Codex @codex  0

For a closed absorbing two-level system, write $N=N_1+N_2$, let $A=1/\tau$, and use ${\sigma }_a={\sigma }_{12}$ for the absorption cross section. This differs from the stimulated-emission cross section convention in part (a). With $r=g_2/g_1$, the rate equations areAt steady state, $N_2=W_{a}N/[A+(1+1/r)W_a]$ for $W_a={\sigma }_{a}I/(\hslash \omega )$. Hence the positive absorption coefficient isFor the given sodium fine-structure transition, the statistical weights are $g_1=2$, $g_2=4$, so $r=2$ and $1+1/r=3/2$. The small-signal transmission gives the optical depthTo account for the finite decrease of intensity through the sample, integrate $dI/dz=-\kappa I$ rather than treating the stronger beam as exactly uniform. If $T=I_{\mathrm{out}}/I_{\mathrm{in}}$, this givesTaking $270\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$ as the incident intensity and $T=0.967$,Using the photon energy $hc/\lambda$ then givesIgnoring the small variation of the stronger intensity would instead give about $1.11\times 10^{-13}{\mathrm{m}}^2$; the integrated value uses the stated transmissions more consistently. The length is not needed to eliminate $N$, but gives the check $N\simeq 9.3\times 10^{14}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$.

The resonant absorption cross section is of optical-wavelength-squared size, much larger than a typical atomic geometric collision area. Pressure broadening cross sections involve phase-changing interatomic encounters and need not equal hard-sphere collision areas; their numerical value depends on collision partners and speed. No precise ratio follows from the supplied data. A useful distinction is that resonant absorption involves coherent response on the optical scale, so its cross section need not resemble an chemical atom's geometric area.

For homogeneous spectral broadening, all participating chemical atoms must share the same resonance and single-atom response width. In a dilute sample dominated by natural linewidth, the weak-beam requirement isUsing the sodium atomic mass, equality occurs near $T=0.017\mathrm{K}$, so $T\ll 17\mathrm{mK}$ is a sufficient thermal condition. Spatial Zeeman energy shifts, light shifts and transit effects should also be small, the laser should address the same selected component, and the interaction should last long enough for steady populations. Uniform impact pressure broadening can also be homogeneous, but would change the width and effective cross section; it is not included in the lifetime-only numerical model.

Real sodium also has hyperfine structure and optical pumping among magnetic sublevels. The inferred ${\sigma }_a$ is the effective cross section of the stated $g_J=2J+1$ two-level system model, assuming statistical sublevel populations and no loss into unaddressed states. A measurement on a resolved, polarized closed hyperfine structure component requires its actual transition dipole moment and selection rules; a universal polarization-independent sodium cross section cannot be inferred from this simplified model. The dependence of resonant cross sections and saturation intensities on sublevel preparation is tabulated explicitly for the real sodium D lines.^[ref]

At low temperature, $x=\epsilon /(k_{B}T)\gg 1$, so the denominator in the exact expression approaches one:The exponential suppression dominates the $T^{-2}$ factor. Almost all particles remain in the ground state, so very little volume change is thermally accessible.

At high temperature, $e^{-x}\to 1$, and thereforeThe excited fraction has already approached $3/4$, so further heating barely changes it. Both limits are consistent with a bounded two-level system; the high-temperature vanishing does not imply that ordinary materials cease expanding when additional levels or other mechanisms become accessible.

Discarding the photon-number result gives a classical mixture of the two outcome branches. The atomic state, in the basis $(|e⟩,|g⟩)$, isIt is also the reduced state before measuring the field; a nonselective operation on the field does not change the atomic reduced density matrix. The atom is not in a coherent superposition with these populations.

For an atomic energy gap $\hslash \omega$, the thermal population ratio is $p_e/p_g=e^{-\hslash \omega /(k_{B}T)}$. Matching it givesA finite positive temperature exists when $0<p_e<p_g$, with $T\to 0^{+}$ at $p_e=0$ and $T\to +\infty$ as $p_e\to 1/2$ from below. Equal populations correspond to zero inverse temperature. If $p_e>1/2$, the expression is a negative effective temperature for a bounded two-level system, not an equilibrium state at any ordinary positive temperature. For a concrete counterexample to an unrestricted positive-temperature interpretation, at $t=0$ the atom is certainly excited, whereas every positive-temperature Gibbs distribution has $p_e\le 1/2$. The fully excited endpoint is the formal limit $T\to 0^{-}$. Matching one density matrix does not establish genuine thermalization with a bath.

Quantize a single electromagnetic normal mode of angular frequency ${\omega }_c$ and represent one isolated atomic transition as a two-level system with raising operator ${\sigma }_{+}=|e⟩⟨g|$. The bare Hamiltonian operator isThe first main approximation is the electric-dipole approximation: the field varies negligibly across an atom, $k{a}_{\mathrm{atom}}\ll 1$, and the leading coupling is $H_d=-\mathbf{d}\cdot \mathbf{E}({\mathbf{r}}_0)$. For states of definite opposite parity, the relevant dipole part is off-diagonal. After choosing operator phases, this gives $H_d=\hslash g(a+a^{†})({\sigma }_{+}+{\sigma }_{-})$, with $g$ fixed by the transition dipole and the one-photon field wave amplitude.

In the interaction picture, $a{\sigma }_{+}$ and $a^{†}{\sigma }_{-}$ oscillate at the difference ${\omega }_a-{\omega }_c$, whereas $a{\sigma }_{-}$ and $a^{†}{\sigma }_{+}$ oscillate at the sum ${\omega }_a+{\omega }_c$. The second main approximation is the rotating-wave approximation: near resonance and for $g\sqrt{n+1}\ll {\omega }_a+{\omega }_c$, the latter terms average away on the interaction time scale. The resulting Jaynes-Cummings model hasThe two-level system and single-normal mode truncations are additional assumptions: other atomic transitions and optical normal modes must be sufficiently far off resonance or weakly coupled. Dissipation is neglected over the interaction time. The retained terms exchange one atomic excitation for one photon, conserving $a^{†}a+{\sigma }_{+}{\sigma }_{-}$.

Let $A=A_{21}$ and $r=g_2/g_1$. Before stimulated emission and stimulated absorption are added, the source and decay terms giveThe upper level is fed at a specified rate of addition to the number density, its spontaneous decay feeds the lower level, and lower-level removal leads to states outside this two-level system. This is therefore an open pumped system, not a closed two-level system with conserved population.

At steady state,The degeneracy-weighted population inversion compares population per magnetic sublevel. It is positive only if $rA{\tau }_1<1$; a positive pump rate alone cannot guarantee optical gain if lower-level removal is too slow. A short lower-state lifetime is consequently helpful even when the upper-state pumping is unchanged.

The equations assume finite positive $A$ and ${\tau }_1$, approximately constant pumping and no other specified sources, sinks or branching channels. A finite steady state would not exist for continuous pumping if the lower level had no escape route. The fixed source rate also presumes access to an external reservoir; it does not imply that the two populations can grow beyond all available active atoms in a real finite medium.

Let $\Delta =\hslash \Omega$ and choose the nondegenerate energy levels as 0 and $\Delta$. For N independent identical units, $Z=(1+e^{-\beta \Delta }{)}^N$; set N=1 for a single two-level system. Differentiating its logarithm givesAt low temperature, $U\sim N\Delta e^{-x}$ and $C_V\sim N{k}_B{x}^2{e}^{-x}$: the upper level is frozen out. At high temperature, the two levels approach equal populations, giving $U\to N\Delta /2$ while $C_V\sim N{k}_B{x}^2/4\to 0$. The energy therefore rises monotonically to a plateau, while the heat capacity has a Schottky peak:Unequal degeneracies would change the populations and peak; the usual equal-degeneracy model is stated here. Shifting both energy levels changes the energy baseline but not heat capacity.

After the quantum quench, hold $H_f$ fixed and evolve without an intervening energy measurement. The unitary time evolution isProjection onto the original $|0⟩$ gives probability amplitude $c^2{e}^{+i{\Delta }_{f}t/(2\hslash )}+s^2{e}^{-i{\Delta }_{f}t/(2\hslash )}$. Squaring its modulus yields the two-level quantum return probabilityTheir sum is one. For $\theta =\pi /3$, the first minimum of $P_0$ is $1/4$ at $t=\pi \hslash /{\Delta }_f$, and the return is complete at $T=2\pi \hslash /{\Delta }_f$. At $\theta =0$ or $\pi$ there is no oscillation, because the initial quantum state is already a final energy eigenstate.

Changing measurement basis reveals the evolving relative quantum phase. Measuring the final energy first instead destroys this quantum coherence between final energy eigenstates in the unconditioned ensemble: its later original-basis return probability is $c^4+s^4=1-\frac{1}{2}{\sin }^2\theta$, equal to $5/8$ for this example. That constant differs from the oscillation of the unmeasured pure state. The work protocol and the oscillation protocol therefore use separate preparations.

A Rabi oscillation is a coherent oscillation of populations in a driven two-level quantum system.

A resonant drive can transfer a quantum state from one energy eigenstate to another and then bring its population back. This is unitary time evolution: the drive exchanges energy with the selected two-level system, while total probability stays one. One complete Rabi cycle has population period $2\pi /\Omega$; halfway through, a Rabi pi pulse transfers the whole population in the ideal model. This makes Rabi oscillations useful for calibrating resonant quantum control, preparing quantum superpositions and supplying the pulses of Ramsey interferometry.

The coherent coupling frequency defined by the chosen driven two-level system Hamiltonian. With $H=\hslash (-\Delta {\sigma }_z+\Omega {\sigma }_x)/2$, resonance gives population oscillations proportional to ${\sin }^2(\Omega t/2)$. Detuning replaces the oscillation frequency by $\sqrt{{\Omega }^2+{\Delta }^2}$ and reduces its contrast. Stating the Hamiltonian avoids factor-of-two ambiguities in the definition of $\Omega$.

Let $A_{21}$ be the spontaneous emission coefficient and let $B\rho$ be the induced transition rate per atom under a resonant radiation spectral energy density $\rho$. For nondegenerate levels the Einstein coefficients obey $B_{12}=B_{21}=B$. In a closed two-level system with no collisional or other population transfer, steady state requiresFor nonzero upper population and drive, division gives the ratio of total spontaneous and stimulated emission rates in the title. In particular $N_1>N_2$ when $A_{21}>0$; continuous driving of this closed model approaches equal populations but cannot create a population inversion. No thermal population law is assumed.

The exact finite-pulse Ramsey transition probability separates a slowly varying pulse response from rapid quantum interference. Define the single-zone transfer probability $p$ and a pulse-induced quantum phase $\theta$ bySince $c_p^2+b^2=1-p$, factorizing the real bracket in the original formula givesWhere $c_p=b=0$, the probability is zero and $\theta$ need not be defined. Elsewhere this identity proves the envelope bound without a weak-drive assumption. The envelope $4p(1-p)$ is not the single-zone response $p$: two equal coherent interactions have different transfer weights. A contiguous resonant Rabi pi pulse of duration $2\tau$ provides another useful comparison with the same total drive duration, but no dark interval. Its line is broad because it has no long flight phase.

In 1977, H. Jeff Kimble, Mario Dagenais, and Leonard Mandel excited a dilute sodium atomic beam with a resonant dye laser. Apertures restricted the observed atoms; a microscope objective collected fluorescence perpendicular to both beams. A beam splitter sent the collected light to two photomultipliers. Shaped pulses drove the start and stop inputs of a time-to-digital converter; its delay histogram rose away from zero delay, indicating photon antibunching. Turning the atomic beam off measured scattered-laser backgrounds. More than one contributing atom and scattered light limited the comparison with an ideal isolated two-level system; the paper explicitly treated corrections.^[ref]

A simple reason for suppressed immediate re-emission is visible in an ideal two-level system. After spontaneous emission, the atom is in $|g⟩$. Its emission operator ${\sigma }_{-}=|g⟩⟨e|$ obeys ${\sigma }_{-}^2=0$, so two instantaneous emissions are impossible. Excitation must rebuild the excited-state population before another emission. This argument explains the zero-delay idealization; the actual photon counting record additionally depends on collection, background, timing, and the number of contributing atoms.

For a closed two-level system with total population $N$, excited-state lifetime $\tau$ and statistical sublevel populations, let $W_a={\sigma }_{12}I/(\hslash \omega )$. The steady rate equation $0=W_a[N_1-(g_1/g_2)N_2]-N_2/\tau$ gives absorption coefficient $\kappa =N{\sigma }_{12}/(1+I/I_{s,a})$. For a uniform slab of thickness $L$ and transmission $T=I_{\mathrm{out}}/I_{\mathrm{in}}$, integrating $dI/dz=-\kappa I$ proves $\ln T+I_{\mathrm{in}}(T-1)/I_{s,a}=-N{\sigma }_{12}L$. Resolved sublevel optical pumping requires a more detailed model.

An open pumped two-level system amplifier with fixed upper-state source $R_2$, upper spontaneous emission only into the lower energy level, and lower-state removal rate $N_1/{\tau }_1$. Let $r=g_2/g_1$, $W={\sigma }_{21}I/(\hslash \omega )$ and $D=N_2-r{N}_1$. Steady rate equations give $N_1=R_2{\tau }_1$ and $D=R_2(1-r{A}_{21}{\tau }_1)/(A_{21}+W)$. Consequently the optical gain is $\alpha ={\alpha }_0/(1+I/I_s)$ with ${\alpha }_0={\sigma }_{21}{R}_2(A_{21}^{-1}-r{\tau }_1)$. Lower-state removal controls whether population inversion is possible, while its lifetime cancels from this model's saturation intensity. Different upper-state branching or a nonconstant pump generally changes that conclusion.

The sections on saturation intensity and resonant scattering cross sections, including Table 7, distinguish different polarizations and sublevel preparations for real sodium. They explain why a statistical fine-structure two-level system cross section need not equal that of a selected closed hyperfine structure transition.

Statistical physics explains collective behavior using probability distributions over microscopic possibilities. Its central surprise is that incomplete microscopic knowledge can still produce precise predictions for internal energy, entropy and heat capacity. The bridge is statistical mechanics: specify the available microstates, assign their probabilities, then compute the expected values of measured quantities.

A two-level system already displays the idea. Warming it makes its higher energy more likely; its heat capacity first rises, then falls as the two probabilities approach equality. With two distinguishable units, merely counting microstates explains why the middle energy has twice the state degeneracy. These small examples expose the machinery before the much larger sums needed for a photon gas or an Ising model.

The appeal is economical: the same microscopic energies and probabilities explain both an average reading and its variance. A measurement's spread therefore becomes useful physical information rather than an inconvenience to discard.

Real atoms have multiple internal quantum states. Optical pumping and spatially varying electromagnetic polarization can remove kinetic energy by additional mechanisms, producing sub-Doppler cooling below the ideal Doppler cooling limit. In polarization-gradient cooling, state-dependent energy shifts from the Stark effect and delayed optical pumping make atoms repeatedly climb potential energy hills. This mechanism needs the internal-state structure omitted by the independent-beam two-level system above. ^[ref].

William D. Phillips's team tested unexpectedly cold sodium molasses with time-of-flight atom detection. A probe above the cloud initially saw no atoms; deliberately heating them verified that the detector worked. Moving the probe below the cloud produced arrival signals consistent with temperatures below the Doppler cooling limit. Independent release/recapture checks used sharply apertured beams and included gravity; uncertain cloud and probe geometry still limited the inferred temperature. These controls tested the thermometer as well as the cooling theory. ^[ref].

The Tavis-Cummings model extends the Jaynes-Cummings model to several two-level systems exchanging excitations with a common quantized normal mode under the rotating-wave approximation. It conserves total excitation number. Equal coupling preserves permutation-symmetric atomic sectors, allowing finite-dimensional reductions for a fixed initial excitation number.

Trapped-ion quantum control prepares an ion's internal quantum state, couples it to quantized motion with laser pulses, and measures the result through state-dependent fluorescence. Its appeal is access to both a controllable two-level system and a quantum harmonic oscillator in one apparatus.

Confinement, preparation, control and readout solve different problems. The Paul trap's RF electric field confines the ion through its RF-averaged trapping potential; it still produces Paul trap micromotion. Doppler cooling and resolved sideband cooling reduce motional excitation. Optical pumping selects an internal quantum state. A coherent pulse then changes amplitudes, while electron shelving converts an internal population into a detectable stream of photons. A bright/dark count by itself does not reveal a quantum superposition's relative phase; an additional controlled rotation before detection can make that phase affect the measured population.

Choose a closed two-level system, equal stimulated absorption and emission strengths, a monochromatic pump, and no extra dephasing. Let $p_g+p_e=1$ be the lower and upper populations, and let spontaneous emission remove upper population at rate $\Gamma =1/{\tau }_e$. In this convention the natural linewidth is full width at half maximum $\Gamma$ in angular frequency, its half width at half maximum is $\Gamma /2$, and its full width at half maximum in hertz is $\Gamma /(2\pi )$. All $\Delta$ below are angular detunings.

Let $s=I/I_{\mathrm{sat}}$ be the on-resonance saturation parameter. An effective stimulated transition rate that reproduces the monochromatic steady response isHere $R$ describes each stimulated direction, while $\Gamma$ describes irreversible spontaneous emission. The rate equation gives the steady populations; it is not a description of transient Rabi oscillations. Setting ${\dot{p}}_e=0$ givesand the population difference relevant to net weak-probe photon absorption isThe pump depletes the lower population by $p_e$, but reduces the population difference by $q=2p_e$: stimulated emission contributes as well as missing ground-state absorbers. On resonance, $s=1$ gives $p_e=1/4$, $p_g=3/4$, $d=1/2$; $s=9$ gives $p_e=0.45$, $p_g=0.55$, $d=0.10$. As $s\to \infty$, the two populations approach $1/2$, rather than producing a population inversion. Far off resonance, $p_e\to 0$ and $d\to 1$.

For moving atoms use $\Delta =\delta -kv$ in these pump-prepared populations. A weak counterpropagating probe interrogates them near $\delta +kv=0$. A simple population-only approximation to its absorption coefficient averages the weak-probe Lorentzian line shape times $d(\delta -kv)$ over the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution. It neglects interference between the beams, changes of velocity during illumination, and multilevel optical pumping. Those restrictions matter for real alkali chemical atoms.