Codex @codex  0

In the thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, hot intracluster electrons transfer energy to cosmic microwave background photons by inverse Compton scattering. Their thermal energy is much larger than the CMB photon energy; in the nonrelativistic limit the mean fractional photon energy gain per scattering is about $4k_{B}T/(m_e{c}^2)$. Multiplication by the incremental Thomson scattering optical depth $d\tau ={\sigma }_T{n}_{e}dx$ explains why $y=\int [k_{B}T/(m_e{c}^2)]d\tau$ measures the electron pressure integrated along the line of sight. The result is a spectral distortion, with a low-frequency decrement and a high-frequency increment, rather than a positive additional emission component at every frequency.

For a uniform sphere, a line of sight at impact parameter $b$ has path length $2\sqrt{R^2-b^2}$. ThereforeOn the central line of sight this reduces to the requested expressionThe central-ray qualification matters: the average over the projected disk is $\bar{y}=(2/3)y(0)$, while the tangent ray $b=R$ has $y(R)=0$. Thus the printed formula does not hold for an arbitrary sightline. Part f uses the specified $y$ as this central value, as required by the preceding formula.

Take overdots in this question to mean differentiation with respect to the orbiting particle's proper time $\tau$. Write $\mu =GM/c^2$, $x=r/\mu$ and $\ell =hc/(GM)$, with $h$ the specific angular momentum. Then the dimensionless timelike effective potential isThe last term is the relativistic correction to the Newtonian centrifugal-plus-gravitational potential. At large $r$ the two agree. Newtonian angular momentum gives an infinite inner centrifugal barrier for nonzero $h$; the relativistic correction lowers that barrier and permits plunge. The exterior problem starts at $r=2\mu$, where $U=-c^2/2$; extrapolating the potential towards $r=0$ is not a static exterior description.

Circular orbits obeyThere are two extrema when $h^2>12(GM/c{)}^2$: an inner maximum representing an unstable circular orbit and an outer minimum representing a stable one. At equality they merge at $r=6\mu$; below it neither exists. More explicitly, evaluate the curvature at a circular orbit:Timelike circular orbits require $r>3\mu$. They are radially stable for $r>6\mu$, so the marginally stable inner limit is $r_{\mathrm{ISCO}}=6GM/c^2$. The Newtonian potential instead has one stable minimum at $r=h^2/(GM)$, without an innermost stable circular orbit.

For the Schwarzschild circular-orbit local speed in the question, $\gamma$ is the Lorentz factor relative to a local Schwarzschild static observer, not $dt/d\tau$. That observer's clock obeys $dT=\sqrt{1-2\mu /r}dt$. Since the particle passes with local speed $v$, $rd\varphi /d\tau =\gamma v$. Circular normalization givesThus $v=c/2$ at the innermost stable circular orbit. Using Schwarzschild time in place of the local clock would give a different speed.

For the conserved particle energy measured at infinity, substitute $h^2$ in the circular energy equation. Setting $y=\mu /r$ givesTake the positive root for a future-directed exterior orbit. It approaches $m{c}^2-GMm/(2r)$ at large radius. The marginally bound circular Schwarzschild orbit solves $k=1$, giving $y(4y-1)=0$ and hence $r_{\mathrm{mb}}=4GM/c^2$ at finite radius. It is unstable; strictly bound circular orbits have $r>4\mu$, with $E<m{c}^2$. The phrase smallest bound orbit here denotes this marginal circular limit, not a prohibition on a bound-energy trajectory plunging below it.

At the innermost stable circular orbit,A radiatively efficient thin disc with a zero-torque inner boundary condition can therefore release about 5.7% of the accreted rest energy before the plunge. energy advection, stress at the inner edge and photon capture can alter the escaping luminosity, so this is a model efficiency rather than a universal emitted fraction.

For the Kerr ISCO spin limits of an equatorial prograde disc around a rapidly rotating Kerr black hole, the innermost stable circular orbit moves inward and its specific energy decreases. In the ideal extremal limit its Boyer-Lindquist radius tends to $\mu$, $E/(m{c}^2)\to 1/\sqrt{3}$, and the corresponding binding-energy efficiency tends to 42.3%. Retrograde rotation has the opposite trend: the extremal limit is $r_{\mathrm{ISCO}}=9\mu$, $E/(m{c}^2)=5/(3\sqrt{3})$, giving about 3.8%. The prograde limiting coordinate radius does not identify a massive orbit with the null horizon generator.^[ref]

Finally $\dot{t}=k/(1-2\mu /r)=1/\sqrt{1-3\mu /r}$. Dividing $\dot{\varphi }=h/r^2$ by this givesIts algebraic form is exactly Newtonian, but $r$ is the Schwarzschild spacetime areal radius and $t$ Schwarzschild time, normalized at infinity. Local clock rates, orbit stability and binding energy remain relativistic. With $G{M}_{\odot }\simeq 1.3271\times 10^{20}{\mathrm{m}}^3{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$,The marginally bound circular-orbit frequency is about $0.404\mathrm{kHz}$. These Schwarzschild ISCO orbital frequencies and marginally bound frequencies are rotation frequencies per distant stationary observer's time, as intended by using $d\varphi /dt$. A static observer at finite radius $r_o$ instead divides both frequencies by $\sqrt{1-2\mu /r_o}$, leaving their ratio unchanged. Identifying an observed quasi-periodic oscillation with the innermost stable circular orbit orbital frequency is an additional astrophysical assumption.

Here $R(t)$ is the cosmological scale factor, $t$ is cosmic time and $H=\dot{R}/R$ is the Hubble parameter. With $R$ a length, $k=+1,0,-1$ labels positively curved, flat and negatively curved spatial sections. This $k$ is unrelated to Question 1's specific orbital energy. The density $\rho$ is mass-equivalent energy density: $\rho c^2$ has energy-per-volume units. In the displayed Friedmann equation $\Lambda$ has units ${\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$; the geometric cosmological constant is ${\Lambda }_{\mathrm{geom}}=\Lambda /c^2$. For a separately conserved fluid of constant equation of state $p=w\rho c^2$, the cosmological perfect-fluid continuity equation gives $\rho \propto R^{-3(1+w)}$, so $ϵ=3w$: zero for pressureless matter and one for radiation. With several fluids, sum their densities in the expansion equation and evolve each separately.

Setting cosmological spatial curvature and the cosmological constant to zero gives the mass-equivalent cosmological critical density,Its energy-density version is ${\rho }_{\mathrm{crit}}{c}^2$; keeping this distinction is necessary when dividing a radiation energy density by $c^2$ below.

In an Einstein-de Sitter universe, $H^2\propto R^{-3}$ integrates to $R\propto t^{2/3}$ and $H=2/(3t)$. With $1+z=R_0/R$,Here $z_1>z_2$ are the two epoch redshifts relative to today. This is elapsed cosmic time, not comoving distance divided by $c$.

For collisionless preservation of a Planck spectrum, use frequency redshift as well as photon-number conservation. Let $f=R/R_i$, so a frequency bin $d\nu$ now corresponds to $d{\nu }_i=fd\nu$ and ${\nu }_i=f\nu$ initially. Collisionless propagation conserves photon number in the corresponding comoving bin:For an initial blackbody spectrum, insert its Planck distribution to obtainThe factors $f^2$ from the numerator cancel the spectral dilution factor, while the exponent changes only the temperature. Integrating gives photon number density proportional to $T^3\propto R^{-3}$ and radiation energy density proportional to $T^4\propto R^{-4}$. Conservation of total photon number alone would not guarantee a blackbody spectrum shape; the frequency-bin mapping and absence of injection or spectral redistribution are essential.

For the numerical density comparisons, the supplied Hubble constant is $H_0=2.33312\times 10^{-18}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. Taking $G=6.67430\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ and $c=2.99792458\times 10^8\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ givesThe radiation specified here is cosmic microwave background photons only. Adding a relic neutrino density would change the photon-only matter-radiation equality result. The rounded present matter and vacuum fractions sum to one without this small photon contribution; the requested pairwise density comparisons do not require silently renormalizing them.

For the final unlabelled flight-time request, insert the case-(c) value $1+z_c=(0.7/{\Omega }_{\gamma 0}{)}^{1/4}=10.98735$ into the stipulated Einstein-de Sitter formula:The two model ages are approximately $2.486\times 10^8$ and $2.478\times 10^5$ years. This uses exactly the instructed matter-only model with the same $H_0$. It is not an exact age difference in the matter-plus-vacuum cosmology; a high-redshift matter-era normalization using $H_0\sqrt{{\Omega }_{m0}}$ would be a different approximation.

The weak equivalence principle says that freely falling test bodies with identical initial conditions follow the same trajectory independently of composition, when nongravitational forces and appreciable self-gravity are negligible. In Newtonian language it implies universal gravitational-to-inertial mass ratio. The Einstein equivalence principle additionally requires local Lorentz invariance and local position invariance of nongravitational experiments: a sufficiently small freely falling laboratory realizes special relativity. The strong equivalence principle extends universality to gravitational experiments and self-gravitating bodies.

A falling elevator makes the local content clear. Uniform gravitational acceleration can be removed along a freely falling worldline by a suitable frame, but curvature cannot generally be removed over an extended region. Nearby geodesics have relative accelerationfor the displayed Riemann-sign convention. tidal forces therefore remain detectable even in free fall. Equivalence motivates a metric description and gravitational clock shifts, but does not uniquely select Einstein's field equations.

Tests compare accelerations of different materials, frequencies of clocks at different gravitational potentials, or the response of self-gravitating bodies. lunar laser ranging times pulses reflected by lunar retroreflectors and fits Earth-Moon motion in the Sun's field; a differential free-fall violation would add a characteristic periodic range perturbation. The fit must also model tides, station and reflector geometry and propagation delays, with solar-radiation pressure and reflector thermal effects checked as possible mimics. Williams and collaborators' 2012 analysis is a concrete example of this method, published after this examination.^[ref]

For a blob in a relativistic jet, take two emission events separated by time $\Delta t_e$ in the galaxy frame. The blob moves transversely by $u\Delta t_e\sin \theta$, while its second photon has $u\Delta t_e\cos \theta$ less distance to travel to the distant observer. Therefore the arrival interval is $\Delta t_{\mathrm{obs}}=\Delta t_e(1-\beta \cos \theta )$ andDifferentiating with respect to viewing angle gives $d{\beta }_{\mathrm{app}}/d\theta =\beta (\cos \theta -\beta )/(1-\beta \cos \theta {)}^2$. The maximum occurs at $\cos \theta =\beta$ and equals $\beta \gamma$. Hence apparent superluminal motion is possible precisely when $\beta \gamma >1$, or $\beta >1/\sqrt{2}$. This is an arrival-time effect; the material and every local signal still travel slower than light.

For $\gamma \gg 1$, $1-\beta \simeq 1/(2{\gamma }^2)$ and $1-\beta \cos \theta \simeq ({\gamma }^{-2}+{\theta }^2)/2$. Thus the Doppler factor isThe Lorentz-invariant specific intensity gives $I_{\nu }/{\nu }^3=I_{{\nu }^{\prime }}^{\prime }/{\nu }^{\prime 3}$. Since $\nu =D{\nu }^{\prime }$, a power-law spectrum with $I_{{\nu }^{\prime }}^{\prime }\propto {\nu }^{\prime -\alpha }$ gives $I_{\nu }(\nu )=D^3{I}_{{\nu }^{\prime }}^{\prime }(\nu /D)\propto D^{3+\alpha }$. This is Doppler boosting of a moving blob: the spectral flux density of an unresolved, intrinsically isotropic blob has the same boost. Comparing identical approaching and receding blobs, with no differential absorption,A spatially steady continuous jet can have a different boost exponent because the emitting material contributing at one arrival time differs; it must not silently replace the specified blob model.

Using the stipulated peak of the photon-photon pair production cross section, not the exact head-on threshold, givesThe relevant photons are near infrared. Interpret the quoted $F_2$ as target-band energy flux, or energy flux per logarithmic frequency interval, consistent with its units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$; it is not a spectral flux density per hertz. For isotropic emission $L_2=4\pi d^2{F}_2$. In a stationary source of radius $R$, the order-of-magnitude photon energy density is $L_2/(4\pi R^{2}c)$, soThe luminosity variability size bound gives $R\lesssim c\Delta t$. Taking the largest allowed radius gives the smallest stationary-source optical depth in this estimate:This assumes the gamma rays and target photons occupy the same region, with an approximately isotropic target field and an order-unity geometric escape factor. A smaller region makes the gamma-ray compactness problem worse.

Here $d=3\times 10^{25}\mathrm{m}$, $R\sim 3\times 10^{11}\mathrm{m}$, and ${ϵ}_{20}=1.67\times 10^{-19}\mathrm{J}$. ConsequentlySuch a stationary co-spatial source would absorb almost all of its high-energy photons.

Let primes denote the blob rest frame and continue to ignore cosmological redshift. For fixed observed gamma-ray energy, ${ϵ}_1^{\prime }={ϵ}_1/D$. The co-moving target energy at the assumed cross-section peak is therefore ${ϵ}_2^{\prime }=D{ϵ}_{20}$. The internal pair-production target energy in a relativistic blob acquires a second Doppler shift when this same target population is observed along our line of sight:It would be incorrect to transform only the gamma ray while treating the internal target radiation as a stationary external field. The target photons responsible for collisions span directions in the blob frame; the observed energy here labels the corresponding part of the internally emitted radiation spectrum.

relativistic beaming both increases the allowed rest-frame source radius, $R^{\prime }\lesssim Dc\Delta t$, and lowers the inferred rest-frame luminosity, $L_{\log }^{\prime }\sim L_{\mathrm{iso},\log }/D^4$. The beamed gamma-ray optical depth then follows from ${ϵ}_2^{\prime }=D{ϵ}_{20}$:For an unbroken power-law spectrum $F_{\nu }\propto {\nu }^{-\alpha }$, $F_{\log }=\nu F_{\nu }\propto {\nu }^{1-\alpha }$, so ${\tau }^{\prime }\propto D^{-(4+2\alpha )}$. In particular, $\alpha =1$ gives the stated $D^{-6}$. Spectral breaks, an external target field or non-coincident emission regions change this inference. Under the requested scaling, transparency requiresThis minimum uses the most favourable nearly axial view, $D\simeq 2\gamma$. The exact axial relation gives ${\gamma }_{\min }=(D_{\min }+D_{\min }^{-1})/2\simeq 8.94$; a less favourable viewing angle requires a larger Lorentz factor. The numerical bound is conditional on the stipulated opacity scaling and internal-source geometry.

Corotation reaches the speed of light at $R_c=c/\Omega$. Extrapolating a dipole field gives $B_c\sim B_{\ast }(R_{\ast }/R_c{)}^3$ and magnetic energy density ${ϵ}_c\sim B_c^2/{\mu }_0$, suppressing order-one factors. An outward electromagnetic energy flux of scale ${ϵ}_{c}c$ through area of scale $R_c^2$ therefore givesThis assumes a dipole-dominated field tied to the rotating star and an effective outgoing Poynting flux near the light cylinder. The dipole extrapolation, angular pattern and surface-field convention affect the coefficient. A strictly aligned vacuum dipole would not radiate, whereas an oblique vacuum dipole does. A plasma-filled magnetosphere opens field lines and can spin down even an aligned rotator, so the light-cylinder estimate is a scaling argument, not an exact vacuum emission calculation or literal rigid motion at $c$. Force-free calculations explicitly demonstrate this distinction.^[ref]

The energy comes primarily from stellar rotation. With constant moment of inertia $I$, $E_{\mathrm{rot}}=I{\Omega }^2/2$, and conservation of energy gives $I\Omega \dot{\Omega }=-P$. ThusFor constant $K$, differentiating gives $\ddot{\Omega }=-3K{\Omega }^2\dot{\Omega }$, hence $n=\Omega \ddot{\Omega }/{\dot{\Omega }}^2=3$. Evolving field strength, inclination, moment of inertia or additional torques invalidate the constant-$K$ prediction; generally $n=3+(\Omega /\dot{\Omega })(\dot{K}/K)$ in this parametrization.

For radial inflow onto mass $M$, take $v_{\mathrm{ff}}\sim (GM/r{)}^{1/2}$ and $\rho \sim \dot{M}/(4\pi r^2{v}_{\mathrm{ff}})$. magnetic pressure decreases as $B_{\ast }^2{R}_{\ast }^6/({\mu }_0{r}^6)$, while ram pressure scales as $\rho v_{\mathrm{ff}}^2\propto \dot{M}(GM{)}^{1/2}{r}^{-5/2}$. Balancing them yieldsNumerical factors and disc geometry are not determined by this spherical estimate. The displayed proportionality holds $M$ fixed and requires a magnetospheric boundary outside the stellar surface.

In a disc, inflowing matter near $R_M$ has specific angular momentum approximately $\sqrt{GM{R}_M}$. If it is transferred to a slower star, the material torque is $N\sim \dot{M}\sqrt{GM{R}_M}$ and $I\dot{\Omega }\sim N>0$. The corotation radius is $R_{\mathrm{co}}=(GM/{\Omega }^2{)}^{1/3}$, distinct from the light-cylinder radius. As stellar spin approaches the inner disc's Keplerian frequency, net spin-up weakens. If $R_M$ lies outside corotation, the field rotates faster than the disc and can centrifugally expel matter in the propeller regime. A characteristic equilibrium isfor fixed mass and magnetic-coupling convention. A complete magnetic torque model can change the coefficient; a star also cannot rotate past its mass-shedding limit, of order $\sqrt{GM/R_{\ast }^3}$.

For opacity per unit mass $\kappa$, an isotropic radiative force balances gravity at $L_E=4\pi GMc/\kappa$. Efficient release of surface gravitational binding energy gives $L_{\mathrm{acc}}\sim GM\dot{M}/R_{\ast }$ and therefore the surface accretion Eddington rateThe radius dependence matters: it uses efficiency $\eta \sim GM/(R_{\ast }{c}^2)$, not an arbitrarily fixed reference efficiency. Substituting this maximal rate into the equilibrium period givesmass, opacity and geometry factors are held fixed. This is the classical radiatively efficient Eddington-limited scaling, not a universal upper bound on every mass supply rate: beaming, advection, outflows and opacity changes can alter it. For sufficiently small field, $R_M\lesssim R_{\ast }$ and the magnetic scaling must be replaced by surface-disc and mass-shedding physics.

Put $v=r\omega$, $\beta =v/c<1$ and $\gamma =(1-{\beta }^2{)}^{-1/2}$. For a photon emitted in laboratory direction $\mathbf{n}$ toward the stationary receiver, its frequency there isSince the receiver lies outside the circle, two emission points have a line of sight tangent to the circle. At those points the source velocity is directly toward or away from the receiver, so $\mathbf{n}\cdot {\mathbf{v}}_e=\pm v$. Thus the doppler extrema for a circularly moving source areThey do not depend on $d$, provided $d>r$; changing $d$ changes the emission and reception phases of the extrema. Closest and farthest source positions instead have transverse velocity relative to that ray, and are not the extrema.

For the corotating receiver, velocities must be evaluated at the actual emission and reception events. An unobstructed vacuum ray satisfies ${\mathbf{x}}_r-{\mathbf{x}}_e=c\Delta t\mathbf{n}$, while rigid steady rotation gives ${\mathbf{v}}_r-{\mathbf{v}}_e=\mathbf{\omega }\times ({\mathbf{x}}_r-{\mathbf{x}}_e)$. Therefore $\mathbf{n}\cdot {\mathbf{v}}_r=\mathbf{n}\cdot {\mathbf{v}}_e$. The emitter and receiver have equal speed magnitudes, hence equal Lorentz factors. The frequency ratio of corotating clocks is consequentlyThus the rim receiver measures ${\nu }_0$, independently of its angular separation. Different transit times or a Sagnac effect do not by themselves imply a frequency change between these identical-radius clocks. The model treats ${\nu }_0$ as a fixed proper clock frequency and assumes a signal path is available; it does not specify the disc's electromagnetic opacity.

Local equivalence and tides. In Newtonian mechanics, inertial mass $m_{\mathrm{i}}$ measures the response to a force, whereas passive gravitational mass $m_{\mathrm{g}}$ couples to an imposed Newtonian gravitational field. A freely falling body obeysThe observed composition independence of free fall says that this ratio is universal. With a common choice of units it is one. This is the Newtonian content of the weak equivalence principle for test particles; it does not by itself specify all nongravitational physics.

The Einstein equivalence principle further says that local nongravitational experiments in a sufficiently small freely falling laboratory have the form predicted by special relativity, independently of the laboratory's location and motion. In such a local inertial frame, the metric tensor is locally the Minkowski metric and the Christoffel symbols vanish at the selected event. The strong equivalence principle extends the universality claim to local gravitational experiments and bodies with significant gravitational self-energy. None of these statements removes measurable tidal forces across a finite apparatus.

In an ideal small freely falling lift, a released ball initially floats relative to the cabin, because both undergo the same free fall. Two separated balls, however, need not retain their separation: they sample different parts of the gravitational field. For a point source, linearizing $\mathbf{g}=-GM\mathbf{r}/r^3$ across a small separation $\mathbf{\xi }$ gives the tidal tensor predictionA radial separation stretches with coefficient $2GM/r^3$, whereas a transverse separation is compressed with coefficient $-GM/r^3$. Initially parallel velocities therefore develop relative motion even though the individual bodies experience zero proper acceleration.

The relativistic statement is geodesic deviation. With the Riemann curvature tensor conventiona connecting vector between neighboring freely falling worldlines satisfiesHere $D/d\tau$ is the covariant derivative along the reference geodesic, and $U^{\mu }$ its four-velocity. Curvature can be nonzero where the Christoffel symbols have been made zero. In the weak, static, slow-motion limit this equation reduces to ${\ddot{\xi }}^i=-{\partial }_i{\partial }_j\Phi {\xi }^j$, recovering the tidal tensor above. A finite falling lift can detect gravity through these relative accelerations; local equivalence does not imply a globally uniform field.

Weak-field connection and potential. Take $x^0=ct$ and the $+---$ metric signature. There is an index error in the printed formula for the Christoffel symbols: its first differentiated metric component must be $g_{\nu 0}$, not $g_{\mu 0}$. The correctly contracted expression isThe offending term vanishes under the stipulated time independence, so this correction does not change the intended calculation. Write $g_{\mu \nu }={\eta }_{\mu \nu }+h_{\mu \nu }$ and treat both $h$ and its derivatives as first order. To that order $g^{00}=1-h_{00}$, $g^{0i}=O(h)$, and $g^{ij}=-{\delta }^{ij}+O(h)$. A stationary metric tensor givesFor the temporal component the inverse-metric coefficient is already first order, soFor a spatial component the zeroth-order inverse metric contributes:The time component of the approximate geodesic equation says that $dt/d\tau$ is constant to the retained order. In its spatial component, convert the proper time derivatives to coordinate-time derivatives and cancel $(dt/d\tau {)}^2$:Comparison with the Newtonian equation $d^2\mathbf{x}/d{t}^2=-\nabla \Phi$ identifies $h_{00}=2\Phi /c^2+C$. For an isolated source, choose the gravitational potential to tend to zero at infinity and normalize the time coordinate there, giving $C=0$. ThusThe quantity $\Phi$ is the Newtonian gravitational potential, or gravitational potential energy per unit mass, in $\mathrm{J}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}={\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. For a point source, $\Phi =-GM/r$. A static clock has $d\tau =\sqrt{g_{00}}dt\approx (1+\Phi /c^2)dt$, connecting the Newtonian limit with gravitational time dilation.

Frequency of the orbiting source. Treat the gas blob as a test particle on a timelike circular Schwarzschild geodesic, with pressure and other nongravitational forces negligible. Treat our very distant location as infinity, so the observer's own gravitational potential is negligible. These are the assumptions that make a unique answer in terms of $R_S/r$ possible.

Put $f=1-R_S/r$ and use a local static observer at the emission point as an intermediate measuring frame. The remote observer lies on the symmetry axis of the orbit. A ray arriving on that axis has zero conserved axial angular momentum, so its local direction is perpendicular to the emitter's azimuthal velocity. Bending within a meridional plane does not alter this orthogonality. The transverse relativistic Doppler effect therefore giveswhere $v$ is the orbital speed measured by that local static observer. The gravitational redshift between static Schwarzschild observers then givesA gravitational circular orbit has $v^2=GM/r+O((GM/r{)}^2/c^2)$ in the weak-field limit, so $v^2/c^2=R_S/(2r)+O((R_S/r{)}^2)$. Expanding both factors,Solving for the emitted frequency givesThe gravitational part is $R_S/(2r)$ and the transverse kinematic time dilation contributes another $R_S/(4r)$; the absence of line-of-sight motion does not remove this second effect.

As an exact check, the local speed on a timelike circular Schwarzschild geodesic satisfies $v^2/c^2=\mu /(r-2\mu )$, where $\mu =GM/c^2=R_S/2$. Therefore the face-on frequency shift of a circular Schwarzschild source iswhose expansion agrees with the boxed answer. If the gas is supported or accelerated by pressure or magnetic stresses rather than following a geodesic, its orbital speed is not fixed by the mass and radius alone; the appropriate first-order result is instead ${\nu }_{\mathrm{em}}\approx {\nu }_{\mathrm{ob}}[1+GM/(r{c}^2)+v^2/(2c^2)]$, with $v$ supplied independently.

A fundamental observer follows the mean cosmic matter flow and is at rest with respect to the homogeneous cosmological frame. Cosmological isotropy permits no preferred spatial acceleration, rotation vector or anisotropic expansion for this flow: the congruence is geodesic, irrotational and shear-free, with isotropic expansion. Its orthogonal homogeneous spatial slices define simultaneity. Choosing fixed spatial labels along these worldlines and their common proper time as $t$ gives synchronous coordinates, $g_{tt}=c^2$ and $g_{ti}=0$.

In the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric, $t$ is this cosmic proper time and $\chi$ is radial comoving coordinate. On a constant-$t$ radial slice, the proper distance in cosmology from $0$ to a fixed ${\chi }_0$ is $D(t)=a(t){\chi }_0$. ThereforeThis is the Hubble parameter. The metric describes expansion when $\dot{a}>0$; its form alone also permits static or contracting histories, so expansion additionally requires that sign of the scale factor derivative.

For a radial photon, the metric components relevant to its motion are $g_{tt}=c^2$ and $g_{\chi \chi }=-a^2(t)$, both independent of $\chi$. The angular momentum components vanish. The covariant-momentum form of the geodesic equation therefore givesOnly this radial contraction is needed: angular metric coefficients can depend on $\chi$, but multiply zero angular components. The conserved quantity is the lower-index $p_1=p_{\chi }$, rather than the contravariant component $p^1$.

For outward travel put $P=-p_{\chi }>0$. The null condition $c^2(p^t{)}^2-a^2(p^{\chi }{)}^2=0$ givesHere the time coordinate is $t$, rather than $ct$. A comoving observer has $u^t=1$ and measures photon energy $E=p_{\mu }{u}^{\mu }=p_t$. Thus energy and frequency decrease as $a^{-1}$, giving the cosmological redshiftThe reciprocal relation for wavelengths follows from their common local propagation speed $c$.

Finally center the spatial coordinates on the receiving comoving observer. At the source, the transverse spatial line element is $dl=a(t_E)S_K(\chi )d\theta$. For a short transverse rod and a small observed angle $\Delta \theta$,Thus the angular diameter distance is $d_A=a(t_E)S_K(\chi )$. Writing the reception epoch as $t_0=t_R$ gives the displayed formula in the question. The length is the proper transverse length at emission; $t_0$ cannot be replaced by an unrelated epoch while retaining that expression.

Choose the null affine parameter so that the photon tangent is its four-momentum $P^{\mu }$. A fundamental observer has $U^{\mu }=(1,0,0,0)$ in cosmic-time coordinates, so the measured energy is $E=P_{\mu }{U}^{\mu }=c^2{P}^t$. The null normalization and conserved radial quantity in part (b) giveThus redshifting of peculiar momentum gives $E\propto a^{-1}$. Since $E=h\nu$, with $h$ the Planck constant, the received-to-emitted frequency ratio is ${\nu }_R/{\nu }_E=a(t_E)/a(t_R)$. By the definition of cosmological redshift,

A blackbody is an ideal body that absorbs all incident electromagnetic radiation, at every frequency and direction. Its absorptivity is one, so Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation makes its equilibrium emissivity one as well. At a specified temperature its thermal spectrum is universal: it depends on temperature, not material or shape. This does not mean it looks black when hot; it can glow brightly while remaining a perfect absorber.

A small hole in a nearly isothermal opaque cavity approximates a blackbody, because radiation entering the hole undergoes many interactions before it could escape. In thermal equilibrium the cavity contains an approximately isotropic Planck spectrum. The emitted radiance follows Planck's law, its integrated outward radiant exitance follows the Stefan–Boltzmann law, and its wavelength peak follows Wien's displacement law. A real surface can have wavelength- and direction-dependent emissivity below this ideal limit.

The constants are the Planck constant $h$, photon frequency $\nu$, speed of light $c$, Boltzmann constant $k_B$ and absolute temperature $T$. The supplied $U_{\nu }$ is a spectral energy density, with units $\mathrm{J}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}\mathrm{H}{\mathrm{z}}^{-1}$. It describes equilibrium radiation per volume and frequency interval, rather than emitted power itself. For isotropic cavity radiation the corresponding surface spectral radiant exitance is $M_{\nu }=c{U}_{\nu }/4$.

At low frequency the curve rises as ${\nu }^2$; it has one positive maximum and an exponentially decaying high-frequency tail. The left panel below shades the area $u(T)={\int }_0^{\infty }{U}_{\nu }d\nu$ under one curve. Put $x=h\nu /(k_{B}T)$; thenThe remaining dimensionless integral is independent of temperature, soThus doubling temperature doubles the characteristic frequency scale, raises the spectrum's height by eight and increases its area by sixteen. Total emitted energy also depends on emitting area and elapsed time.

For $x=h\nu /(k_{B}T)\ll 1$, the Taylor expansion $e^x-1=x+O(x^2)$ gives the Rayleigh-Jeans law for equilibrium radiation,This is the classical limit: each electromagnetic mode has mean thermal energy approximately $k_{B}T$. Extending it to arbitrarily large frequencies would give a divergent integrated energy density, the ultraviolet catastrophe.

For $x\gg 1$, $e^x-1\simeq e^x$, giving the Wien approximationPlanck's quantum hypothesis assigns equally spaced mode energies $E_n=nh\nu$. When the spacing is small relative to $k_{B}T$, many levels are occupied and the classical approximation works. When $h\nu \gg k_{B}T$, exciting even one quantum is exponentially unlikely, suppressing the high-frequency tail. The single expression $⟨E⟩=h\nu /(e^x-1)$ contains both limits. Comparing temperature directly to $h\nu$ would be dimensionally incorrect; the low-temperature condition means $k_{B}T\ll h\nu$.

First convert from a spectral energy density per unit frequency to one per unit wavelength, including the Jacobian matrix and determinant:Set $d{U}_{\lambda }/d\lambda =0$ and define $x=hc/(\lambda k_{B}T)$. The nonzero maximum satisfies $5(1-e^{-x})=x$, with numerical root $x=4.96511$. ConsequentlyThis is Wien's displacement law. One must maximize the wavelength density, rather than find the frequency maximum and merely put $\lambda =c/{\nu }_{\max }$: the frequency and wavelength peaks of Planck's law are different because a spectral density changes under a change of coordinate.

Compton scattering transfers energy and momentum from a photon to an electron. For an initially stationary, approximately free electron, a photon scattered through a nonzero angle generally has lower frequency and longer wavelength; the recoiling electron carries the difference. The effect demonstrates the photon momentum $p_{\gamma }=h\nu /c=h/\lambda$, beyond a purely elastic classical scattering description.

The middle panel of the figure in solution shows the incident photon along $+x$, the outgoing photon at angle $\theta$ above that direction, and the recoiling electron at deflection angle $\varphi$ below it. Each arrow labels its particle and momentum; the initial electron is at rest at the interaction point. The scattered photon and electron have opposite transverse momentum components, while their forward components sum to the incident photon momentum.

A blackbody absorbs all incident electromagnetic radiation, at every frequency, direction and polarization: its absorptivity is one. In thermal equilibrium, Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation makes its emissivity one as well. Its emitted spectrum depends only on its absolute temperature, through Planck's law, rather than on the material of its surface.