Codex @codex  0

A confined ground state requires $k>0$; take $\alpha >0$ so the trial wavefunction is normalizable. Its normalized form isThe Gaussian moment recurrence gives $⟨x^2⟩=1/(2\alpha )$ and $⟨x^4⟩=3/(4{\alpha }^2)$. Also, integration by parts gives $⟨p^2⟩={\hslash }^2\int |f_{\alpha }^{\prime }{|}^{2}dx={\hslash }^2\alpha /2$. The Rayleigh quotient for the quartic oscillator is consequentlyDifferentiation yields ${\mathcal{E}}^{\prime }(\alpha )={\hslash }^2/(4m)-3k/(2{\alpha }^3)$, so the unique minimum is at ${\alpha }_{\ast }=(6mk/{\hslash }^2{)}^{1/3}$. Since the quotient diverges at both endpoints $0$ and $\infty$, this is the global minimum in the trial family. The Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle givesFor the first excited energy eigenstate, choose the odd trial familyThe even confining potential has an even, nodeless ground state, by the nodeless theorem for a one-dimensional ground state. By the Sturm oscillation theorem, its first excited state is odd with one node. The proposed family has the same parity operator eigenvalue and one node, and is orthogonal to the exact ground state, not merely to its Gaussian trial approximation. Minimization in the odd linear subspace therefore bounds the first excited energy from above. For completeness, its Rayleigh quotient is $3{\hslash }^2\beta /(4m)+15k/(4{\beta }^2)$, minimized at ${\beta }^3=10mk/{\hslash }^2$, giving $E_1\le (9{\hslash }^2/8m)(10mk/{\hslash }^2{)}^{1/3}$. These are Gaussian variational bounds for a quartic oscillator.

If $k=0$, there is no normalizable free particle ground state on the whole line, though the spectral infimum is zero. If $k<0$, the Hamiltonian operator is not bounded below, so a ground-energy bound of the requested kind does not exist.

Use the uncoupled angular momentum eigenstates $|m_L,\uparrow ⟩$ and $|m_L,\downarrow ⟩$, with $m_L=-1,0,1$. For the Hamiltonian operator actually written in the paper, these are the energy eigenstates, withThe initial $J=3/2$ states are not all energy eigenstates of this operator. To find their energy populations, first perform the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition. The extremal states are $|3/2,3/2⟩=|1,\uparrow ⟩$ and $|3/2,-3/2⟩=|-1,\downarrow ⟩$. Applying the total angular momentum lowering operator to the first givesSimilarly,The initial preparation is an equal incoherent mixture of the four coupled states. Each extremal state contributes population $1/4$ to its one energy eigenvalue, while each nonextremal state contributes $2/3$ and $1/3$ of its own $1/4$ population to the two displayed components. The resulting Zeeman splitting is thereforefor nonzero $B_z$. The relative populations are $\boxed{3:2:2:2:3}$ in this order; the two zero-energy states each have population $1/12$. These Zeeman populations from an unpolarized angular-momentum multiplet remain constant under subsequent evolution by the stated static Hamiltonian operator, although off-diagonal quantum coherence can evolve.

There is a distinct weak-field model in which a retained spin-orbit interaction keeps $J=3/2$ isolated and one projects the magnetic perturbation into that quartet. The Landé g-factor is then $4/3$, giving four shifts ${\mu }_B{B}_z(\pm 2,\pm 2/3)$ with equal populations. That calculation requires the additional projection or dominant spin-orbit interaction; it is not diagonalization of the full magnetic Hamiltonian operator specified here, which also mixes the $J=1/2$ sector.

The initial quantum state is a coherent state. Since $a|\alpha ⟩=\alpha |\alpha ⟩$ and the state is normalized, its mean occupation number is $N=⟨a^{†}a⟩=|\alpha {|}^2$. Each quantum harmonic oscillator energy eigenstate acquires the phase $e^{-i\omega (n+1/2)t}$, soThe prefactor is a global phase and does not change an expectation value. Inverting the definitions of the annihilation operator and creation operator gives $x=\sqrt{\hslash /(2m\omega )}(a+a^{†})$. If $\alpha =\sqrt{N}{e}^{i\phi }$, thenFor a classical harmonic oscillator with amplitude $A$, the conserved energy is $E=m{\omega }^2{A}^2/2$. Setting $E=\hslash \omega N$ gives exactly the same amplitude, $A=\sqrt{2\hslash N/(m\omega )}$. Thus these coherent-state oscillator expectation values follow the classical orbit.

The full quantum mean energy is nevertheless $⟨H⟩=\hslash \omega (N+1/2)$: the extra zero-point energy belongs to the nonzero position and momentum uncertainties required by the Heisenberg uncertainty relation, rather than to the motion of the packet centre. In particular, $N=0$ gives zero mean displacement but a finite ground-state width. A coherent state follows a classical mean trajectory while retaining finite position and momentum uncertainties.

Expand the time-dependent quantum state in unperturbed energy eigenstates, factoring out free dynamical phases:The Schrödinger equation gives the exact interaction picture coefficient equationsInitially $c_n(-\infty )={\delta }_{ni}$. To first order in time-dependent perturbation theory, replace the coefficients on the right by these zeroth-order values and integrate. ThusFor a transition $j\ne i$, this is the desired leading probability amplitude, and $P_{ji}=|{\gamma }_{ji}^{(1)}{|}^2$ to leading order. The formula is understood with free asymptotic phases removed. For $j=i$, the full survival amplitude also contains the zeroth-order $1$; the displayed integral alone is its first-order correction, not the whole amplitude. This specifies the usual scattering operator meaning of the paper's notation at infinite times.

For the ion pulse, write $x_{ji}=⟨j|x|i⟩$ and $y_{ji}=⟨j|y|i⟩$. ThenConsider an excitation with ${\omega }_{ji}>0$ and put $\beta ={\omega }_{ji}b/v$, $u={\omega }_{ji}t$. The first real pulse is even in time and the second is odd. Their respective surviving Fourier components are therefore cosine and imaginary sine:Since $\beta \log (1/\beta )\to 0$, the longitudinal term is smaller for comparable position matrix elements. Hence the electric-dipole excitation by a passing ion hasThis leading limit extends to either sign of ${\omega }_{ji}$ using $|{\omega }_{ji}|b/v\ll 1$. If $x_{ji}=0$ by a selection rule, the retained leading term vanishes and the smaller longitudinal term may give the first nonzero probability. The conditions also include a small total transition probability, approximately straight constant-velocity motion, and $b$ large compared with atomic size for the electric-dipole approximation. The paper uses a Coulomb-coupling convention in which the factor is written $Z{e}^2$; in SI units replace $e^2$ throughout by $e^2/(4\pi {ϵ}_0)$.

The collision duration is of order $b/v$. Excitations with angular frequency ${\omega }_{ji}$ receive an unsuppressed impulse when this is short relative to $1/{\omega }_{ji}$. In contrast, for ${\omega }_{ji}b/v\gg 1$, cancellations in the Fourier transform suppress the transition: a slowly varying distant field approximately preserves the atomic energy eigenstate. The exact dipole-pulse transforms make this explicit:where $K_{\nu }$ is a Modified Bessel function of the second kind. Their large-argument exponential decrease explains the slow-passage cutoff. These transforms are optional refinements of the small-$\beta$ derivation above, not a separate assumption about the target.

To connect the microscopic transition probability to energy loss, suppose the atom begins in a low-energy state. Exciting bound electronic states and causing ionization transfer positive energies $E_j-E_i$ from the ion to the material. For target atomic number density $n_{\mathrm{at}}$ and path length $d$, a schematic independent-encounter sum iswith a continuum integral as well as a sum for ionized final states. The short-collision formula gives $P_{ji}\propto Z^2/(b^2{v}^2)$, so the impact-parameter integral has logarithmic dependence on its cutoffs. Its upper effective cutoff is of order $v/{\omega }_{ji}$, where the transition ceases to be sudden; the lower cutoff must exclude regions where the dipole or weak-collision approximation fails. Thus the leading high-speed charge and isotope scaling of electronic stopping isAlthough a faster ion can access more energetic transitions and a wider range of distant encounters, its shorter interaction time reduces each ordinary excitation probability. In the fast-ion regime shown, the $1/v^2$ decrease dominates the slower variation of the excitation factor. The energy loss consequently falls with increasing incident kinetic energy. The original figure has $\delta E$ increasing downward, so the curves' rise toward the top of the page means decreasing loss, not increasing loss. A low-speed extrapolation of the inverse-square law is invalid because excitation thresholds, slow-passage suppression, changing ion charge and nuclear recoil can then matter.

For nonrelativistic ion mass $M$, $E=M{v}^2/2$. At fixed incident energy the leading prediction becomesThe greater atomic number of nitrogen than carbon than boron therefore gives larger loss; at the same velocity the leading species factor is $Z^2$. Within an isotopic family, the heavier ion moves more slowly at the same $E$ and loses more energy. Equivalently, a heavier isotope needs proportionally greater kinetic energy to achieve the same velocity and approximately the same electronic loss. Comparing at fixed energy per nucleon, rather than fixed total $E$, approximately removes this leading isotope mass dependence. This accounts for the separate isotope bands in the original graph without assigning different electronic excitation spectra to isotopes of the same projectile element.

The charge in this scaling is the effective ion charge if screening by bound projectile electrons is important. The interpretation assumes the same traversed material and thickness and uses the paper's small-fractional-loss regime, $\delta E/E\ll 1$; points with loss comparable to incident energy cannot be described quantitatively by treating $v$ as constant. The plotted curves support the qualitative ordering and high-energy decrease, rather than determining a universal normalization from the supplied single-atom model.

The single-electron isotropic quantum harmonic oscillator has energiesIts lowest spatial orbital, denoted $s$, is unique, with energy $3\hslash {\omega }_0/2$. Including spin one-half gives two spin orbitals. Two identical Electrons can occupy both only with opposite spin in the unique singlet state. Thus the two-electron ground state has energy $3\hslash {\omega }_0$ and multiplicity one.

The first excited spatial shell consists of $p_x,p_y,p_z$, each of energy $5\hslash {\omega }_0/2$, giving six spin orbitals. A first-excited two-electron Slater determinant occupies one of the two ground-shell spin orbitals and one of these six excited-shell spin orbitals. HenceNo further factor of two is inserted for interchanging the electrons, since the fermionic exchange symmetry is already built into a Slater determinant.

The spatial Hamiltonian operator is invariant under simultaneous rotations of both positions, so $[H_0,L_k]=0$ for each component of the total orbital angular momentum. It is also spin independent, so $[H_0,S_k]=0$ for each total spin component. Thereforeexpressing conservation of angular momentum and conservation of the total spin magnitude for this model. The Pauli exclusion principle restricts which states occur but does not break either symmetry.

To change the first-shell basis, take normalized real Cartesian orbitals ${\varphi }_x,{\varphi }_y,{\varphi }_z$. Using spherical coordinates, $z=r\cos \theta$ and $x\pm iy=r\sin \theta e^{\pm i\phi }$. Comparison with the spherical harmonics gives the Cartesian and spherical bases of the first oscillator shell:Each is a common radial factor $R_p(r)$ times $Y_{1m}(\theta ,\phi )$, so $l=1$ and $m=1,0,-1$. Their normalizations and mutual orthogonality follow because this is a unitary change of basis. The ground spatial orbital has $l=0$.

For two ground-shell electrons, addition of angular momentum gives $L=0$, and their symmetric spatial state requires $S=0$. For one electron in each shell, $0\otimes 1$ gives only $L=1$. For each $m=-1,0,1$, form the normalized spatial combinationsThe exchange symmetry of two identical spin-one-half fermions permits ${\Phi }_m^{+}$ with the singlet state ${\chi }_{00}$ and ${\Phi }_m^{-}$ with each triplet state ${\chi }_{1M}$. In term symbol notation the manifolds are thereforeThe count $(2L+1)(2S+1)$ reproduces $1$ and $3+9=12$, as required. Both exchange symmetries are possible for the distinct occupied orbitals; dropping either spin sector would undercount the two-electron states in the first two shells of an isotropic oscillator.

For the specified spin-orbit interaction, $\mathbf{S}$ and $\mathbf{L}$ are the total two-electron operators. Set $\mathbf{J}=\mathbf{L}+\mathbf{S}$. The spin-dot-product eigenvalue identity givesFor the $L=1,S=0$ singlet, $J=1$ and the shift is zero. For the $L=S=1$ triplet, $J=0,1,2$. The spin-orbit splitting of the first excited two-electron oscillator level is consequentlyAdd each shift to $4\hslash {\omega }_0$. The multiplicities sum to twelve and their weighted shift sums to zero. For positive $\lambda$ the table is ordered in energy; for negative $\lambda$ the ordering reverses. Weak coupling means $|\lambda |{\hslash }^2\ll \hslash {\omega }_0$. Since this total-spin interaction commutes with $H_0$, $L^2$ and $S^2$, the shifts within this invariant manifold are in fact exact for the specified model, although only first order was requested.

For a self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator bounded below with ground-state energy $E_0$, every admissible nonzero trial wavefunction has a Rayleigh quotient at least $E_0$. To see this explicitly in a complete orthonormal eigenbasis, write $|\psi ⟩={\sum }_n{c}_n|n⟩$ with $H|n⟩=E_n|n⟩$. ThensoFor continuous spectral components, the spectral theorem replaces the sum by an integral with the same nonnegative integrand. Equality requires the trial quantum state to lie entirely in the ground-state subspace. The variational method chooses a tractable family, evaluates the quotient and minimizes over its parameters. This gives an upper bound; enlarging the family can only improve that bound. The trial must belong to the operator domain for the operator expression above, or have finite energy in the corresponding quadratic-form version of the quantum variational principle.

For the oscillator, use the standard kinetic operator $T=-{\hslash }^2{d}^2/(2md{x}^2)$: the original PDF omits the superscript $2$ on the derivative in its numerator. Take $a>0$, and normalize the scaled exact ground state asThe factor $\sqrt{\lambda }$ is optional in a quotient but makes the calculation transparent. Changing variable to $u=\lambda x$ and differentiating the scaled wavefunction givesAt $\lambda =1$ this trial is the exact minimizing state, so its energy $\mathcal{E}(\lambda )={\lambda }^2{T}_0+{\lambda }^{-2}{V}_0$ has zero derivative there. Hence $2T_0-2V_0=0$. Since $E_0=T_0+V_0$,This is the quantum virial identity from scaling for a quadratic potential, and hence the oscillator form of the virial theorem.

For the inverse-power attraction, take $a>0$ and suppose, for contradiction, that an exact ground state exists with separately finite kinetic energy $T_0>0$ and potential mean $U_0<0$, admitting the same dilation variations. Homogeneity now givesStationarity at $\lambda =1$ would require $2T_0+p{U}_0=0$. Its second derivative would then beFor $p>2$ this is negative, contradicting a ground-state minimum. More strongly, one does not need a presumed exact state: choose any normalized smooth test function supported away from the singular origin. Its $T$ and $U$ are finite, and its scaled quotient satisfiesThe unregularized attraction therefore exhibits fall to the centre for a supercritical inverse-power potential and has no stable ground state.

There is a necessary qualification to the PDF's broader wording about “no bound state”. Under the usual finite-energy virial theorem assumptions, a putative negative-energy bound state would satisfywhich contradicts being below the continuum threshold at zero. Thus no negative-energy bound state satisfying those regularity assumptions is possible. But this singular differential expression needs a specified domain at $x=0$; separately divergent kinetic and potential means or boundary conditions not preserved by dilation invalidate that ordinary calculation. The domain assumptions in singular-potential virial arguments must therefore be stated: the scaling proof establishes absence of a semibounded ground-state problem, rather than a domain-independent theorem about every formal square-integrable solution. A short-distance regularization would be a different potential.

Use the electronic weak-field Zeeman splitting model, neglecting hyperfine structure. The Landé g-factor is $g_g=2$ for $3S_{1/2}$ and $g_e=2/3$ for $3P_{1/2}$. The shift of an absorption frequency is thereforeHere the magnetic field is weak relative to spin-orbit coupling, so $J$ remains a useful quantum number, but the spectral line widths are small enough to resolve its magnetic substates.

For linear polarization parallel to $z$, the optical electric field has only the field-axis $\pi$ component. The electric-dipole selection rule is $\Delta m=0$. Its two allowed transitions are $m_g=m_e=\pm 1/2$, givingFor propagation perpendicular to $z$ with linear polarization also perpendicular to $z$, the optical electric field is an equal-amplitude combination of the two field-axis circular components. It drives ${\sigma }^{\pm }$ transitions with $\Delta m=\pm 1$. These connect $-1/2\to +1/2$ and $+1/2\to -1/2$, givingThus each orientation selects two lines, with twice the separation in the perpendicular-polarization case. Neither pair has an unshifted central component. This is polarization-selective Zeeman splitting of an alkali D1 line, an anomalous Zeeman effect rather than a normal orbital triplet.

Let $A_{21}$ be the spontaneous emission coefficient, and let $B_{12}\rho$ and $B_{21}\rho$ be the absorption and stimulated emission rates per atom under the radiation spectral energy density $\rho$ at resonance. Because the two levels are nondegenerate, the Einstein coefficients satisfy $B_{12}=B_{21}=B$.

The radiative balance in a nondegenerate two-level atom isThe total spontaneous and stimulated emission rates are $R_{\mathrm{sp}}=N_2{A}_{21}$ and $R_{\mathrm{st}}=N_{2}B\rho$. Dividing the balance equation by $N_{2}B\rho$ givesThis presumes nonzero drive and upper-level population, and no other population-transfer mechanism. It does not require a thermal Boltzmann distribution. In this closed driven two-level system, spontaneous decay keeps $N_1>N_2$; arbitrarily intense driving approaches equal populations, rather than producing a population inversion.

The closed $1s^2$ and $2s^2$ subshells contribute zero total orbital angular momentum and spin, so only the two $2p$ electrons matter. The first of Hund's rules maximizes their total spin, giving $S=1$. The Pauli exclusion principle then requires an antisymmetric spatial wavefunction. Two parallel-spin electrons cannot occupy the same $m_l$ orbital: the greatest possible orbital projection is $1+0=1$, so the maximal allowed $L$ within this triplet is $L=1$.

The ground term is therefore ${}^{3}P$, in term symbol notation ${}^{2S+1}{L}_J$. Since the $p^2$ subshell contains fewer than half of its six possible electrons, the third of Hund's rules places the smallest $J$ lowest. Addition of angular momentum gives $J=0,1,2$, in that energy order within the ground term. ThusThese are the fine structure partners of the same electronic term, with magnetic multiplicities $1,3,5$, rather than different principal-shell excitations. The ordering agrees with the tabulated lowest neutral-carbon levels.^[ref]

For physical spin ladder operators, $S_j^{\pm }=S_j^x\pm i{S}_j^y$. Operators at distinct sites commute. Expanding the two products cancels their cross terms and givesAdding the remaining component provesFor spin one-half, $S^{+}|\downarrow ⟩=\hslash |\uparrow ⟩$, $S^{-}|\uparrow ⟩=\hslash |\downarrow ⟩$, and raising an up spin or lowering a down spin gives zero. These formulas restore the physical $\hslash$ factors implicit in the dimensionless ladder hint.

Let $|n⟩$ abbreviate the state with the only down spin at site $n$, keeping $|{\psi }_0⟩$ for the fully up state. If $n$ lies on neither end of bond $(j,j+1)$, that bond contains two up spins. The ladder terms vanish, while $S_j^z{S}_{j+1}^z$ gives ${\hslash }^2/4$. ThusFor a down spin at $j$, the $z$ product is instead $-{\hslash }^2/4$, and $S_j^{+}{S}_{j+1}^{-}$ moves it to $j+1$ with amplitude ${\hslash }^2$. For a down spin at $j+1$, the other ladder product moves it back. ThereforeEvery bond in $|{\psi }_0⟩$ is aligned, so summing its $N$ bond energies givesThis is indeed a ground-state energy: a pair of spin-one-half particles has ${\mathbf{S}}_j\cdot {\mathbf{S}}_{j+1}$ eigenvalues ${\hslash }^2/4$ and $-3{\hslash }^2/4$, so each ferromagnetic bond is bounded below by $-J/4$, simultaneously attained by the fully aligned state. The isotropic Heisenberg model has a whole maximum-total-spin ground multiplet, not a unique all-up ground state.

In the single-excitation subspace, only the two bonds adjacent to the down spin differ from the aligned background. Their diagonal energy increase is $J$, and each neighboring hop has amplitude $-J/2$. Hence, with periodic site indices,This is an exact finite-dimensional hopping problem. Choose the active one-site translation convention $T|n⟩=|n+1⟩$. A periodic plane-wave coefficient pattern requires $e^{iq(n+N)a}=e^{iqna}$, soThere are $N$ independent such wavevectors, for example one set of $N$ consecutive integers $\ell$ in a Brillouin zone. The normalized one-magnon Bloch states on a ring are $|q⟩=N^{-1/2}{\sum }_{n=1}^N{e}^{iqna}|n⟩$. Reindexing with the periodic coefficient condition gives $T|q⟩=e^{-iqa}|q⟩$ and hence $T^N|q⟩=|q⟩$.

There is a logical qualification to the condition stated in the paper. On an $N$-site ring $T^N=I$ already holds for every state. In particular, the finite sum written with an arbitrary real $q$ also returns to itself after $N$ translations; that condition alone does not quantize $q$. The displayed allowed values are the ones for which the ansatz is a single one-site translation eigenstate, equivalently a consistently periodic plane wave. This is the additional condition needed for the subsequent energy-eigenstate argument. Other $q$ values generally describe superpositions of the allowed momentum modes.

Apply the hopping Hamiltonian operator and shift the summation index using periodic boundary condition. The coefficients from $|n-1⟩$ and $|n+1⟩$ are respectively $e^{iqa}$ and $e^{-iqa}$ times the original coefficient. Thusand the nearest-neighbour ferromagnetic magnon dispersion isThe unnormalized state in the question has the same energy. Distinct allowed momenta are orthogonal, since $N^{-1}{\sum }_n{e}^{i(q-q^{\prime })na}={\delta }_{q{q}^{\prime }}$ over one set of representatives.

For large $N$ the sampled wavevectors become dense, and the requested sketch is the periodic curve $[E(q)-E_0]/J=1-\cos (qa)$ over $-2\pi <qa<2\pi$. It has a zero at $q=0$ and tends to the equivalent zero at either open endpoint; maxima $2J$ occur at $q=\pm \pi /a$. Near any equivalent zero,using $q$ measured from that zero. The low-momentum ferromagnetic magnon is quadratic, with group velocity ${\hslash }^{-1}dE/dq=(Ja/\hslash )\sin (qa)$. The $q=0$ state is proportional to the total spin lowering operator acting on $|{\psi }_0⟩$, so it belongs to the same ground multiplet and has exactly zero excitation energy. Extending the plot beyond one reciprocal period repeats states rather than adding new independent modes. The lattice spacing $a$ is the nearest-neighbor chord length specified in the paper; $Na$ is the translation length in this lattice description, not necessarily the continuous circumference of a circular arrangement.

Take a normalized spin one-half state in the $S_z$ eigenbasis. Since $\mathbf{S}=(\hslash /2)\mathbf{\sigma }$, direct multiplication of the Pauli matrices givesSubstitution of the half-angle parametrization givesThus $\theta$ and $\varphi$ are precisely the polar and azimuthal angles of the mean spin. Two complex coefficients contain four real parameters; normalization removes one and an unobservable common quantum phase removes another. The resulting pure states form the Bloch sphere. One may choose $\alpha$ real and nonnegative away from the patch where $\alpha =0$. At the poles the azimuth is redundant. The length $|⟨\mathbf{S}⟩|=\hslash /2$ should not be confused with $\sqrt{⟨S^2⟩}=\sqrt{3}\hslash /2$.

For a spatial plane wave, $-i\hslash \nabla$ becomes $\hslash \mathbf{k}$, so the Hamiltonian operator reduces to the Weyl Hamiltonian matrixDefine $\mathbf{n}=(\sin \theta \cos \varphi ,\sin \theta \sin \varphi ,\cos \theta )$ and ${\chi }_{+}=(\cos (\theta /2),e^{i\varphi }\sin (\theta /2){)}^{\mathsf{T}}$. The matrixsatisfies $(\mathbf{\sigma }\cdot \mathbf{n}){\chi }_{+}={\chi }_{+}$ by the angle-addition identities. Consequently the displayed spinor is an energy eigenstate for either $\mathbf{k}=+k\mathbf{n}$ or $\mathbf{k}=-k\mathbf{n}$, with respective energies $+\hslash vk$ and $-\hslash vk$, for $k\ge 0$. Equivalently, at each fixed nonzero wavevector the two branches areIf $v<0$, the two energy labels exchange; the ordered eigenvalues are $\pm \hslash |v||\mathbf{k}|$. Taking $v>0$ sets the convention in the sketches. An orthogonal spinor ${\chi }_{-}=(-e^{-i\varphi }\sin (\theta /2),\cos (\theta /2){)}^{\mathsf{T}}$ obeys $(\mathbf{\sigma }\cdot \mathbf{n}){\chi }_{-}=-{\chi }_{-}$ and supplies the other branch at $+k\mathbf{n}$.

The Pauli matrix multiplication law independently gives $H(\mathbf{k}{)}^2=(\hslash v{)}^2|\mathbf{k}{|}^{2}I$. The dispersion relation is therefore a pair of cones touching at zero energy and momentum; a signed straight-line cut has upper and lower branches $\pm \hslash v|k_x|$. In the $k_z=0$ plane, $\theta =\pi /2$, and the upper-branch mean spin points radially outwards, the lower-branch spin radially inwards. This is spin-momentum locking, not a tangential spin texture. At the touching point the two states are degenerate and the spin direction is not selected by the Hamiltonian operator.

Now let a spatially constant perturbation have matrix $V=\left(\begin{array}{cc}u& w\\ w^{\ast }& z\end{array}\right)$, with $u,z$ real. The Hermitian two-by-two matrix in the Pauli basis decomposition follows explicitly fromwhere $d=(u+z)/2$, $c=(u-z)/2$, $a=\mathrm{Re}w$, and $b=-\mathrm{Im}w$ are real. Equivalently, $d=\mathrm{tr}V/2$ and $(a,b,c{)}_i=\mathrm{tr}(V{\sigma }_i)/2$. The four matrices are linearly independent under the trace inner product and span the four-dimensional real vector space of Hermitian two-by-two matrices.

Spatial constancy means the perturbation does not mix different wavevectors, so each momentum sector can still be diagonalized independently. Write $\mathbf{b}=(a,b,c)$. The full matrix and its exact eigenvalues areThis constant matrix perturbation of a Weyl Hamiltonian translates the cone toIn three-dimensional momentum space the energy bands still touch; the perturbation produces no full spectral gap. The new branch spin directions are parallel and antiparallel to $\hslash v\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{b}$, so their radial texture is centered on the shifted point.

A restricted cut must be distinguished from the full dispersion relation. In the fixed plane $k_z=0$, the energies are $d\pm \sqrt{(\hslash v{k}_x+a{)}^2+(\hslash v{k}_y+b{)}^2+c^2}$, with minimum branch separation $2|c|$. This plane misses the crossing if $c\ne 0$. Along any line through ${\mathbf{k}}_{\ast }$ the dispersion relation still crosses linearly. Thus a sketch of a gapped fixed-plane cut alone would not describe the gapless three-dimensional Hamiltonian operator. The cone after a general perturbation is also no longer a function of $|\mathbf{k}|$ about the old origin alone.

For the quantum harmonic oscillator, the canonical commutation relation $[x,p]=i\hslash$ gives $[a,a^{†}]=1$ and $H_0=\hslash {\omega }_0(a^{†}a+1/2)$. Inverting the definition of the annihilation operator givesWith normalized energy eigenstates and consistent phases, $a|0⟩=0$ and $a^{†}|0⟩=|1⟩$. Their orthogonality therefore givesMore generally, $⟨n|x|0⟩=x_{01}{\delta }_{n1}$, the oscillator electric-dipole selection rule out of the ground state.

To derive the transition amplitude, insert the expansion in stationary energy eigenstates into the Schrödinger equation with $H=H_0+V_1(t)$. The derivatives of the explicit phases cancel the $H_0$ terms. Projection onto $⟨n|$ leaves the exact coefficient equationsThe initial conditions are $c_0(-\infty )=1$ and $c_{n\ne 0}(-\infty )=0$. To first order in the perturbation, replace the amplitudes on the right by these initial values. Since $E_n-E_0=n\hslash {\omega }_0$, integration gives time-dependent perturbation theory in the formThis neglects depletion and higher-order transitions; it is justified when the total transition probability is small. Here $⟨0|x|0⟩=0$, so there is also no first-order diagonal amplitude change from this particular perturbation.

For the exponential electric field, the electric-dipole interaction is $V_1=-qEx{e}^{t/\tau }$, with $\tau >0$. Only $n=1$ couples directly to the initial state, andThe Born rule givesThe real part $1/\tau >0$ makes the lower-limit contribution vanish. ThusSet $u={\omega }_0\tau$ and $\eta =qE{x}_{01}/(\hslash {\omega }_0)$. The dimensionless form is $p_1/{\eta }^2=u^2/(1+u^2)$, increasing monotonically from zero to one, with half the asymptotic value at $u=1$. A sufficient weak-field condition for the entire curve is $|\eta |\ll 1$.

For ${\omega }_0\tau \ll 1$, the force has acted for too little time to appreciably change the state at the instant of measurement. The short-time amplitude is approximately $iqE{x}_{01}\tau /\hslash$, soFor ${\omega }_0\tau \gg 1$, instead,The nonzero slow-switch limit is a probability in the original $H_0$ basis. It does not contradict the adiabatic theorem. At $t=0$ the instantaneous oscillator is displaced by $d=qE/(m{\omega }_0^2)$:Its ground state is $|0_E⟩=|0⟩+\eta |1⟩+O({\eta }^2)$ in the original basis. Adiabatic following therefore predicts exactly the finite original-basis limit found above.