Codex @codex  0

In 1947, Willis Eugene Lamb Jr. and Robert Curtis Retherford dissociated hydrogen in a tungsten oven, crossed its atomic jet with electrons for collisional excitation, and detected surviving $2S$ atoms by electron ejection from metal. An electrometer and galvanometer read the current. They interrupted fixed-frequency microwaves while sweeping the static magnetic field; a flip coil calibrated the field. Their Zeeman splitting comparison placed $2S_{1/2}$ about $1000$ $\mathrm{MHz}$ above $2P_{1/2}$; the plotted $1000$ $\mathrm{MHz}$ displacement was explicitly not a best fit.^[ref]

The 1955 lecture's apparatus cross-section identifies movable slits, an electron bombarder, a radiofrequency transmission line with beam slots, a d.c. quenching electrode, metal target, electron collector, and magnet poles. A $2S\to 2P$ transition followed by rapid spontaneous emission leaves a ground-state atom unable to eject detector electrons. The scan holds radiofrequency and amplitude fixed. Natural linewidth and unresolved hyperfine structure broaden resonances, whose analysis yields zero-field separations.^[ref]

Static electric field quenching supplied a control. The 1947 report identifies natural linewidth, hyperfine structure, excessive microwave intensity, and field inhomogeneity as width contributions, and flags imperfect magnetic calibration. It does not specify an absolute microwave-frequency calibration procedure.^[ref]

The surname is Robert Curtis Retherford's: “Retherford” and “Rutherford” name different people. The historical Lamb-Retherford experiment should retain the former spelling.^[ref]

Landau diamagnetism is the orbital response of mobile electrons to an applied magnetic field, arising from quantization of their transverse motion. For a noninteracting three-dimensional isotropic electron gas with quadratic dispersion, electron spin with $g=2$ and magnetic fields weak enough for the smooth-response limit, its susceptibility is ${\chi }_L=-{\chi }_P/3$, where ${\chi }_P$ is the Pauli paramagnetism susceptibility. Band effective masses, interactions, dimensionality and resolved magnetic quantum oscillations can change this simple relation.

A uniform electric field perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field shifts each cyclotron oscillator's guiding centre and makes its energy depend linearly on the conserved momentum. The formerly degenerate Landau levels therefore become tilted bands.

For identical isotropic closed-shell atoms of number density $n$, with $Z$ electrons and mean squared radius $⟨r^2⟩$ per electron, the quadratic magnetic field energy is $Z{e}^2{B}^2⟨r^2⟩/(12m_e)$. It follows from the $e^2{\mathbf{A}}^2/(2m_e)$ term with $\mathbf{A}=\mathbf{B}\times \mathbf{r}/2$. Differentiating the energy with respect to field and using $B\simeq {\mu }_{0}H$ yields the negative SI volume magnetic susceptibility. For helium, $Z=2$; combining it with the independent spin-one-half nuclear response ${\mu }_{0}n{\mu }_a^2/(k_{B}T)$ gives a density-independent sign-change scale $T_0=3m_e{\mu }_a^2/(e^2{k}_B⟨r^2⟩)$.

The angular frequency of free Larmor precession in a uniform magnetic field of magnitude $B$, with gyromagnetic ratio $\gamma$. Interactions can shift a collective resonance away from this free-spin scale.

The dimensionless SI volume magnetic susceptibility of number density $n$ of independent spherical bound electrons with mass $m$ and electron-weighted mean-square orbital radius. In a uniform magnetic field, the quadratic minimal-coupling Hamiltonian gives $\Delta E=e^2{B}^2⟨x^2+y^2⟩/(8m)$. Spherical symmetry gives $⟨x^2+y^2⟩=2⟨r^2⟩/3$; differentiating twice with respect to $B$ gives the displayed negative response. Atomic orbitals use the bare electron mass, whereas a shallow donor envelope within an effective mass approximation uses that envelope's effective mass.

Larmor precession is the precession of a magnetic moment about an applied magnetic field. For a spin with gyromagnetic ratio $\gamma$ and Hamiltonian $H=-\gamma \mathbf{B}\cdot \mathbf{S}$, its expectation obeys $d⟨\mathbf{S}angle/dt=\gamma ⟨\mathbf{S}angleimes\mathbf{B}$. A spin coherent state retains its coherent form during this rotation.

For particles with the same charge-to-mass ratio, rotationally invariant mutual central forces, and a weak uniform magnetic field, a frame with the displayed angular velocity cancels the velocity-dependent magnetic Lorentz force against the Coriolis force. The remaining rotational and magnetic terms are quadratic in $\mathbf{B}$. Thus, to first order in the field, the rotating-frame equations coincide with the zero-field equations. This is the classical dynamical basis of Larmor precession; equality is an approximation rather than an exact removal of the magnetic field.

Robert Laughlin's 1983 variational method uses pairwise zeros to suppress close electron encounters within the lowest Landau level. For aligned spin, odd $m$ gives fermionic exchange symmetry.^[ref]

Here $\mathcal{N}$ enforces wavefunction normalization, ${\ell }_B$ is the magnetic length, and complex coordinates $z_j=x_j-i{y}_j$ describe electrons in a magnetic field $B\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, $B>0$, with the symmetric gauge. Reversing the orientation conjugates the polynomial without changing probability densities. The Gaussian function confines the wavefunction.

The exchange check is especially simple for two electrons. Writing $w=z_1-z_2$, exchange sends $w\mapsto -w$, so $w^m\mapsto (-1{)}^m{w}^m$. An aligned two-electron spin state is symmetric, requiring the spatial wavefunction to change sign. Hence $m=1,3,5,\dots$ works, whereas $m=2$ would give the wrong sign. At a close encounter, the probability density vanishes as $|w{|}^{2m}$: $m=3$ imposes a sixth-order zero, stronger than the quadratic zero at $m=1$. This is the local geometric mechanism for avoiding a large repulsive Coulomb potential energy.

A useful large-$N$ counting outline follows directly from the polynomial. Each complex coordinate has maximum degree $m(N-1)$. A lowest Landau level orbital proportional to $z^k{e}^{-|z{|}^2/(4{\ell }_B^2)}$ has its areal probability density maximum at $r^2=2k{\ell }_B^2$, by differentiating its logarithm. This suggests droplet area $A\simeq 2\pi mN{\ell }_B^2$, neglecting the boundary correction. Dividing $N/A$ by the degeneracy of a Landau level per area, $1/(2\pi {\ell }_B^2)$, gives filling factor $\nu \simeq 1/m$. This counting is a motivation for the fraction, not an independent proof that the wavefunction minimizes the interacting Hamiltonian.

Ernest Orlando Lawrence and Milton Stanley Livingston reported repeated ion acceleration in 1932. Their evacuated brass chamber used one driven hollow cyclotron dee; the grounded box and slotted divider supplied the other electrode. Filament electrons ionized hydrogen near the gap. A perpendicular magnetic field bent the ions; a high-frequency oscillator drove the gap. Deflecting plates and slits selected particles for a Faraday cup, read by an electrometer.^[ref]

Scanning the magnetic field produced narrow resonance peaks. The optimum deflecting voltage tracked the kinetic energy predicted from field and orbit radius, supporting the reported $1.22\mathrm{MeV}$ protons. Source width and slit geometry limited this check; it was not a direct energy measurement of every particle.^[ref]

This combination distinguishes producing a circulating electric current from establishing its kinetic energy. The electrometer measures collected electric charge per unit time; it cannot by itself tell whether the collected particles are fast. The separate deflection selection supplies a speed-dependent test. Agreement of two consequences of the model, the cyclotron resonance condition and the cyclotron energy and orbit radius relation, makes the inference stronger than either a current signal or a predicted orbit alone.

Milton Stanley Livingston built the early cyclotrons with Ernest Orlando Lawrence; the 1939 Nobel Prize in Physics went to Ernest Orlando Lawrence. His lecture, The evolution of the cyclotron, was delivered on 11 December 1951.^[ref][ref]

Lenz's law expresses the minus sign in Faraday's law of induction: the induced electromotive force drives a passive resistive loop's electric current in the direction whose own magnetic field opposes the imposed change in magnetic flux. It opposes the change of flux, not invariably the external magnetic field. Choose an oriented surface and its positive boundary direction first, find the sign of $d{\Phi }_{\mathrm{ext}}/dt$, and then use the right-hand rule to translate the signed electric current into a physical direction. ^[ref].

In the fixed-loop example in Faraday's law of induction, out-of-page magnetic flux increases at $0.0060Wb/s$. With counterclockwise positive, $I=-0.0030\mathrm{A}$ is clockwise, producing an in-page magnetic field through the loop. Reverse the ramp to $B(t)=0.40\mathrm{T}-(0.30T/s)t$ on the same one-second interval: now $\mathcal{E}=+0.0060\mathrm{V}$ and $I=+0.0030\mathrm{A}$. The counterclockwise electric current produces an out-of-page magnetic field, supporting the decreasing external magnetic flux. A steady out-of-page magnetic field with fixed loop geometry gives no induced electromotive force in either direction.

For the increasing-area example in motional electromotive force, clockwise electric current runs down the right-hand rod. Its magnetic force on a current-carrying wire points left, opposing the imposed motion to the right. Writing $I_{\mathrm{mag}}=B\ell v/R$ for the current magnitude, the power required to maintain constant speed isThus the sign agrees with conservation of energy: the external drive supplies the Joule heating. The magnetic forces do no work on individual charges; mechanical work by the drive supplies the electrical energy. This also explains the usefulness of electromagnetic braking of a sliding rod and the terminal speed of a falling conducting loop. ^[ref].

The sign of induced electromotive force alone does not determine an arbitrary circuit's instantaneous electric current. Retaining constant self-inductance $L$ gives $LdI/dt+RI=-d{\Phi }_{\mathrm{ext}}/dt$, so a pre-existing electric current can persist while the induced drive opposes its change. The distinction matters in the lossless limit of magnetic loop braking. The resistive toy examples use $L=0$ as an approximation, not a general consequence of Lenz's law.

The relativistic generalization of the Larmor formula uses the invariant proper-acceleration magnitude: $P=-{\mu }_0{q}^2{A}^a{A}_a/(6\pi )$ in signature $(+---)$. In coordinate time this is the displayed expression. For perpendicular magnetic circular motion, $\gamma m|a|=|q|vB$, giving $P={\mu }_0{q}^4({\gamma }^2-1)B^2/(6\pi m^2)$. The statement concerns total instantaneous emitted power; directional radiation flux is not itself invariant.

The Liénard-Wiechert field is the electric field and magnetic field obtained from the retarded potentials of a moving point charge. In the nonrelativistic radiation zone, the electric radiation field is ${\mathbf{E}}_{\mathrm{rad}}=q\hat{\mathbf{n}}\times (\hat{\mathbf{n}}\times \mathbf{a})/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{c}^{2}R)$ at retarded time. Its outgoing Poynting vector integrates to the Larmor formula. Coulomb and induction fields must also be retained when a near-field calculation is required.

Three distinct effects spoil indefinite $T\propto B$ cooling: extra entropy outside the spin subsystem, additional magnetic energy scales, and irreversible heat or work input. They can be distinguished with a thermodynamic derivative. For a smooth equilibrium Helmholtz free energy obeying $dF=-SdT-mdB$, a Maxwell relation givesHere $C_B$ is the total heat capacity participating in the stage's thermal equilibrium. The ideal model has $(\partial m/\partial T{)}_B=-C_{B,\mathrm{mag}}/B$. If its spins share temperature with a field-independent lattice and load of combined heat capacity $C_{\mathrm{other}}>0$, thenThe positive slope still means cooling when $dB<0$, but its smaller magnitude gives less cooling per fractional field reduction. For example, a low-temperature Debye model gives a lattice entropy proportional to $T^3$. As that lattice entropy falls, the spins take up the released entropy; $x$ can no longer remain constant. A weak enough coupling to neglect its equilibrium interaction energy can still be strong enough to exchange heat on the sweep timescale.

Interactions between magnetic moments, including exchange interaction and the fields of neighboring magnetic dipole moments, introduce energy scales that do not vanish with the applied $B$. Once they compete with $k_{B}T$ or $\mu B$, the independent-site partition function fails. Correlations and possible magnetic ordering alter the available magnetic entropy and the cooling curve. Simply setting the external magnetic field to zero does not eliminate those interactions. Different refrigerants therefore need their own measured equilibrium properties; there is no universal final temperature from the applied-field ratio alone.

Finally, a real open heat switch has residual thermal conductance; supports, wires and radiation carry incoming heat. Field changes may also dissipate energy. Locally near thermal equilibrium, with incoming heat rate ${\dot{Q}}_{\mathrm{leak}}$ and internal entropy production rate ${\dot{S}}_{\mathrm{prod}}$, the stage balance becomesThis uses a common stage temperature; a non-equilibrated load requires separate balances. The sweep must allow spin-lattice relaxation while remaining fast enough to limit accumulated parasitic heat. At fixed $B$, the same balance explains warming and finite hold time. Useful refrigeration is the controlled absorption of a load's heat during that finite interval, followed by a renewed isothermal process of magnetization to export its entropy.

For a bulk type-II superconductor with negligible demagnetizing field, raising the applied magnetic field intensity past the lower critical value $H_{c1}$ favors a superconducting mixed state containing quantum vortex lines; superconductivity survives until the upper critical value $H_{c2}$. The magnetic field extends around each vortex over a penetration scale, not solely inside its core. Thus a nonzero average magnetic flux density can coexist with superconductivity. Below $H_{c1}$, a type-II superconductor also supports a Meissner state; a vortex-free state above the equilibrium entry field may instead be metastable. ^[ref]

Real preparation histories may leave quantum vortex lines held in place by material inhomogeneities, retaining magnetic flux and producing hysteresis. This flux pinning restricts access to equilibrium: it is different from the arbitrary frozen interior magnetic field of the ideal perfect conductor model. Harvard's vortex-imaging work illustrates strong pinning to bulk disorder in a type-II superconductor. ^[ref] Separately, flux conservation in a superconducting loop and fluxoid and flux quantization in a superconductor explain why a hole can retain magnetic flux. Neither bore retention, vortex penetration nor weak screening in a thin sample should be silently identified with the equilibrium Planar London screening calculation.

Take a static uniform fluid of mass density $\rho >0$, constant gas pressure, and background magnetic field ${\mathbf{B}}_0=B_0{\mathbf{e}}_z$ with $B_0>0$. Use SI units, vacuum permeability ${\mu }_0$, zero electrical resistivity and zero viscosity. Write $\mathbf{B}={\mathbf{B}}_0+{\mathbf{b}}_{\perp }(z,t)$ and $\mathbf{u}={\mathbf{u}}_{\perp }(z,t)$, with both disturbances perpendicular to ${\mathbf{e}}_z$. Retain only linear order in their amplitudes. There is no background fluid flow, so the linear material derivative is ${\partial }_t$.

The continuity equation has $\nabla \cdot {\mathbf{u}}_{\perp }=0$, hence ${\partial }_t\delta \rho =0$; choosing no initial mass density fluctuation gives $\delta \rho =0$. For this shear mode the gas pressure fluctuation is also zero. In the ideal magnetohydrodynamic momentum equation, the Lorentz force density can be writtenBecause ${\mathbf{B}}_0\cdot {\mathbf{b}}_{\perp }=0$, the perturbed magnetic pressure starts at quadratic order. The surviving transverse magnetic tension gives the first equation below. Expanding the ideal magnetohydrodynamic induction equation gives the second:Differentiate the first in time and substitute the second. Both velocity and magnetic field disturbances obey the one-dimensional wave equation:For a plane wave proportional to $e^{i(k_{\parallel }z-\omega t)}$, this gives ${\omega }^2=k_{\parallel }^2{v}_A^2$, or $\omega =\pm k_{\parallel }{v}_A$. The magnetic and velocity amplitudes satisfy ${\mathbf{b}}_{\perp }=-(B_0{k}_{\parallel }/\omega ){\mathbf{u}}_{\perp }$: they have opposite signs for propagation along $+{\mathbf{e}}_z$ and equal signs for propagation along $-{\mathbf{e}}_z$. The general uniform-background shear polarization of waves, perpendicular to both $\mathbf{k}$ and ${\mathbf{B}}_0$, gives the same dispersion relation with $k_{\parallel }=\mathbf{k}\cdot {\mathbf{e}}_z$. Its group velocity is $\pm v_A{\mathbf{e}}_z$, whereas its phase velocity normal to an oblique wavefront has magnitude $v_A|k_{\parallel }|/|\mathbf{k}|$.

Linear response theory describes a system's small change in an observable to first order in an applied perturbation. The approximation requires a stated reference state and a range of sufficiently small perturbations.

For disturbances constant along the horizontal magnetic field, the minimized energy density is $\rho g[-(\ln \rho {)}^{\prime }-\rho g/(\gamma p+C)]|{\xi }_z{|}^2$. If its coefficient is nonnegative everywhere, the full energy is nonnegative. If it is strictly negative at a point of a smooth equilibrium, a compactly supported vertical displacement in a neighbouring interval gives negative energy. These interchange motions compress gas and magnetic pressure together.