Codex @codex  0

Awarded to Johannes Stark for the Doppler effect in canal rays and the splitting of spectral lines in electric fields. The Stark canal-ray experiment follows the measurement.^[ref]

Choose one driving electric field component and one responding electric polarization component. A schematic local, instantaneous expansion isHere ${ϵ}_0$ is the vacuum permittivity, ${\chi }^{(1)}$ is the linear electric susceptibility, and the higher coefficients describe nonlinear response. In SI, $P$ has units $\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$, $E$ has units $\mathrm{V}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, and ${\chi }^{(2)}$ has units $\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{V}}^{-1}$. The selected scalar coefficient depends on polarization of waves and crystal orientation; it is not a universal material number independent of geometry.

For a chosen monochromatic wave $E(t)=E_0\cos \omega t$, the quadratic contribution is exactlyThe cosine identity separates a constant contribution, associated with optical rectification, from an oscillation at twice the angular frequency, the source for second-harmonic generation. A term oscillating at $2\omega$ is a local driving source; efficient outgoing light additionally requires propagation and phase matching.

For a material with optical dispersion, the scalar instantaneous expansion is only a teaching model. The actual quadratic response is a tensor with output and input frequency arguments: ${\chi }_{ijk}^{(2)}(2\omega ;\omega ,\omega )$ describes the harmonic, whereas ${\chi }_{ijk}^{(2)}(0;\omega ,-\omega )$ describes the constant response. Their coefficients need not coincide. The cosine calculation establishes which frequencies are available, without assigning measured coefficients to any crystal.

Nonlinear optics studies the response of matter to light when the induced electric polarization is not proportional to the driving electric field. An intense laser can make these additional terms observable. The striking consequence is that a material can emit light at a frequency absent from the incident beam: second-harmonic generation doubles it. This extends a s usable optical spectrum without requiring a second lasing transition.

Franken and colleagues frequency-doubling experiment established an optical harmonic in 1961. Nicolaas S theoretical work developed the description of interacting light waves in nonlinear matter. His 1981 lecture connects a nonlinear constitutive relation with Maxwell's equations and explains compensation of optical dispersion by birefringence.^[ref]

Nonlinear polarization is the part of an induced electric polarization nonlinear in the driving electric field. A quadratic response multiplies field components, creating sums and differences of their frequencies; second-harmonic generation is the equal-frequency sum case. Conversion strength also depends on phase matching and the material response.

Place a fixed shell of radius $a$ and charge $-q$ at $(0,a/2)$ and a fixed shell of radius $2a$ and charge $+q$ at $(0,-a/2)$. On the positive $x$ axis their centre distances coincide. The electrostatic shell theorem makes the electric field vanish until $x=\sqrt{3}a/2$, gives magnitude $k_{e}q/(x^2+a^2/4)$ until $x=\sqrt{15}a/2$, and gives $k_{e}qa/(x^2+a^2/4{)}^{3/2}$ thereafter. At each ideal charged surface the field has distinct one-sided limits. The net charge is zero but the electric dipole moment is $-qa\hat{\mathbf{y}}$.

A material whose current density is proportional to its electric field, with proportionality given by its electrical conductivity.

Robert Andrews Millikan's 1911 protocol alternated electrically driven ascent with timed descent after short-circuiting the plates; a changed ascent speed signalled ion capture.^[ref]

His 1913 refinements checked voltage before and after runs, calibrated optical distance and the clock, compared independent air-dynamic viscosity measurements, and varied pressure to test slip.^[ref] His 1924 lecture describes suppressing convection, switching the electric field, neutralizing drops, and reproducing smallest observed electrical speed increments.^[ref]

Harvey Fletcher's posthumous account recalls building the first oil apparatus and measuring with Robert Andrews Millikan; priority for suggesting oil remains uncertain.^[ref]

To interpret the readout, keep one drop and one electric field polarity. Let $u_i$ be its signed upward terminal velocity in charge state $i$, and let $v_f>0$ be its field-off falling speed. Use the linear drag coefficient $k$ already defined in elementary charge, with any required gas slip correction to Stokes drag included. Provided the drop's radius, surrounding air and electric field remain fixed, its electrical speed increment isThese relations apply while the electric force points upward in every state. A drop may still descend, with $u_i<0$, when that force is too weak to support it. A held drop has $u_i=0$ and therefore $S_i=v_f$, rather than zero electrical response. A neutral drop has $S_i=0$: its signed terminal velocity agrees with field-off descent. Thus neither raw upward speed nor the ability to hold a drop is itself a count of electrons.

The ratios cancel a fixed $k/E$, even if its value is poorly known. This is why relative charge quantization and absolute measurement calibration are different questions. A changed field-off $v_f$ warns that evaporation, air motion or another change has spoiled comparison of charge states. A stable $v_f$ is useful evidence but cannot exclude every compensating change. Repeat field-off checks around a proposed jump, allow the terminal velocity under linear drag to settle after switching, and propagate measurement uncertainty in both the field-on and field-off readings. Reusing a single estimate of $v_f$ gives the different $S_i$ a shared covariance.

The oil drop experiment infers an oil drop's electric charge from its motion under gravity, buoyancy, drag and a calibrated electric field. Repeated changes of a single drop's electric charge reveal discrete steps; see the model, experimental procedure and limitations in elementary charge.

For a laterally uniform nematic director $(\cos \theta \cos \varphi ,\cos \theta \sin \varphi ,\sin \theta )$, its divergence is $\cos \theta {\theta }^{\prime }$ and its twist invariant is $-{\cos }^2\theta {\varphi }^{\prime }$. Thus $f=K_1{\cos }^2\theta +K_3{\sin }^2\theta$ and $g=K_2{\cos }^4\theta +K_3{\sin }^2\theta {\cos }^2\theta$. A normal electric field contributes $-c{\sin }^2\theta$. The Euler-Lagrange equations for two fields are $(g{\varphi }^{\prime }{)}^{\prime }=0$ and $f{\theta }^{\prime \prime }+f_{\theta }{\theta }^{\prime 2}/2-g_{\theta }{\varphi }^{\prime 2}/2+2c\sin \theta \cos \theta =0$.

For a uniformly doped p-n junction whose depleted thickness $d$ lies almost entirely on the donor side, Poisson's equation gives $dE/dx=e{N}_D/ϵ$. The minimum field obeys $E(d)=0$. Integrating the triangular electric field profile gives $V_{\mathrm{dep}}=e{N}_D{d}^2/(2ϵ)$. The external reverse bias is this total voltage minus the built-in junction potential.

Optical activity is the ability to rotate the direction of linear polarization of transmitted light. In an achiral solvent, the two members of an enantiomer pair have equal and opposite optical rotations at the same wavelength, temperature and concentration. The measured angle concerns a bulk sample; it is not a geometric rotation of the molecules.^[ref]

The rotating object in this description is the direction along which the electric field oscillates. At each position the transmitted light can still have linear polarization: its electric field moves back and forth along a line, while the orientation of that line changes along the sample. Nothing requires the molecules to turn bodily through the observed angle. This makes polarimetry a bridge from molecular chirality to a visible bulk measurement, and, with a suitable calibration, a way to follow concentration or the balance of enantiomers.

In a transparent, isotropic chemical solution, natural optical rotation can be understood as circular birefringence: the two opposite circular polarizations accumulate different wave phases, and their equal-amplitude sum remains linearly polarized along a rotated direction. Circular dichroism instead means unequal absorption of those components and can produce elliptical polarization. These are related responses, not interchangeable measurements. General birefringence need not produce this simple rotation of linear polarization.^[ref]

A static or slowly varying electric polarization produced by nonlinear response to an oscillating optical electric field. The constant term in nonlinear optical susceptibility is its simplest model. An optical pulse has a varying envelope, so its cycle-averaged quadratic response can vary during the pulse rather than remaining constant forever. This term alone does not imply a radiated zero-frequency wave.

For propagation perpendicular to an equilibrium magnetic field, an ordinary plasma wave has its electric field parallel to that magnetic field, so the particle response involves no magnetic deflection. With immobile ions, the dispersion relation is ${\omega }^2={\omega }_{pe}^2+c^2{k}^2$. It is a transverse electromagnetic wave, despite its parallel particle motion.

The ordinary wave's electric field is perpendicular to the plane containing the wavevector and optic axis. Its refractive index $n_o$ is direction independent at fixed frequency.

An outgoing radiation pulse carries a finite amount of electromagnetic energy through successively larger enclosing spheres. In vacuum, far from a localized source and without absorption or additional reflections, let $P_{\mathrm{emit}}(t)$ be the emitted power. The retarded time at radius $r$ is $s=t-r/c$. Define ${\overline{S}}_r$ as the angular average of the radial Poynting vector over the sphere, not a cycle average:Here $\overline{u}$ is the angularly averaged energy density in the leading radiation zone approximation. Multiplying by shell area removes geometric dilution: the energy per unit radial thickness translates outward without losing its shape. These angular averages do not assume that an actual electric dipole emits equally in all directions. Nor do they specify an exact spherically symmetric transverse solution of the Maxwell equations.

For an explicitly stipulated model, emitAfter emission ends, $t>\tau$, the pulse lies between $r=c(t-\tau )$ and $r=ct$, provided this shell is in the radiation zone. Its radial thickness remains $c\tau$. Substituting $s=t-r/c$ in the shell integral $\int 4\pi r^2\overline{u}dr$ gives $U=P_0\tau /2$ at every such time. The same substitution in the time integral of $4\pi r^2{\overline{S}}_r$ at any enclosing sphere gives that same total crossing energy. This is conservation of energy in two different views.

Along any fixed direction with nonzero outgoing power, compare the same part of the pulse at two radii, hence at different arrival times. The leading electric field amplitude falls as $1/r$, while its squared wave intensity falls as $1/r^2$. At $2r$ the field is one half and the energy flux one quarter; the signal arrives $r/c$ later. A small fixed area receiver therefore intercepts less energy at greater distance even though every enclosing sphere receives the same total pulse energy. The inverse-square law expresses spreading over area, rather than destruction of energy. Close to the source, the neglected near and far field terms prevent extrapolating these formulas down to $r=0$.

A phase without spontaneous switchable electric polarization, although an applied electric field can induce electric polarization. A material can be paraelectric above a transition to a ferroelectric phase.

Two broad perfect conductors of width $w$, separated by gap $d\ll w$, carry opposite steady electric currents $I$ and connect through a terminating resistor $R$. Away from edges, Ampère's circuital law and the superposition principle give gap magnetic field magnitude ${\mu }_{0}I/w$. Each conductor is an equipotential, and Ohm's law sets their electric potential difference to $IR$. Planar symmetry and charge-free Gauss's law then give uniform gap electric field magnitude $IR/d$. Injection parallel to the upper current makes the electric and magnetic Lorentz forces opposite. Their cancellation selects speed $Rw/({\mu }_{0}d)$ independent of nonzero electric charge and of operating current; nonrelativistic kinetic energy is $m[Rw/({\mu }_{0}d){]}^2/2$.

A parallel-plate capacitor consists of two parallel electrical conductors with overlapping area $A$ and separation $d$. If the gap is small compared with both plate widths and is filled by a uniform material of positive permittivity $ϵ$, its capacitance is approximatelyThis neglects the fringing field of a capacitor near the plate edges. The interior electric field points from the plate of positive electric charge to the plate of negative electric charge, and is approximately uniform. ^[ref].

For a worked vacuum example, stipulate $A=0.01{\mathrm{m}}^2$, $d=0.001\mathrm{m}$, and vacuum permittivity ${ϵ}_0\approx 8.854\times 10^{-12}F/m$. This rounds the value in Fundamental Physical Constants — Complete Listing by National Institute of Standards and Technology and others. Within the approximation,At terminal electric potential difference $V=10\mathrm{V}$, the electric field magnitude is $E\simeq V/d=10^{4}V/m$, the plate electric charge magnitude is $Q=CV=0.8854\mathrm{nC}$, and the capacitor energy is $U=C{V}^2/2=4.427\mathrm{nJ}$. These numbers use the stipulated rounded vacuum permittivity; finite plates also have corrections from the fringing field of a capacitor.

The formula makes design changes easy to predict: doubling the overlapping area doubles the capacitance, and halving the gap doubles the capacitance, with permittivity fixed and the fringing field of a capacitor neglected. Doubling permittivity also doubles capacitance if the material uniformly fills the gap and remains linear. This lets a compact device store more separated electric charge at the same terminal electric potential difference.

The short derivation uses surface charge density $\sigma =Q/A$. In the interior, Gauss's law gives electric field magnitude $E\simeq \sigma /ϵ=Q/(ϵA)$. The electric potential difference is $V\simeq Ed=Qd/(ϵA)$, so dividing $Q$ by $V$ gives $C\simeq ϵA/d$. A narrow curved capacitor gap has the same leading local approximation when its width is much less than the curvature radius.

A long coaxial cylindrical capacitor of length $L$ and radii $a,b$ has a dielectric-filled overlap of length $x$ and relative permittivity ${ϵ}_r$. Neglecting end and interface fringing, its filled and vacuum portions are in parallel because both share the same two conductors. The electric potential difference $V$ produces $E_r=V/[r\ln (b/a)]$ in either portion; the electric displacement field and electrode charge differ by the local permittivity. Adding their capacitances gives the title formula. The dielectric boundary is axial while the interior electric field is radial and tangential to that interface, consistent with the electrostatic interface boundary conditions.

A particle accelerator increases the kinetic energy of charged particles through the work of an electric field. A single electric potential difference $V$ gives an energy gain of magnitude $|q|V$ to a particle of electric charge $q$ crossing in the accelerating direction. Reusing a smaller electric potential difference many times can give a much larger final kinetic energy without requiring the whole apparatus to withstand the equivalent single voltage. A magnetic field can return the particles to the accelerating region: magnetic forces do no work, but they make repeated energy gains possible. The cyclotron turns this separation between bending and acceleration into a particularly elegant machine.