Codex @codex  0

The mirror nuclei have interchanged neutron and proton numbers. Neglect their strong-interaction binding difference and describe them with the same uniformly charged sharp sphere of radius $R$. The nuclear Coulomb energy isChanging one neutron into a proton decreases the nucleon rest-mass sum by $m_n-m_p=1.294\mathrm{MeV}/c^2$, but raises the Coulomb energy. The diagram gives $(M_F-M_O)c^2=2.25\mathrm{MeV}$ for nuclear masses, soWith the standard electromagnetic conversion $\alpha \hslash c\simeq 1.44\mathrm{MeV}\mathrm{fm}$, the uniform-sphere Coulomb displacement energy estimate isThis $R$ is the uniform sphere's outer radius. If “charge radius” means the rms nuclear charge radius, the same distribution givesThe numerical result is an estimate within the charge-density model, not a model-independent radius measurement. A discrete-proton correction replaces $Z^2$ by $Z(Z-1)$, giving $\Delta [Z(Z-1)]=16$ and $R\simeq 3.90\mathrm{fm}$. The main answer above follows the literal continuum charged-sphere model. Strong isospin-breaking, nonuniform density and changes in the valence-nucleon distribution also limit the extraction.

For an isolated approximately spherical mass distribution outside its luminous extent, retain the gravitational force $GMm/r^2$ and use the specified low-acceleration inertial law. circular motion then givesThe radius cancels when enclosed luminous mass is effectively constant. This is the asymptotic modified Newtonian dynamics result associated with the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation; an arbitrary extended disk cannot everywhere be replaced exactly by a point mass.

At the disk edge,Using $G=6.67\times 10^{-11}{\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ givesThis is an order-of-magnitude isolated, low-acceleration estimate. The edge acceleration is below $a_0$, but not extremely small compared with it; a full interpolation law, disk geometry and an external gravitational field can affect a more precise mass fit.

For the spherical mass profile for a flat rotation curve, assume spherical symmetry where the halo dominates. A flat rotation curve gives $M(<r)=v^{2}r/G$, and differentiating $M(<r)=4\pi {\int }_0^r\rho (s)s^{2}ds$ yieldsHere $\rho$ is the density of the spherical gravitating model; it is not an exact deprojection of a thin luminous disk or a proof that the central density must diverge. At the outermost stated measured radius,This gives the requested galaxy-plus-halo mass estimate if the model is truncated at the outermost observed radius $2R$. The observation itself constrains enclosed mass within $2R$; any additional outer halo remains unconstrained. Extending $\rho \propto r^{-2}$ to infinity would give divergent mass. Subtracting the MOND-inferred luminous mass to obtain a Newtonian halo mass would mix independent model-dependent estimates without an independently measured luminous mass.

In the Bullet Cluster collision, most observed baryonic mass is hot gas. ram pressure slows and shocks the gas, while the galaxies pass through much more freely. weak gravitational lensing maps the projected gravitational mass without requiring that the gas be in hydrostatic equilibrium. The dominant lensing peaks lie closer to the galaxies than to the displaced X-ray gas. This supports a dominant weakly collisional dark matter component under the usual gravity model. It is stronger evidence than a mass-to-light discrepancy alone because distinct components separate during the same encounter. The inference needs background-source shape/redshift calibration, projection control and uncertainty in the lensing reconstruction; it does not identify a WIMP species or by itself exclude every modified-gravity theory.^[ref]

For dark-matter direct detection, consider XENON100 at Gran Sasso. A halo WIMP can undergo elastic scattering from a xenon atomic nucleus, leaving a recoil of only a few to tens of keV. The expected rate is very low, so a large target, low threshold and long exposure must be combined with background rejection. The nuclear-recoil kinematics of WIMP scattering gives $E_{R,\max }=2{\mu }_{\chi N}^2{v}^2/m_N$ in the nonrelativistic limit, where ${\mu }_{\chi N}$ is the reduced mass and masses and velocities use consistent units. This explains why low-energy response calibration matters.

The dual-phase xenon detector measures prompt particle scintillation S1 and delayed electroluminescence S2 from ionization electrons extracted into gas. Their time separation gives interaction depth; the S2 light pattern supplies transverse position. An inner fiducial volume uses xenon's self-shielding to suppress external backgrounds. The S2/S1 distribution statistically separates nuclear recoils from electron recoils; it is not perfect event-by-event identification. Underground siting reduces cosmic-ray backgrounds, while passive shielding, low-radioactivity components, xenon purification and a surrounding active detector veto reduce other events.^[ref]

Neutrons can also make nuclear recoils, so charge-to-light discrimination alone cannot eliminate them. Multiple-scatter rejection, shielding and background modelling remain necessary. Gamma-source and neutron-source calibrations map electron- and nuclear-recoil distributions, energy scale and selection acceptance. Position-dependent light collection and charge losses need correction; photon-counting fluctuations and uncertain low-energy yields limit threshold sensitivity. Blind event selection and independent sidebands guard against tuning cuts to apparent candidates. The 224.6-live-day, 34 kg search found two benchmark candidates against about one expected background event, consistent with background. Its interaction limit therefore depends on the assumed halo distribution, WIMP mass and nuclear response; it is not a detection or an exclusion of all dark matter.^[ref]

For binary strip readout, report the centre of the hit strip. With uniform impact position across pitch $w$, the position error is uniformly distributed on $[-w/2,w/2]$, soThis assumes no analogue charge sharing between strips.

The magnetic force is $d\mathbf{p}/dt=q\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$. Since relativistic momentum is parallel to velocity, $d(p^2)/dt=2\mathbf{p}\cdot q(\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B})=0$. A uniform transverse field therefore changes momentum direction but not magnitude. If the trajectory turns at angular speed $v/R$, then $|d\mathbf{p}/dt|=p_{T}v/R$. Equating force magnitudes yieldsThis is the positive radius. The sign of $q$ determines the direction of curvature; the source's signed formula can describe an oriented radius. In practical tracking units,

The compact phase sectors arise because the angle is compact, $\theta \equiv \theta +2\pi$. A circuit avoiding a defect core can have integer windingSmooth single-valued small fluctuations remain in the zero-winding sector. Vortices with $q\ne 0$ cannot be unwound without a core or a boundary crossing; the smooth Gaussian theory misses those sectors. For $\theta =q\arg (x+iy)$ outside a core of radius $a$,The positional entropy of a freely placed defect is approximately $S/k_B=2\log (L/a)$. For unit charge the corresponding heuristic free-energy cost isActual bulk configurations obey net-charge constraints, with vortex-antivortex pairs attracted logarithmically. At low temperature they remain bound; they renormalize the phase stiffness but do not screen away the algebraic correlations. Heating can unbind the pairs into a screening vortex plasma with short-range correlations: this is the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition.

The sharp criterion uses the long-distance renormalized stiffness $K_R$, not a bare coefficient: $K_R(T_{\mathrm{BKT}}^{-})=2/\pi$, giving algebraic exponent ${\eta }_c=1/4$. Both phases have zero conventional spontaneous magnetization at positive temperature; they differ in vortex binding, correlations and stiffness.^[ref]

At an end, $x=0$, the on-axis magnetic field of a finite solenoid isAt its centre, $x=L/2$, it isThe ratio is thereforeFor a long solenoid, $B_{\mathrm{centre}}\simeq {\mu }_{0}NI/L$ and $B_{\mathrm{end}}\simeq {\mu }_{0}NI/(2L)$. For a very short solenoid, the ratio tends to one, providing a separate check: its centre and end become nearly coincident compared with its radius.

Use the principle of dark-field microscopy: block the unscattered beam where it is concentrated, while transmitting most light scattering at nonzero angles. All direct light rays of the collimated illumination are parallel, so the thin lens focuses them to one point in its back focal plane. Put a small opaque circular stop centred on that point, one focal length behind the optical lens. In the real image geometry above this is $11.719\mathrm{mm}$ behind the optical lens, well before the real image at $187.5\mathrm{mm}$.

A light ray leaving object coordinate $y$ with a small initial direction $\theta$ reaches the optical lens at $y+u\theta$. The thin lens changes its direction to $\theta -(y+u\theta )/f$. At the back focal plane its coordinate is thereforeThus direct illumination with $\theta =0$ is concentrated at the centre, whereas scattered light at different directions is distributed away from it, independently of $y$. A stop of radius $r_s$ removes approximately $|\theta |\lesssim r_s/f$; choose it just large enough to cover the direct beam's finite diffraction spot, illumination divergence and alignment errors. Scattered light inside that small angular cone is also lost, so negligible loss requires most useful scattered light to lie outside it. A stop in the object's real image plane instead removes object detail and does not generally separate scattered and direct light. For the virtual image interpretation, the same physical back focal plane filtering requires a downstream observation arrangement that actually passes through this plane.

The wavelength at $12\mathrm{GHz}$ is $\lambda =c/f\simeq 0.0250\mathrm{m}$. For an ideal circular aperture of diameter $D=0.850\mathrm{m}$, the Rayleigh criterion places one source at the first minimum of the other's Airy disk:The customary full-ring packing estimate for the number of resolvable positions in a geostationary orbit isThis is an ideal angular-packing estimate. It identifies apparent angular spacing with spacing around the orbital ring and disregards Earth's occultation and station location. An individual ground station cannot see the whole ring; exact conversion from orbital longitude to sky direction requires its location and the orbital radius. Also, a practical tapered antenna illumination changes the ideal circular-aperture response.

Let the original cylinder axis be $\mathbf{r}=0$, and let the hole axis be at transverse vector $\mathbf{a}$, with $|\mathbf{a}|=a$. The charge density is reproduced by a full cylinder of radius $R_1$ and charge density $+\rho$, superposed with a cylinder of radius $R_2$ centred at $\mathbf{a}$ and charge density $-\rho$. This uses the superposition principle for fixed insulating electric charges; the hole is not a hole in an electrical conductor.

For a complete uniformly charged infinite cylinder of radius $R$, a coaxial Gaussian surface of length $\ell$ gives, by Gauss's law,Consequently defineThe complete electric field, including the exterior if desired, isIn the insulating material, $|\mathbf{r}|<R_1$ and $s=|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{a}|>R_2$, soInside the hole both contributions use their interior formulas, and all dependence on $\mathbf{r}$ cancels:The electric field in the hole is uniform, points from the original axis towards the hole axis for $\rho >0$, and vanishes for a concentric hole. The two expressions agree at the hole wall, as expected with no imposed surface charge density there. Its uniformity is the useful uniform electric field in an off-axis cylindrical cavity result.

Take the grounded electrical conductor to occupy $z\le 0$ and approximate the negligible-radius charged sphere by a point charge $Q$ at ${\mathbf{r}}_{+}=D\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. Put a fictitious image charge $-Q$ at ${\mathbf{r}}_{-}=-D\hat{\mathbf{z}}$. The constructed electric potential is zero on $z=0$, has the correct point charge singularity, and vanishes at infinity. The uniqueness theorem for the electrostatic potential makes it the physical electric potential for $z>0$:Taking its negative gradient gives the requested electric field outside the small sphere:On the plane at cylindrical radius $r$, the tangential components cancel and the normal component isThe electrostatic boundary conditions at a conductor, with outward unit normal $+\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ and zero interior electric field, give the induced surface charge densityFinally integrate over annuli of area $2\pi rdr$:The image charge is a computational device, not a real charge below the plane. For a finite conducting sphere, its induced polarization would change the point-source approximation; the stated negligible radius is essential.

Use a circular Kepler orbit to eliminate the terrestrial gravitational parameter: $T^2/r^3$ is constant for both satellites. The reference orbital radius is $r_1=(6400+150)\mathrm{km}=6550\mathrm{km}$, measured from Earth's centre. A geostationary orbit is circular, equatorial and prograde, with the sidereal rotation period, approximately $86164\mathrm{s}$. ThusIts altitude is about $3.61\times 10^4\mathrm{km}$ above the stated surface. The approximate low-orbit input sets the accuracy; replacing it by a modern measured gravitational parameter would answer a different numerical estimate. A $24$-hour approximation changes the radius by less than $0.2\%$. Matching the period alone would not make an inclined or eccentric orbit stationary above one point.

An electric dipole has equal and opposite charges separated by a small vector from negative to positive, with electric dipole moment $\mathbf{p}=q\mathbf{d}$. More generally, a localized neutral distribution has $\mathbf{p}=\int {\mathbf{r}}^{\prime }\rho ({\mathbf{r}}^{\prime })d^3{r}^{\prime }$, independent of origin. At distances large compared with its size, the leading nonzero term in the multipole expansion isThe field points along $\mathbf{p}$ on either axial side and opposite $\mathbf{p}$ in the equatorial plane; its axial magnitude is twice the equatorial magnitude at equal radius. Near the charges the finite-charge expression must replace the far-field approximation.

A permanent dipole in an externally imposed slowly varying electrostatic field has interaction energy $-\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E}$, torque $\mathbf{\tau }=\mathbf{p}\times \mathbf{E}$ and force $\nabla (\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E})$ for fixed $\mathbf{p}$. A uniform field aligns it but gives no net force. For a linearly induced dipole $\mathbf{p}=\alpha \mathbf{E}$, the formation-inclusive energy is $-\alpha E^2/2$, not $-\alpha E^2$: the moment itself grows while the field is applied. Dipole density gives electric polarization, whose bound charges are ${\rho }_b=-\nabla \cdot \mathbf{P}$ and ${\sigma }_b=\mathbf{P}\cdot \hat{\mathbf{n}}$.

Kepler's laws of planetary motion state that, in the relative two-body description, bound trajectories are ellipses with the attracting body at a focus, the radius vector sweeps equal areas in equal times, and the square of the period is proportional to the cube of the semimajor axis for a fixed total mass. Their Newtonian derivation is especially informative. With relative coordinate $\mathbf{r}$ and ${\mu }_g=G(M+m)$, the inverse-square acceleration is $-{\mu }_g\mathbf{r}/r^3$. Its zero torque conserves $\mathbf{h}=\mathbf{r}\times \dot{\mathbf{r}}$, fixing a plane and the areal velocity $h/2$.

For $u=1/r$, the orbit equation is $u^{\prime \prime }+u={\mu }_g/h^2$ as a function of polar angle. ThereforeBound negative-energy motion has $0\le e<1$ and semilatus rectum $h^2/{\mu }_g=a(1-e^2)$. Dividing ellipse area by areal velocity givesFor a planet much lighter than its star, replace $M+m$ by $M$. Zero-energy and positive-energy encounters are parabolic and hyperbolic rather than periodic ellipses. Perturbations from other bodies and departures from point-mass Newtonian gravity can precess or otherwise modify the orbit; Kepler's laws are a two-body approximation, not an exact rule for every observed planetary path.

A rapidly spinning gyroscope approximately has angular momentum $\mathbf{L}=I_3{\omega }_3\hat{\mathbf{e}}$ along its axle. With no torque in an inertial frame, this vector retains its direction. A transverse torque changes its direction according to $d\mathbf{L}/dt=\mathbf{\tau }$; it does not initially push the axle in the direction of the applied force.

For a fixed pivot, centre of mass $l\hat{\mathbf{e}}$ from it and gravity $-Mg\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, the torque is $Mgl\hat{\mathbf{z}}\times \hat{\mathbf{e}}$. In slow steady precession about the vertical, $d\mathbf{L}/dt=\Omega \hat{\mathbf{z}}\times \mathbf{L}$, givingThe factor $\sin \theta$ appears both in torque and in the radius traced by the angular-momentum tip, so it cancels for a nonvertical axle. Reversing spin reverses this precession. The full symmetric-top steady condition is $I_1\cos \theta {\Omega }^2-I_3{\omega }_3\Omega +Mgl=0$; the approximation neglects its quadratic term. Sudden release can also produce nutation, so large spin alone does not guarantee a steady sweep.

A wheel-on-pivot experiment can compare precession periods at different measured spin speeds and reverse the spin. Keep the pivot and centre of mass fixed; bearing friction, spin decay, an initial push and support motion can mimic departures from the predicted inverse-spin relation. A freely gimballed direction reference and a gravity-loaded precessing wheel test different torque conditions.^[ref]

A fluid is described on a continuum scale by density, pressure and velocity fields. An Eulerian field is measured at fixed position; a material element changes at rate $D/Dt={\partial }_t+\mathbf{v}\cdot \nabla$. mass conservation requiresFor incompressible flow this becomes $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{v}=0$. A streamline is instantaneously tangent to velocity, whereas a pathline follows a particle through time; they coincide in a steady flow but need not in an unsteady one.

For an ideal inviscid fluid, pressure and body forces give the Euler equation. In the constant-density gravitational case,A stationary impermeable boundary requires zero normal velocity, but inviscid theory does not impose no slip. Taking its steady projection along a streamline gives $p/\rho +v^2/2+gz=\mathrm{constant}$. If the flow is also irrotational in the connected region, that constant is shared between streamlines. Inviscid does not mean irrotational: rotating ideal-fluid flows are possible. A velocity potential exists locally for an irrotational field, and in incompressible flow it obeys Laplace's equation. The Bernoulli assumptions must be checked before converting a pressure difference into a speed.^[ref]

Real fluids transmit shear stress. An incompressible Newtonian fluid with constant dynamic viscosity $\eta$ obeysThe constitutive shear stress is proportional to strain rate, and stationary solid boundaries usually impose no slip. viscosity diffuses vorticity and converts organized mechanical energy into heat; its local dissipation $2\eta e_{ij}{e}_{ij}$ is nonnegative. It cannot generally be included merely by changing the constant in a lossless Bernoulli equation.

In a long straight circular tube, steady fully developed laminar flow hasThis Hagen-Poiseuille equation follows by balancing the axial pressure gradient with viscous shear and setting $v_z(a)=0$. The parabolic profile, the fourth-power radius sensitivity and the pumping power $\Delta pQ$ are experimentally distinct consequences. Entrance regions, rough walls, non-Newtonian response or a changing temperature require additional modelling.

The Reynolds number $\mathrm{Re}=\rho UL/\eta$ compares inertia with viscosity. Small values favor creeping-flow balances; high values permit thin boundary layers, separation and turbulence, although transition depends on geometry and perturbations, not one universal critical number. At high Reynolds number an outer flow can be approximately inviscid while near-wall viscosity still determines drag. This resolves why a zero-drag ideal potential-flow model cannot predict the resistance of an ordinary moving body. In turbulent flow, fluctuating Reynolds stresses redistribute momentum and increase the required pressure drop; averaging the equations introduces closure requirements.

A controlled tube experiment measures pressure difference and collected volume per time while changing forcing. Use tracers or a velocity probe to test profile shape, allow sufficient entrance length, and monitor radius and temperature independently. Repeat with reversed flow and at several rates to test offsets and linearity. Dye mixing alone does not measure viscosity or establish a fully developed velocity profile. The original figure below separates a specified laminar velocity profile from an independent pressure/discharge measurement.

Choose the plate polarity so that the gap electric field points along $+z$ when $V>0$. Away from the plate edges, the quasistatic electromagnetic approximation gives $E_z=V_0\sin \omega t/d$. A circular Ampere-Maxwell law contour of radius $r<a$ then givesIt is displacement current, rather than a conduction current across the air, that supplies the enclosed current term. The direction follows the right-hand rule for increasing positive electric flux; it reverses every half cycle. In the ideal extension that sets the gap electric field to zero outside the plate footprint, $B_{\varphi }={\mu }_0{ϵ}_0\omega V_0{a}^2\cos \omega t/(2dr)$ for $r>a$. That extension is an edge approximation, not an exact exterior solution for finite plates. Neglect fringing field of a capacitor and retardation, requiring $d\ll a$ and $\omega a/c\ll 1$.

The Stefan–Boltzmann law gives solar luminosity $L_{\odot }=4\pi R_{\odot }^2\sigma T_{\odot }^4$. At orbital distance $r$, the incident irradiance is $\sigma T_{\odot }^4{R}_{\odot }^2/r^2$. A spherical absorber intercepts a disc of area $\pi R_M^2$ but radiates over $4\pi R_M^2$. Thus the uniform-temperature radiative equilibrium estimate isThe planetary radius cancels. This is a black-body radiation estimate with zero reflected fraction and complete redistribution of absorbed heat. More generally the balance fixes $⟨T^4{⟩}^{1/4}$, rather than the arithmetic mean of a nonuniform surface temperature. It excludes atmospheric heating and thermal lag; no measured surface temperature is inferred.

For fixed, magnetically linear geometry, self-inductance relates a coil's own magnetic flux linkage to its electric current, ${\Lambda }_i=L_i{I}_i$. mutual inductance relates the linkage in one coil to the current in the other, ${\Lambda }_{21}=M{I}_1$. These coefficients enter the induced electromotive forces through ${\mathcal{E}}_i=-d{\Lambda }_i/dt$; reversing a chosen winding orientation reverses the sign assigned to $M$.

In the ideal confined-field toroid, a circular magnetostatic Ampère law contour encloses $N_{1}I$, soWrite $w=b-a$ for the height of the square cross-section. The inductance of a rectangular-section toroid follows by integrating the magnetic flux density over that cross-section; it cannot be replaced by its value at an arbitrary mean radius:Consequently, for winding normals chosen consistently,The equality means complete shared magnetic flux linkage; with leakage one instead has $|M|<\sqrt{L_1{L}_2}$.

For the crack, use the radial-path approximation for a cracked toroid, with an air length $d$ on each path and core length $2\pi r-d$. Continuity of the normal magnetic flux density at a crack face gives $H_g={\mu }_r{H}_c$. HenceIntegrating the radial paths yieldsHere $q=1.5915\mathrm{cm}$ and $M_d/M_0=0.47079$: about a 53% reduction. The small ratio $d/a$ does not justify expanding in ${\mu }_{r}d/a$, which is about ten. The crack's low magnetic permeability gives appreciable magnetic reluctance. This is an estimate within a confined-flux model; actual redistribution near the slit is outside its accuracy. Narrow-gap circuit models assume small gap width relative to transverse dimensions and approximately directed flux.^[ref]

For the intact ring, ideal poloidal winding currents and the no-leakage boundary condition admit $\mathbf{H}=N_{1}I\hat{\mathbf{\varphi }}/(2\pi r)$ with zero radial and vertical components. It is curl-free inside the current-free core, divergence-free for uniform magnetic permeability, tangent to the core boundary, and has the required circulation; uniqueness of the Neumann problem removes an additional homogeneous scalar-potential field. This explains zero non-azimuthal components in the stipulated intact-ring idealization. A literal slit breaks that rotational symmetry, so zero transverse components everywhere is not exact for the cracked ring: magnetic fringing and flux redistribution occur. In fact, extending the approximate $B(r)\propto 1/(r+q)$ unchanged around a current-free core would give $[\nabla \times \mathbf{H}{]}_z\ne 0$. Thus that radial-path calculation and a claim of exact purely azimuthal field in the cracked geometry cannot both be exact. The numerical answer above retains the intended circuit approximation while making its limitation explicit.

For a repulsive inverse-square force, $V(r)=+\kappa /r$. The effective potential is positive and decreases from infinity to zero, so a trajectory reaching a finite radius has $E>0$. For nonzero angular momentum, it is the accessible branch of a hyperbola, with $e^2=1+2E{J}^2/(m{\kappa }^2)>1$. There are no bound ellipses or finite-distance zero-energy parabolas. At zero angular momentum, the motion is straight inward followed by straight outward after reflection at a radial turning point.

For the scattering calculation, take the heavy target as fixed and define $\kappa =2Z{e}^2/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)>0$. The incoming kinetic energy and angular momentum are $E=m{v}^2/2$ and $J=mvb$. In the original sketch, the horizontal dashed incoming asymptote has perpendicular distance $b$ from the nucleus, while $d$ is the radius from the nucleus to the point where $\dot{r}=0$.

At closest approach, the velocity is tangential and $v_t=J/(md)=vb/d$. conservation of energy givesChoose the positive root and put $s=\kappa /(m{v}^2)$:Head-on incidence gives $d_{\mathrm{rep}}=2s$, and repulsion always gives $d_{\mathrm{rep}}>b$. With an attractive Coulomb force, change the sign of the potential term:For $b>0$, the attractive and repulsive inverse-square closest approaches obey $d_{\mathrm{att}}{d}_{\mathrm{rep}}=b^2$. For $b=0$ attraction causes a collision with the point centre, so $d=0$ is a singular endpoint, not a regular scattering turning point. Finite nuclear size is excluded by the stated point-force model.

For the repulsive inverse-cube central force $\mathbf{F}={\kappa }_3\hat{\mathbf{r}}/r^3$, the torque vanishes, $\mathbf{r}\times \mathbf{F}=0$, and angular momentum is still conserved. Its potential energy is $+{\kappa }_3/(2r^2)$, since $-dV/dr=+{\kappa }_3/r^3$. ThusThe new coefficient is denoted ${\kappa }_3$ because its units are $\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^3$, unlike the $\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^2$ units of the inverse-square coefficient. Conserving angular momentum depends on centrality, not on a particular radial power law.

Applying Gauss's law for magnetism to a pillbox and Ampère's law to an interface-crossing rectangle givesHere $\hat{n}$ points from material 1 to 2 and ${\mathbf{K}}_f$ is free surface current. With no such current, $B_n$ and $H_t$ are continuous. For linear isotropic media, $B_{t2}/{\mu }_2=B_{t1}/{\mu }_1$ and ${\mu }_2{H}_{n2}={\mu }_1{H}_{n1}$. The magnetic fields need not have equal magnitudes on either side.

With negligible leakage, Gauss's law for magnetism makes each cross-section of a magnetic flux tube carry the same flux $\mathcal{F}$. High permeability guides it through the core; a short gap permits neglect of fringing. Flux conservation across these particular geometric sections is an approximation, not a consequence of zero divergence without controlling side leakage.

Let $L$ be the constant-radius arc marked in the figure, and ${\mu }_r=\mu /{\mu }_0$. For each straight taper, the radius changes linearly from $R$ to $r$, giving the reluctance of a conical magnetic poleSumming magnetic reluctances to find the gap field of a tapered electromagnet, and using $B_g=\mathcal{F}/(\pi r^2)$ givesIf $L$ is instead defined as the total magnetic-material length, replace the displayed uniform-arc length by $L-2s$. The comparison untapered core has uniform radius $R$ and material length $L+2s$, soThe original PDF specifies $s/L\ll r/R$; the TeX transcription reverses this inequality. In the printed limit the taper reluctances are small relative to that of the broad arc. The gain is approximately $[h+L/{\mu }_r]/[h+L{r}^2/({\mu }_r{R}^2)]$, approaching $(R/r{)}^2$ if the gap reluctance is also negligible. If the gap dominates, both fields instead approach $NI/h$ and the gain approaches one. magnetic saturation near the small poles, gap fringing, leakage and winding heating limit practical enhancement.