Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 63 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use geometrized units with initially, and write , . The given nonextremality assumption makes . Thus the static Killing vector field has a simple zero of its norm atThe exterior is static. For radial null geodesics, , independently of . With , the metric iswhich is regular at since . The outgoing null equation is . Inside the future horizon these rays move to smaller radius, while outside they can escape to infinity. Hence the zero is the event horizon. The inner zero of is not another regular Killing horizon: the Killing norm there diverges rather than vanishes. The strict charge bound matters when making the regular extension.
For the Euclidean black-hole regularity condition, continue , consistent with the sign of the given quantum time-translation operator. Set . To leading order and , so the radial–time part of the Euclidean metric isIntroduce the radial proper length coordinate by . ThenThe first two terms are a polar plane with angle . Smoothness at its origin requiresA different period would make a conical singularity. The time coordinate is normalized to proper time at infinity, so no further asymptotic redshift factor is needed. The cancellation of proves the charge independence of the Euclidean horizon period under a regular radial conformal factor; this argument would fail at .
To justify the thermal interpretation, analytic continuation of the time-evolution operator gives . Its matrix element is an imaginary-time propagation kernel. Identifying the initial and final configurations and integrating over them takes its trace, giving the Euclidean path integral . In an energy eigenbasis each state has weight , exactly the Boltzmann factor of a canonical ensemble. Thus the geometrically required period is the inverse Hawking temperature. With dimensions restored, an imaginary time period gives . ConsequentlyHere is mass in ordinary units; for a neutral hole and the physical imaginary-time period is . Bosonic thermal fields are periodic and fermionic fields antiperiodic over that same Euclidean period. The relation to the canonical density operator, not just dimensional reasoning, identifies the temperature.
For an evaporation estimate take a neutral, isolated Schwarzschild black hole and approximate its radiated power with the Stefan–Boltzmann law. Its area is , and the photon Stefan-Boltzmann constant is . Substituting the temperature givesThe black-hole evaporation speeds up as the mass decreases. Integrating, rather than dividing the initial rest energy by the initial power, givesThe corresponding initial Hawking temperature is about K. This is the Stefan-Boltzmann estimate of Schwarzschild evaporation time at the level of accuracy requested. Greybody factors and other emitted species alter the numerical coefficient, but not the leading cubic scaling of a large isolated hole. The estimate assumes negligible accretion or ambient radiation absorption; a stellar-mass hole in the present cosmic radiation bath is not currently losing mass at that isolated-hole rate. Finally the semiclassical formula does not describe the Planck-scale endpoint: extrapolating it to zero mass is an estimate of the macroscopic lifetime, not a proof of what the final quantum object is.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 45 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For the Gaussian critical exponents, use dimensionless statistical-action conventions, with the Boltzmann factor . If is an energy, apply the following to and absorb that smooth factor into the couplings. Choose the Fourier transform conventionReality gives . The Fourier-space statistical Hamiltonian isThe source term is not multiplied by one half. Completing the Gaussian functional integral gives and the connected Fourier-space two-point correlation functionAssume for the stable massive Gaussian field theory. In the continuum long-distance theory, the real-space correlation function is the Green kernel of . Away from its source, a radial ansatz gives, at large , . Equivalently the propagator pole is at . Thus the exponential correlation length isAt the correlation length diverges. A sharp momentum regulator itself introduces artificial oscillatory long-distance tails; this length describes the physical continuum pole or a local/smoothly regulated model on distances large compared with .
For a momentum-shell renormalization group step with , split the Fourier modes into retained modes and eliminated modes . Define as the retained field. Integrating the eliminated modes is exact for a Gaussian field theory; a uniform source acts only on the zero mode, so this integration produces a field-independent free-energy term. Rescale and set . The retained quadratic action becomesKeeping the gradient coefficient fixed requires . For , the source term is , so the complete Gaussian rescaling isThe corresponding real-space field obeys ; confusing that real-space factor with would change the source exponent incorrectly.
Let be free energy per original volume, with proportional to . Rescaled volume is , so the Gaussian free-energy scaling relation isA field-normalisation Jacobian can be included in the field-independent shell term. For any finite step on positive-mass modes, that background is analytic near . Subtract regular backgrounds and choose on the massive side. The usual homogeneous singular scaling then givesThese are Gaussian critical exponents for the stipulated Gaussian approximation. A useful check is its source-dependent contribution : gives precisely that power of .
There is a qualification to a strictly pure-power singular free energy. The Gaussian free-energy logarithm at effective dimension two in contains after subtracting analytic terms. Thus the displayed exponent assignments remain the formal power indices, but at the advertised homogeneous expression needs this additive logarithmic term. A purely quadratic theory also cannot stabilise the ordered phase or the zero-mass zero mode at nonzero ; the scaling calculation is taken from , and an ordered-phase continuation requires stabilising interactions.
At a uniaxial Lifshitz point, the quadratic kernel instead isThe vanishing coefficient of is an additional tuning that distinguishes this Lifshitz point from an ordinary critical point. Use a factorised cutoff, retain and , and integrate its complement. A rectangular or cylindrical retained region is suitable; its precise boundary is not an exponent. This is a uniaxial Lifshitz Gaussian renormalization step.
Set , , and . The momentum measure acquires . Keeping both kinetic coefficients fixed requiresTherefore the anisotropic blocking and source factors areThe anisotropic effective dimension is : one parallel coordinate contributes half the scaling weight of a perpendicular coordinate. The rescaled-volume factor is , soChoosing gives the requested Lifshitz Gaussian exponents:Again , checking the uniform-source susceptibility. The associated length powers are and . A Gaussian determinant has the analogous logarithmic exception if its effective dimension equals 2. Interactions can alter these exponents; dimensional rescaling here solves the specified Gaussian model.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 303 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Take the couplings in the Hamiltonian to include inverse temperature, so the Boltzmann factor is . If physical energies are used instead, first replace by their products with . Split the on-site term equally between its two bonds. For spin states the spin-chain transfer matrix has entriesUsing the specified coupling coordinates, in the order this isFor example, and . This is the nearest-neighbour Blume–Emery–Griffiths model with an additive constant and the paper's sign convention for .
Summing the periodic spin chain gives the partition function . For finite real couplings all entries of are strictly positive; the Perron–Frobenius theorem gives a unique positive dominant eigenvalue with for . Since is a symmetric matrix, all its eigenvalues are real. Thus in the thermodynamic limit,The positivity condition is stronger and more useful than mere ordering by signed value: subdominant eigenvalues can be negative. Also, the printed strict ordering between the other two is not guaranteed for all couplings. For instance, makes the positive constant matrix with two equal zero eigenvalues. Degeneracy there does not affect the largest-eigenvalue limit; no explicit generic eigenvalues are needed.
For spin magnetization, introduce a dimensionless field through , or insert into the trace. Thenwhere is a normalized eigenvector of the largest eigenvalue and . Spin inversion symmetry gives , since the positive eigenvector of the largest eigenvalue is unique. Thereforeat zero field, both at finite and in the finite-coupling thermodynamic limit. The finite- result follows directly by pairing each configuration with its spin-reversed partner. Eigenvalues at a single fixed field do not determine a general observable: a field derivative of the largest eigenvalue, or its eigenvector, is required. Positivity and the real analytic dependence on the couplings exclude a finite-temperature spontaneous symmetry breaking transition in this one-dimensional finite-range chain; singular zero-temperature coupling limits require separate treatment.
For even , spin decimation on alternate sites sums the middle spin of each two-bond segment, hence the coarse spin-chain transfer matrix is . DefineDirect multiplication gives . Matching its entry ratios to the original parameterization yields the spin-1 chain decimation recursionThe remaining overall positive factor is absorbed into . Keeping that factor preserves the free energy as well as normalized spin probabilities. Indeed , exactly; on an odd ring an unmatched boundary segment needs separate handling rather than assuming a uniform two-site block decomposition.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 3 14B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
In chemical equilibrium, the reaction obeys chemical-potential balance for ionizationbecause a photon gas in equilibrium has photon chemical potential . Applying the given nonrelativistic Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution to each massive species givesThe Hydrogen binding energy is in units with . Thus Saha's equation isFor ground-state hydrogen, and , so the degeneracy factor is one. Since , the translational factor is commonly written .
Charge neutrality gives . Write . Thenand henceCombining this with the stated photon density produces
In our universe the baryon-to-photon ratio is tiny, so there are roughly photons per baryon. Even when the mean photon energy is far below , the high-energy blackbody radiation tail contains enough ionizing photons to suppress neutral hydrogen. The recombination temperature is reached only after the Boltzmann factor overwhelms this large photon-to-baryon ratio, at .
For a universe with , take the degeneracy factor as one, , and define . Neutral formation occurs when the boxed ratio is of order one, giving approximatelyWith and , this gives and thereforeto order unity. This is much hotter than recombination in our universe because there is no enormous excess of photons, but it remains below because the electron's large translational phase space still favours the ionized state.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 344 3 f Solution 2026-09-28
A subcritical droplet must make a rare thermal fluctuation from the metastable basin over the free-energy barrier . Its probability carries the Boltzmann factor , so the nucleation rate has the Arrhenius formFor a volume containing order one candidate subcritical droplet, the waiting time for a supercritical droplet and subsequent macroscopic growth is thereforeup to an algebraic kinetic prefactor. This is the Arrhenius nucleation time.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ii Paper 2 37A e Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
If a physical tension acts on a state of extension , its mechanical energy is . The canonical ensemble therefore assigns that state the Boltzmann factorComparison with the statistical weight givesEquivalently, is the thermodynamic conjugate variable to in the Gibbs free energy, just as pressure is conjugate to volume.
For a ferromagnetic nearest-neighbour Ising model on a chain let , and . The dimensionless Hamiltonian is . In one dimension, decimating every other spin closes exactly within the nearest-neighbour family, including its additive constant. This is the exact chain building block of the Migdal-Kadanoff approach; bond moving becomes an additional approximation in higher-dimensional lattices.
For exact zero-field Ising-chain decimation, sum over an intermediate spin between two retained spins:Parallel and antiparallel end spins give and . HenceFor an even periodic chain, . Rescaling the lattice spacing back to completes the renormalization step. Decimation of successive links gives , as follows by multiplying the transfer matrix times.
Let . Then on . The infinite-temperature renormalization-group fixed point attracts every ; the zero-temperature renormalization-group fixed point is unstable to heating, with slope two. There is no intermediate ferromagnetic renormalization-group fixed point. Equivalently for small , while for large finite . Thus there is no finite-temperature ordered thermodynamic phase in the short-range chain.
The domain-wall scaling coordinate of an Ising chain near is the domain-wall Boltzmann factor . Its recursion and the zero-field correlation length areSince , the recursion has the correct length scaling. Its exponent is one with respect to ; it is not a finite power of physical temperature about . In the thermodynamic limit, a bond is a domain wall with probability , giving the same exponentially large length scale. Their finite energy allows entropy to proliferate walls at any positive temperature.
Exact Ising-chain decimation and length
. Original one-dimensional recursion v'=v squared, finite-temperature iterates flowing to zero and the exact correlation length with its low-temperature asymptote. The coordinate v is tanh(J/kBT); no finite-temperature critical point is introduced. Details.The Ising-chain decimation constant matters for thermodynamics. With dimensionless free energy per spin ,The second expression follows independently from transfer eigenvalues and and satisfies the recursion. Multiplying it by restores the physical free energy. Dropping would preserve normalized retained-spin probabilities but lose the eliminated-spin entropy.
Finite-field Ising-chain decimation is also exact. Use the symmetric transfer matrixand read the new couplings fromHere , and . The latter off-diagonal entry, the field convention split between adjacent bonds and the constant must all be tracked consistently. Near the zero-temperature zero-field renormalization-group fixed point , while at the independent-spin field is unchanged.
In the higher-dimensional Migdal-Kadanoff approximation, moving bonds creates chains that can be decimated. With bond moving first on a -dimensional hypercubic lattice and length factor , the strengthened links have , giving the conventionFor no transverse bonds move, so this reduces to the exact chain result. In higher dimensions it discards geometric correlations and is generally approximate on the original lattice; moving and decimating in another order yields another approximation, not a contradictory exact chain formula.[ref]
Position Space Renormalization Group by Mehran Kardar. lecture 13, printed pp. 79–81, equations V.18–V.27: exact chain; lecture 14, printed pp. 86–87, equations V.51–V.54: bond-moving convention
Past exam of the physics A course of the University of Cambridge 2010 Paper 2 Section A 1 Solution 2026-10-20
As an estimate, model the confinement by an infinite square well of width and use the stipulated electron mass. Its energy eigenvalues are , , so the gap controlling thermal occupation of a quantum well isThus suppresses excitation: . For example makes this ratio below one percent in this model. There is no sharp cutoff. The ground state energy itself corresponds to about , but it is the excitation gap that enters the Boltzmann factor. Finite barrier height and a different effective mass would change the numerical scale; neither is supplied.
Past exam of the physics B course of the University of Cambridge 2017 Paper 2 Section C C12 Solution 2026-10-18
For a classical dilute ideal gas in thermal equilibrium, the probability of a single-particle velocity is proportional to the Boltzmann factor for kinetic energy, . Velocities with speed between and fill a spherical shell of velocity-space volume . The normalized Maxwell speed distribution is thereforeThe factor counts states, rather than representing an extra Boltzmann energy factor.
Set and use . Normalization cancels in ratios, so the given recurrence givesConsequentlyThe root mean square speed is larger than the mean speed, consistent with the positive variance of the speed distribution.
The expression is the canonical partition function for a system in thermal equilibrium with a large heat bath at fixed temperature . The system exchanges energy with the bath, while its particle number and external mechanical parameters, such as volume, are fixed. The bath is large enough that its temperature is not appreciably changed by this exchange.
The system has allowed energy levels . The index labels distinct energy values, and the integer degeneracy factor counts distinct quantum states with that same energy. is the Boltzmann constant, and is a state's Boltzmann factor. The dimensionless sum normalizes the probabilities:Thus the degeneracy multiplies the probability of occupying the level, not the probability assigned to each individual state within it.
The canonical model is not restricted to a classical ideal gas. It applies to a quantum rotor, for example, provided the sum counts all of that system's allowed states with their proper degeneracies. For a many-particle system, would be the energy of a many-particle state, with any quantum-statistical restrictions already built into the state count.
Write . Summing the Boltzmann factors gives the one-atom partition functionSince , the Brillouin magnetization formula isHere is the total magnetic moment used by the question; the magnetization per unit volume is . For independent distinguishable atoms, , with no indistinguishability factor.
Putting yieldsThe apparent singularities of the hyperbolic cotangents at cancel; the finite sum makes the zero-field limit explicit.[ref]
Statistical Physics by David Tong. Chapter 1: canonical partition functions and independent two-state systems
Past exam of the quantum condensed matter course of the University of Cambridge 2014 4 Solution Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
Nondegenerate carrier product. Assume three-dimensional parabolic energy bands near their extrema, spin degeneracy two, and no additional uncounted valley multiplicity. Near the conduction edge, a Boltzmann approximation to the Fermi-Dirac distribution givesAngular integration and the Gaussian radial integral yieldFor valence electron holes, the empty-state probability is . Measuring electron hole kinetic energy downwards from similarly givesThe factors two count spin once in each band. Multiplying cancels the chemical potential and proves the semiconductor mass-action law:In an intrinsic neutral semiconductor, . In a doped equilibrium semiconductor the same product holds under the stated nondegenerate assumptions, even when . Extra valleys or several valence branches must be included in the effective density-of-states factors rather than counted inconsistently.
Equilibrium junction. Put the p region on the left and the n region on the right. Before contact their majority carriers are electron holes and electrons, respectively. Diffusion initially sends electrons from n to p and electron holes from p to n. This leaves negative ionized acceptors on the p side and positive ionized donors on the n side, creating a depletion region and an electric field directed from n to p. At equilibrium this field balances diffusion, so the net electric current vanishes.
For a homojunction the gap remains constant while the conduction band and valence band edges bend downwards from p to n by . The equilibrium chemical potential is flat. Since , the electrostatic potential rises from p to n. The carrier profiles satisfyWith fully ionized nondegenerate dopants, the neutral p side has , , while the neutral n side has , . Thus the electron concentration rises across the junction and the electron hole concentration falls, with both small relative to the far-side majority densities in much of the depleted region. The ideal depletion approximation neglects these mobile populations when calculating the fixed space electric charge, but the actual equilibrium profiles are smooth.
Equilibrium band bending, a flat chemical potential and complementary electron/hole profiles across a homojunction
. Details. The built-in potential follows from these Boltzmann factors:There is no applied terminal bias; the internal electrostatic potential variation does not contradict a constant electrochemical potential.
Opposing carrier fluxes under reverse bias. Use for the magnitude of reverse bias and for reverse electric current, as in the PDF. The junction barrier increases by . The Shockley diode equation in that orientation can be writtenThe reverse-directed contribution is supplied by minority electrons on the p side and minority electron holes on the n side. They reach the depletion edge by diffusion and are swept across by the built-in field. The opposing contribution is associated with majority carriers thermally crossing the barrier in the forward direction; reverse bias suppresses it by the Boltzmann factor. At zero bias detailed balance makes the two equal, while at large enough reverse bias the opposing flux becomes negligible.
In the ideal neutral-region diffusion model,Here are minority-carrier diffusion coefficients, their diffusion lengths, and is junction area. The two terms inside this positive prefactor are the electron and electron hole contributions; both flow in the same reverse-current direction. This separates the two carrier-species contributions from the two opposing fluxes in the Shockley diode equation. Calling the saturation term a drift current refers to its passage across the depleted region, and does not eliminate the minority-carrier diffusion needed to supply it.
Reading the measured curves. At , the ideal equation gives , initially proportional to reverse electric potential difference. At , it approaches a plateau . The thermal electric potential differences at the three temperatures are about –, consistent with a rise at small reverse biases and near saturation at larger ones. Higher temperature produces a much larger plateau because thermal electron-hole excitation raises exponentially.
The lower-temperature curve has a noticeable residual electric potential difference dependence rather than a perfectly flat plateau. Depletion-region generation, surface leakage or other departures from the ideal diffusion model can contribute. The sharp upturn at the largest reverse electric potential differences is reverse breakdown, outside the unextended Shockley diode equation; the plot alone does not identify a unique microscopic breakdown mechanism. The original horizontal axis duplicates the final decade label, so a precise breakdown electric potential difference cannot be read reliably. Neither issue prevents estimating the gap from the intermediate-bias saturation region.
Band-gap estimate. Use plateau electric currents at a common intermediate reverse bias, away from both the small-bias rise and the breakdown upturn. Approximate readings are , –, and . Kelvin temperatures are required in the activation law.
For fixed effective masses, . If the remaining transport prefactor is approximately constant, extracting a semiconductor band gap from diode saturation current therefore usesUsing the widest temperature separation and the rounded readings givesNeglecting all algebraic prefactors and fitting instead gives about . These differ by roughly , a material correction on the graph's precision scale. Thus an honest graph-based conclusion isThe nonflat low-temperature plateau, rough electric current readings, unprovided temperature dependence of , and possible gap variation prevent a more precise extraction. If depletion-region generation dominated rather than the specified mechanism, its activation slope could involve a different energy scale; the displayed estimate explicitly uses the diffusion-dominated saturation model requested here.
For each pair of adjacent spins, define the transfer matrix for a classical spin chain by . Multiplying its entries gives the Boltzmann factor of a whole configuration. The periodic boundary condition identifies the last index with the first, soThe assumed interchange symmetry of makes a real symmetric matrix, hence it has an orthonormal eigenbasis. At finite positive temperature, every matrix entry is strictly positive, so the Perron–Frobenius theorem supplies a unique positive largest eigenvalue , larger in modulus than every other one. Therefore .
Local observables become matrix insertions. For example, with ,Thus partition functions and correlation functions reduce to a fixed-dimensional eigenvalue problem, rather than a sum over exponentially many microstates.
Let and use the two spin values as row and column labels. Define the spin-chain transfer matrixIt is a real symmetric matrix because ; every entry is strictly positive for finite bond energies at . The Boltzmann factor of a spin configuration factorizes into the product . Summing the intermediate spin labels is exactly matrix multiplication, and the final closure imposes periodic boundary conditions. ThusWriting , its eigenvalues areA positive-entry matrix need not have two positive eigenvalues; can be negative. The Perron–Frobenius theorem ensures here. Therefore the Helmholtz free energy is , and its value per spin in the thermodynamic limit is .
For an open chain there are bonds, with both endpoint Ising spins independently summed. Retain the same spin-chain transfer matrix, but replace the trace by endpoint vectors. With ,This follows directly by expanding the product of Boltzmann factors. If are orthonormal eigenvectors of the symmetric matrix , the equivalent spectral decomposition isFixed endpoint Ising spins replace the corresponding by a basis vector; extra endpoint energies replace its entries by the corresponding Boltzmann factors. The leading bulk Helmholtz free energy per spin agrees with the periodic result, because the boundary changes only subextensive terms. In particular, gives , as required for one free Ising spin.
For low temperature, factor out the largest Boltzmann factor from the dominant eigenvalue:Thus the Helmholtz free energy per site has the expansionDifferentiate at fixed , remembering that . The entropy per site isThe nonzero residual entropy comes from an exponentially large ground-state degeneracy, generated by geometrical frustration. A triangle with antiferromagnetic energy has minimum energy : if , the apex must have the opposite sign; if , either apex sign is permitted. The two all-equal configurations instead have energy . Thus exactly one of a minimum-energy triangle's bonds is frustrated. The bridge can simultaneously minimize its energy at by requiring , where is the next cell's first base spin.
For fixed and , the number of allowed apex choices is therefore two when and one when . The zero-temperature counting transfer matrix on successive first base spins isThe eigenvalues of are and . Dividing by the sites and taking the thermodynamic limit gives , independently confirming the derivative calculation. This does not assert a unique ordered ground state: the extensive choice of frustrated bonds is precisely what leaves entropy at zero temperature. At high temperature, all Ising spins become independent and per site.
For the sawtooth Ising chain, there is a source inconsistency: the printed Ising spin values are , with no definition of . The requested transfer matrix follows for , namely the usual Ising model with values . For arbitrary , summing an apex spin actually givesFor example, , and give the bracket , whereas the claimed hyperbolic cosine gives . Thus the printed identity is false literally. The rest of Question 1 uses the intended symmetric Ising spin values, .
For a fixed configuration of base spins, each apex spin appears in only one local Boltzmann factor. The apex spins are therefore conditionally independent, and their finite sums factorize:Only the base spins carry information from one triangle to the next. The apex spins have already been summed out, so no apex index remains in the transfer matrix; the final trace implements the periodic boundary condition.
Differentiate the Helmholtz free energy at fixed couplings. With from solution, the entropy per spin isIt is particularly useful to writeAt , this is , so . For fixed , the first exponential dominates alone, giving . Hence the residual entropy isThe finite positive difference must be kept fixed in the second limit; taking it to zero first gives the other answer.
At high temperature, and , whenceAll configurations become equally probable because their Boltzmann factors tend to one. The two available states per spin, rather than the coupling values, determine this entropy.
A nonzero superconducting energy gap suppresses the population of thermally excited quasiparticles. When , their Boltzmann factor produces an approximately activated electronic heat capacity,where the prefactor varies algebraically rather than exponentially. For the rough estimate requested, neglect its change between the two quoted temperatures. Taking a ratio eliminates its unknown magnitude:ThereforeThe corresponding excitation energy is . The units of the two heat-capacity readings cancel in their ratio.
This is a heat-capacity activation estimate, not an exact determination of a gap from two data points. More generally, if , the same measurements giveFor example, the low-temperature BCS theory form for a fully gapped isotropic superconductor has and would give about . The stated approximate data and constant-gap assumption support the simpler estimate; they do not specify a detailed density of states or heat-capacity prefactor. Here means the minimum quasiparticle excitation energy, rather than automatically twice that value.

