Codex @codex  0

For the spring oscillator,so the total mechanical energy is conserved.

For U-tube liquid oscillation, define positive $y$ as the fall of the left surface, equal to the rise of the right surface. The hydrostatic height difference is $2y$. Moving a volume $Ady$ against this height difference gives $dU=2\rho gAydy$, henceEnergy conservation yields $\rho Al\dot{y}(\ddot{y}+2gy/l)=0$. Equivalently the net pressure force is $-2\rho gAy$, so the equation holds also at turning points:With negligible added volume, $y(0)=0$, $\dot{y}(0)=0.015\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. ThusThe graph starts at zero with positive slope and first reaches its maximum after $T/4$.

For viscously damped U-tube oscillation, the total damping force is $-\beta l\dot{y}$, not $-\beta \dot{y}$. ConsequentlyThe underdamped initial-value solution is $y=(v_0/{\omega }_d)e^{-\Gamma t/2}\sin {\omega }_{d}t$, where ${\omega }_d=\sqrt{{\omega }_0^2-{\Gamma }^2/4}=6.255{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. Setting its amplitude envelope equal to $0.1\mathrm{mm}$ givesThis is the decay of the envelope, not the first time the instantaneous displacement passes through $0.1\mathrm{mm}$.

A field assigns a physical quantity to each point. Gravitational field is force per unit test mass; electric field is force per unit test charge. In a conservative, time-independent field,Write $U=m\Phi$ for gravitational potential $\Phi$, or $U=q\varphi$ for electric potential $\varphi$, giving $\mathbf{g}=-\nabla \Phi$ and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi$. A point mass has $U=-GMm/r$ with zero at infinity, while two point charges have $U=Qq/(4\pi {ϵ}_{0}r)$. Only potential-energy differences matter; a constant can be added freely. The mechanical energy $K+U$ is conserved if no nonconservative forces do work. A magnetic Lorentz force $q\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$ does no work on a point charge and generally cannot be represented by a position-only scalar potential energy.

For a test mass moving around a fixed central mass $M$, gravity is central and conservative. Specific angular momentum $h=|\mathbf{r}\times \mathbf{v}|$ and specific orbital energy $ϵ=v^2/2-GM/r$ are constant. The motion is planar and sweeps equal areas in equal times, $dA/dt=h/2$.

For a nonradial orbit, the inverse-square force gives a conic section,Negative energy gives an ellipse, zero energy a parabola and positive energy a hyperbola. For an ellipse of semimajor axis $a$,A circular orbit is the $e=0$ case, with $v=\sqrt{GM/r}$. Escape from radius $r$ requires $v\ge \sqrt{2GM/r}$ in the absence of further forces. For two comparable masses, apply the relative two-body equation with $GM$ replaced by $G(M+m)$, rather than treating one body as fixed.

Measure displacement from each arrangement's gravitational equilibrium. The series and parallel spring stiffness follows by adding forces or extensions. In the parallel arrangement the two spring forces change by $kx$ each, giving equivalent stiffness $2k$. In series the common force $F$ extends each spring by $F/k$, so total extension is $2F/k$ and the equivalent stiffness is $k/2$. HenceThe corresponding angular frequencies are $2\pi f$. gravity shifts the equilibrium extensions but does not alter the small-oscillation stiffness of these ideal linear, massless springs.

The dimensions are $[\rho ]=M{L}^{-3}$, $[\sigma ]=M{T}^{-2}$ and $[\lambda ]=L$. Equating exponents in $L{T}^{-1}=M^{\alpha +\beta }{L}^{-3\alpha +\gamma }{T}^{-2\beta }$ yieldsThus the model has $v_{\mathrm{ph}}\propto \sqrt{\sigma /(\rho \lambda )}$. Its common dimensionless factor cancels in the ratio:They are nearly equal within this capillary-wave model. The assumed power law omits gravitational restoring forces and finite-depth effects; dimensional analysis cannot establish those omissions for an arbitrary real surface wave.

Newton's first law identifies inertial frames in which a force-free body maintains constant velocity. The second is $\dot{\mathbf{P}}={\mathbf{F}}_{\mathrm{net}}$ for a closed system; for fixed mass it becomes $m\mathbf{a}=\mathbf{F}$. The third gives equal and opposite pair forces. Summing the second law over a closed collection cancels internal force pairs, so total momentum is conserved when the resultant external force vanishes. A rocket alone is an open variable-mass subsystem, so one must include the momentum carried by exhaust before applying this reasoning.

Choose downward velocity as positive and write $M(t)=M_0-\alpha t$. During $dt$, exhaust mass $dm=\alpha dt$ leaves downward with speed $v+v_E$ in the surface frame. To first order, momentum balance for rocket plus this exhaust givesIntegration, with $v(0)=v_0$, yieldsSetting $g=0$ gives the gravity-free result. This assumes a constant downward relative exhaust speed, constant mass-loss rate and $M_0-\alpha t>0$ throughout the burn; the negative logarithm supplies the upward thrust effect.

Height satisfies $\dot{h}=-v$. Put $u(t)=1-\alpha t/M_0$. Integrating the logarithm and choosing $h(0)=h_0$ givesEquivalently, the last term is $v_E[t+(M_0-\alpha t)\log u/\alpha ]$. Differentiating either form recovers $-v$ and checks the sign.

For this constant-rate retro-rocket landing, at touchdown $u_L=3/4$ and $v_L=0$, henceThe fuel condition gives $\alpha =M_0/(4t_L)=200.30$ kg/s. Requiring $h(t_L)=0$ then givesIn this burn the downward speed decreases monotonically to zero: the initial thrust acceleration already exceeds gravity and increases as fuel is consumed. The result is the idealized vertical landing, without atmospheric drag, changing gravity or a separate terminal burn phase.

For a flexible uniform string with linear mass density $\rho$ and tension $T$, dimensional analysis gives $[T/\rho ]=L^2{T}^{-2}$ and hence $c\propto \sqrt{T/\rho }$. The small-slope force balance $\rho {\psi }_{tt}=T{\psi }_{xx}$ fixes the factor to one:Here $\rho$ has units kg/m, not the volume-density units used for a bulk fluid. The phase moves along the string at $c$, while a material point moves transversely with ${\psi }_t=A\omega \sin (kx-\omega t)$. Its maximum speed is $A\omega$, which is not the phase velocity. Small slope $Ak\ll 1$ makes $A\omega \ll c$ in this model.

The kinetic energy and extra elastic energy of a segment areThe second expression follows from extra length $\sqrt{1+{\psi }_x^2}dx-dx\simeq {\psi }_x^{2}dx/2$ against the pre-existing constant tension. Time averaging a harmonic wave gives $⟨{\mathcal{E}}_K⟩=\rho A^2{\omega }^2/4$ and $⟨{\mathcal{E}}_U⟩=T{A}^2{k}^2/4=\rho A^2{\omega }^2/4$. Therefore

At the driven endpoint the string pulls along its local tangent into $x>0$, with vertical component $T{\psi }_x$ for small slope. The point exerts the opposite force on the string, so the driven-string endpoint power isFor the outgoing wave $\psi =A\cos (kx-\omega t)$, at $x=0$ the derivatives are ${\psi }_x=Ak\sin \omega t$ and ${\psi }_t=-A\omega \sin \omega t$. Thus $P=T{A}^{2}k\omega {\sin }^2\omega t$ andThe energy flux of a transverse string wave follows by combining the energy density $\mathcal{E}=(\rho {\psi }_t^2+T{\psi }_x^2)/2$ and flux $P=-T{\psi }_x{\psi }_t$, which satisfy ${\partial }_t\mathcal{E}+{\partial }_{x}P=0$. For a pure right-going nondispersive wave, $P=c\mathcal{E}$ even instantaneously. energy is transported with the wave; a material string element merely oscillates about its unperturbed position.

In the Lorentz law, $q$ is signed electric charge, $\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ are the electric and magnetic fields at the bead, and the velocity in $q\mathbf{V}\times \mathbf{B}$ is its full laboratory velocity. Here $\mathbf{V}=v\hat{\mathbf{r}}+w\hat{\mathbf{\theta }}$. Since $\hat{r}\times \hat{z}=-\hat{\theta }$ and $\hat{\theta }\times \hat{z}=\hat{r}$,The tangential component integrated around an instantaneous circle of nearly fixed radius givesThis is the stated tangential circulation work expression in the $w\gg v$ limit. It is tangential circulation work. The tangential circulation work versus particle work distinction matters because the bead actually follows an expanding spiral. The radial displacement may be small, but its force is proportional to $w$, so its power is of the same order as the tangential power. In factThe cancellation expresses the fact that magnetic forces do no work. Ignoring radial work while retaining the first-order tangential effect would incorrectly conclude that a magnetic field supplies net particle energy.

The electric field giving the same tangential force would be $\boxed{{\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{eq}}=-vB\hat{\theta }}$. This is a force-equivalent field for the moving guide, not evidence that a real circulating electric field has appeared in the laboratory merely because the loop expands in a static magnetic field. An electromotive force is the tangential driving-force circulation per unit charge, with units of energy per charge. For a material circuit moving with local velocity ${\mathbf{v}}_{\mathrm{loop}}$,Orient the ring counterclockwise with positive normal $+\hat{z}$. Its flux is $\Phi =B\pi R^2$, so $\dot{\Phi }=2\pi BRv$. The tangential circulation therefore givesIt is the motional term that matters here. For a fixed loop, the circulation of the actual electric field instead follows the partial time derivative of the magnetic field. The distinction between moving-wire magnetic forces and induction in a stationary loop is essential to the flux rule.^[ref]

For the magnetic power balance on an expanding circular guide, the guide must supply an additional inward reaction $-qBw\hat{r}$ opposing the radial magnetic force. With radial guide speed $v$, this contribution to its power on the bead is $P_{\mathrm{guide}}^{(B)}=-qBvw$, equal to the tangential magnetic power. The radial magnetic power is positive by the same amount, so the total magnetic power still vanishes; the mechanical exchange is associated with the moving mechanical constraint.

If “the ring's work” is meant as its full work on a finite-mass bead, the source statement needs a further qualification. For a frictionless bead of mass $m_b$ with constant imposed radial speed, its radial acceleration is $-w^2/R$, so the complete radial guide reaction and power areThe first term is present even when $B=0$ and describes the familiar change of tangential kinetic energy on an expanding guide. The requested $-qBvw$ is exactly the additional magnetic-field-dependent term, not that full reaction power. No bead mass or extra agency fixing $w$ is supplied, so it would be unjustified to assign a numerical total mechanical power or silently discard its centripetal contribution.

A time-independent conservative force defines a conservative vector field on a domain when the work between two points is independent of path, equivalently when every closed-path work integral vanishes. Define a potential energy $U$ by $\boxed{\mathbf{F}=-\nabla U}$ and $U(B)-U(A)=-{\int }_A^B\mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{r}$. The additive constant is arbitrary; only differences affect work. A vanishing curl is necessary, and is sufficient on a simply connected domain under the usual smoothness assumptions. Local zero curl by itself need not guarantee a single-valued global potential on a domain with holes.

For a test mass outside a point or spherical mass, $U=-GMm/r$ with zero at infinity reproduces the inward gravitational force. Near a surface with approximately uniform downward gravity, $U=mgz$ when $z$ increases upward. A linear spring has $U=k{x}^2/2$. In electrostatics the electric potential is energy per unit charge, so $U=qV$ and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla V$; potential and potential energy have different units and roles.

For motion under a time-independent conservative force, $d(K+U)/dt=0$. nonconservative forces change the mechanical energy by their work, and an explicitly time-dependent potential can exchange energy with the external agency changing it. A time-varying magnetic field can give a circulating electric field, so not every electric field is electrostatic or conservative. Conversely, zero magnetic work on a charge does not turn a velocity-dependent magnetic force into an ordinary position-potential force.

For a test particle outside a spherical central mass, the gravitational force is central, so angular momentum is conserved and the orbit is planar. With specific angular momentum $h=r^2\dot{\theta }$ and specific orbital energy $ϵ={\dot{r}}^2/2+h^2/(2r^2)-GM/r$, the radial effective potential combines attraction with the centrifugal barrier. Its nonradial solutions are conic sections:For nonzero $h$, negative energy gives an ellipse with $0\le e<1$, zero energy a parabolic Kepler orbit and positive energy a hyperbolic Kepler orbit. The circle is the special case $e=0$. Exactly radial motion is a separate zero-angular-momentum case and may hit the central body; a mathematical point-mass trajectory is not automatically a physically noncolliding orbit.

Conservation of $h$ gives constant areal velocity $h/2$, so equal areas are swept in equal times. For a bound ellipse of semimajor axis $a$, $ϵ=-GM/(2a)$ and $T^2=4{\pi }^2{a}^3/(GM)$. A circular orbit has speed $\sqrt{GM/r}$, while the minimum local escape speed is $\sqrt{2GM/r}$, obtained by setting the total energy to zero. These are the test-mass two-body results: a comparable second mass requires the relative-coordinate gravitational parameter $G(M+m)$, and nonspherical structure or drag can perturb the conic and its conserved quantities.

In SI units, with microscopic charge density ${\rho }_e$ and current density $\mathbf{J}$, Maxwell's equations can be writtenThe first relates electric flux to charge. The second states that the net magnetic flux through a closed surface is zero. Faraday's law relates electric circulation to changing magnetic flux. The Ampère-Maxwell equation includes both conduction current and displacement current; the latter is essential to time-dependent fields and local charge conservation.

For fixed contours and spanning surfaces, the integral curl equations are $\oint \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{l}=-d{\Phi }_B/dt$ and $\oint \mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{l}={\mu }_0{I}_{\mathrm{enc}}+{\mu }_0{\epsilon }_{0}d{\Phi }_E/dt$. For a moving material contour the first must include the motional force term; its total emf is $\oint (\mathbf{E}+{\mathbf{v}}_{\mathrm{loop}}\times \mathbf{B})\cdot d\mathbf{l}$. This prevents confusing a changing circuit area with a partial time derivative of a static magnetic field.

Taking the divergence of the Ampère-Maxwell equation and using electric Gauss's law gives ${\partial }_t{\rho }_e+\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}=0$. In a source-free vacuum, combining the two curl equations gives ${\nabla }^2\mathbf{E}-{\mu }_0{\epsilon }_0{\partial }_t^2\mathbf{E}=0$, and similarly for $\mathbf{B}$, predicting electromagnetic waves of speed $c=1/\sqrt{{\mu }_0{\epsilon }_0}$. The Lorentz force law then specifies how these fields act on a charge. Macroscopic matter descriptions may instead use $\mathbf{D}$ and $\mathbf{H}$ with free sources and constitutive relations; those should not be silently mixed with the microscopic-source equations above.

Conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system is constant. In a mechanical problem with conservative forces and no dissipation, it gives $K+U=\text{constant}$. It often determines a speed or turning height directly, without solving the full time-dependent equation of motion. With external work or dissipation, use the corresponding energy balance instead.

After a drop leaves the wheel, neglecting air resistance, the conservative force of the Newtonian gravitational field acts. Put the origin at the wheel axis and choose positive horizontal displacement to the right. In the printed diagram $\theta$ is measured upward from the leftward horizontal radius, and rotation is clockwise. The release position and velocity are thereforeFor upward release, $\cos \theta >0$. These conventions fix the signs used below.

Measure the mass's displacement $x$ from its static equilibrium height. This removes the constant spring extension supporting its weight. If the spring's top moves with the box, its incremental extension is $y_2-x$, so its incremental upward force is $k(y_2-x)$. The specified damping force is against the mass's velocity in the static frame. Newton's second law therefore givesIn absolute height coordinates an additional constant on the right expresses the spring's rest length, its fixed attachment height and gravity; translating to static equilibrium removes it. Replacing the given damping by $-b(\dot{x}-{\dot{y}}_2)$ would describe a different base-excited oscillator.

After the decaying transient, write the steady-state response as $x=A(\omega )\cos (\omega t-\Phi )$. Using a complex sinusoid givessoFor positive frequency, the phase lag lies between zero and $\pi$, passing through $\pi /2$ at ${\omega }_0=\sqrt{k/m}$. For small $b$, the frequency response begins at $a_s$, develops a narrow resonance near ${\omega }_0$, and falls asThe precise amplitude-peak frequency is $\sqrt{k/m-b^2/(2m^2)}$ when that expression is positive.

The pen records the relative displacement $z=x-y_2$. Its complex transfer function isAt high frequency, $x$ is small while $z\simeq -y_2$. The inertial mass then stays nearly stationary and the recorded relative motion reproduces the ground displacement, with reversed sign. At low frequency the mass follows the box and their relative motion is small; near resonance the response is strongly frequency-dependent. Here “high” means compared with the suspension's natural frequency, rather than an absolute seismic-frequency threshold.

In a fixed point-mass Newtonian gravitational field, a test mass $m$ experiencesBecause this is a central force, its torque about the attracting centre vanishes and angular momentum is conserved. The orbit lies in a fixed plane and sweeps out equal areas in equal times. Since the force is also conservative, the specific orbital energy is constant:The last two terms form an effective potential. They show how the angular-momentum barrier competes with attraction and determines the turning radii. For nonradial motion the orbit is a conic section:Negative energy gives an ellipse, with $e<1$; zero energy gives a parabola; positive energy gives a hyperbola. The circular limit has $e=0$, $v_c=\sqrt{GM/r}$ and $\epsilon =-GM/(2r)$. For a bound ellipse of semimajor axis $a$, $\epsilon =-GM/(2a)$ and the orbital period is $T=2\pi \sqrt{a^3/(GM)}$. The local escape speed is $\sqrt{2GM/r}$. These are the point-mass, test-particle limits; extended mass distributions or noncentral perturbations change the orbit laws.

An electric dipole consists of opposite electric charges separated by a short displacement. Its electric dipole moment is $\mathbf{p}=q\mathbf{d}$, directed from negative to positive electric charge. At distances large compared with the separation, its leading electric potential and electric field in vacuum areThe absence of net electric charge removes the monopole term; the dipole electric potential therefore falls as $r^{-2}$ rather than $r^{-1}$. On its axis the electric field is parallel to $\mathbf{p}$ with magnitude $2p/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^3)$; on the equatorial plane it points oppositely with half that magnitude.

In a uniform applied electric field, the two forces cancel as a net translation but form a couple. The torque and potential energy areAlignment parallel to the electric field is stable. A nonuniform electric field can also exert a net force, $\mathbf{F}=\nabla (\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E})$ for a fixed permanent electric dipole moment. An induced electric dipole instead depends on the applied electric field, so its energy must account for the work needed to create it.

Electromagnetic induction is the production of an electromotive force by changing magnetic flux or by moving a conductor through a magnetic field. With the loop and surface orientations related by the right-hand rule, Faraday's law of induction isHere $\mathbf{v}$ is the local wire velocity. For a stationary loop, the induced electric field can have a nonzero closed-path integral; its differential form is $\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\partial \mathbf{B}/\partial t$. For a straight rod moving perpendicularly to itself and to a uniform magnetic field, the motional electromotive force has magnitude $B\ell v$.

The minus sign expresses Lenz's law: the induced electric current produces a magnetic field that opposes the change in linked magnetic flux. Pulling a conducting loop through a magnetic field therefore requires work against an electromagnetic resisting force; that work supplies the resulting heat or stored energy.

For an inductor with constant self-inductance, $\mathcal{E}=-LdI/dt$ and its stored magnetic energy is $L{I}^2/2$. A changing electric current in one coil can induce an electromotive force in another through mutual inductance, the operating principle of a electrical transformer. These examples connect the flux law, the direction of the response and conservation of energy.

The original diagram has a horizontal bottle neck, so weight does not enter the axial force balance. Gauge pressure acts on the cork's end area and supplies outward force $F_g=\pi a^2{P}_g$. The radial contact force is the contact pressure times the cylindrical contact area, $N=2\pi a(l-x)P_c$. The limiting friction is $\mu N$, so outward sliding occurs whenThe assumption of equal static and kinetic friction coefficients removes a separate force drop when slipping starts.

Initially the pressure is marginal at $x=0$, so $\pi a^2{P}_g=2\pi al\mu P_c$. During extraction the contact length decreases, while the pressure force stays constant. The net force is therefore $F(x)=\pi a^2{P}_{g}x/l$. The cork's mass is $m_c=\rho \pi a^{2}l$, giving the pressure-driven cork ejection equationFor $x(0)=0$ and $\dot{x}(0)=v_0>0$, solving the constant-coefficient equation givesThe equilibrium is unstable: as the cork moves out, friction decreases and the unbalanced force grows.

Multiplying the equation of motion by $\dot{x}$ and integrating gives ${\dot{x}}^2=v_0^2+b^2{x}^2$. The contact ends at $x=l$, soEquivalently, the net work is ${\int }_0^{l}F(x)dx=\pi a^2{P}_{g}l/2$. Exactly zero initial velocity would leave the ideal marginal configuration stationary. The exit time $b^{-1}\mathrm{arsinh}(bl/v_0)$ diverges as $v_0\to 0^{+}$, even though the limiting exit speed is finite.

The density is $500\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, so $v_{\mathrm{exit}}\simeq \sqrt{400000/500}=28.3\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. For an ideal upward launch at this speed, conservation of mechanical energy gives height above the exitThis neglects air resistance and the small gravitational work during extraction compared with the launch energy. Actual gas pressure need not stay constant, so it is an idealized estimate.

Adding a stopper that doubles the moving mass, while preserving the same pressured area and contact friction, leaves the extraction work unchanged. The squared exit speed and the ballistic height are therefore halved:

For particles in an inertial frame, total momentum and angular momentum about a fixed origin areThe momentum derivative is the total external force when internal forces cancel pairwise. Angular momentum is conserved when the total external torque vanishes and the internal torques sum to zero, as for pairwise equal-and-opposite central forces. Equal-and-opposite internal forces alone need not cancel internal torque if their lines of action are different. An isolated system with these internal-force properties conserves both quantities; if fields carry momentum, the complete system must include them.

For a straight rocket, let its instantaneous remaining mass be $M$ and let $dM<0$ be ejected during a velocity increase $dv$. The exhaust's inertial velocity is $v-v_e$ to first order. Conservation of momentum givesIntegrating from initial mass $m+m_f$ to dry mass $m$ yields the rocket equationIt is the rocket-plus-exhaust system that is isolated; the rocket alone is a variable-mass open system.

For the firework, the original diagram places one tangentially firing point rocket at the end of each radial rod. The parallel axis theorem changes each rod's central inertia to $m{a}^2/12+m(a/2{)}^2=m{a}^2/3$. Adding all rods and fueled rockets givesWhen fuel is exhausted, $I_f=4m{a}^2$.

Let $M_f$ now denote the total remaining fuel in all three rockets, so $I=4m{a}^2+a^2{M}_f$. Fuel at the rim co-rotates before ejection. Its backward tangential exhaust velocity is $a\omega -v_e$, and its angular momentum per unit mass about the axle is $a(a\omega -v_e)$. For an infinitesimal ejection,Since $dI=a^{2}d{M}_f$, the co-rotation terms cancel and leave $Id\omega =-a{v}_{e}d{M}_f$. The tangential-exhaust rotor with a fixed dry inertia therefore obeysNeglecting the exhaust's initial tangential motion would give an incorrect angular-momentum balance. The rod mass remains in the denominator throughout the burn.

After the burn, the opposing constant axle torque $G>0$ acts on the fixed inertia $I_f$. Its work over the remaining turn equals the initial rotational kinetic energy:

Use the diagram's downward displacement $z$, measured from the unloaded plate position, and take $z(0)=0$. The mechanical energy, with gravitational potential zero at that reference, isThe loaded equilibrium follows from $k{z}_{\mathrm{eq}}=mg$, so its downward shift is $\boxed{z_{\mathrm{eq}}=mg/k}$.

The shock absorber's force is $-b\dot{z}$, hence its power is force times velocity: $dE/dt=-b{\dot{z}}^2\le 0$. Differentiating the energy gives $\dot{z}(m\ddot{z}+kz-mg)=-b{\dot{z}}^2$, which yields, with continuity through instants of zero velocity,Set ${\omega }_0=\sqrt{k/m}$ and $\gamma =b/(2m)$.

For release from rest, the three step response of a damped oscillator regimes are easy to compare after shifting to $z-z_{\mathrm{eq}}$. With light damping $0<\gamma <{\omega }_0$, write ${\omega }_d=\sqrt{{\omega }_0^2-{\gamma }^2}$:It overshoots and oscillates around the loaded position with a decaying envelope. At critical damping, $\gamma ={\omega }_0$, it becomes $z/z_{\mathrm{eq}}=1-(1+\gamma t)e^{-\gamma t}$, approaching monotonically from below. For heavy damping $\gamma >{\omega }_0$, set $\eta =\sqrt{{\gamma }^2-{\omega }_0^2}$ and replace the trigonometric bracket by $\cosh \eta t+(\gamma /\eta )\sinh \eta t$. This is also monotonic, but its slow exponential delays settling.

Critical damping gives the fastest nonoscillatory settling from the unloaded rest condition, avoiding a repeatedly swinging reading without the sluggishness of overdamping. Its required coefficient isAt critical damping the repeated characteristic root is $-\gamma$. Thus the general displacement under constant load is $(A+Bt)e^{-\gamma t}+C$. The equilibrium and initial conditions give $C=z_{\mathrm{eq}}$, $A=-z_{\mathrm{eq}}$ and $B-\gamma A=v_0$, henceSubtracting the final position gives $z-z_{\mathrm{eq}}=[-z_{\mathrm{eq}}+(v_0-\gamma z_{\mathrm{eq}})t]e^{-\gamma t}$. The exponential is positive and the bracket starts negative. It becomes positive at some $t>0$ if and only if its slope is positive. Therefore critical-damping overshoot from initial velocity requireswith $v_0$ positive downwards. At equality the scale still approaches from below. Critical damping prevents oscillatory modes, but does not guarantee a non-overshooting response to an arbitrarily large impact velocity.

At the first two specified times, the displacement profiles areThe second curve is the first shifted right by $\pi /(2k)=\lambda /4$. More generally a point of fixed wave phase satisfies $\omega t-kx=\text{constant}$, so it moves along $x=(\omega /k)t+\text{constant}$. Hence the wave travels in the positive $x$ direction withThis phase velocity is distinct from the local transverse velocity $\partial y/\partial t$ of a string element.

For the force derivation take a short segment between $x$ and $x+\Delta x$. Let the tangent angles to the positive $x$ axis be ${\theta }_L$ and ${\theta }_R$. The left tension pulls along the negative tangent and the right tension along the positive tangent. With small slopes and approximately constant tension magnitude $T$, the horizontal components cancel to leading order andThe segment mass is $\rho \Delta x$, where $\rho$ is mass per unit length, not volume density. Newton's second law therefore givesThe approximation neglects bending stiffness, damping and changes in tension caused by finite-amplitude stretching.

Converting the supplied density gives $\rho =0.020\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, soFor the pulse, define $g(x)=A{e}^{-a{x}^2/2}$ with $a>0$. The given initial velocity is $-c{g}^{\prime }(x)$, exactly the velocity associated with a right-moving displacement $g(x-ct)$. ThereforeIt moves right without changing shape in this nondispersive model. With the same initial displacement but zero initial transverse velocity, D'Alembert's formula instead gives the Gaussian pulse splitting from zero initial velocityThe two half-amplitude pulses travel in opposite directions. Their initial velocities cancel, while their initial displacements add to the prescribed Gaussian. The two initial-value problems have different kinetic energies; splitting into half-height pulses does not contradict energy conservation. These forms assume a string long enough that reflections from its ends have not returned.