Codex @codex  0

The differential form of Faraday's law of induction isBy Stokes theorem, for a stationary oriented circuit it becomes $\mathcal{E}=\oint \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{\ell }=-d{\Phi }_B/dt$, where ${\Phi }_B=\int \mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{S}$ is magnetic flux and $\mathcal{E}$ is electromotive force. Circuit orientation and surface normal obey the right-hand rule. Lenz's law is the physical meaning of the minus sign: the induced current's magnetic field opposes the change in linked magnetic flux. For a moving circuit, the force per unit electric charge is $\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$, and its line integral is the corresponding electromotive force. Motion through a static magnetic field can therefore induce a voltage even when ${\partial }_t\mathbf{B}=0$.

Let $\theta$ be the wire's angle from the downward vertical, $r=L\sin \theta$, and choose $\mathbf{\omega }$ and $\mathbf{B}$ upward, as in the figure. The motional term along the wire has radial component $B\omega s$ at cylindrical radius $s$. In steady electrical equilibrium, integrating from the grounded axis to the bob givesThe Lorentz force on this positive electric charge is radially outward. Its ratio to the required centripetal term is $QB/(m\omega )\lesssim C{B}^2{L}^2/(2m)$, so the stated heavy-bob condition makes its effect on the zero-field conical pendulum geometry negligible. With wire tension $T_w$, $T_w\cos \theta =mg$ and $T_w\sin \theta =m{\omega }^{2}r$, giving $\cos \theta =g/({\omega }^{2}L)$. Hence the magnetically charged conical pendulum hasA nonzero-radius orbit requires ${\omega }^{2}L>g$. Reversing the sense of rotation or the magnetic field reverses the sign of $Q_0$.

The response to the added electric field requires an electrical convention. In the usual mechanical approximation, treat the pre-existing electric charge as $Q_0$, include its upward electric force $Q_{0}E$, and neglect all magnetic-force feedback. ThenThis predicts an increased radius for $Q_{0}E>0$. It is the result when the newly applied field is used only as a probe force on the original electric charge.

There is a first-order qualification if the bob remains electrically connected to the grounded pivot and the uniform added field's potential is included consistently. Put $s=\cos \theta$ and set the external electric potential to zero at the pivot. The external potential at the bob is then $ELs$, so the charging relation and full force balance becomeThe second equation follows by eliminating the wire tension between vertical balance and radial balance, including the outward magnetic Lorentz force. Expanding both equations to first order in $E$, and to leading order in $C{B}^2{L}^2/m$, with $s_0=g/({\omega }^{2}L)$, givesThe extra factor arises from the added field changing $Q$ by $-CEL{s}_0$ and therefore changing the radial magnetic force. That term is linear in $E$ too; the heavy-bob assumption alone does not justify retaining $Q_{0}E$ while dropping it. The two expressions refer to the two electrical approximations just specified. The expansion requires a small change relative to the initial radius and is nonuniform as that radius tends to zero.

For an electrical measurement, route the grounded connection through a sensitive electrometer operated near zero input voltage, and integrate the charging electric current when $B$ or $\omega$ is changed. Starting with the field off, the transferred electric charge is $Q_0$ in this ideal capacitance model. Reversing $B$ separates the induced signal from offsets. Alternatively, isolate the charged bob briefly and measure its electric potential with a high-input-impedance electrometer, accounting for the instrument's extra capacitance and for the fact that isolation changes the electrical boundary condition.

An electric dipole consists of equal and opposite electric charges separated by a displacement $\mathbf{d}$. Its electric dipole moment is $\mathbf{p}=q\mathbf{d}$, directed from negative to positive electric charge. At distances large compared with the separation, its leading electric potential and electric field areThere is no monopole term because the net electric charge is zero. The axial electric field points along $\mathbf{p}$ with magnitude $2p/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^3)$, while the equatorial electric field points oppositely with half that magnitude.

A uniform applied electric field exerts zero net force on an ideal fixed electric dipole, but it exerts torque $\mathbf{\tau }=\mathbf{p}\times \mathbf{E}$. Its orientation-dependent potential energy is $U=-\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E}$, so alignment with the electric field is stable. A nonuniform applied electric field can also exert a net force, $\mathbf{F}=\nabla (\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E})$ for a fixed permanent electric dipole moment.

A permanent electric dipole moment exists without an applied electric field. An induced electric dipole moment instead develops in response to the local electric field; in an isotropic linear model $\mathbf{p}=\alpha \mathbf{E}$. Creating that induced moment requires accounting for the work of polarization, so its mechanical potential energy in a specified applied electric field is $-\alpha E^2/2$, rather than $-\alpha E^2$. In matter, the dipole moment per unit volume is the polarization density $\mathbf{P}$.

An electrostatic field calculation begins by specifying the charge information, material response and boundary conditions. In vacuum, prescribed volume and surface electric charge densities can be superposed directly using Coulomb's law. For a volume distribution,Differentiating this electric potential gives the electric field. This is useful for known source distributions, but in the presence of conductors the induced surface electric charge is usually an unknown rather than an independently specified input.

Gauss's law is especially effective when symmetry fixes the direction and magnitude of the electric field on a suitable closed surface. A spherical charge distribution gives a radial field, an infinitely long uniform line gives a cylindrical field, and a uniform infinite sheet gives a planar field. In an arbitrary geometry, the flux law remains true but does not alone determine the pointwise electric field. A multipole expansion is another useful approximation: far from a localized charge distribution, successive monopole, dipole and higher terms separate the effects of total charge and its spatial structure.

For a boundary-value formulation, use the electrostatic equationsThey imply Poisson equation ${\nabla }^2\varphi =-\rho /{ϵ}_0$, or Laplace equation where $\rho =0$. A conductor in electrostatic equilibrium is an equipotential with zero internal electric field. Its exterior normal electric field fixes the surface electric charge through $E_n=\sigma /{ϵ}_0$. One must specify whether each conductor is grounded, maintained at a prescribed voltage, or isolated with prescribed total electric charge.

Uniqueness of Poisson equation justifies methods that construct a convenient candidate solution. With fixed boundary electric potential and suitable behaviour at infinity, a solution satisfying the field equation is the solution. With normal-derivative boundary conditions, the source and flux must be compatible, and the electric potential is determined only up to an additive constant.

For example, a point charge $q$ a distance $h$ above a grounded infinite plane has the same upper-half-space electric potential as $q$ and a mirrored image charge $-q$ below it. Their potentials cancel on the plane. The image is a mathematical source in the excluded region, not a second physical charge. Separation of variables similarly constructs solutions suited to rectangular, cylindrical or spherical boundaries; matching coefficients enforces the prescribed boundary data.

In dielectrics, the distinction between total and free charge is essential. In a linear isotropic material,Only where permittivity is constant may this be reduced to ${\nabla }^2\varphi =-{\rho }_f/ϵ$. At an ordinary interface, $\varphi$ and the tangential electric field are continuous, while the jump in normal electric displacement field is the free surface charge. Applying Gauss's law to total charge with ${ϵ}_0$, or its displacement-field form to free charge, gives consistent descriptions; mixing their sources and permittivities does not.

A useful interface example is the image charge at a dielectric interface. If $q$ lies in medium 1, the source-side potential is represented bywhere $r_1$ is distance to the real charge and $r_2$ to its mirrored position. The other-side potential can be written ${\varphi }_2=q_t/(4\pi {ϵ}_2{r}_1)$, where $q_t=2{ϵ}_{2}q/({ϵ}_1+{ϵ}_2)$. Continuity of $\varphi$ and of normal $\mathbf{D}$ fixes both coefficients. The equal-permittivity limit gives no image; the conductor limit ${ϵ}_2\to \infty$ gives $q^{\prime }\to -q$.

For a sphere of radius $a$ and relative permittivity ${ϵ}_r$ in a uniform external electric field ${\mathbf{E}}_0$, matching the spherical solutions gives a uniform internal electric field and an external induced electric dipole moment:This illustrates how a material boundary modifies an otherwise simple applied electric field.

For complex boundaries or spatially varying materials, finite difference methods or the finite element method solve the same boundary value problem numerically. A sound calculation checks its boundary conditions, charge or flux balance and convergence with mesh refinement. The governing equations, source classification and uniqueness argument remain the organizing principles even when an analytic formula is unavailable.

Images and uniqueness. The method of images replaces a conducting boundary by fictitious charges outside the physical field region. Choose them so that the resulting electric potential satisfies the required conductor potentials. The Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem then guarantees the same physical exterior field. For example, a point charge $q$ at height $h$ above a grounded plane has an image $-q$ at height $-h$: the plane is an equipotential at zero, and the charge is attracted toward it by $q^2/(16\pi {\epsilon }_0{h}^2)$. The image is a computational device; the physical conductor carries a continuous induced surface charge density.

Potential of a line. Surround an infinite line charge $\lambda$ by a coaxial Gaussian cylinder of radius $r$ and length $L$. Gauss's law gives $E_r(2\pi rL)=\lambda L/{\epsilon }_0$, hence $E_r=\lambda /(2\pi {\epsilon }_{0}r)$. Integrating $E_r=-dV/dr$ givesWriting an additive constant instead is equivalent. The reference length makes the logarithm dimensionless; an isolated infinite line cannot be assigned a finite zero potential at infinity.

Locating the two lines. Put the grounded plane at $x=0$ and the physical cylinder at $(x,y)=(d,0)$, with axis along $z$ and radius $a<d$. Set $c=\sqrt{d^2-a^2}$, and place line charges $+\lambda$ and $-\lambda$ at $(c,0)$ and $(-c,0)$. If $R_{+}$ and $R_{-}$ are their distances from an observation point, the cylinder-plane image charges giveOn $x=0$, $R_{-}=R_{+}$, so $V=0$. To check the cylinder, define $q=(d+c)/a$. The level set $R_{-}=q{R}_{+}$ is a circle: completing the square givesSince $d^2-c^2=a^2$, its centre is $d$ and radius is $a$. The positive line lies inside the cylinder; the negative line lies behind the plane. There is consequently no fictitious charge in the exterior physical region. A Gaussian contour around the cylinder encloses $+\lambda$ only, so the required physical charge per unit length is also correct. These boundary conditions and the far-field behaviour determine the physical solution by Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem.

Cylinder voltage. The constant distance ratio on the cylinder immediately givesIts capacitance per unit length is $C^{\prime }=2\pi {\epsilon }_0/\mathrm{arcosh}(d/a)$. In the thin-cable limit, $\mathrm{arcosh}(d/a)\simeq \ln (2d/a)$.

Cable attraction. Because the cable is idealized as infinite, the meaningful answer is force per unit length. For $a=0.020\mathrm{m}$, centre height $d\simeq 10\mathrm{m}$ and $V_c=1.1\times 10^4\mathrm{V}$,The electrostatic attraction per unit length of a cylinder above a plane isFor example, this follows without any ambiguity about moving image positions from $F_d=\frac{1}{2}{V}_c^{2}d{C}^{\prime }/dd$ at fixed voltage, including the work of the voltage source. Its sign is negative because capacitance decreases with height. A cable length $L$ experiences approximately $fL$ downward when end effects are negligible. This is the electrostatic contribution only.

The boundary-value method. In a charge-free region, the electric potential obeys the Laplace equation, ${\nabla }^2\Phi =0$, and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \Phi$. Conductors impose equipotential boundaries, with specified voltages or charges, and a far-field condition fixes the remaining behaviour. The Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem guarantees that a solution meeting the prescribed conductor potentials is the physical one. To see why, the difference $w$ of two candidate solutions is harmonic and vanishes on the boundaries; integration by parts gives $\int |\nabla w{|}^{2}dV=0$, hence no difference in their fields. An exterior problem also needs the appropriate condition at infinity.

Two axisymmetric harmonic functions. For $\Phi =f(r)\cos \theta$ in spherical coordinates, the Laplacian reduces toFor $f=r$, the bracket is $2r-2r=0$. For $f=r^{-2}$, it is $2r^{-2}-2r^{-2}=0$. ThereforeThe second function is singular at the origin, which is allowed here because that point lies inside the excluded conductor. The printed spherical Laplacian has a typo in its azimuthal term: its denominator should be $r^2{\sin }^2\theta$. Both functions are axisymmetric, so that term vanishes and the typo does not affect these calculations.

Potential and field geometry. Set the lower conductor to zero potential and the distant upper plate to $V$. The small boss sees approximately uniform background field $-E_0\hat{\mathbf{z}}$, where $E_0=V/d$. Combining the two harmonic functions to make $\Phi =0$ on $r=a$ gives the conducting hemispherical protrusion in a uniform field,It also vanishes on the surrounding plane $z=0$. The electric field components areEquipotentials crowd near the apex, and field lines meet the conductor normally.

The formula has the correct uniform far field but does not exactly impose a flat upper equipotential at finite $d$. It is the leading approximation justified by $a\ll d$; an exact finite-gap solution would include further corrections.

The original PDF places this complete question before B6 without a visible question number. It is included here under a descriptive heading.

Why images work. In the method of images, place fictitious image charges outside the region where the physical electric field is required. Choose them so that the combined electric potential satisfies the conductor boundary conditions. The Uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem then proves that this construction gives the physical exterior field. The images do not describe the actual surface-charge locations.

Two examples are a charge $q$ above a grounded conducting plane, represented by $-q$ at the mirror point, and the image charge for a grounded conducting sphere used below. In each case the image lies inside the excluded conductor and makes its surface an equipotential of the required value.

Potential of the two charges. By the law of cosines, the distances from the observation point to charges at $x_j$ are $s_j=(r^2+x_j^2-2r{x}_j\cos \theta {)}^{1/2}$. The superposition principle and Coulomb's law therefore give

The grounded sphere. Set $r=a$ and require $s_1=\alpha s_2$ at every polar angle. Matching the coefficients of $\cos \theta$ and the constant terms givesThe useful noncoincident solution isIndeed $s_1=(a/x_2)s_2$ on the sphere, so the two potential terms cancel there. A Gaussian surface enclosing the sphere but not the external charge measures the total image charge in the exterior representation. Thus the physical induced net charge is

An isolated neutral sphere. The grounded image would give nonzero net charge. Add a central image $q_0=+aq/x_2$ to cancel it. A central image changes the surface potential by a constant, preserving the equipotential condition, whereas an arbitrary off-centre image would generally spoil it. The image charges for a neutral conducting sphere giveThe potential is measured relative to zero at infinity for each finite $x_2$.

Fixed applied field and dipole moment. For positive $q$ on the positive $x$ axis, the applied central field is ${\mathbf{E}}_0=-q\hat{\mathbf{x}}/(4\pi {\epsilon }_0{x}_2^2)$. The central image contributes no electric dipole moment, soIts units are coulomb metres. Keeping $E_0$ fixed makes $q/x_2^2$ constant, so this induced moment is independent of the distance.

The distant-charge limit. As $x_2\to \infty$ with $q/x_2^2$ fixed, the applied field becomes uniform over any fixed neighbourhood of the sphere. The neutral pair of opposite images approaches a point dipole of the finite moment above. The external potential contains a growing spatial constant $q/(4\pi {\epsilon }_0{x}_2)$, so the infinity-referenced conductor potential does not have a finite limit. Subtracting this irrelevant constant gives the usual induced charge on a conducting sphere in a uniform electric field; the exterior potential becomesThis has zero potential on the sphere, but a uniform applied field cannot simultaneously have its potential vanish at spatial infinity.

The method of images solves certain electrostatics problems by replacing a conductor by fictitious electric charges outside the region where the solution is required. The replacement must satisfy the actual boundary values of the electric potential as well as the prescribed sources. The uniqueness of Poisson equation then establishes that the constructed electric potential equals the physical one in that region. The image locations are mathematical devices; they are not real charges inside the metal.

For a point charge $q$ at $(0,0,a)$ above an infinite grounded conducting plane $z=0$, put an image charge $-q$ at $(0,0,-a)$. In a cylindrical coordinate system with coordinates $(s,z)$ the potential in the physical region isThis vanishes at $z=0$, has the required singularity at the real charge, and tends to zero at infinity. With electric field $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi$, the induced surface charge density follows from the normal field immediately above the conductor:The force on $q$ is the field of the image evaluated at the real charge:The electrostatic energy relative to infinite separation is $U=\frac{1}{2}q{\varphi }_{\mathrm{image}}=-q^2/(16\pi {ϵ}_{0}a)$. The factor $1/2$ accounts for the fact that the induced charge changes as the real charge is assembled; treating the image as an independently fixed physical charge would give the wrong energy.

A second standard geometry is a grounded conducting sphere of radius $b$ with a charge $q$ a distance $d>b$ from its centre. Its exterior field is generated by an image $q^{\prime }=-qb/d$ at distance $b^2/d$ from the centre on the line towards the real charge. On the sphere the distances to the real and image charges are in the ratio $d/b$, making their potentials cancel. For an isolated neutral sphere, an additional central image $+qb/d$ makes the total induced charge zero and leaves the surface an equipotential. The construction is powerful for suitable symmetric boundaries, but arbitrary boundaries do not in general admit a finite image system.

In electrostatic equilibrium a conductor has $\mathbf{E}=0$ throughout its bulk and constant electric potential on each connected component. Otherwise free charge would continue moving. Gauss's law then excludes bulk excess charge; it resides on surfaces. Just outside a conductor the tangential field vanishes and the normal jump isfor a vacuum interface with outward normal $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$. Surface charge rearranges in an external field to enforce these boundary conditions. Greater curvature often concentrates charge, but the actual distribution is a global boundary-value problem.

An empty closed cavity inside a conductor has constant potential and zero field, even in an external electrostatic field. If a charge $q$ is placed in the cavity, a Gaussian surface in the metal shows that the cavity wall carries total induced charge $-q$; its detailed distribution depends on geometry. An initially neutral isolated conductor then has $+q$ on its exterior surface. A grounded conductor can exchange charge with Earth, so this isolation condition no longer applies.

A useful example is a charge $q$ at height $d$ above an infinite grounded plane. In the physical half-space, the method of images replaces the induced charges by an image $-q$ at height $-d$, giving the attractive force $q^2/(16\pi {ϵ}_0{d}^2)$. The image is a mathematical construction, not an actual charge behind the conductor. Equipotential surfaces and charge conservation determine conductor fields together.

A field assigns a physical quantity to each point. Gravitational field is force per unit test mass; electric field is force per unit test charge. In a conservative, time-independent field,Write $U=m\Phi$ for gravitational potential $\Phi$, or $U=q\varphi$ for electric potential $\varphi$, giving $\mathbf{g}=-\nabla \Phi$ and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi$. A point mass has $U=-GMm/r$ with zero at infinity, while two point charges have $U=Qq/(4\pi {ϵ}_{0}r)$. Only potential-energy differences matter; a constant can be added freely. The mechanical energy $K+U$ is conserved if no nonconservative forces do work. A magnetic Lorentz force $q\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$ does no work on a point charge and generally cannot be represented by a position-only scalar potential energy.

A time-independent conservative force defines a conservative vector field on a domain when the work between two points is independent of path, equivalently when every closed-path work integral vanishes. Define a potential energy $U$ by $\boxed{\mathbf{F}=-\nabla U}$ and $U(B)-U(A)=-{\int }_A^B\mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{r}$. The additive constant is arbitrary; only differences affect work. A vanishing curl is necessary, and is sufficient on a simply connected domain under the usual smoothness assumptions. Local zero curl by itself need not guarantee a single-valued global potential on a domain with holes.

For a test mass outside a point or spherical mass, $U=-GMm/r$ with zero at infinity reproduces the inward gravitational force. Near a surface with approximately uniform downward gravity, $U=mgz$ when $z$ increases upward. A linear spring has $U=k{x}^2/2$. In electrostatics the electric potential is energy per unit charge, so $U=qV$ and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla V$; potential and potential energy have different units and roles.

For motion under a time-independent conservative force, $d(K+U)/dt=0$. nonconservative forces change the mechanical energy by their work, and an explicitly time-dependent potential can exchange energy with the external agency changing it. A time-varying magnetic field can give a circulating electric field, so not every electric field is electrostatic or conservative. Conversely, zero magnetic work on a charge does not turn a velocity-dependent magnetic force into an ordinary position-potential force.

An electric dipole consists of opposite electric charges separated by a short displacement. Its electric dipole moment is $\mathbf{p}=q\mathbf{d}$, directed from negative to positive electric charge. At distances large compared with the separation, its leading electric potential and electric field in vacuum areThe absence of net electric charge removes the monopole term; the dipole electric potential therefore falls as $r^{-2}$ rather than $r^{-1}$. On its axis the electric field is parallel to $\mathbf{p}$ with magnitude $2p/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^3)$; on the equatorial plane it points oppositely with half that magnitude.

In a uniform applied electric field, the two forces cancel as a net translation but form a couple. The torque and potential energy areAlignment parallel to the electric field is stable. A nonuniform electric field can also exert a net force, $\mathbf{F}=\nabla (\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E})$ for a fixed permanent electric dipole moment. An induced electric dipole instead depends on the applied electric field, so its energy must account for the work needed to create it.

Put the charged sheet at $z=0$ and the grounded plates at $z=\pm d/2$. By symmetry the electric field points away from the positive sheet with equal magnitude in the two gaps. A Gaussian pillbox crossing the sheet givesThe plate boundary conditions fix their electric potentials to zero. For the charged sheet between grounded parallel plates, the central potential isWith vacuum permittivity ${\epsilon }_0=8.85419\times 10^{-12}\mathrm{F}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, $V_s\simeq 28.24\mathrm{V}$. An electron has electric charge $-e$, so moving from a grounded plate to this positive potential decreases its potential energy by $e{V}_s$. Conservation of energy then givesThe unrounded value is $3.15\times 10^6\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, about $0.0105c$. Either plate gives the same speed. The ideal calculation neglects the electron's disturbance of the prescribed field and image-force effects at its release point, consistently with treating it as a test particle.

An electric dipole is a localized pair of opposite electric charges, or more generally a neutral electric charge distribution with nonzero first electric moment. For charges $-q$ and $+q$ separated by displacement $\mathbf{d}$ directed from negative to positive, the electric dipole moment isA neutral molecule can have a permanent electric dipole moment when its positive and negative charge centres do not coincide. An applied electric field can also produce an induced electric dipole moment by distorting an initially nonpolar electric charge distribution.

At distance $r\gg |\mathbf{d}|$ in vacuum, expand the difference of the two point-charge potentials to first order in the separation. The leading electric potential isThe monopole term cancels because the net electric charge is zero. Taking $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \Phi$ gives the electric dipole fieldOn the dipole axis its magnitude is $2p/(4\pi {\epsilon }_0{r}^3)$ and its direction is along $\mathbf{p}$; in the equatorial plane the magnitude is $p/(4\pi {\epsilon }_0{r}^3)$ and the field points opposite to $\mathbf{p}$. The $r^{-3}$ decay is faster than the $r^{-2}$ field of an isolated point charge.

In a uniform external electric field, the opposite forces on the two charges cancel in their resultant but form a couple. Its torque isFor a fixed permanent electric dipole moment, the interaction potential energy isDifferentiating with respect to orientation recovers the torque. Parallel alignment minimizes $U$ and is stable against a small rotation; antiparallel alignment maximizes $U$ and is unstable. Rotating a fixed dipole slowly from parallel to antiparallel requires external work $2pE$.

A nonuniform electrostatic electric field can also exert a net force. Expanding the two charge forces gives $\mathbf{F}\simeq (\mathbf{p}\cdot \nabla )\mathbf{E}$, which equals $\nabla (\mathbf{p}\cdot \mathbf{E})$ for a fixed dipole in a curl-free electrostatic field. Thus a suitably aligned dipole is attracted toward stronger field. An induced electric dipole moment requires care in computing energy: when $\mathbf{p}=\alpha \mathbf{E}$ for constant isotropic electric polarizability, building the dipole costs energy and the effective interaction is $U=-\alpha E^2/2$, rather than substituting directly into the fixed-dipole formula. These field, torque and energy effects explain molecular orientation and electric polarization.

A conservative vector field has path-independent work: the integral ${\int }_A^B\mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{r}$ depends only on its endpoints. Equivalently, the line integral around every closed path in its domain vanishes. One can then define a single-valued potential energy $U$ byThe arbitrary additive constant in $U$ has no effect on the force. A useful zero is often chosen at infinity for a localized attractive interaction.

A differentiable conservative force has $\nabla \times \mathbf{F}=0$ because the curl of a gradient vanishes. Conversely, a smooth curl-free field on a simply connected domain admits a global scalar potential. The domain condition matters: on the punctured plane, $\mathbf{F}=(C/r)\hat{\mathbf{\theta }}$ has zero curl away from the missing origin but closed-loop work $2\pi C$ around it. It is not globally conservative there. The existence of a local potential does not establish a single-valued potential throughout a domain with holes.

The work-energy theorem gives $\Delta T=W$ for kinetic energy $T$. If all forces are conservative and $U$ has no explicit time dependence, thenThis is conservation of mechanical energy. In one dimension, an equilibrium occurs at $dU/dx=0$; a local minimum with $U^{\prime \prime }>0$ is stable, while a maximum with $U^{\prime \prime }<0$ is unstable. Expanding about a minimum gives $U\simeq U_0+U^{\prime \prime }(x_0)(x-x_0{)}^2/2$, producing simple harmonic motion with ${\omega }^2=U^{\prime \prime }(x_0)/m$.

Examples include the spring force $F_x=-kx$ with $U=k{x}^2/2$, the near-surface gravitational force $-mg\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ with $U=mgz$, and the central Newtonian gravitational field with $U=-GMm/r$. An electrostatic force on a fixed electric charge $q$ has $U=q\Phi$, where $\Phi$ is the electric potential.

Sliding friction provides a contrasting physical test: traversing a closed path still dissipates mechanical energy, since the frictional force opposes the local motion on both outward and return legs. Its work depends on path length and cannot be represented by a position-only $U$. Total energy can remain conserved when the resulting internal energy is included. Also, even if $\mathbf{F}=-\nabla U(\mathbf{r},t)$ at each instant, explicit time dependence gives $d(T+U)/dt=\partial U/\partial t$; a static conservative-field argument alone does not guarantee constant mechanical energy in that situation.

Write $a=0.020\mathrm{m}$ for the side length. In an equilateral triangle, the distance from centre to a vertex is $a/\sqrt{3}$; it is two thirds of the altitude $\sqrt{3}a/2$. By the superposition principle, the electric potential at the centre due to the three fixed electrons isHere $e>0$ is the elementary charge and ${\epsilon }_0$ the vacuum permittivity. The approaching electron has electric charge $-e$, so its potential energy, measured relative to infinity, is positive:The fixed sources do not move, and radiation is excluded. Hence conservation of mechanical energy givesUsing $e=1.60218\times 10^{-19}\mathrm{C}$, $m_e=9.10938\times 10^{-31}\mathrm{kg}$ for the electron mass, and $(4\pi {\epsilon }_0{)}^{-1}=8.98755\times 10^9\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{C}}^{-2}$ givesThis speed is small enough to justify classical kinetic energy. There is an idealization in the word “stops”: along the line normal to the triangle through its centre, this threshold energy makes the electron approach the central equilibrium asymptotically. A smooth, conservative trajectory cannot reach an equilibrium with exactly zero velocity in finite time unless it was already there. The energy threshold, and therefore the requested initial speed, is nevertheless unambiguous.

In vacuum, the source-free Maxwell equations arePut $\psi =\omega (t-z/c)$ and denote the constant electric amplitude by $E_0$. A corresponding traveling-wave magnetic field isBoth divergences vanish because both the electric field and the magnetic field depend only on $z,t$ and have zero $z$ component. Direct differentiation gives $\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=(\omega E_0/c)(\cos \psi ,\sin \psi ,0)=-{\partial }_t\mathbf{B}$ and $\nabla \times \mathbf{B}=(\omega E_0/c^2)(-\sin \psi ,\cos \psi ,0)=c^{-2}{\partial }_t\mathbf{E}$. A time-independent background magnetic field satisfying the homogeneous equations could be added; the formula is the wave component.

Introduce the magnetic vector potential and electric potential by $\mathbf{B}=\nabla \times \mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi -{\partial }_t\mathbf{A}$. These identities automatically give the divergence equation for $\mathbf{B}$ and Faraday's law. For this wave choose $\varphi =0$ and $\mathbf{A}=(c/\omega )\mathbf{B}$; the derivatives just calculated verify both potential equations.

The electromagnetic force is the Lorentz force, $Q(\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B})$. On the smooth constraint plane $z=z_0$, the constraint force is normal to the plane. Both $\mathbf{v}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ are tangential, so $\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$ is normal and is balanced by that constraint force; it does not affect the tangential motion. ThusA particular motion is ${\mathbf{r}}_{\parallel }={\mathbf{r}}_0-[Q{E}_0/(m{\omega }^2)](\cos \psi ,\sin \psi )$, a circle of radiusThe general planar motion also includes a constant drift velocity; the particle moves on a circle when that drift is zero. The constraint force can do no work because it is perpendicular to the velocity.

Constancy of each ionic electrochemical potential gives the Boltzmann distribution in the local electric potential:Positive potential repels positive ions and attracts negative counterions. The coordinate $s$ measures distance from a locally planar surface; the same local relations hold for a spherical potential with its appropriate radial coordinate.

A direct band gap has its conduction minimum and valence maximum at the same crystal momentum. A photon can then connect the band-edge states with negligible momentum change. An indirect band gap requires an additional phonon to supply or remove momentum, making radiative recombination much less probable. Direct-gap materials such as gallium arsenide or gallium nitride are therefore usually better for a light-emitting diode than silicon.

For the graded junction, let $q=|e|>0$, ${\epsilon }_s={\epsilon }_0{\epsilon }_r$, and use electrostatic potential $\phi$ with $E_x=-{\phi }^{\prime }$. Fully ionized dopants have charge density $\rho =q(N_D-N_A)=q\alpha x$, so Poisson's equation is ${\phi }^{\prime \prime }=-q\alpha x/{\epsilon }_s$. The paper's displayed plus sign corresponds to using the negative potential $V=-\phi$, or a signed electron charge in that formula. The positive barrier magnitude and charge magnitude must be used consistently in the width below.

The intended compensation point is $x=0$, where $N_D=N_A$ and the net doping changes sign. A locally neutral model with comparable electron and hole mobilities has its lowest carrier conductivity near there. The depletion approximation neglects mobile-carrier conductivity throughout the layer, so it does not by itself locate an exact conductivity minimum; unequal mobilities or asymmetric carrier profiles can shift it.

Let the depletion edges be $x=\pm d$. With zero exterior field, integrating $E_x^{\prime }=\rho /{\epsilon }_s$ and imposing $E_x(\pm d)=0$ gives the linearly graded p-n junction fieldIts integral gives $\phi (x)=\phi (0)+q\alpha (d^{2}x-x^3/3)/(2{\epsilon }_s)$, so the electric potential increases toward the n-type side while the electron band edges $E_c,E_v$ bend downward together. Their separation is the local band gap, and the equilibrium electrochemical potential is flat. The built-in potential arises when carrier diffusion exposes ionized dopants until the opposing field balances further diffusion.

Finally the positive barrier isWith total width $w=2d$, this yields the linearly graded junction depletion widthHere $\alpha >0$ labels p-to-n progression with increasing $x$; otherwise use its magnitude in the width formula.

A lipid bilayer has two opposed leaflets: hydrophilic heads contact the water on either side, while hydrophobic tails meet in its interior. This arrangement reduces exposure of the tails to water through the hydrophobic effect. Approximately cylindrical molecular packing favors a lipid bilayer; a strongly wedge-shaped amphiphile can instead form a micelle. Closing a sheet into a lipid vesicle removes its costly exposed edge.

Within a fluid membrane, lipids diffuse laterally, while transfer of a polar head through the hydrophobic core is much slower without assistance. The core limits passive transport of ions and many polar solutes; membrane proteins provide selective routes. Bending costs free energy but does not require the large area compression associated with stretching the molecular packing, so a thin membrane can bend readily while strongly resisting area change. Cholesterol and tail saturation alter packing and fluidity. In a cell, the bilayer also supports embedded proteins and a difference of electric potential across the membrane.

In a conductor, mobile electrons redistribute in response to an electric potential, producing an induced charge density that opposes its source. Finite electronic compressibility means a finite density change requires a change of local kinetic Fermi energy. Screening is therefore not perfect at every microscopic distance. On scales comparable to atomic structure or the Fermi wavelength, a continuum local-density model itself fails.

Thomas-Fermi screening treats electrons as a locally uniform degenerate free electron gas, replaces the ionic background by a smooth neutralizing charge, and neglects nonlocal response, exchange and correlation corrections. The electrochemical chemical potential is uniform in equilibrium. Because an electron has charge $-e$, its electrostatic energy is $-eV$, givingAt zero potential $\mu =E_{F0}$. Linearizing at fixed $\mu$, with $|eV|\ll E_{F0}$, givesInsert this in Poisson's equation to obtain $({\nabla }^2-{\xi }^{-2})V=-{\rho }_{\mathrm{free}}/{ϵ}_0$, where the Thomas-Fermi screening length isAway from a point source, direct radial differentiation shows ${\nabla }^2(e^{-r/\xi }/r)={\xi }^{-2}{e}^{-r/\xi }/r$. The decaying solution is therefore $V=C{e}^{-r/\xi }/r$. Integrating Poisson's equation over a small sphere containing charge $Q$ fixes $C=Q/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)$. For a sufficiently large source, the linearized formula is only a far-field approximation, not a justified description of its singular core.

For monovalent sodium, the electron number density is its atomic number density,This gives $E_{F0}=3.15\mathrm{eV}$ andRoom temperature is far below the corresponding Fermi temperature, so degeneracy is well justified, and sodium's simple conduction band makes a free-electron estimate useful. However $k_F\xi =0.615$ and the mean atomic spacing is $n_0^{-1/3}=0.340\mathrm{nm}$. The potential varies on a scale shorter than $k_F^{-1}$ and the atomic spacing, so the slowly varying local-density and continuum assumptions are not quantitatively controlled at the screening length itself. A nonlocal treatment includes Friedel oscillations, absent from the pure exponential.

Nearly unchanged interlayer force constants in two-layer and twenty-layer films are consistent with very local screening and bonding forces: reducing the distant bulk need not strongly change the force between adjacent layers. They also indicate that metallic electronic response can survive in the thin film. The observation does not by itself validate the numerical Thomas-Fermi approximation, establish an identical full phonon spectrum, or rule out surface-induced electronic changes; it directly constrains the measured local force constant.