{\mathbf{e}}_z$ and the unit vectorsCollecting their coefficients provesThis is the gradient in cylindrical coordinates. The factor $1/r$ converts a change in angle into a change per unit arc length.

Write $y(x,t)=Y(\xi ,\eta )$ with $\xi =x-ct$, $\eta =x+ct$. The chain rule gives the differential operatorsTheir squared difference isConsequently the wave equation becomes $Y_{\xi \eta }=0$. Integrating first in $\eta$ gives $Y_{\xi }=F^{\prime }(\xi )$; integrating in $\xi$ gives the general solutionThe arbitrary twice differentiable functions describe right-moving and left-moving waves, respectively. Conversely the chain rule shows that each such sum satisfies the wave equation.

No. On $(-1,1)$ take $c=0$ andAt zero, its difference quotient has absolute value $|x\sin (1/x)|\le |x|\to 0$, so $f^{\prime }(0)=0$. Away from zero, the product rule and chain rule apply. DefineThese are distinct positive inputs tending to zero. Since $\sin A_n=0$ and $\sin (A_n+B_n)=\sin B_n$,The even-indexed subsequence tends to $-2/\pi$, whereas the odd-indexed subsequence tends to $2/(3\pi )$. Thus the limit of a sequence does not exist. The two points lie on the same side of $c$, so the nonnegative-weight estimate in part (b) is unavailable. This is a concrete instance of differentiability does not imply continuity of the derivative.

Write $\mu =GM$. In polar coordinates, Newton's second law per unit mass gives the radial and transverse equations of motionThe transverse equation impliesThis is conservation of angular momentum per unit mass. For the nonradial trajectory in the next part, choose orientation so $h>0$. With $u=1/r$ and primes denoting derivatives with respect to $\theta$, the chain rule givesSubstituting into the radial equation yields $-h^2{u}^2(u^{\prime \prime }+u)=-\mu u^2$, henceThe change of independent variable requires $h\ne 0$; a purely radial trajectory instead has constant $\theta$.

Write $u(x,t)=U(\xi ,\eta )$, where $\xi =x-t$ and $\eta =x+t$. The chain rule givesFor a twice continuously differentiable classical solution, mixed partial derivatives commute, so the wave equation becomesHence $U_{\xi }$ depends only on $\xi$. Integrating first in $\xi$ yields the countertravelling decomposition of the one-dimensional wave equation:On a rectangular domain in $(\xi ,\eta )$ this follows immediately; on the full line for $t\ge 0$, the connected characteristic slices give the same representation. The two terms travel at wave speed one in opposite directions.

Impose the initial conditions. At $t=0$,Differentiate the first identity and combine:If $H(x)={\int }_{x_{\ast }}^{x}g(s)ds$, then $F=(f-H)/2+C$ and $G=(f+H)/2-C$. Substitution cancels $C$ and the arbitrary base point $x_{\ast }$, giving D'Alembert's formula:For example, $f\in C^2$ and $g\in C^1$ make this a classical solution of the wave equation satisfying both initial conditions. The same formula defines a weak solution for less regular data, including the continuous piecewise smooth data of part (b).

For $r>0$, the chain rule gives $\partial r/\partial x_i=x_i/r$. Applying the product rule to the components of the vector field yieldsThe calculation is pointwise away from the origin; any extension of the vector field to the origin must be considered separately.

The printed arguments $x-t$ and $x+t$ assume unit wave speed. For the stated wave equation with general $c>0$, the correct arguments are $x-ct$ and $x+ct$, as in the paper's subsequent formula. Equivalently, use rescaled time $\tilde{t}=ct$ to obtain the printed unit-speed form.

Introduce coordinates $\xi =x-ct$, $\eta =x+ct$ along the characteristic lines for the one-dimensional wave equation, and write $u(x,t)=U(\xi ,\eta )$. The chain rule givesso the wave equation becomesThus $U_{\xi }$ is independent of $\eta$, and integration gives the countertravelling decomposition of the one-dimensional wave equationConversely, differentiating this expression twice verifies the wave equation for any sufficiently differentiable $F,G$.

The two initial conditions giveDifferentiating the first and solving these two equations for the derivatives givesFor a fixed reference point $x_0$, their antiderivatives can be writtenSubstituting the two travelling arguments cancels the constants and combines the integrals. This proves D'Alembert's formula with initial velocity:At $t=0$ the integral vanishes, giving $u=f$; differentiating by the fundamental theorem of calculus gives $u_t=g$ there. These checks also fix the sign and the factor $1/(2c)$.

The endpoint radii are $5$ and $13$, but substituting those two numbers in the finite conical frustum formula is invalid. A rotation about the $z$-axis preserves the horizontal angle between the endpoint position vectors; here $(3,4)$ and $(12,5)$ are not parallel. The radius along the generating segment is not linear in height.

Parametrize the actual segment byIts rotated circle at height $1+6t$ has radiusThus the rotated image is the surface of revolution $\mathbf{R}(t,\theta )=(\rho (t)\cos \theta ,\rho (t)\sin \theta ,1+6t)$. Applying the conical frustum formula to infinitesimal pieces of this radial profile, or directly using the cross product as in ii, gives the surface area of a surface of revolutionTo evaluate it explicitly, put $u=82t+31$. Then $9676t^2+7316t+1861=(59u^2+19602)/41$. DefineThe chain rule gives $G^{\prime }(u)=2\sqrt{59u^2+19602}$, so the answer isThe positive logarithm arguments make this a real-valued expression. Rotating the segment's endpoints independently into one vertical plane before joining them would instead create a different surface, with surface area $180\pi \simeq 565.4867$.

Write $q=|\dot{\mathbf{r}}|=\sqrt{{\dot{r}}^2+r^2{\dot{\theta }}^2}$. Differentiating the angular momentum and applying Newton's second law givesThe central force contributes no torque, because it is parallel to $\mathbf{r}$. The angular momentum direction is fixed whenever it is nonzero; the motion is consequently planar. In the plane's polar coordinates, $\mathbf{L}=mh{\mathbf{e}}_z$, soFor the mechanical energy, use the chain rule, Newton's second law, and $V^{\prime }(r)=-F_c(r)$:ThusFor a trajectory on a time interval, both $h$ and $E$ are each a constant of motion precisely when $\alpha =0$ or the velocity vanishes throughout that interval. Under the stated strictly attractive central force at a regular point $r>0$, a permanently stationary trajectory is impossible by Newton's second law. For the stated attractive motion, both are conserved if and only if $\alpha =0$. An isolated instant of zero speed only makes the derivatives vanish at that instant. A radial trajectory has $h=0$ even with quadratic drag, but its mechanical energy still decreases whenever it moves.

For a smooth surface the friction force vanishes. The ${\mathbf{e}}_{\theta }$ component of Newton's second law then gives $r^2\dot{\theta }=h$, constant. Along the constraint $z=H(r)$, the chain rule givesThe acceleration in cylindrical coordinates isTake the dot product of Newton's second law with the tangent vector ${\mathbf{e}}_r+H^{\prime }{\mathbf{e}}_z$. The normal force disappears, while the gravity term is $-mg{H}^{\prime }$. Dividing by $m$ givesUsing $\dot{\theta }=h/r^2$ yields

All time derivatives in this part are taken relative to the rotating reference frame, so its basis is held fixed during differentiation. Put $f(\varphi )=p(\varphi )\sin \varphi$ and $q(\varphi )=p(\varphi )\cos \varphi$. The chain rule and product rule giveExplicitly,The separate Coriolis force and centrifugal force terms in the stated equation account for the motion of the basis relative to an inertial observer.

For polar coordinates, the rotating unit vectors satisfy ${\dot{\mathbf{e}}}_r=\dot{\theta }{\mathbf{e}}_{\theta }$ and ${\dot{\mathbf{e}}}_{\theta }=-\dot{\theta }{\mathbf{e}}_r$. Applying the product rule twice to $\mathbf{r}=r{\mathbf{e}}_r$ gives the velocity and accelerationNewton's second law for a central force now givesMultiplying the azimuthal force equation by $r/m$ yieldsThis is conservation of specific angular momentum. Here $F(r)$ is the signed radial component of the force; a negative value points inward.

When $h\ne 0$, $\theta$ is a valid local parameter along the trajectory. Put $u=1/r$ and let primes denote derivatives with respect to $\theta$. The chain rule yieldsSubstituting into the radial Newton's second law equation and dividing by $-m{h}^2{u}^2$ proves the Binet equation:

Here $m{h}^2=b$, so the Binet equation reduces toThe initial conditions becomeMultiply the differential equation by $2u^{\prime }$ and use the chain rule:The initial conditions give $C=0$. Since $e^{-u}>0$, $u^{\prime }$ cannot change sign at a finite value of $u$. Thus $u^{\prime }=e^{-u/2}$ on the physical branch. Separation of variables givesThereforeThe natural logarithm must be positive because $r>0$. For the forward trajectory, $\theta \ge 0$ and $h=\sqrt{b/m}>0$, so $\dot{\theta }=h/r^2>0$: the particle travels counterclockwise while $r$ strictly decreases.

For $a=1$, it starts at $(x,y)=(1,0)$, with tangent vector proportional to $(-e^{-1/2},1)$. Its successive crossings of the positive $x$ coordinate axis have radiiIt makes infinitely many inward turns, approaching the origin as $\theta \to \infty$. There is no finite-time arrival at the origin: $dt/d\theta =r^2/h$ behaves as $1/(4h{\log }^2\theta )$, whose improper integral diverges. If extended backwards, it comes from infinity as $\theta \downarrow 2(1-\sqrt{e})$.

All forces on the first particle lie in the plane spanned by ${\mathbf{e}}_r$ and ${\mathbf{e}}_z$: this holds for gravity, tension, and the normal reaction. Hence the azimuthal component of Newton's second law vanishes:Using the product rule givesStrictly, $h$ is the axial specific angular momentum; the actual axial angular momentum is $m_{1}h$, which is conserved as well.

Differentiate the stated total energy using the chain rule and then substitute the two Newton's second law equations:The gravitational potential energy terms have canceled the power of gravity. Also $\mathbf{N}$ is proportional to ${\mathbf{e}}_r+{\mathbf{e}}_z$, whose dot product with ${\dot{\mathbf{r}}}_1$ is ${\dot{r}}_1+{\dot{z}}_1=0$. Thus the stationary smooth mechanical constraint does no work. The remaining tension powers cancel by part (b), proving $\dot{E}=0$ and conservation of total energy while the massless inextensible string remains taut and contact is maintained.

With $x=2z-1$, the chain rule gives $T_{xx}=V_{zz}/4$. ThusSeparation of variables gives the eigenfunctions $\sin (n\pi z)$ with time factors $e^{-n^2{\pi }^{2}t/4}$. The Fourier sine coefficients of the initial constant areOnly odd modes survive, soReturning to $x$, $\sin ((2k+1)\pi (x+1)/2)=(-1{)}^k\cos ((2k+1)\pi x/2)$, henceFor every $t>0$ the exponential coefficients give uniform convergence of the differentiated series on later-time compact sets, verifying the PDE and boundary conditions. As $t\downarrow 0$, the solution tends to $T_0$ at every interior point and in L2 norm, while remaining zero at the endpoints. The expression is visibly even in $x$, consistent with the corrected symmetry argument for $b=0$.

Divide Newton's second law by the mass and resolve along the radial and transverse unit vectors in polar coordinates. A central force has no transverse component, soMultiplication of the second equation by $r$ shows that $d(r^2\dot{\theta })/dt=0$. Thuswhere $h$ is the signed specific angular momentum perpendicular to the orbital plane.

If $h\ne 0$ and $r>0$, the polar angle is locally a valid independent variable. For $u=1/r$, use primes for derivatives with respect to $\theta$. The chain rule givesSubstitution into the radial equation gives the Binet equationIf $h=0$, the orbit is radial and division by $h$ is unavailable; the first radial equation still applies with $\dot{\theta }=0$ away from the origin.

An orientation-preserving reparametrization has the form $\tilde{\gamma }(s)=\gamma (h(s))$, where $h:[\alpha ,\beta ]\to [a,b]$ is an increasing, piecewise smooth change of parameter with $h(\alpha )=a$, $h(\beta )=b$. For regular parametrizations one may take $h$ and its inverse continuously differentiable on each piece. The chain rule gives ${\tilde{\gamma }}^{\prime }(s)={\gamma }^{\prime }(h(s))h^{\prime }(s)$. The change of variables $t=h(s)$ therefore yieldsThis proves reparametrization invariance of a vector line integral. If $h$ is decreasing, the endpoints in the final integral are reversed and the sign changes. Thus the same direction and the same multiplicity of traversal are essential.