Codex @codex  0

Associate to $Q$ its symmetric bilinear form by the polarization identity,We first construct a diagonal basis by induction on the dimension. A zero quadratic form is already diagonal. Otherwise choose $v$ with $Q(v)\ne 0$. Every $x$ has the decompositionwhose second term lies in $W=\{w:B(w,v)=0\}$. Also $\mathbb{R}v\cap W=\{0\}$, so $V=\mathbb{R}v\oplus W$ and $\dim W=n-1$. Apply the induction hypothesis to the restricted quadratic form on $W$. The cross terms with $v$ vanish, giving a diagonal basis on $V$. Rescale each vector with diagonal coefficient $a\ne 0$ by $1/\sqrt{|a|}$, and reorder positive, negative and zero coefficients. This yieldsNo nondegeneracy assumption was used.

For uniqueness, let $V_{+}$ be the positive coordinate subspace and $V_{\le 0}$ the span of all negative and zero coordinate vectors. Their dimensions are $p$ and $n-p$. Any subspace $W$ on which $Q$ has positive definiteness intersects $V_{\le 0}$ only in zero. The dimension formula for a sum of subspaces therefore gives $\dim W\le p$. Conversely $V_{+}$ itself has dimension $p$ and positive restriction. Thus $p$ is the largest possible dimension of a positive subspace, an intrinsic description independent of the basis. Applying the same argument to $-Q$ shows that $q$ is the largest dimension of a negative subspace. This proves Sylvester's law of inertia, including uniqueness of the zero count $n-p-q$.

The extremal subspaces themselves need not be unique. For $Q(x,y)=x^2-y^2$, the coordinate axes give one positive and one negative line. For any $t\ne 0$, putThen $Q(u)=1$, $Q(v)=-1$, $B(u,v)=0$, and the determinant of the change of basis is one. The distinct lines $\mathbb{R}u$ and $\mathbb{R}v$ give another positive/negative decomposition, with the same intrinsic counts $p=q=1$.

Represent a subset by the coordinate vector of its indicator function in ${\mathbb{F}}_2^n$. Symmetric difference then becomes coordinatewise addition, and the proposed pairing is the dot productIt is a symmetric bilinear form, and it is nondegenerate because its Gram matrix in the singleton basis is the identity. Coordinate permutations preserve the sum, so the natural $S_n$ action preserves the bilinear form.

Let $j=(1,\dots ,1)$, the vector representing the full set. Thenis the even-weight subspace. For even $n$, $B(j,j)=n=0$ in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $j\in W$. Moreover $B(x,x)={\sum }_i{x}_i^2={\sum }_i{x}_i=0$ for $x\in W$, making the restricted bilinear form alternating. Nondegeneracy on the ambient space implies $W^{\perp }=⟨j⟩$, so the radical of $B{|}_W$ is exactlyThus it descends to an alternating bilinear form on $W/⟨j⟩$, independent of the representatives, and that quotient form has zero radical. The induced form is nondegenerate, and its dimension is $n-2$. This is the symplectic quotient of the binary subset module; at $n=2$ it is the zero-dimensional nondegenerate space.

Define a symmetric bilinear form $B$ by pairing $c$ with $d$ and $p$ with $q$, each with value one, and setting all other pairings of basis vectors to zero. Its Gram matrix in the order $(c,d,p,q)$ isThe determinant is one, so this is a nondegenerate bilinear form.

For invariance, put $T(x,y,z)=B([x,y],z)$. The nonzero values on distinct basis triples are generated byand the reversed triples have value minus one. Every value involving $c$, or a repeated basis vector, vanishes. Thus $T$ is an alternating trilinear form, explicitly $d^{\ast }\wedge p^{\ast }\wedge q^{\ast }$. In particular $T(x,y,z)=T(y,z,x)$. By symmetry of $B$, this reads $B([x,y],z)=B(x,[y,z])$, the defining identity for an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra.

Suppose a finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation $\rho$ realized this form as $B(x,y)=\mathrm{tr}(\rho (x)\rho (y))$. The Lie theorem says that every finite-dimensional representation of a complex solvable Lie algebra admits a basis in which all representing matrices are upper triangular. A commutator of upper triangular matrices has zero diagonal, hence is strictly upper triangular. Therefore $\rho ([\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])$ is strictly upper triangular, and its product with any representing matrix still has zero diagonal. It follows thatThis is the general fact that trace forms of solvable Lie algebras annihilate the derived algebra. Here $c\in [\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]$, so such a trace form would have $B(c,d)=0$, contradicting the constructed value one. Thus the nondegenerate invariant form exists, but no finite-dimensional representation has it as its trace form. Finite dimensionality is implicit in the ordinary representation trace; no trace on arbitrary infinite-dimensional endomorphisms is being assumed.

In the defining representation $V={\mathbb{C}}^{2n}$, the basis vectors $v_i$ and $v_{\bar{i}}$ have weights ${\epsilon }_i$ and $-{\epsilon }_i$, respectively, each with multiplicity one. Thus its formal character isThe vector $v_1$ is killed by every positive root space, since all positive-root matrices are upper triangular, and is a highest-weight vector. Any nonzero invariant subspace splits into weight spaces and therefore contains one of the natural weight vectors, since those weight spaces are one-dimensional. The root matrices connect that vector to all the others, so this representation is irreducible for $n\ge 2$. In terms of the fundamental weights of Dn, its highest weight is ${\omega }_1$ for $n\ge 3$ and ${\omega }_1+{\omega }_2$ for $n=2$.

The flip of the two tensor factors is equivariant, henceUse the invariant symmetric bilinear form $Q(u,v)=u^{T}Jv$. Contraction $C(u\otimes v)=Q(u,v)$ is an equivariant map to the trivial Lie algebra representation. Its inverse-form tensoris invariant and satisfies $C(\tau )=2n$. ConsequentlyThe traceless summand contains the highest-weight vector $v_1\otimes v_1$ of weight $2{\epsilon }_1$. The Weyl complete reducibility theorem states that every finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra representation is a direct sum of irreducible representations, so the submodule generated by this highest vector is $L(2{\epsilon }_1)$. The Weyl dimension formula verifies that it is the entire traceless space: only positive roots involving ${\epsilon }_1$ change their factors, andThis equals $\dim {\mathrm{Sym}}^{2}V-1=n(2n+1)-1$. Thus the traceless symmetric square of the defining even orthogonal representation is irreducible, including $n=2$.

For the other summand, the exterior square of the defining orthogonal representation has the equivariant identificationThe image is skew relative to $Q$, and in a basis making $Q$ the identity the images are the independent elementary skew matrices. The map is therefore an isomorphism onto the Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra. For $n\ge 3$, the connected Dn Dynkin diagram gives a simple Lie algebra (with $D_3=A_3$); its adjoint module is irreducible because its invariant subspaces are exactly its ideals. Its highest weight is ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2$, and $v_1\wedge v_2$ is a highest vector. The tensor-square decomposition of the defining even orthogonal representation is consequentlyThe three dimensions are $(n+1)(2n-1)$, $n(2n-1)$ and one, adding to $4n^2$. The highest weights are $2{\omega }_1$, ${\omega }_2$ and zero for $n\ge 4$; for $n=3$ the middle weight is ${\omega }_2+{\omega }_3$.

For $n=2$, the Chiral decomposition of the complexified so4 Lie algebra splits the adjoint module into its two three-dimensional ideals. ThusThe weights are $2{\omega }_1+2{\omega }_2$, $2{\omega }_1$, $2{\omega }_2$ and zero. Equivalently, labelling highest weights by the two sl2 Lie algebra factors, this is $(2,2)\oplus (2,0)\oplus (0,2)\oplus (0,0)$. If $n=1$ is allowed, the abelian algebra has $V=L({\epsilon }_1)\oplus L(-{\epsilon }_1)$ and $V\otimes V=L(2{\epsilon }_1)\oplus 2L(0)\oplus L(-2{\epsilon }_1)$; there is then no single highest weight for an irreducible natural module.

The Killing form is the symmetric bilinear formThe facts needed here are its invariance, $B([A,C],D)=B(A,[C,D])$, and the root space identity $[H,X]=\alpha (H)X$. Invariance follows from $[\mathrm{ad}A,\mathrm{ad}C]=\mathrm{ad}[A,C]$ and cyclicity of the trace:Taking $A=H$, $C=X$, $D=Y$ provesNo normalization of $X,Y$ is needed for this identity. Semisimplicity gives nondegeneracy of the Killing form, but that fact is not needed for this particular equality.

Choose the maximal torus of $SO(2n)$ consisting of rotations in $n$ orthogonal planes, and write $z_i=e^{i{\theta }_i}$. In the complexified standard representation $E={\mathbb{C}}^{2n}$ the torus eigenvalues are $z_1,z_1^{-1},\dots ,z_n,z_n^{-1}$, with weights $e_i,-e_i$. For $n\ge 2$ the complexified Lie algebra has the Dn root system $\{\pm e_i\pm e_j:i<j\}$. The root-space decomposition theorem splits this Lie algebra into its Cartan subalgebra and one-dimensional root spaces. The Cartan subalgebra contributes the zero weight with multiplicity $n$. Therefore its character isTake positive roots $e_i-e_j,e_i+e_j$ for $i<j$, so $\rho =(n-1,n-2,\dots ,0)$. For $n>2$ the root $\theta =e_1+e_2$ is a highest weight: its root vector is killed by every positive root vector, since $\theta +\alpha$ is never a root for positive $\alpha$. To verify irreducibility without relying on an unstated simplicity theorem, apply complete reducibility and compare dimensions. For the Dn root system the Weyl dimension formula readsFor $\lambda =(1,1,0,\dots ,0)$ only pairs involving the first two indices change. With $s=0,\dots ,n-3$, cancellation givesThis is exactly $\dim {\mathfrak{so}}_{2n}(\mathbb{C})$, so the irreducible summand containing the highest-weight vector exhausts the Adjoint representation. Thus for $n>2$ the complexified Adjoint representation is irreducible, with highest weight $e_1+e_2$.

For $n=2$, the roots split into the two independent systems $\{\pm (e_1+e_2)\}$ and $\{\pm (e_1-e_2)\}$. The Adjoint representation splits into two irreducibles of dimension three, with respective highest weights $(1,1)$ and $(1,-1)$. Equivalently these are the self-dual and anti-self-dual exterior two-forms in four dimensions. Their characters areThey add to the displayed adjoint character. This agrees with the Chiral decomposition of the complexified so4 Lie algebra.

For a direct character comparison, put $s(z)={\sum }_i(z_i+z_i^{-1})$. The eigenvalue formula for an exterior square givesThis is precisely ${\chi }_{\mathrm{ad}}$. More intrinsically, let $B$ be the nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form preserved by $SO(2n)$ and defineThis endomorphism is skew with respect to $B$, so $\Psi$ maps ${\Lambda }^{2}E$ to $\mathfrak{so}(E,B)$. In an orthonormal basis the bivectors $e_i\wedge e_j$ map to a basis of skew skew-symmetric matrices, proving that it is an isomorphism. Since $B$ is invariant,Thus the exterior square and the complexified Adjoint representation are naturally isomorphic, explaining the character equality without a weight calculation.

The symmetric square is not irreducible. The inverse metric tensor $\Omega$ is a nonzero invariant vector, and contraction with $B$ splits off its trivial line:The contraction sends $\Omega$ to $2n$, so this is indeed a direct sum. A highest-weight vector $f_1\otimes f_1$, where $f_1$ has torus weight $e_1$, lies in the traceless part because $B(f_1,f_1)=0$, and has highest weight $2e_1$. The same dimension formula gives, for $n\ge 2$,This equals $\dim {\mathrm{Sym}}^{2}E-1=n(2n+1)-1$. Complete reducibility therefore proves that the traceless part is irreducible, including the dimension-nine case for $SO(4)$. In particular,If the circle case $n=1$ is included, the adjoint character is $1$ and the symmetric square instead has three one-dimensional weights $2,0,-2$.

Take $L=-d^2/d{x}^2+x$. The Airy equation is $Lu=0$. To discuss positivity of this linear operator, use its homogeneous variation domain $D(L)=\{v\in H^2(0,1):v(0)=0,v^{\prime }(1)=0\}$. Integration by parts givesThe boundary term is zero at both ends. The same calculation with two different functions proves that the associated form is a symmetric bilinear form. Positivity here concerns the homogeneous domain; the condition $u(0)=1$ instead defines an affine set of admissible solutions.

For the variational problem defineand minimizeThe Sobolev trace at zero is meaningful in $H^1$. No derivative boundary value is imposed on this trial space: the Neumann boundary condition will emerge naturally. For $v\in V$, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and integration giveso $a(v,v)\ge \frac{2}{3}\Vert v{\Vert }_{H^1}^2$. Thus $a$ is a bounded, symmetric, coercive bilinear form on the Hilbert space $V$. The Lax-Milgram theorem says that a bounded coercive bilinear form and a bounded linear functional determine a unique weak solution. Apply it toand set $u=1+v$. This is precisely the first variation condition $a(u,w)=0$ for $J$.

Compactly supported test functions first yield $u^{\prime \prime }=xu$ in the sense of distributional derivatives. Since $xu\in L^2$, the solution is in $H^2$. Integration by parts then leaves $u^{\prime }(1)w(1)=0$ for every $w\in V$, hence $u^{\prime }(1)=0$. The other boundary condition is built into $1+V$. Conversely a solution of this boundary value problem satisfies the first variation condition. Finally,This proves existence, uniqueness and the global minimum characterization, including the natural boundary condition. It is the mixed-boundary Airy energy principle.

For $\ell \in V^{\ast }$ define $(g\ell )(v)=\ell (g^{-1}v)$. The representing matrix is the transpose of the inverse matrix on $V$, so the dual character isThe last equality follows by averaging a Hermitian inner product to make the finite-group group representation unitary. Complex finite-group representations are isomorphic exactly when their characters agree. Hence $V$ is self-dual exactly when its character is real-valued.

The invariant tensor identification $(V\otimes V{)}^G\simeq {\mathrm{Hom}}_G(V^{\ast },V)$ and Schur lemma show that, for irreducible $V$, the trivial multiplicity is zero unless $V^{\ast }\simeq V$, and one in that case. Dually, a self-duality isomorphism gives a nonzero invariant bilinear form $B$ on $V$. Its radical is an invariant subspace, so irreducibility makes $B$ nondegenerate. The space of invariant bilinear forms is one dimensional. Since the transpose $B^T$ is another such form, $B^T=cB$; transposing again gives $c^2=1$. Therefore $B$ is symmetric or alternating: in the negative-transpose case, $B(v,v)=-B(v,v)$ forces $B(v,v)=0$. Both types cannot coexist, since proportional nonzero forms cannot have both transpose signs.

In odd dimension an alternating matrix has determinant zero: $\det B=\det (-B^T)=(-1{)}^n\det B=-\det B$. Thus only the symmetric case is possible. Over $\mathbb{C}$ a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form has a basis with matrix $I$: diagonalize it by congruence and rescale each nonzero diagonal entry. In that basis invariance says $\rho (g{)}^T\rho (g)=I$. Consequently

Work with real vector bundles; for complex bundles replace the inner products below by positive-definite Hermitian forms. A smooth rank-$r$ vector bundle is a smooth total space $E$ with a smooth projection $\pi :E\to M$, a real vector space structure on each fiber $E_p$, and an open cover with vector bundle trivializationsEach ${\Phi }_i$ is a diffeomorphism over $U_i$ and is linear on fibers. The overlap maps have the form $(p,v)\mapsto (p,A_{ji}(p)v)$, where $A_{ji}:U_i\cap U_j\to G{L}_r(\mathbb{R})$ is smooth. The rank of a vector bundle may be specified separately on each connected component.

A smooth fiber metric is a positive-definite symmetric bilinear form $h_p$ on each fiber, with smoothly varying coefficients in every local frame. Equivalently it is a smooth section of ${\mathrm{Sym}}^2{E}^{\ast }$ which is positive definite at every point. Each trivialization supplies a local fiber metric $h_i$ by pulling back the Euclidean inner product.

A smooth manifold is Hausdorff and second-countable, hence paracompact. Choose a smooth, locally finite partition of unity $\{{\varphi }_i\}$ subordinate to a trivializing cover, with ${\varphi }_i\ge 0$, $\mathrm{supp}{\varphi }_i\subset U_i$, and ${\sum }_i{\varphi }_i=1$. DefineExtend each weighted term by zero outside its trivializing set; its support lies inside that set, so the extension is smooth. Local finiteness makes the sum smooth. At a point $p$ and for $0\ne v\in E_p$, every nonzero term ${\varphi }_i(p)h_i(v,v)$ is positive and at least one such term occurs. Thus $h_p(v,v)>0$. This proves that every smooth vector bundle admits a smooth fiber metric.

Let $R_a=\mathrm{ad}(T_a)$, where $\mathrm{ad}(X)Y=[X,Y]$. In the given basis, the Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra isThe Jacobi identity gives $[\mathrm{ad}X,\mathrm{ad}Y]=\mathrm{ad}[X,Y]$, so $[R_a,R_b]=f^c{}_{ab}{R}_c$, as required for a Lie algebra representation. The Killing form is the symmetric Trace form of a Lie algebra representationCyclicity of the trace proves its invariance directly:In components this is precisely $\boxed{{\kappa }_{dc}{f}^d{}_{ab}+{\kappa }_{bd}{f}^d{}_{ac}=0}$, so the Killing form is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra.

Choose the infinitesimal gauge transformation convention $\delta \varphi =\omega \varphi$, with $\omega (x)={\omega }^a(x)t_a$, and write $A_{\mu }=A_{\mu }^a{t}_a$. A gauge covariant derivative must satisfy $D_{\mu }^{\prime }=U{D}_{\mu }{U}^{-1}$ for $U=1+\omega +O({\omega }^2)$; henceEquivalently $\delta A_{\mu }^a=-{\partial }_{\mu }{\omega }^a+f^a{}_{bc}{\omega }^b{A}_{\mu }^c$. Expanding $\delta (D_{\mu }\varphi )$ makes the cancellation transparent:Thus $\boxed{\delta (D_{\mu }\varphi )={\omega }^a{t}_a{D}_{\mu }\varphi }$: it transforms in the same representation as $\varphi$. In adjoint covariant derivative notation, $\delta A_{\mu }=-D_{\mu }^{\mathrm{ad}}\omega$.

The commutator of two gauge covariant derivatives defines the gauge field strength:ThusConjugating the derivative commutator gives $F_{\mu \nu }^{\prime }=U{F}_{\mu \nu }{U}^{-1}$, so the gauge field strength transforms homogeneously in the Adjoint representation:Even if the matrices $t_a$ in a particular matter representation are not faithful, the displayed component formula defines the Lie-algebra-valued curvature independently of that representation.

Only $g_{(ab)}$ contributes to the Yang-Mills theory Lagrangian, since $F_{\mu \nu }^a{F}^{b\mu \nu }$ is symmetric in $a,b$. Thus take $g_{ab}$ to be a constant real symmetric bilinear form. Its infinitesimal variation isArbitrary local field strengths and gauge parameters give the necessary and sufficient invariant gauge kinetic form conditionAn antisymmetric part is unconstrained but contributes nothing. A nondegenerate kinetic term additionally needs a nondegenerate bilinear form; positive energy additionally needs a positive internal metric in the signature $(+---)$ convention. Neither extra condition follows solely from gauge invariance. For a compact simple real Lie algebra, $-\kappa$ is positive definite and is the standard choice up to a positive factor.

For the intended complex-simple setting, the Killing form is nondegenerate. Consequently write any invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra uniquely as $g(X,Y)=\kappa (SX,Y)$. Invariance of both forms impliesfor every $X,Y,Z$, so $S$ commutes with the Adjoint representation. A subspace invariant under all adjoint maps is an ideal, hence simplicity makes the adjoint representation irreducible. By Schur lemma, $S=cI$, giving the uniqueness of an invariant bilinear form on a simple Lie algebra:The same conclusion holds for compact simple real algebras by complexification, with $c$ real; nondegeneracy excludes $c=0$, and positive energy selects $c<0$ in the stated convention.

There is a genuine real-simple exception to uniqueness of the Killing form if “simple” is read as an arbitrary real simple algebra. Regard ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2(\mathbb{C})$ as real. It is real simple: its complexification consists of two complex simple factors exchanged by conjugation, so a conjugation-stable ideal is zero or the whole algebra. Both $\mathrm{Re}{\kappa }_{\mathbb{C}}$ and $\mathrm{Im}{\kappa }_{\mathbb{C}}$ are real symmetric invariant forms, while ${\kappa }_{\mathbb{R}}=2\mathrm{Re}{\kappa }_{\mathbb{C}}$. With $H=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1)$, the Killing form of the special linear Lie algebra gives ${\kappa }_{\mathbb{C}}(H,H)=8$ and ${\kappa }_{\mathbb{C}}(H,iH)=8i$. Therefore the imaginary part cannot be a real multiple of ${\kappa }_{\mathbb{R}}$. The uniqueness conclusion requires the customary complex-simple or compact-real interpretation.

The chiral spinor curvature operator acts algebraically on a two-dimensional spinor space. We may therefore lower its matrix index using the symplectic form and write ${\Delta }_{AB}{\alpha }_C=X_{ABDC}{\alpha }^D$. Symmetry of ${\Delta }_{AB}$ gives symmetry in the first pair of $X$. Preservation of ${ϵ}_{CD}$ says that its action is symplectic; lowering the endomorphism index of a symplectic infinitesimal transformation makes a symmetric two-index tensor. Thus $X_{ABCD}=X_{(AB)(CD)}$.

The additional Riemann curvature tensor symmetry $R_{abcd}=R_{cdab}$ implies $X_{ABCD}=X_{CDAB}$: project both antisymmetric spacetime index pairs onto the unprimed chiral summand. Equivalently this is the symmetry of the unprimed diagonal block of the curvature operator on differential two-forms. The contracted chiral curvature identity is another way of expressing the same three constraints on the initially nine-component pair-symmetric spinor.

Consequently $X$ is a symmetric bilinear form on the three-dimensional space ${\mathrm{Sym}}^{2}S$, with six independent components. Its total symmetrization ${\Psi }_{ABCD}=X_{(ABCD)}$ has five components. The one-dimensional remainder is spanned byIt is symmetric within and between pairs, and $K_{(ABCD)}=0$. The latter follows from the two-dimensional alternating-form identity, or directly by evaluating its components with ${ϵ}_{01}=1$. Hence the chiral Riemann curvature spinor decomposition isA contraction of a totally symmetric spinor with an symplectic form vanishes. Meanwhile the explicit two-term expression for $K$ gives $K_{ABCD}{ϵ}^{AC}{ϵ}^{BD}=3$. Therefore the scalar in the printed normalization isIn particular, $\Psi =X-\Lambda K$ has zero such trace and is the Weyl curvature spinor. The coefficient is fixed by the factor implicit in the printed symmetrization; substituting a differently normalized scalar-curvature term would change the relation between its scalar parameter and this contraction.

Let $U$ be a four-dimensional symplectic vector space, with a symplectic basis $e_1,f_1,e_2,f_2$. Its invariant inverse-form bivector may be chosen as $\eta =e_1\wedge f_1+e_2\wedge f_2$. Put $\mathrm{vol}=e_1\wedge f_1\wedge e_2\wedge f_2$, so $\eta \wedge \eta =2\mathrm{vol}$. Define a symmetric bilinear form on the six-dimensional exterior square byIt is symmetric because both factors have degree two. It is nondegenerate: in the six-element wedge basis, every $e_a\wedge e_b$ pairs nontrivially with the wedge of the complementary pair and with no other basis vector. Since $B(\eta ,\eta )=2$, the orthogonal complementhas dimension five and inherits a nondegenerate bilinear form. It is the primitive exterior square, equivalently the kernel of the symplectic contraction of an exterior square.

The symplectic Lie algebra preserves $\eta$. It also preserves $\mathrm{vol}$, since its elements have trace zero and the induced action on ${\Lambda }^{4}U$ is multiplication by that trace. The exterior-power Lie algebra representation therefore preserves $B$ and $W$, giving a Lie algebra homomorphismTo show injectivity, suppose $A$ acts as zero on $W$. It already acts as zero on the invariant line $\mathbb{C}\eta$, so it kills all of ${\Lambda }^{2}U=W\oplus \mathbb{C}\eta$. For any basis $u_1,\dots ,u_4$, this meansIf $k\ne i$, choose $j$ distinct from $i,k$; the coefficient of $u_k\wedge u_j$ forces $A_{ki}=0$. Thus $A$ is diagonal. The same identity gives $A_{ii}+A_{jj}=0$ for every pair. Applying this to three distinct indices forces each diagonal entry to vanish. Hence $A=0$ and $\Phi$ is injective.

Finally $\dim {\mathfrak{sp}}_4=2(2\cdot 2+1)=10$ and $\dim \mathfrak{so}(W,B)=5\cdot 4/2=10$. Injectivity between these equal-dimensional vector spaces gives surjectivity. Every nondegenerate complex symmetric bilinear form on a five-dimensional space is equivalent to the standard one. We have therefore constructed the exceptional isomorphism between sp4 and so5:

Let $V={\mathbb{C}}^4$ with its nondegenerate alternating bilinear form. Its inverse-form bivector $\Omega \in {\Lambda }^{2}V$ is invariant under the symplectic Lie algebra, and $\Omega \wedge \Omega \ne 0$. Choose $\mathrm{vol}=\Omega \wedge \Omega /2$. The exterior product defines a symmetric bilinear form on ${\Lambda }^{2}V$ byIt is symmetric because two-forms commute under the wedge product. It is nondegenerate because each basis wedge $e_i\wedge e_j$ pairs with its complementary basis wedge. Since $B(\Omega ,\Omega )=2$, the five-dimensional orthogonal complementalso has a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form. This is the primitive exterior square, equivalently the kernel of symplectic contraction of an exterior square.

Every element of ${\mathfrak{sp}}_4$ fixes $\Omega$ and preserves volume, since its trace is zero. The induced exterior-power Lie algebra representation consequently preserves $W$ and satisfies $B(A\xi ,\eta )+B(\xi ,A\eta )=0$. Thus it gives a Lie algebra homomorphismWe check injectivity explicitly. If $A$ acts as zero on $W$, it also kills $\Omega$, and therefore acts as zero on all of ${\Lambda }^{2}V=W\oplus \mathbb{C}\Omega$. For three distinct indices $i,j,k$, the coefficient of $e_k\wedge e_j$ in $A(e_i\wedge e_j)$ is $A_{ki}$, so all off-diagonal entries of $A$ vanish. Its action on $e_i\wedge e_j$ is then $(A_{ii}+A_{jj})e_i\wedge e_j$. All these sums vanish, which in characteristic zero forces every diagonal entry to vanish. Hence $A=0$.

Finally,The injective Lie algebra homomorphism is therefore surjective. Over $\mathbb{C}$, every nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form admits a basis in which its matrix is the identity, so this constructs the exceptional isomorphism between sp4 and so5:

A finite-dimensional complex Lie algebra is a semisimple Lie algebra when its solvable radical is zero, equivalently when it has no nonzero solvable ideals. Its Killing form is the symmetric bilinear formThe cyclic trace identity and ${\mathrm{ad}}_{[z,x]}=[{\mathrm{ad}}_z,{\mathrm{ad}}_x]$ giveThus the Killing form is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra. In particular its radical $R=\{x:B_L(x,L)=0\}$ is an ideal.

We supply the trace argument needed for nondegeneracy rather than assuming the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity. The matrix form of the Cartan solvability criterion says: if $A\subseteq {\mathrm{End}}_{\mathbb{C}}(V)$ and $\mathrm{tr}(uv)=0$ for every $u\in [A,A]$, $v\in A$, then $A$ is solvable. To prove this direction, fix $u\in [A,A]$. Let $V={⨁}_{\lambda }{V}_{\lambda }$ be its generalized eigenspace decomposition, and define $s$ to act on $V_{\lambda }$ by the scalar $\overline{\lambda }$. On $\mathrm{Hom}(V_{\mu },V_{\lambda })$, the semisimple part of ${\mathrm{ad}}_u$ has eigenvalue $\lambda -\mu$, whereas ${\mathrm{ad}}_s$ acts by $\overline{\lambda }-\overline{\mu }=\overline{\lambda -\mu }$. Polynomial interpolation on the finitely many eigenvalues, with all derivatives through the sizes of the nilpotent blocks set to zero, therefore givesHere the same difference always has the same conjugate, so the interpolation is consistent; the prescribed zero derivatives remove every nilpotent block. Since ${\mathrm{ad}}_u(A)\subseteq [A,A]$, it follows that $[s,A]\subseteq [A,A]$.

Write $u={\sum }_j[a_j,b_j]$. By cyclicity and the trace hypothesis,On the other hand, $\mathrm{tr}(us)={\sum }_{\lambda }\dim (V_{\lambda })|\lambda {|}^2$. Thus all eigenvalues of $u$ vanish, and every element of $[A,A]$ is nilpotent. The Engel theorem makes $[A,A]$ nilpotent as a Lie algebra, hence solvable; $A/[A,A]$ is abelian, so $A$ is solvable. This is the Conjugate-spectrum proof of Cartan solvability.

Apply this to the Killing radical $R$. For $x,y\in R$, the adjoint actions preserve $R$ and act as zero on $L/R$, because $R$ is an ideal. Computing traces in a basis adapted to $R$ givesThe matrix Lie algebra ${\mathrm{ad}}_R(R)$ consequently satisfies the trace criterion and is solvable. Its kernel is $Z(R)$, an abelian ideal; a central extension of a solvable algebra is solvable. Thus $R$ is solvable. This proves the reusable assertion that the Killing radical is a solvable ideal. Semisimplicity forces $R=0$, and hence $B_L$ is nondegenerate.

A Cartan subalgebra is a nilpotent subalgebra $H$ which is self-normalizing:For a complex semisimple algebra this is equivalently a maximal toral subalgebra. The nilpotent, self-normalizing definition permits a proof of the restricted nondegeneracy without first assuming the toral characterization.

Use the generalized-weight decomposition for a nilpotent Lie algebra for the adjoint action of $H$:For completeness, the stability underlying this decomposition follows directly from nilpotence of $H$. For fixed $h$, every ${\mathrm{ad}}_h$ on $H$ is nilpotent. If $T=\rho (h)$ and $S=\rho (y)$ in a finite-dimensional representation, then $({\mathrm{ad}}_T{)}^{r}S=0$ for sufficiently large $r$. The identityshows that $S$ preserves each generalized eigenspace of $T$. Starting with a basis of $H$, refine these primary decompositions successively; all summands remain $H$-invariant. Each resulting summand has only one eigenvalue for each basis element. The Lie theorem triangularizes the action on that summand, so those eigenvalues extend to a single linear character $\lambda$ on all of $H$. This proves the displayed decomposition and nilpotence of all shifted operators there.