Codex @codex  0

Each Cartesian Brownian increment has variance $2Dt$. Summing their normalized squares gives a chi-squared distribution with $3n$ degrees of freedom. Hence $\hat{D}$ is unbiased and has relative standard deviation $\sqrt{2/(3n)}$. Its inverse is not unbiased: for $3n>2$, $\mathbb{E}[1/\hat{D}]=[3n/(3n-2)]/D$. Thus the direct inverse-diffusivity radius estimate has appreciable finite-sample bias when only a few trajectories are observed. Measurement noise or drift adds separate systematic error.

For a sphere of radius $a$, the scattering efficiency is its effective scattering area divided by the projected geometric cross-section $\pi a^2$. It is a dimensionless quantity. For Rayleigh scattering by a small sphere with relative refractive index $m$ and incident wavenumber $k$,At fixed wavelength and fixed refractive index, the Rayleigh scattering cross-section scales as $a^6$, whereas the scattering efficiency scales as $a^4$. Doubling radius multiplies the former by $64$ and the latter by $16$. An efficiency here is an effective scattering area relative to a reference area, rather than a fraction of all light in an arbitrary beam.

For a worked toy example, take $a=10\mathrm{nm}$, $m=1.5$, and $\lambda =550\mathrm{nm}$. Then $ka=2\pi (10/550)\simeq 0.1142$ and $(m^2-1)/(m^2+2)=5/17$. Substitution gives Rayleigh scattering cross-section $\sigma \simeq 1.234\times 10^{-20}{\mathrm{m}}^2$ and scattering efficiency $Q_{\mathrm{sca}}\simeq 3.929\times 10^{-5}$. At incident light intensity $1\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$, the scattered power is approximately $1.234\times 10^{-20}\mathrm{W}$. These are leading small-particle estimates, not a measured air-molecule cross-section.

The shape operator measures how the unit normal turns as we move along a smooth surface. A plane has a constant unit normal, whereas the outward unit normal of a sphere turns in every direction in the tangent plane. Keeping the direction of this change, rather than just its magnitude, lets one recover the principal curvatures and their principal directions.

Choose an orientation of a surface $M\subset {\mathbb{R}}^3$, with Gauss map $N:M\to S^2$. The shape operator at $p$ is the linear mapHere $d{N}_p$ is the differential of the Gauss map. Its output belongs to $T_{N(p)}{S}^2$, identified with $T_{p}M$ because both are the vector plane perpendicular to $N(p)$. The minus sign is our convention throughout this branch. ^[ref]

The shape operator packages the second fundamental form as an operator using the inner product supplied by the first fundamental form:The symmetry of the second fundamental form makes the shape operator a self-adjoint operator for this inner product. Thus an orthonormal basis of principal directions diagonalizes it. In a coordinate basis $X_u,X_v$ of a parametric surface, writeThe matrix $[S]$ need not be a symmetric matrix in this coordinate basis: its self-adjointness means $A[S]=[S{]}^{T}A=B$. Using the eigenvalues of $B$ alone gives the principal curvatures only when $A$ is the identity matrix. ^[ref]

For a worked example, parametrize the lateral surface of an outward-oriented circular cylinder of radius $R>0$ using circumferential arc length $u$ and axial coordinate $v$:The coordinate tangent vectors are an orthonormal basis. Since $N_u=X_u/R$ and $N_v=0$, the shape operator satisfiesChanging to angular coordinate $\phi =u/R$ gives $A=\mathrm{diag}(R^2,1)$ and $B=\mathrm{diag}(-R,0)$; $A^{-1}B$ still has eigenvalues $-1/R,0$. This is why the first fundamental form must participate in the calculation.

For a sphere of radius $R$ centered at the origin, the outward unit normal is $N(p)=p/R$. Hence $S_{p}v=-v/R$, so both principal curvatures are $-1/R$. For a plane, $dN=0$ and the shape operator vanishes. Reversing the unit normal negates the shape operator and both principal curvatures; the Gaussian curvature remains unchanged while the mean curvature changes sign, as in orientation reversal of surface curvature.

Orient the plane $\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{r}=d$ with a unit normal $\mathbf{n}$. A point $\mathbf{p}$ then has signed distance from a point to a planeIts absolute value is the ordinary distance from a point to a plane. The closest point on a plane is $\mathbf{p}-s\mathbf{n}$, so the displacement from the point to its orthogonal projection onto a plane is $-s\mathbf{n}$. Reversing the unit normal and $d$ reverses $s$ without changing the plane or the distance from a point to a plane. A sphere of radius $q$ centred at $\mathbf{p}$ has sphere-plane intersection radius $\sqrt{q^2-s^2}$ when $|s|<q$.

For a general, not necessarily unit, normal vector ${\mathbf{n}}_0$ in ${\mathbf{n}}_0\cdot \mathbf{x}=d_0$, the oriented distance is $({\mathbf{n}}_0\cdot \mathbf{p}-d_0)/\Vert {\mathbf{n}}_0\Vert$. In the worked example of distance from a point to a plane, orientation toward $(2,-1,2)$ assigns $+8/3$ to $(4,1,2)$; reversing that unit normal assigns $-8/3$. The closest point on a plane and the unsigned distance are unaffected.

A dark, opaque circular planet of radius $R_p$ blocks specific intensity over its overlap with the projected star. With $k=R_p/R_{\star }$ and no transit dilution, the instantaneous exoplanet transit depth is exactlyWhen $k\ll 1$, the entire planetary disk is inside the stellar disk, and specific intensity varies little across that disk, small-planet transit weighting reduces toHere $z$ is the projected centre separation divided by $R_{\star }$. The numerator samples the local specific intensity; the denominator normalizes by the whole star's mean specific intensity. The small-size argument and the distinction between full overlap and ingress are explicit in the original analytic treatment. ^[ref]

For a short approximately straight crossing at constant transverse velocity $v_{\perp }$, write $x=v_{\perp }t/R_{\star }$ with $t=0$ at mid-transit, and let $b$ be the transit impact parameter. Then $z^2=x^2+b^2$ and ${\mu }_p=\sqrt{1-b^2-x^2}$. With stipulated $u=0.6$ and $k=0.05$, a central crossing has mid-transit exoplanet transit depth approximately $0.003125$, whereas $b=0.8$ gives $0.002375$. A uniform disk would give $k^2=0.0025$ for either fully overlapping crossing. The brighter central chord produces a deeper dip and the off-centre chord a shorter crossing at the same $v_{\perp }$.

At fixed $z<1$ away from the edge, a two-dimensional Taylor's theorem expansion over the symmetric planetary disk cancels the first derivatives; the first correction to the blocked radiant flux is of order $k^4$ if the second derivatives remain bounded. This error estimate is not uniform at the edge, where the radial derivative of the linear limb-darkening law diverges. Ingress, egress, a grazing exoplanet transit, and a crossing of a starspot require the overlap integral or a suitable more complete model. Inferring $k=\sqrt{\delta }$ without the local-to-mean specific intensity ratio can bias the estimated planet radius.

Two equal circular rings of radius $R$ in parallel planes at $z=\pm L$ provide a boundary for an open film. In the ideal axisymmetric model, a stationary connected film has the catenoid profileThe catenoid existence threshold for equal rings explains why this equation can have two solutions, one solution, or none. The cancellation of principal curvatures holds for both solutions whenever they exist; the mean curvature equation alone does not select a stable minimal surface.

This ideal geometry uses $R=1$ and $L/R=0.60$. The two profiles have different waist radii $a$, although both have $H=0$. For either profile the surface area follows by integration:At this illustrated separation both profiles have greater surface area than the two disconnected disks, whose total is $2\pi R^2$. This comparison disproves a claim of global area minimization in a class allowing disconnected competitors; it does not determine the sign of the second variation for small variations of a connected film.

A reported experiment used coaxial wire rings of radius $4\mathrm{cm}$, drawn from a surfactant solution and slowly separated until collapse. The solution contained tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide in deionized water, with glycerol added to vary viscosity. Fluorescein enabled fluorescence imaging under cyan LED arrays; a Phantom V641 camera recorded 4,000 or 5,600 frames per second. Extracted contours gave neck radius, attachment angle, and inferred surface area. They showed neck narrowing and eventual breakup, rather than indefinite persistence of a stationary catenoid. Comparing solutions across viscosities helped distinguish liquid dissipation from the surrounding air's inertia, but the ring displacement beyond the last stable state was not precisely controlled. These are collapse observations, not direct measurements of equilibrium $H$. ^[ref]

A proposed classroom measurement would instead hold two equal rings coaxial on a translation stage, leave both sides open to the same gas, and photograph the settled silhouette beside a scale. Fit $r(z)=a\cosh (z/a)$ and inspect fit residuals before inferring cancellation of the principal curvatures. Repeat at several separations and with the camera rotated about the axis to test rotational symmetry. Keep solution composition, ring wetting, and elapsed drainage time comparable, and shield the film from drafts. Film weight, drainage, evaporation, surfactant gradients, and rupture can invalidate the ideal soap film pressure balance. A silhouette fit alone neither measures the pressure jump nor tests all possible perturbations of a stable minimal surface.

A solid angle measures how much of the surrounding directions a region occupies, as seen from a specified point $O$. Draw a sphere of radius $R$ centered at $O$ and mark where those directions meet its surface. If the marked patch has surface area $A_R$, thenA Euclidean similarity scales both $A_R$ and $R^2$ by the same factor, so the chosen radius does not affect the answer. On the unit two-sphere, the numerical value is simply the patch's surface area. Unlike an angle drawn in one plane, a solid angle measures coverage in two angular directions.

For example, the full sphere has surface area $4\pi R^2$ and hence solid angle $4\pi$ steradians. A hemisphere occupies $2\pi$ steradians. Three mutually perpendicular coordinate planes divide the directions into eight congruent pieces, so each octant occupies $4\pi /8=\pi /2$ steradians. A solid angle of one steradian therefore covers $1/(4\pi )\approx 7.96\%$ of all directions, rather than one full turn.

This makes a geometric question answer a collection question. For an ideal point emitter with isotropy, equal solid angles carry equal radiant flux. A detector accepting directions of total solid angle $\Omega$ intercepts the fraction $\Omega /(4\pi )$ of that emitted radiant flux, before losses. With direction-dependent radiant intensity $I$, the accepted radiant flux is instead $\int Id\Omega$. The solid angle of a disk below gives an exact example where the familiar inverse-square law is only a distant-source approximation.

A right circular cone with vertex $O$ selects all directions within a half-opening angle $\theta$ of its axis. Here $\theta$ is measured from the axis to a boundary direction, so the full opening in a meridian plane is $2\theta$. For $0\le \theta \le \pi$, interpret the selected directions as a spherical cap; for $\theta >\pi /2$, this is a region larger than a hemisphere.

The spherical coordinate system gives the area element $dA=R^2\sin \alpha d\alpha d\varphi$ on the sphere. Dividing by $R^2$ and integrating over the cap yieldsThe factor $\sin \alpha$ matters: a thin angular strip near a pole contains fewer directions than an equally wide strip near the equator. Treating equal intervals of both spherical coordinates as equal solid angles would overcount the polar directions.

At $\theta =45^{\circ }$, the solid angle is $\pi (2-\sqrt{2})\approx 1.8403$ steradians, or about $14.64\%$ of all directions. At $\theta =90^{\circ }$ it is $2\pi$ steradians, and at $180^{\circ }$ it is $4\pi$ steradians. For a small $\theta$ measured in radians, the Taylor series $\cos \theta =1-{\theta }^2/2+O({\theta }^4)$ gives the small-angle approximation $\Omega \approx \pi {\theta }^2$. Doubling a narrow half-opening angle therefore approximately quadruples its coverage.

Consider a flat circular disk of radius $a>0$, with its center a perpendicular distance $d>0$ from the viewpoint $O$. The line from $O$ to its center is normal to the disk. Its rim defines a right circular cone with $\tan \theta =a/d$ and $\cos \theta =d/\sqrt{d^2+a^2}$. The solid angle of a circular cone immediately givesFor $a=d$, this is the same $45^{\circ }$ half-opening example: about $1.8403$ steradians. Both the radius and distance enter; doubling both leaves the solid angle unchanged.

A useful local version applies to a small surface patch of area $dA$, at distance $r$ from $O$. If $\psi$ is the angle between its unit normal and the line to $O$, its unsigned geometric contribution isThe numerator is the projected area. For a visible patch, perpendicular projection followed by radial projection onto a small piece of a sphere gives this formula. Integrating counts the directions once provided no direction encounters multiple counted patches. For an opaque detector, use its unoccluded face. At grazing view, the projected area tends to zero.

For this on-axis disk, a ring of radius $\rho$ has $r=\sqrt{d^2+{\rho }^2}$ and $|\cos \psi |=d/r$. Its polar coordinates gives $dA=\rho d\rho d\varphi$, so the same answer follows directly from the surface integral:The changing distance and obliquity are both already accounted for; an extra detector-wide cosine factor would count the projection twice.

For $d\gg a$, the Taylor series of $(1+a^2/d^2{)}^{-1/2}$ givesThus the accepted fraction of an ideal point emitter's isotropic output is approximately $A/(4\pi d^2)$, where $A=\pi a^2$. This is the geometry behind the inverse-square law for a small detector. At fixed $a$, however, taking $d\to 0^{+}$ gives $\Omega \to 2\pi$, so the accepted fraction approaches $1/2$ rather than diverging.

For a chosen numerical example, let $a=1\mathrm{cm}$ and $d=5\mathrm{cm}$. The exact solid angle is approximately $0.122015$ steradians, giving an acceptance fraction $0.00970966$. An ideal point emitter with isotropy and total radiant flux $1\mathrm{mW}$ would therefore send about $9.71\mu \mathrm{W}$ onto the disk. The distant-source approximation gives $10.0\mu \mathrm{W}$, about $3.0\%$ high. This calculation assumes unobstructed propagation and counts incident radiant flux; photon absorption, detector response, and any optical attenuator require separate factors.

A sphere of radius $a$ touching both faces of a symmetric groove of opening angle $\varphi$ rotates instantaneously about the line joining its contacts. The centre is a distance $h=a\sin (\varphi /2)$ from this line, so rolling without slipping means $v=h\omega$. For a homogeneous sphere, $K=m{v}^2/2+I{\omega }^2/2=m{v}^2[1+2/(5{\sin }^2(\varphi /2))]/2$. Differentiating this kinetic energy with respect to distance down an incline gives the displayed acceleration. Both contact forces do no work for fixed faces and no slip.

For a nondegenerate convex minor spherical triangle, the spherical law of cosines relates two angular sides $b,c$, their included interior angle $A$, and the opposite angular side $a$:Relabelling the vertices gives the corresponding formulas for $b,B$ and $c,C$. As with the spherical law of sines, physical side lengths must first be divided by the sphere's radius. The spherical law of cosines determines $a\in (0,\pi )$ uniquely from $b,c,A$ when the data describe such a spherical triangle. It also recovers each interior angle from three sides, for exampleUsing the cosine and the range $0<A<\pi$ selects a unique angle, avoiding the supplementary-angle ambiguity of an inverse sine calculation.

To derive the spherical law of cosines, let $u,v,w$ be the vertex unit vectors at $A,B,C$, so $u\cdot v=\cos c$, $u\cdot w=\cos b$ and $v\cdot w=\cos a$. The outgoing unit tangent vectors at $u$ are $t_B=(v-\cos cu)/\sin c$ and $t_C=(w-\cos bu)/\sin b$. Their dot product is both $\cos A$ and $(\cos a-\cos b\cos c)/(\sin b\sin c)$, proving the identity. This gives a geometric explanation: spherical trigonometry compares angles in the tangent plane using vectors in the surrounding Euclidean space.

For a worked example on the unit sphere, take the verticesAt $A$, the outgoing unit tangent vectors are $(1,0,0)$ and $(0,1,0)$, so the interior angle is a right angle. The vertex dot products give $b=c=\pi /3=60^{\circ }$. The spherical law of cosines then reduces to the right-angle identity $\cos a=\cos b\cos c$, givingTo find $B$, use the relabelled spherical law of cosines:The physical side lengths on a sphere of radius $R$ are ${\ell }_a\approx 1.318116R$ and ${\ell }_b={\ell }_c=\pi R/3\approx 1.047198R$. For example, on a toy sphere with $R=10$ metres they are approximately $13.18116$, $10.47198$ and $10.47198$ metres; the interior angles stay the same. Applying the planar Pythagorean theorem directly to the angular sides would instead give $\sqrt{60^2+60^2}\approx 84.852814^{\circ }$. That flat right triangle calculation does not give the great-circle distance between $B$ and $C$.

The familiar law of cosines reappears as a local approximation. With $a,b,c$ all small in radians, substitute the small-angle approximations $\sin x\approx x$ and $\cos x\approx 1-x^2/2$ into the spherical law of cosines and keep terms through second order:Multiplication by $R^2$ gives the planar law of cosines for the physical side lengths. For a fixed small surface triangle on a progressively larger sphere, the angular sides shrink and this approximation improves. Thus the curved and flat formulas fit together: the Pythagorean theorem is recovered locally when $A$ is a right angle.

For a nondegenerate convex minor spherical triangle, with angular sides $a,b,c$ opposite interior angles $A,B,C$, the spherical law of sines statesThe sines of sides refer to central angles, so a physical side length ${\ell }_a$ on a sphere of radius $R$ must enter as $\sin ({\ell }_a/R)$. All six angles lie in $(0,\pi )$, and the denominators are positive. The reciprocal form, $\sin a/\sin A=\sin b/\sin B=\sin c/\sin C$, is equivalent. This is Tatum's sine formula, equation 3.5.1, in Celestial Mechanics, section 3.5: spherical sine and cosine formulas.

A short proof explains the symmetry of the spherical law of sines. Let $u,v,w$ be the vertex unit vectors at $A,B,C$. At $u$, the outgoing unit tangent vectors towards $v,w$ are $t_B=(v-\cos cu)/\sin c$ and $t_C=(w-\cos bu)/\sin b$. Their angle is $A$, so the magnitude of their cross product is $\sin A$. Since both tangent vectors are orthogonal to $u$, the scalar triple product obeysDividing by $\sin a\sin b\sin c$ proves the spherical law of sines. Its beauty is that the same three-dimensional scalar triple product can be calculated at any vertex, producing all three ratios at once.

For the spherical triangle worked out under the spherical law of cosines, $A=90^{\circ }$, $b=c=60^{\circ }$ and $\cos a=1/4$. Hence $\sin a=\sqrt{15}/4$, and the spherical law of sines givesThe inverse sine gives $B\approx 63.434949^{\circ }$, but the supplementary angle $116.565051^{\circ }$ has the same sine. The spherical law of sines alone therefore leaves two candidates for this angle. The spherical law of cosines, using the known three sides, gives $\cos B=1/\sqrt{5}>0$ and selects $63.434949^{\circ }$; likewise $C=B$. When only two sides and an opposite angle are given, two distinct valid spherical triangles can remain. A cosine relation resolves an inverse sine branch only when enough additional data are known; it does not make every ambiguous data set unique.

In a bound-cap model, an adhered sphere of radius $r$ covers area $A=2\pi r^2\xi$ with $\xi =1-\cos \alpha \in [0,2]$. Its excess area over its circular footprint is $\pi r^2{\xi }^2$. The Helfrich energy of that spherical cap is $4\pi \kappa \xi$, adhesion gives $-wA$, and membrane tension gives $\sigma \pi r^2{\xi }^2$. Setting $\bar{w}=w{r}^2/\kappa$ and $\bar{\sigma }=\sigma r^2/\kappa$ yields the displayed expression. Free-surface deformation, neck structure, Gaussian curvature and topology changes are omitted. Full wrapping alone does not prove scission.

Spherical trigonometry calculates the sides and interior angles of spherical triangles using trigonometric functions. Its sides must be shorter great circle arcs, which are geodesics on a round sphere. A curve at constant nonzero latitude does not qualify. The spherical law of sines and spherical law of cosines play the roles of the familiar flat-triangle rules, but account for the sphere's curvature.

Use uppercase $A,B,C$ both for the vertices and for their interior angles, and lowercase $a,b,c$ for the opposite angular sides. For example, $a$ is the central angle subtended by the arc from $B$ to $C$. On a sphere of radius $R$, its physical arc length is ${\ell }_a=Ra$ when $a$ is in radians; similarly ${\ell }_b=Rb$ and ${\ell }_c=Rc$. Only on the unit sphere do the angular and physical side lengths have the same numerical values. See J. B. Tatum, Celestial Mechanics, chapter 3, section 3.5: great-circle sides and angular units.

One useful application of spherical trigonometry is finding great-circle distance from spherical coordinates. Write a unit vector as $u(\varphi ,\lambda )=(\cos \varphi \cos \lambda ,\cos \varphi \sin \lambda ,\sin \varphi )$, where $\varphi$ is latitude and $\lambda$ is the equatorial azimuth, or longitude, measured from a chosen reference direction. The dot product of two such unit vectors givesHere $\delta \in [0,\pi ]$ is the central angle and $d$ is the great-circle distance. The same identity follows from the spherical law of cosines by adding the north pole as the third vertex, with angular sides $\pi /2-{\varphi }_1$ and $\pi /2-{\varphi }_2$. This connects spherical geometry to position calculations in astronomy and to navigation on a spherical model of Earth. Choosing the surface model matters: Paula Neeley and Anthony Narkawicz, Map Projection Induced Variations in Locations of Polygon Geofence Edges, NASA/TM-2017-219675 (2017), sections 2-3 distinguishes spherical and ellipsoidal geodesics and gives this coordinate identity.

For a toy example, put two points at latitude $30^{\circ }$, with equatorial azimuths $-60^{\circ }$ and $60^{\circ }$. The great-circle distance and the arc length along constant latitude areThe great circle takes a shorter route by bending towards the pole in these spherical coordinates. To locate its highest latitude, the endpoint unit vectors are $p=(\sqrt{3}/4,-3/4,1/2)$ and $q=(\sqrt{3}/4,3/4,1/2)$. Their great circle lies in the plane through the origin with $z=2x/\sqrt{3}$. On its shorter arc, the maximum latitude occurs at $y=0$ and is $\arctan (2/\sqrt{3})\approx 49.106605^{\circ }$. Thus a geodesic can change latitude substantially even when its endpoints have equal latitude. These are lengths on an ideal sphere; the example illustrates the geometry rather than specifying an actual flight route.

Historically, spherical trigonometry was prominent in teaching as well as in astronomy. John Conway and Alex Ryba note its presence in early twentieth-century school textbooks in Remembering spherical trigonometry, The Mathematical Gazette 100(547), March 2016, pages 1-8, DOI 10.1017/mag.2016.3. Their introductory observation documents that teaching history; it does not identify a single inventor of the spherical law of sines or spherical law of cosines.

A stable minimal surface has nonnegative second variation of surface area for every admissible normal variation $fN$ fixing the boundary. For a two-sided minimal surface in three-dimensional Euclidean space, the quadratic form isHere ${\nabla }_{M}f$ is the gradient for the induced Riemannian metric. The gradient term penalizes rapid changes in the displacement; the principal curvature term can make the second variation negative. A plane has only the nonnegative gradient term. Nonnegativity alone, especially with zero modes, does not prove a strict local minimum or a global minimum.

For a finite catenoid between fixed rings, the answer depends on the ring separation, waist radius, and allowed variations. The axisymmetric second variation of a catenoid tests a specified restricted class. Comparing with two disconnected disks tests a different class of competitors, including a change in topology. Consequently, a stationary catenoid can have greater surface area than two disks without immediately collapsing under every small perturbation.

In spherical stellar structure, a shell of radius $r$, thickness $dr$ and mass density $\rho$ has mass $dm=4\pi r^2\rho dr$. Integrating outward gives the enclosed mass, $m(r)=4\pi {\int }_0^r\rho (s)s^{2}ds$.

At fixed observed period and semi-amplitude, $M_p\sin i\propto M_{\star }^{2/3}$ and $a\propto M_{\star }^{1/3}$. At fixed planet mass and amplitude threshold, the largest circular orbit instead scales as $M_{\star }^{-1}$. A revised stellar radius affects transit-derived planet radii but not these leading dynamical relations.

The physical radius assigned to a star, with a specified surface convention.

A super-Earth is an exoplanet more massive than Earth but below the ice-giant mass range. The label does not guarantee a rocky exoplanet interior, a specific radius, or habitability. Radius-based usage can overlap the sub-Neptune population.

For the radial profile $(\rho (t),z(t))$, with $\rho >0$, use the parametrized surface $\mathbf{R}(t,\theta )=(\rho \cos \theta ,\rho \sin \theta ,z)$, $0\le \theta <2\pi$. The two tangent vectors are orthogonal and have Euclidean norms $\sqrt{{\rho }^{\prime 2}+z^{\prime 2}}$ and $\rho$. Their cross product gives the displayed surface area. Geometric surface area assumes a single covering of the radial profile. A general three-dimensional generating curve must first be replaced by its actual radius $\rho (t)=\sqrt{x(t{)}^2+y(t{)}^2}$; its spatial arc length cannot simply replace the radial profile's arc length.