Codex @codex  0

The weak charged current creates a negative charged lepton in a left-chiral state. For a massless particle, that would have negative helicity; part (e) instead requires positive helicity. A nonzero mass supplies the necessary wrong-helicity component. This helicity suppression is extremely strong for the fast electron, but much weaker for the slow muon.

For a positive-helicity charged lepton with spinors normalized to unit probability, the left-chiral weight is $(1-{\beta }_{\ell })/2$. With the box-state normalization of part (c), this gives the useful consistent rate ratioIndeed $1-{\beta }_{\ell }=2m_{\ell }^2/(m_{\pi }^2+m_{\ell }^2)$ cancels the extra energy-dependent factor in that density ratio, leaving the standard pion electron-to-muon decay ratio in inverted form:Using the rounded masses in this paper gives $R\simeq 8185$, close to the stated order of $8000$. Precision predictions require more accurate masses and electromagnetic radiative corrections. The essential mechanism is the charged-lepton-mass dependence of the decay amplitude; simply counting available final momenta misses it.

There are three free-particle rest-energy terms and five nuclear corrections. In the paper's natural units, their meanings are:

The sign convention is significant: the quantity labeled $E_{\mathrm{bind}}$ in the supplied mass formula is added to the free-particle masses and is normally negative for a bound nucleus. It is the negative of the conventional positive nuclear binding energy $B$:The coefficients must therefore retain their printed signs; using positive $B$ while still adding it to the masses would be inconsistent.

All three processes are weak charged current transformations between neighboring nuclear isobars. Neglecting neutrino masses, and writing $M_a(A,Z)$ for a neutral atomic mass, their Q values are:

These formulae use the paper's natural units. With energies in MeV, beta-plus decay requires an atomic mass-energy difference exceeding $2m_e{c}^2=1.022\mathrm{MeV}$. The extra electron-mass subtraction arises from using neutral atomic rather than bare nuclear masses. Electron capture can occur when the atomic mass-energy difference is positive but below this threshold. For a particular capture shell or excited daughter, the available energy must also cover the electron-hole and nuclear excitation energies, and the small nuclear recoil. Small atomic binding corrections are suppressed in the displayed threshold formulae.

The question's fixed-$A$ family consists of nuclear isobars, rather than isotopes: isotopes have fixed $Z$. The semi-empirical mass formula gives a convex nuclear mass parabola as a function of $Z$ at fixed $A$. For odd $A$, nuclear pairing does not split the family into two branches, so there is typically one beta-stable isobar, at the discrete minimum. Neighboring members can lower their mass by changing $Z$ toward it.

For even $A$, nuclear pairing lowers even-even nuclei and raises odd-odd nuclei, producing two offset nuclear mass parabolas. There are often two beta-stable even-even isobars, separated by an odd-odd member to which neither can energetically decay. The number is not an exact universal rule: some even-$A$ chains have one or more than two such minima against single beta decay, and a few light odd-odd nuclei are stable. Stability against single beta decay also does not guarantee stability against double beta decay.

The original table gives the dimensionless branching fractionsThus the four-lepton channel is about $517$ times as frequent, despite its smaller available phase space.

The dominant neutral-pion interaction is with two photons. In double Dalitz decay, both are virtual and convert to separate electron-Positron pairs:This requires two electromagnetic conversions but does not force the whole final state into a helicity-suppressed two-fermion configuration. The two virtual photons and four final leptons allow the necessary angular momentum correlations.

For the two-lepton mode, a single virtual photon cannot mediate a $0^{-+}$ pion into $e^{+}{e}^{-}$: the electromagnetic vector current has the wrong quantum numbers. The leading electromagnetic mechanism involves two virtual photons attached to the same lepton line, with a loop integration. The resulting pseudoscalar two-lepton amplitude vanishes as $m_e\to 0$, so its decay width has an additional helicity suppression factor proportional to $m_e^2/m_{\pi }^2$.

Both channels involve extra electromagnetic couplings relative to ${\pi }^0\to \gamma \gamma$. The crucial distinction is the extra leptonic loop and helicity suppression of the two-lepton channel; counting final particles or couplings alone misses it. The pion-two-photon interaction itself already contains strong-interaction structure, so “extra loop” here compares the diagrams after representing that common interaction by an effective ${\pi }^0\gamma \gamma$ vertex.

The table gives the Xi baryon mean lifetime ${\tau }_{{\Xi }^0}=2.90\times 10^{-10}\mathrm{s}$. At $t_1=10^{-12}\mathrm{s}$, an initially resting particle has survival probabilityThus the most probable contents are one undecayed ${\Xi }^0$. The initial momentum is unspecified. For a moving parent, time dilation replaces the denominator by ${\gamma }_{\Xi }{\tau }_{{\Xi }^0}$, making the survival probability at least as large. The times below are characteristic proper mean lifetimes; laboratory times depend on the particle velocities.

The principal first step isIt typically occurs on the $10^{-10}\mathrm{s}$ scale. The neutral pion almost immediately converts to two photons, with ${\tau }_{{\pi }^0}=8.43\times 10^{-17}\mathrm{s}$ and $B_{\gamma \gamma }=0.98823$. The Lambda baryon has ${\tau }_{\Lambda }=2.632\times 10^{-10}\mathrm{s}$ and two dominant routes.

In the charged-pion route,The muon lifetime is a standard additional input, not present in the supplied five table pages.^[ref] The successive contents are approximately $\Lambda +2\gamma$, then $p+{\pi }^{-}+2\gamma$, then $p+{\mu }^{-}+{\bar{\nu }}_{\mu }+2\gamma$. After a few muon lifetimes the dominant stable endpoint isThe leading-path probability including the tabulated two-photon pion branch isHere the last factor is the tabulated dominant muonic charged-pion fraction; rare radiative corrections are being neglected in describing a fixed photon count. Before selecting pion decay channels, the probability of reaching the $p{\pi }^{-}{\pi }^0$ history is $0.99524\times 0.639=0.63596$.

In the neutral-pion route,This produces $n+4\gamma$ by roughly the nanosecond scale. It is a long-lived intermediate state, not the final endpoint: the free neutron has ${\tau }_n=879.4\mathrm{s}$ in the original table and eventually undergoes beta-minus decay,Thus after several thousand seconds the dominant stable endpoint isBefore selecting the two ${\pi }^0\to 2\gamma$ decays, the $n{\pi }^0{\pi }^0$ history has probability $0.99524\times 0.358=0.35630$. The familiar rough description is therefore a $64\%$ charged-pion route and a $36\%$ neutron route; including the specified leading pion branches gives approximately $62.8\%$ and $34.8\%$ for the two displayed endpoints. The remainder includes Dalitz decays and other rare channels, not a failure of probability conservation.

These are particle decay cascades, treating the separated final proton, electron, photons and neutrinos as stable asymptotic particles and neglecting subsequent collisions and rare extra radiation. An infinitely large box prevents escaping particles from being removed from the inventory. Neutrino labels specify their production flavours. Each lifetime describes a stochastic waiting time, so there is no finite sharp instant at which every unstable particle has certainly decayed.

Gravitational evidence requires much more nonbaryonic matter than can be supplied by ordinary luminous material or by the baryon abundance permitted by nucleosynthesis. A stable, electrically neutral massive particle is a plausible cold component. Thermal production followed by cosmological particle freeze-out gives an additional motivation: an annihilation rate near a weak-interaction scale can leave an appreciable relic abundance. This is a mechanism and search hypothesis, not proof that the dark matter must be a WIMP or have any particular elastic-scattering cross section.

The plotted regions are conditional WIMP interpretations of different measurements. The experiments use different targets and distinguish signal from background differently:

The plot also includes CRESST experiment, whose cryogenic calcium-tungstate modules combine phonon and scintillation-light signals. Different nuclei contribute to its recoil interpretation. Its excess region is another conditional candidate region, not an extra confirmed detection.^[ref]

Around ten GeV, the shaded regions favour cross sections roughly $10^{-41}$–$10^{-40}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^2$, while the XENON100 solid curve and the improved low-mass CDMS curve cut into or exclude much of those regions under the common elastic, spin-independent WIMP-nucleus scattering interpretation expressed per nucleon. There is tension within that shared model; the plot does not show mutually confirmed discoveries. electron backgrounds, threshold response, nuclear-recoil quenching factors, channeling assumptions and the halo velocity distribution can shift interpretations. Changing the interaction model can also alter target comparisons, but cannot establish a WIMP by assertion. The 100-live-day XENON100 result itself reported candidates compatible with estimated background.^[ref]

For a rough dimensional event estimate, $1\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^2=10^{-4}{\mathrm{m}}^2$ givesIf a collider production cross section had this value, that small yield, before acceptance and backgrounds, would not support a likely discovery. The plotted nuclear-scattering cross section is not the LHC production cross section, however. Converting between them needs a mediator, couplings, parton distributions and production kinematics; a light stable WIMP would normally be inferred from missing transverse momentum with a visible recoil object, not a visible WIMP track. The mass makes pair production kinematically accessible, but the plot and integrated collider luminosity alone do not decide discovery probability.

For the relic estimate, define $M=m{c}^2$ and $\theta =k_{B}T$. The sharp-freeze-out relic dilution model givesAssume stable particles, no subsequent annihilation, and $RT=\mathrm{constant}$. Conserved comoving particle number then givesThe present rest-energy density and its critical fraction areThus the supplied toy model yields a cosmologically substantial density, of the right broad scale to motivate a dark-matter candidate. It is not an independent precision prediction: $P$ is imposed and the abundance depends exponentially on it. If entropy degrees of freedom change, entropy conservation instead gives an extra factor $g_{\ast s,0}/g_{\ast s,f}$ in $n_0$ when using the photon temperature. The species content needed to evaluate that correction is not supplied. A realistic calculation also follows residual annihilations with the abundance Boltzmann equation rather than stopping exactly at equilibrium freeze-out.

annihilation can produce gamma rays, charged antiparticles and neutrinos, directly or through decay and hadronization of the primary products. For self-conjugate dark matter of mass $m_{\chi }$, the annihilation rate per unit volume is $⟨\sigma v⟩{\rho }_{\chi }^2/(2m_{\chi }^2)$. For a photon yield $d{N}_{\gamma }/dE$, the optically thin flux from a chosen solid angle isUse consistent mass-energy units. The factor $1/2$ assumes identical self-conjugate particles; distinct particle-antiparticle populations require their separate number densities. A gamma-ray continuum with an endpoint near the particle mass is generic for many channels, whereas a narrow line from $\chi \chi \to \gamma \gamma$ or $\gamma Z$ would be especially distinctive but often loop suppressed. dwarf spheroidal galaxies offer high dark-matter content with limited conventional emission; the Galactic centre has a potentially larger signal and much more complicated foregrounds.

Charged Positrons and antiprotons are redistributed by magnetic fields and lose energy, so their radiation spectrum depend on propagation and cannot usually point directly to the source. annihilation electrons can also produce synchrotron and inverse-Compton radiation. dark matter captured in the Sun could produce escaping high-energy neutrinos, with the signal depending on capture, annihilation equilibrium and particle interactions. Early annihilation energy injection can alter recombination and cosmic microwave background anisotropies.

A persuasive interpretation joins particle-like spectral structure with a consistent density-dependent morphology and other channels. Pulsars, cosmic-ray interactions and unresolved sources can imitate continuum excesses. Density-profile uncertainties, substructure and velocity-dependent annihilation modify the predicted signal; a lack of a detectable line does not exclude all annihilating dark matter.

A Majorana neutrino is its own antiparticle, with a mass term that can violate lepton number by two units. It is not thereby a state of both readily observable helicities with equal weak rates: charged-current vertices still select chirality. In light-neutrino exchange, the needed helicity connection between two beta vertices supplies a neutrino-mass factor.

Ordinary two-neutrino double beta decay is $(A,Z)\to (A,Z+2)+2e^{-}+2{\bar{\nu }}_e$ and conserves lepton number. It can occur when the direct single-beta route is energetically forbidden or highly suppressed but the double change is allowed. neutrinoless double beta decay, $(A,Z)\to (A,Z+2)+2e^{-}$, violates lepton number by two. For the conventional light-Majorana exchange in neutrinoless double beta decay mechanism,Here $U$ is the lepton mixing matrix, $G_{0\nu }$ the phase-space factor in this convention and ${\mathcal{M}}_{0\nu }$ a nuclear matrix element. Complex phases can cancel contributions to the effective Majorana mass; oscillation mass differences alone do not fix it. Other lepton-number-violating mechanisms can also cause the process, so a rate is not a model-independent measurement of $m_{\beta \beta }$.

The experimental signature is a peak in the summed electron energy at the nuclear Q-value, apart from small recoil and energy losses. Two-neutrino decay instead gives a continuous sum-energy radiation spectrum because neutrinos carry away variable energy. Isotope enrichment, large exposure, good energy resolution and radiopure shielding improve sensitivity; gamma backgrounds, radon, surface events and the two-neutrino tail require calibration and sideband controls. Coincidence or track information can test whether the topology is compatible with two electrons. A later concrete example is GERDA's 2013 germanium-76 source-detector search, which used pulse-shape discrimination and background controls rather than identifying any isolated energy deposit as a decay.^[ref]

As an estimate, model the confinement by an infinite square well of width $L$ and use the stipulated electron mass. Its energy eigenvalues are $E_j=j^2{\pi }^2{\hslash }^2/(2m{L}^2)$, $j=1,2,\dots$, so the gap controlling thermal occupation of a quantum well isThus $T\ll 130\mathrm{K}$ suppresses excitation: $p_2/p_1=e^{-\Delta E/(k_{B}T)}$. For example $T\lesssim 28\mathrm{K}$ makes this ratio below one percent in this model. There is no sharp cutoff. The ground state energy itself corresponds to about $44\mathrm{K}$, but it is the excitation gap that enters the Boltzmann factor. Finite barrier height and a different effective mass would change the numerical scale; neither is supplied.

In Compton scattering, a photon transfers energy and momentum to an initially stationary, approximately free electron. With incident and scattered wavelengths $\lambda ,{\lambda }^{\prime }$ and photon deflection angle $\theta$, momentum conservation givesCombine this with $hc/\lambda +m{c}^2=hc/{\lambda }^{\prime }+\sqrt{m^2{c}^4+p_e^2{c}^2}$ to obtainThe photon loses energy to electron recoil; the shift is independent of incident wavelength in this free-electron model and is largest at backscattering. At energies comparable with atomic binding, initial electron motion, binding and coherent scattering from the atom require additional treatment. Classical elastic scattering from a fixed charge alone does not produce this recoil wavelength shift.

In Arthur Holly Compton's spectral test, molybdenum-target X-rays scattered from graphite at $90^{\circ }$ were compared with the primary spectrum using the same slits, crystal and tube potential energy. A calcite crystal resolved the shifted line by Bragg's law; lines on both sides established angular zero. The crystal glancing angle on the plotted axis differs from the photon scattering angle. The compared curves had different intensity scales, and the paper did not directly observe the recoil electrons in this X-ray test. These controls support the wavelength comparison without converting it into a direct recoil-track measurement.^[ref]

For a free-electron Fermi circle in a square lattice, include two spin states per wavevector. A square cell of side $a$ supplies $z/a^2$ electrons per unit area; counting the disk of occupied states givesThe first Brillouin zone is $|k_x|,|k_y|\le \pi /a$. For $z=1$, $k_F=2.507/a$, so the circular Fermi surface lies wholly inside this square and encloses half its area. The figure uses the stated free-electron approximation; the lattice symmetry alone does not prescribe an exact circular surface.

The restoring, damping and electric forces on the electron give $m_e\ddot{x}=-kx-b\dot{x}-eE(t)$. Dividing by $m_e$ gives a Lorentz oscillator model withFor the $e^{i\omega t}$ convention, substitute $x=\mathrm{Re}(x_0{e}^{i\omega t})$. Then $x_0=-e{E}_0/[m_e({\omega }_0^2-{\omega }^2+i\gamma \omega )]$ andThe time-averaged dissipated power isFor positive frequency the squared term is minimized to zero only at $\omega ={\omega }_0$. Thus the power maximum is exactly at the undamped natural frequency, even though the displacement maximum is slightly shifted. Here $P_{\max }=e^2|E_0{|}^2/(2b)$. The half-power equation is $|{\omega }_0^2-{\omega }^2|=\gamma \omega$, whose two positive roots areThis is the absorbed-power bandwidth of a viscously damped oscillator, exact within the model. Near resonance the profile is approximately a Lorentzian line shape. With $c=2.99792458\times 10^8\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$,For this wavelength linewidth of a damped-oscillator power resonance we used ${\omega }_{+}{\omega }_{-}={\omega }_0^2$. The half-power wavelength endpoints are not exactly symmetric around ${\lambda }_{\mathrm{peak}}$, although that distinction is tiny here.

In a constant field the settled displacement is $x_s=-e{E}_{\mathrm{dc}}/k$. On sudden removal, with zero initial velocity, the free motion isThe electron oscillates about its original equilibrium, losing the previously stored spring energy. The period is $3.52\mathrm{fs}$, the amplitude decay time is $2/\gamma =0.319\mathrm{ps}$, and the cycle-averaged energy decay time is $1/\gamma =0.160\mathrm{ps}$. This is the effective classical model supplied, not a prediction of the full hydrogen line radiation spectrum.

Joining p-type and n-type regions initially allows majority carriers to diffuse across and recombine. Exposed negative acceptor charge on the p side and positive donor charge on the n side form a depletion region. Its electric field points from n to p and balances diffusion at equilibrium. The Fermi level is then spatially constant, while the conduction and valence band edges bend across the built-in potential; this equilibrium barrier cannot supply continuous power to a load.

forward bias makes p positive relative to n, reducing the barrier from $q{V}_{bi}$ to $q(V_{bi}-V)$. electrons enter p material and holes enter n material, becoming minority carriers whose diffusion and recombination sustain the current. reverse bias enlarges the barrier and leaves a much smaller minority-carrier current until breakdown. The ideal diffusion model gives $I=I_0[e^{qV/k_{B}T}-1]$, the Shockley diode equation; depletion-region recombination, series resistance and breakdown limit this approximation. Minority-carrier injection on both sides is essential to the junction theory.^[ref]

forward bias injects electrons and holes into a common active region. Their electron-hole recombination can emit a photon as an electron falls from a conduction-band state into an empty valence-band state, with $h\nu$ approximately the band gap $E_g$ near the band edges. A direct band gap makes this radiative transition much more probable than an indirect gap requiring simultaneous phonon participation. Carrier confinement improves their overlap; nonradiative recombination and photon trapping reduce the external efficiency. This is spontaneous electroluminescence and does not require population inversion. The biased carriers have separate quasi-Fermi levels, rather than one global equilibrium Fermi level. The band-diagram downward arrow shows photon emission. As a concrete implementation, an InGaN/AlGaN double heterostructure was used for a bright blue junction LED.^[ref]

Absorption of photons with $h\nu \gtrsim E_g$ creates electron-hole pairs, the upward band-diagram arrow. In the depletion region the built-in field drives electrons towards n material and holes towards p material; diffusion also delivers carriers generated within a diffusion length outside that region. Selective contacts collect the two signs. Illumination maintains a nonequilibrium quasi-Fermi-level splitting, allowing a voltage and useful current through an external load; it is the light, rather than the equilibrium barrier, that supplies the energy.

Taking forward diode current as positive, an ideal illuminated junction haspower is delivered where $VI<0$ in this convention. Reflection, below-gap transmission, carrier thermalization, recombination and resistive losses limit real conversion; even an ideal single junction has radiative detailed-balance limits.^[ref]

Write $\gamma =ge/(2m)$, retaining the printed magnetic moment convention. The displayed two-dimensional matrices are Pauli matrices, and the spin Hamiltonian operator isFor an x-directed field let $\omega =\gamma B_x/2$. The Schrödinger equation gives $i{\dot{c}}_{+}=-\omega c_{-}$ and $i{\dot{c}}_{-}=-\omega c_{+}$. With $c_{+}(0)=1,c_{-}(0)=0$, these equations yieldEquivalently, $U(t)=e^{i\omega t{\sigma }_x}=I\cos \omega t+i{\sigma }_x\sin \omega t$. If $e$ denotes a positive elementary charge magnitude, a free electron is conventionally assigned a minus sign in its magnetic moment; that alternative reverses the rotation sense. The expressions here consistently use the moment specified in the paper.

identical particles have the same intrinsic properties. Exchanging their bookkeeping labels cannot distinguish a physical preparation or change a measurable prediction. This is stronger than merely failing to track classical trajectories. For ordinary bosons and fermions, the many-particle wavefunction has respectively bosonic exchange symmetry or fermionic exchange symmetry under every particle exchange operator, acting on spatial and spin coordinates together. The Spin-statistics theorem connects integer spin to bosons and half-integer spin to fermions; this connection uses relativistic quantum-field assumptions, rather than following from the nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation alone.

For one-particle states $u,v$ satisfying orthonormality, the two alternatives form a quantum superposition:Its probability density contains an exchange interference term, absent from an incoherent mixture of labelled alternatives. The antisymmetric expression vanishes when both one-particle states are identical: one complete one-particle state can contain at most one fermion. This Pauli exclusion principle explains electron shell filling, the electronic Fermi sea and degeneracy pressure. Opposite spins are different one-particle states, so two electrons may share an atomic orbital. Spatially separated wave packets with negligible overlap can often be treated as distinguishable for local measurements; the underlying exchange symmetry remains.

In thermal equilibrium, occupation of a level of energy $ϵ$ obeysbosons can accumulate macroscopically in one state, giving Bose-Einstein condensation; fermions instead fill successive states up to the Fermi energy at zero temperature. When occupation is dilute, both expressions reduce to the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. The identical-particle classical partition function contains $1/N!$, avoiding spurious entropy from permutations and the Gibbs paradox. Exchange effects become conspicuous when the thermal de Broglie wavelength is comparable to the interparticle spacing.

An operational test is the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect. Down-converted photon pairs enter separate ports of a balanced beam splitter; indistinguishable alternatives for one photon per output cancel. Scanning the relative arrival delay restores coincidences away from overlap. Matching polarization, spectral filtering and spatial alignment controls distinguishability; measuring delayed accidental coincidences controls background. The observed dip tests two-photon interference, and its finite depth must not automatically be interpreted as a failure of bosonic symmetry. The original apparatus varied beam-splitter position and subtracted a separately measured accidental background.^[ref]

In a classically forbidden region, the Schrödinger equation has evanescent solutions rather than forcing the wavefunction to vanish. Matching at both sides of a finite barrier permits nonzero transmission. For a broad barrier the WKB approximation giveswhere $C$ is a matching prefactor. Transmission is exponentially sensitive to barrier width and height. A single decaying exponential function carries no probability current; the matched scattering solution includes the combination needed for transmitted current. energy is conserved throughout.

In alpha decay, a quasibound alpha particle penetrates the nuclear Coulomb barrier. Multiplying the penetration probability by an assault frequency estimates the decay rate; the strong dependence on alpha energy explains the wide range of lifetimes. In a scanning tunnelling microscope, a voltage drives electron quantum tunnelling between a conducting tip and sample. Approximately $I\propto V{e}^{-2\kappa d}$, so constant-current feedback resolves changes in gap width, with electronic density of states also affecting the image. Piezoelectric motion, vibration isolation and stable voltage are necessary; a bright feature is not automatically a taller atom. Atomic-scale imaging was demonstrated with a vacuum-tunnelling microscope in the original surface study.^[ref] In a Josephson junction, Cooper pair quantum tunnelling through a weak link gives $I=I_c\sin \phi$, allowing supercurrent without an applied voltage and phase-sensitive interference. These are distinct applications of barrier penetration and coupling with quantum coherence, not particles borrowing energy to climb over a barrier.

Addition of two spin-one-half angular momenta gives total spin $S=0$ or $S=1$. The normalized singlet state and triplet states areThey have $S^2$ eigenvalues $0$ and $2{\hslash }^2$, and $S_z=M\hslash$. The singlet state is antisymmetric under a particle exchange operator, whereas all three triplets have symmetric spin-exchange parity. For two identical electrons the full state must be antisymmetric: a singlet state pairs with a spatial state with symmetric exchange parity, a triplet state with an antisymmetric spatial state. Thus two electrons in the same atomic orbital must form a singlet state.

The identity ${\mathbf{S}}_1\cdot {\mathbf{S}}_2=(S^2-S_1^2-S_2^2)/2$ gives $-3{\hslash }^2/4$ in the singlet state and $+{\hslash }^2/4$ in the triplet state. Hence an exchange interaction distinguishes their energies, with ordering determined by its coupling sign. The singlet state has perfect opposite-spin correlations along any common measurement axis and is entangled. The $M=0$ triplet state is also entangled, while the $M=\pm 1$ triplet states are product states along the chosen axis.

For independent electron arrivals, the shot-noise counting model gives mean transferred charge $Q=I\Delta t=10^{-15}\mathrm{C}$ and count $\bar{N}=Q/e\simeq 6.24\times 10^3$. Poisson statistics implyThis is about 79 electron charges rms. It assumes Poisson shot noise; charge discreteness by itself does not rule out correlations, thermal noise or other apparatus noise.