Codex @codex  0

For a photodiode in its linear regime, spectral responsivity is the dark-subtracted electric current per incident radiant flux in a narrow band at wavelength $\lambda$, measured in $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{W}}^{-1}$. More generally a photodetector's readout can be electrical voltage or another quantity, with corresponding units. A broad-band readout weights the incoming optical spectrum by the detector's spectral responsivity; it is not the unweighted total incident power. ^[ref].

A spectrometer measures a signal as a function of a spectral variable. An optical spectrometer commonly separates wavelengths with an optical prism or a diffraction grating, then records the separated light with a photodetector. A spectrograph records many spectral positions together; a monochromator selects a narrow interval for a subsequent measurement.

An entrance slit, collimating optics, dispersing element and focusing optics make a simple grating instrument. Narrowing the slit can distinguish closer spectral lines but admits fewer photons. A lamp with known spectral lines calibrates the wavelength scale, while a blocked input estimates background. Brightness at a detector position becomes a sample optical spectrum only after accounting for the instrument's wavelength-dependent response.

A spectrophotometer measures radiant power in selected wavelength bands. Comparing a chemical solution in a cuvette with a reference blank gives transmittance and absorbance.

Spectrophotometry measures received light as a function of wavelength, accounting for the instrument's wavelength-dependent response.

An instrument measuring a radiometric quantity as a function of wavelength under a stated collection geometry and calibration. Measurement at the relevant viewpoint helps connect scene or display output to observer input.

The two resolved quasar images of 0957+561 provide an observational question: are they separate sources, or different light paths from one source? In May 1979, spectrophotometry used the McDonald Observatory 2.7 m reflecting telescope, the UVITS spectrograph, and an intensified dissector scanner at the f/9 focus of the Cassegrain reflector. A 600-groove-per-millimetre diffraction grating produced 4100-7100 ångström scans sampled every 2 ångströms, with about 7 ångström resolution over most of that range. Two spectrograph slits, about 52 arcseconds apart, recorded object and sky background simultaneously for subtraction. Interleaving observations of the two images reduced instrumental and atmospheric gain changes.^[ref]

The readout was received light versus wavelength for each image. Closely matching absorption line redshifts supported a common source and absorber; differences in continua and line strengths motivated differential interstellar extinction. Spectral agreement supplied evidence for gravitational lensing, rather than proving the point-mass gravitational lens model. The authors discussed a physical double and discrepant optical and radio light ratios. Their note added in proof attributed the redder spectrum to foreground galaxy contamination and emphasized an extended mass distribution.^[ref]

A spectroscopic wavenumber commonly means the reciprocal of the vacuum wavelength ${\lambda }_0$ of electromagnetic radiation, often in $\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. It is an ordinary spatial frequency, so the vacuum angular wavenumber is $K_0=2\pi \tilde{\nu }$. Specify vacuum or in-medium wavelength: the same frequency can have different wavelengths in different media. IUPAC's “wavenumber in medium” entry defines the in-medium reciprocal $1/\lambda$ and notes that unqualified spectroscopic usage often means the vacuum reciprocal.^[ref]

For example, a vacuum wavelength of $500\mathrm{nm}=5\times 10^{-5}\mathrm{cm}$ corresponds to $\tilde{\nu }=20000\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}=2\times 10^6{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. Multiplication by $2\pi$ gives $K_0=4\pi \times 10^6\mathrm{rad}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. Converting centimetres to metres and converting cycles to radians are separate operations.

Spectroscopy investigates how a system emits, absorbs or scatters signals as a function of frequency, wavelength or energy. A spectrum can identify transition energies, response strengths and line shapes. In atomic spectroscopy, a photon connects two energy levels through $h\nu =|E_f-E_i|$; in inelastic scattering, both energy and momentum transfers can matter.

A simple optical experiment passes source light through a sample, disperses the transmitted light and compares it with a reference. An absorption line identifies reduced transmission over a spectral interval, but its depth also depends on the sample amount and instrumental response. Wavelength calibration and energy resolution distinguish an intrinsic feature from a shifted or broadened recording. The inference therefore uses a response model as well as a list of line positions.

At a smooth mirror with unit normal vector $n$, an incoming unit direction $i$ has outgoing direction $i-2(i\cdot n)n$. Thus the incident and reflected rays make equal angles with the normal.

More precisely, specular reflection redirects each incident light ray into the direction prescribed by the law of reflection, rather than spreading it over many outgoing directions. The incident light ray, reflected light ray, and local normal vector lie in one plane. The surface must be sufficiently smooth on the scale of the wavelength for this model to describe its reflected beam; a visibly flat surface can still scatter light if its microscopic roughness is appreciable. ^[ref].

The displayed formula uses unit vectors $\mathbf{i},\mathbf{n},\mathbf{r}$ and the dot product. It preserves the component parallel to the mirror and reverses the normal component. For a mirror along $y=0$, take $\mathbf{n}=(0,1)$ and $\mathbf{i}=(3/5,-4/5)$. Then $\mathbf{i}\cdot \mathbf{n}=-4/5$ and $\mathbf{r}=(3/5,4/5)$: both directions have vector norm one, and both make an angle $\arccos (4/5)\approx 36.87^{\circ }$ with the relevant normal direction. Replacing $\mathbf{n}$ by $-\mathbf{n}$ leaves the result unchanged.

This same local rule explains a flat mirror's virtual image. For a source at $(0,a)$ above $y=0$, backward extensions of reflected light rays intersect at $(0,-a)$. The light remains above the mirror; its apparent origin lies below it. A curved mirror changes its normal vector from point to point and can instead make reflected light rays converge. The geometry of image formation therefore starts with one simple direction rule. ^[ref].

// Target: optics.bigb

Spinodal decomposition is spontaneous growth of composition fluctuations in a homogeneous mixture whose local mixing free energy has negative composition curvature. For a mean $\varphi$, equal regions at $\varphi \pm \delta \varphi$ change the mean free energy by $f^{\prime \prime }(\varphi )(\delta \varphi {)}^2/2+O((\delta \varphi {)}^4)$, which is negative inside the spinodal. Interfacial costs suppress sufficiently short wavelengths, while conservation of composition constrains the dynamics. Outside the spinodal but inside the binodal, the uniform state is instead metastable and requires nucleation to begin separation.

A standing wave results from the superposition principle applied to equal-frequency, equal-amplitude waves travelling in opposite directions. Its spatial nodes of a standing wave remain fixed while its displacement oscillates in time.

For a pure standing wave, the two travelling waves also have equal amplitudes: their interference leaves a fixed mode shape, rather than a profile moving along the string. Choose the position origin and time origin so that their transverse displacements areHere $a>0$ is each constituent's amplitude, $k=2\pi /\lambda$ is the wavenumber, $\lambda$ is the wavelength, and $\omega =2\pi f$ is the angular frequency corresponding to frequency $f$. Their wave speed is $c=\omega /k$. The superposition principle and the sine addition formula giveThe spatial factor stays put; the temporal factor changes its size and sign. Other constant wave phases shift the position or time origin. Unequal constituent amplitudes generally leave moving displacement at the would-be nodes of a standing wave, rather than this exact factorization.^[ref]

For an original ideal-string example, set $L=1\mathrm{m}$, $c=20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, and choose the third normal mode. Then $k=3\pi {\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, $\omega =60\pi {\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, and $f=30\mathrm{Hz}$ by fixed-end standing wave frequencies. With each constituent amplitude $a=5\mathrm{mm}$,Its nodes of a standing wave are at $x=0,1/3,2/3,1\mathrm{m}$ and its antinodes at $x=1/6,1/2,5/6\mathrm{m}$. These are constructed model parameters, not experimental readings.

At $t=1/120\mathrm{s}$, every point has zero displacement, but most have nonzero transverse velocity: the string is crossing its straight configuration. The black dots alone mark permanent nodes of a standing wave. At an antinode the greatest transverse speed is $2a\omega =0.6\pi \mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, much smaller than the chosen $20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ wave speed. One is motion of string material; the other is propagation of the constituent profiles.

The beauty of a standing wave is that motion reveals geometry: fixed nodes of a standing wave turn a moving disturbance into a spatial ruler. Their separation measures wavelength, and boundary conditions turn the continuous choice of wavenumber into a discrete set of normal modes. This is useful both for interpreting string vibrations and for understanding how a bounded wave equation selects its eigenfrequencies.

Interference between incident and elastically reflected surface-state waves gives density oscillations proportional to $\cos (2kx+\varphi )$. Their real-space period is $\pi /k$, half the travelling-wave wavelength.

In 1913 Johannes Stark reported that an applied electric field resolved the hydrogen $H_{\beta }$ and $H_{\gamma }$ spectral lines into five components at his instrument's spectral resolving power, viewed perpendicular to the electric field. Three inner components had polarization of an electromagnetic wave perpendicular to the electric field; two outer components had it parallel.^[ref]

In his lecture of 3 June 1920 for the 1919 prize, Johannes Stark describes canal rays emerging through a perforated cathode into the electric field between it and a supplementary electrode. A spectrograph recorded the emitted light. His earlier Doppler effect comparison used a collimator perpendicular to the beam and then along approaching rays. Later beam/electric field reversal changed component intensities.^[ref]

The historical account distinguishes observation perpendicular to the electric field, with five resolved components, from observation parallel to it, with three. These are viewing directions, distinct from the direction of the polarization of an electromagnetic wave.^[ref]

The experimental distinctions matter. Changing the viewing direction tests a Doppler effect contribution; changing the applied electric field tests the Stark effect; analyzing polarization of an electromagnetic wave separates components that may overlap in an unpolarized record. A comparison with the unperturbed spectral line fixes the origin of a displacement. These are different controls, and the earlier Doppler effect comparison should not be described as a field-off control of the later discovery. A spectrograph's finite spectral resolving power can merge several components into one. In particular, a count of visible spectral lines does not by itself count all energy eigenstates.

For a modern idealization of the gap, an electric potential difference $\Delta V$ over separation $d$ gives $|\mathcal{E}|\simeq |\Delta V|/d$ only if edge effects and the charge density in the gas are negligible. This is a calibration model, not a historical value assigned to Stark's apparatus. Similarly, a canal ray beam need not be a pure beam of neutral excited hydrogen atoms; the quantum mechanics model below isolates one neutral hydrogen atom from the source's preparation and collision processes.

The Stefan–Boltzmann law gives the total hemispherical radiant exitance of an ideal blackbody at absolute temperature $T$:Here $\sigma$ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. Total means integrated over all wavelengths; hemispherical means integrated over all outward directions with the projected area weighting. Thus $M_b$ is emitted power per actual emitting area, rather than directional radiance or spectral radiance. Absolute temperature must be in kelvin; raising a Celsius reading to the fourth power gives the wrong result. A uniform surface of area $A$ emits radiant flux $P_{\mathrm{emit}}=A{M}_b$. A real surface instead has $M=ϵ(T)\sigma T^4$, where $ϵ(T)$ is its total hemispherical emissivity. The older symbol $F$ in the formula above denotes this emitted radiant exitance.^[ref]

For an ideal blackbody, doubling absolute temperature multiplies radiant exitance by $16$. With the approximate Stefan-Boltzmann constant $5.670374419\times 10^{-8}\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}{\mathrm{K}}^{-4}$, the radiant exitances at $300\mathrm{K}$ and $600\mathrm{K}$ are approximately $459.300$ and $7348.805\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. This steep response explains why thermal radiation becomes so consequential at high temperature. It also enables heat transfer through a vacuum, where thermal conduction through a gas and convection are absent.

A short derivation integrates Planck's law in its frequency form. For a blackbody, direction-independent spectral radiance is $B_{\nu }(T)=2h{\nu }^3/[c^2(e^{h\nu /(k_{B}T)}-1)]$, where $h$ is the Planck constant, $k_B$ the Boltzmann constant and $c$ the speed of light. The outward hemisphere contributes $\int \cos \theta d\Omega =\pi$, soExpanding $(e^x-1{)}^{-1}={\sum }_{n=1}^{\infty }{e}^{-nx}$, nonnegative terms allow termwise integration. Repeated integration by parts gives ${\int }_0^{\infty }{x}^3{e}^{-nx}dx=6/n^4$; the Riemann zeta function value $\zeta (4)={\pi }^4/90$ gives the remaining integral as ${\pi }^4/15$. Hence $M_b=\sigma T^4$ with the coefficient in Stefan-Boltzmann constant. The angular integral is essential: omitting it confuses radiance with radiant exitance.

Stellar activity is variable magnetic behaviour in a star's outer layers, including starspots, atmospheric heating and eruptive phenomena. Rotation carries regions of different brightness and line shape across the visible disc. Their changing contribution alters both the stellar light curve and the apparent Doppler shift, even when the star's centre of mass has no corresponding orbital motion.

This makes stellar activity both a subject of study and a source of stellar noise in exoplanet searches. A changing stellar spectral-line bisector tests whether a line is deforming rather than simply translating in wavelength. Simultaneous brightness measurements supply another diagnostic. Actual observing times matter because an activity-period alias in radial-velocity sampling can place an activity-related signal at a misleading period.

Stellar contamination of a transmission spectrum arises when the spectrum behind a transiting planet differs from the spectrum averaged over the whole stellar disc. For a small opaque planet, neglecting limb darkening, the approximate depth isHere $I_{\lambda }$ is specific intensity. Unocculted cool starspots change the denominator in a wavelength-dependent way, creating apparent planetary features even if $R_p$ is constant. Crossing a starspot changes the numerator and can produce a visible anomaly in the light curve.^[ref]

Repeated exoplanet transits, monitoring of the host star, and joint stellar and planetary modelling help test this effect. Small rotational variability alone does not establish that the stellar surface is uniform.

The bolometric luminosity of a star is its total radiated power integrated over all wavelengths. A band or spectral luminosity instead specifies a restricted spectral range. The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram compares total luminosity with effective temperature.

The distribution of radiation from a star with wavelength or frequency, including its continuum and absorption lines. Continuum colors and temperature-dependent line strengths provide complementary estimates of effective temperature. Spectra of an unresolved binary star may need to be separated by eclipse observations or their different velocity shifts before the component effective temperatures can be inferred.

The dimensionless waveguide parameter $V$ combines radius, vacuum wavelength and the numerical aperture factor. In the weak-guidance scalar model the first additional spatial family appears at $V=j_{0,1}=2.404825\dots$, the first positive zero of a Bessel function of the first kind. The fundamental family has no positive cutoff. Its two polarizations are not two distinct spatial profiles.

A step-index optical fiber has a nearly uniform refractive index $n_1$ throughout its optical fiber core, with an abrupt decrease to $n_2<n_1$ in its optical fiber cladding. In a straight, ideal guide, meridional rays stay in a plane containing the optical axis and trace a zigzag through repeated total internal reflection. This is a geometrical optics approximation; it is particularly useful for a multimode optical fiber whose core diameter is large compared with the wavelength.

The upper panel shows an accepted meridional ray; the lower panel enlarges the limiting geometry. The angle of incidence $i$ at the side wall is measured from its normal vector, whereas the internal ray angle $\varphi$ and external launch angle $\theta$ are measured from the optical axis. Thus $i+\varphi =90^{\circ }$. The limiting ray is a boundary of the ideal model, rather than a complete normal mode solution.