Codex @codex  0

The phrase equivalence principle covers several related claims. The weak equivalence principle concerns the universality of free fall for test particles of negligible self-gravity, with the same initial conditions and no relevant nongravitational forces. In a Newtonian notation,Composition-independent motion requires the ratio of passive gravitational mass to inertial mass to be universal. Its common value can then be absorbed into the normalization of $\mathbf{g}$; the empirical assertion is universality, not the numerical convention used to express the ratio.

The Einstein equivalence principle includes that universality and extends the claim to local nongravitational experiments through local Lorentz invariance and local position invariance. A sufficiently small freely falling laboratory should recover the nongravitational laws of special relativity. The strong equivalence principle extends the scope to local gravitational experiments and bodies with appreciable gravitational self-energy. An experiment establishing one part of the weak statement does not automatically establish these stronger claims.

The motivating elevator comparison makes both the power and the limitation clear. Release a small object in a freely falling cabin. The cabin and object share the local free fall, so the object initially floats relative to the cabin. In a cabin supported against gravity, a released object instead accelerates relative to the floor, as it does in a suitably accelerated cabin in flat spacetime. This suggested replacing a universal gravitational force by geometric inertial motion. It does not identify a finite planetary gravitational field with an accelerated frame everywhere: separated falling objects can have a measurable relative acceleration.

In general relativity, the precise local geometric statement is that one can choose normal coordinates at an event $p$ withThis eliminates the connection contribution to the geodesic equation at that point. It does not generally set the Riemann curvature tensor to zero. In normal coordinates the first metric corrections away from $p$ are quadratic in the coordinate separation, and geodesic deviation measures the associated tidal forces. Equivalence is a local approximation for finite experiments whose extent and duration make these corrections negligible; it is not an assertion that curvature has been transformed away.^[ref]

There are direct experimental consequences beyond the elevator thought experiment. An Eötvös experiment compares bodies of different composition on a torsion balance, using a differential signal to test the universality of gravitational acceleration. MICROSCOPE performed an analogous test in orbit using electrostatic control of titanium-alloy and platinum-alloy test masses. Its first published result in 2017 constrained their differential free fall; this was already available before the examination. It tested a specific weak-equivalence prediction, not every possible gravitational law.^[ref] Comparisons of different atomic clocks can instead test local position invariance, including the expected gravitational redshift. These measurements constrain related but distinct parts of the framework.

The principle remains important as a restriction on how matter couples to gravity and as an organizing guide for experimental tests. It does not, on its own, derive the Einstein field equations. Universally coupling matter to a metric tensor still leaves choices for that metric's action; the equivalence principle does not uniquely fix field equations. For example, a metric gravitational action containing a scalar curvature squared term can retain the same minimal matter coupling while changing the gravitational dynamics. Selecting the Einstein-Hilbert action requires further dynamical assumptions and empirical success. The present role of the principle is consequently precise and limited: it supports local relativistic physics and universal matter coupling, while curvature, gravitational field equations and their quantitative predictions remain additional content.

A tidal force measures the difference of gravitational acceleration across an extended object. A freely falling reference frame removes a spatially uniform acceleration, but not its gradient. For a distant point mass $M$ at distance $R$ and direction $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ from the reference centre, a small internal displacement $\mathbf{x}$ givesThe tidal tensor has eigenvalues $2GM/R^3$ radially and $-GM/R^3$ in each transverse direction: radial stretching and transverse squeezing. Its trace vanishes in the source-free region, consistent with the gravitational Gauss law. An associated relative potential is ${\Phi }_{\mathrm{tide}}=-GM[3(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot \mathbf{x}{)}^2-x^2]/(2R^3)$.

The scale is $GMl/R^3$ across size $l$, not the centre's absolute gravity $GM/R^2$. This distinction explains how a more distant massive object can exert a large force but a modest tide. Opposite-side stretching supports the elementary two-bulge picture; real ocean tides also involve rotation, basin geometry and fluid dynamics, so the static gradient alone does not predict coastal heights or timing. The same gradient stresses satellites and can disrupt a self-gravitating body when it competes with the body's own gravitational restoring acceleration.

A gravitational assist changes a spacecraft's velocity relative to the Sun by scattering it in the gravitational field of a moving planet. In the planet's rest frame, ignore other forces during the encounter and take the spacecraft mass negligible. The incoming and outgoing asymptotic velocities have equal magnitude,because the encounter is conservative, but their directions differ along a hyperbolic orbit. If the planet has approximately constant heliocentric velocity ${\mathbf{V}}_p$, the heliocentric spacecraft velocities are ${\mathbf{v}}_{\mathrm{in},\mathrm{out}}={\mathbf{V}}_p+{\mathbf{u}}_{\mathrm{in},\mathrm{out}}$. Its specific energy change isThus a flyby can increase or decrease heliocentric energy depending on its geometry. The planet exchanges momentum and orbital energy with the spacecraft; its speed change is extremely small because its mass is much greater. There is no energy creation and no increase of asymptotic speed in the planet's own frame.

For a point-mass planet, conservation of energy and angular momentum gives the hyperbolic eccentricity and deflection anglewhere $r_p$ is periapsis distance and $b$ the impact parameter. The velocity-vector change has magnitude $2u_{\infty }\sin (\delta /2)$, so the maximum energy-change magnitude for this fixed deflection is $2V_p{u}_{\infty }\sin (\delta /2)$. A small periapsis increases the turning angle, but collision, atmosphere and tidal forces limit how close a real spacecraft may pass. Multiple encounters allow large changes without expending the propellant that equivalent direct velocity changes would require.

The differential gravitational acceleration responsible for a tidal force is the difference between accelerations at separated points of a body. Relative to a freely falling reference point $\mathbf{R}$, a small offset $\mathbf{\xi }$ experiencesThe tidal tensor has units ${\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$; the vector called $\mathbf{T}(\mathbf{\xi })$ in the source is the resulting differential acceleration, in $\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. An actual differential force is this vector multiplied by the test mass. Measurable effects include relative motion of separated freely falling masses, radial stretching, transverse squeezing, deformation and, when self-gravity or strength is insufficient, disruption. A spatially uniform acceleration alone produces no tidal deformation.

A spatially uniform external gravitational acceleration moves a body's centre of mass without stretching it. Tidal forces arise from the variation of that acceleration across the body. Let a distant mass $M$ lie at distance $D$ along unit vector $\mathbf{n}$, and let $|\mathbf{r}|\ll D$ denote position relative to the body's centre. Subtract the centre's acceleration. To first order,The tidal tensor is $T_{ij}=GM(3n_i{n}_j-{\delta }_{ij})/D^3$. It stretches along the line to the source with eigenvalue $2GM/D^3$ and compresses in the two perpendicular directions with eigenvalues $-GM/D^3$. Its trace vanishes outside the source, consistently with Laplace's equation for the gravitational potential.

After removal of the constant and uniform-acceleration terms, the tidal potential isAn ideal equilibrium ocean on a sphere of radius $R$ follows an equipotential of the body's gravity plus this perturbation. For surface gravity $g$, the leading displacement isup to a constant fixing total water volume. The quadrupolar form produces bulges on both the near and far sides; the far-side bulge follows from differential acceleration, without postulating a repulsive gravitational force.

The Moon and Sun both raise terrestrial tides, with relative strength set mainly by $M/D^3$, rather than by the total gravitational pull $M/D^2$. Their contributions reinforce near new and full Moon to produce spring tides, and partly cancel near quadrature to produce neap tides. Earth's rotation relative to the tidal pattern gives a strong semidiurnal component in the simplest geometry. Real tide heights and timing depend on ocean depth, coastlines, basin resonances, Coriolis acceleration, friction and the declination of the forcing bodies. Tidal dissipation produces phase lags and torques, exchanging rotational and orbital angular momentum and gradually altering the spin and orbit. The equilibrium bulge is therefore a useful starting model, not an exact local tide forecast.

The weak equivalence principle says that freely falling test bodies with identical initial conditions follow the same trajectory independently of composition, when nongravitational forces and appreciable self-gravity are negligible. In Newtonian language it implies universal gravitational-to-inertial mass ratio. The Einstein equivalence principle additionally requires local Lorentz invariance and local position invariance of nongravitational experiments: a sufficiently small freely falling laboratory realizes special relativity. The strong equivalence principle extends universality to gravitational experiments and self-gravitating bodies.

A falling elevator makes the local content clear. Uniform gravitational acceleration can be removed along a freely falling worldline by a suitable frame, but curvature cannot generally be removed over an extended region. Nearby geodesics have relative accelerationfor the displayed Riemann-sign convention. tidal forces therefore remain detectable even in free fall. Equivalence motivates a metric description and gravitational clock shifts, but does not uniquely select Einstein's field equations.

Tests compare accelerations of different materials, frequencies of clocks at different gravitational potentials, or the response of self-gravitating bodies. lunar laser ranging times pulses reflected by lunar retroreflectors and fits Earth-Moon motion in the Sun's field; a differential free-fall violation would add a characteristic periodic range perturbation. The fit must also model tides, station and reflector geometry and propagation delays, with solar-radiation pressure and reflector thermal effects checked as possible mimics. Williams and collaborators' 2012 analysis is a concrete example of this method, published after this examination.^[ref]

tidal forces measure differences in gravitational acceleration across an extended region. Neighboring freely falling particles each have zero four-acceleration, but their separation need not accelerate uniformly. Let $u^{\mu }$ be the tangent to a reference timelike geodesic and ${\xi }^{\mu }$ its infinitesimal separation from a neighboring one, chosen from an affinely parametrized geodesic congruence. Using the Riemann curvature tensor convention specified in Solution 3,Changing the overall curvature convention changes this displayed sign. The covariant derivatives compare vectors by parallel transport, avoiding a coordinate-dependent subtraction of accelerations.

In the Newtonian limit, expand the force field at two nearby points:For $\Phi =-GM/r$, a local orthonormal frame aligned with the radius givesThere is radial stretching and transverse compression; the trace vanishes outside the mass. Two freely falling test masses and a measurement of their changing separation implement gravity gradiometry. Their common acceleration drops out, while a relative acceleration proportional to separation remains. A local inertial frame removes Christoffel symbols at a point, but cannot remove nonzero curvature over a finite region.

A tidal force is a difference of gravitational acceleration across an extended region. In Newtonian gravity, $g_i=-{\partial }_i\Phi$. Two neighboring freely falling particles separated by ${\xi }^j$ have, to first order,For a point mass, $\Phi =-GM/r$. In a local orthonormal radial/transverse frame,A small freely falling cloud stretches radially and compresses transversely. Outside the source the three eigenvalues sum to zero, consistently with ${\nabla }^2\Phi =0$; within matter the trace is $-4\pi G\rho$. These are accelerations of separations, not the much larger common acceleration of the cloud's centre.

In general relativity, freely falling test particles follow timelike geodesics. A freely falling frame can eliminate the connection at one event, but not the Riemann curvature tensor throughout a finite laboratory. Let $u$ be the geodesic tangent and $\xi$ a connecting vector for neighboring geodesics with $[u,\xi ]=0$. In the explicitly chosen curvature conventionthe geodesic deviation equation isIt follows by commuting ${\nabla }_u{\nabla }_{\xi }u$, using ${\nabla }_{u}u=0$ and zero torsion. In a parallel-propagated orthonormal frame, its spatial components directly describe measured relative acceleration. The weak-field, slow-motion limit recovers the Newtonian Hessian above. Reversing the curvature sign convention reverses the displayed curvature side, without changing the physical stretching. The equivalence principle removes locally uniform gravity, while geodesic deviation measures the residual tidal field. The connection between parallel transport, curvature and neighboring geodesics is developed systematically in the standard geometric construction.^[ref]

Nearby freely falling particles can accelerate relative to one another even though each follows a geodesic. A local inertial frame removes the common gravitational acceleration at one event; it cannot remove the variation across an extended laboratory. That variation is a tidal force, measured covariantly by geodesic deviation.

Let $u^{\mu }$ be the reference four-velocity and ${\xi }^{\mu }$ an infinitesimal separation to a neighboring geodesic, with matching affine parameters. With the convention $[{\nabla }_{\beta },{\nabla }_{\gamma }]V^{\mu }=R^{\mu }{}_{\nu \beta \gamma }{V}^{\nu }$,This relates measured relative acceleration to the Riemann curvature tensor. Reversing the curvature-tensor convention reverses the displayed curvature sign, without changing the physical relative motion.

In a small freely falling frame outside a spherical mass, the weak-field tidal tensor has radial and transverse components proportional to $2,-1,-1$. ThusAn initially spherical cloud stretches radially and compresses in both transverse directions. Two separated test masses, with their changing separation measured by light, form the basic idea of a gravity gradiometer; the common falling motion drops out. A uniform apparent acceleration in an accelerated laboratory can occur even in flat Minkowski spacetime, so it is the separation-dependent tidal response that diagnoses curvature.

Local equivalence and tides. In Newtonian mechanics, inertial mass $m_{\mathrm{i}}$ measures the response to a force, whereas passive gravitational mass $m_{\mathrm{g}}$ couples to an imposed Newtonian gravitational field. A freely falling body obeysThe observed composition independence of free fall says that this ratio is universal. With a common choice of units it is one. This is the Newtonian content of the weak equivalence principle for test particles; it does not by itself specify all nongravitational physics.

The Einstein equivalence principle further says that local nongravitational experiments in a sufficiently small freely falling laboratory have the form predicted by special relativity, independently of the laboratory's location and motion. In such a local inertial frame, the metric tensor is locally the Minkowski metric and the Christoffel symbols vanish at the selected event. The strong equivalence principle extends the universality claim to local gravitational experiments and bodies with significant gravitational self-energy. None of these statements removes measurable tidal forces across a finite apparatus.

In an ideal small freely falling lift, a released ball initially floats relative to the cabin, because both undergo the same free fall. Two separated balls, however, need not retain their separation: they sample different parts of the gravitational field. For a point source, linearizing $\mathbf{g}=-GM\mathbf{r}/r^3$ across a small separation $\mathbf{\xi }$ gives the tidal tensor predictionA radial separation stretches with coefficient $2GM/r^3$, whereas a transverse separation is compressed with coefficient $-GM/r^3$. Initially parallel velocities therefore develop relative motion even though the individual bodies experience zero proper acceleration.

The relativistic statement is geodesic deviation. With the Riemann curvature tensor conventiona connecting vector between neighboring freely falling worldlines satisfiesHere $D/d\tau$ is the covariant derivative along the reference geodesic, and $U^{\mu }$ its four-velocity. Curvature can be nonzero where the Christoffel symbols have been made zero. In the weak, static, slow-motion limit this equation reduces to ${\ddot{\xi }}^i=-{\partial }_i{\partial }_j\Phi {\xi }^j$, recovering the tidal tensor above. A finite falling lift can detect gravity through these relative accelerations; local equivalence does not imply a globally uniform field.

Weak-field connection and potential. Take $x^0=ct$ and the $+---$ metric signature. There is an index error in the printed formula for the Christoffel symbols: its first differentiated metric component must be $g_{\nu 0}$, not $g_{\mu 0}$. The correctly contracted expression isThe offending term vanishes under the stipulated time independence, so this correction does not change the intended calculation. Write $g_{\mu \nu }={\eta }_{\mu \nu }+h_{\mu \nu }$ and treat both $h$ and its derivatives as first order. To that order $g^{00}=1-h_{00}$, $g^{0i}=O(h)$, and $g^{ij}=-{\delta }^{ij}+O(h)$. A stationary metric tensor givesFor the temporal component the inverse-metric coefficient is already first order, soFor a spatial component the zeroth-order inverse metric contributes:The time component of the approximate geodesic equation says that $dt/d\tau$ is constant to the retained order. In its spatial component, convert the proper time derivatives to coordinate-time derivatives and cancel $(dt/d\tau {)}^2$:Comparison with the Newtonian equation $d^2\mathbf{x}/d{t}^2=-\nabla \Phi$ identifies $h_{00}=2\Phi /c^2+C$. For an isolated source, choose the gravitational potential to tend to zero at infinity and normalize the time coordinate there, giving $C=0$. ThusThe quantity $\Phi$ is the Newtonian gravitational potential, or gravitational potential energy per unit mass, in $\mathrm{J}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}={\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. For a point source, $\Phi =-GM/r$. A static clock has $d\tau =\sqrt{g_{00}}dt\approx (1+\Phi /c^2)dt$, connecting the Newtonian limit with gravitational time dilation.

Frequency of the orbiting source. Treat the gas blob as a test particle on a timelike circular Schwarzschild geodesic, with pressure and other nongravitational forces negligible. Treat our very distant location as infinity, so the observer's own gravitational potential is negligible. These are the assumptions that make a unique answer in terms of $R_S/r$ possible.

Put $f=1-R_S/r$ and use a local static observer at the emission point as an intermediate measuring frame. The remote observer lies on the symmetry axis of the orbit. A ray arriving on that axis has zero conserved axial angular momentum, so its local direction is perpendicular to the emitter's azimuthal velocity. Bending within a meridional plane does not alter this orthogonality. The transverse relativistic Doppler effect therefore giveswhere $v$ is the orbital speed measured by that local static observer. The gravitational redshift between static Schwarzschild observers then givesA gravitational circular orbit has $v^2=GM/r+O((GM/r{)}^2/c^2)$ in the weak-field limit, so $v^2/c^2=R_S/(2r)+O((R_S/r{)}^2)$. Expanding both factors,Solving for the emitted frequency givesThe gravitational part is $R_S/(2r)$ and the transverse kinematic time dilation contributes another $R_S/(4r)$; the absence of line-of-sight motion does not remove this second effect.

As an exact check, the local speed on a timelike circular Schwarzschild geodesic satisfies $v^2/c^2=\mu /(r-2\mu )$, where $\mu =GM/c^2=R_S/2$. Therefore the face-on frequency shift of a circular Schwarzschild source iswhose expansion agrees with the boxed answer. If the gas is supported or accelerated by pressure or magnetic stresses rather than following a geodesic, its orbital speed is not fixed by the mass and radius alone; the appropriate first-order result is instead ${\nu }_{\mathrm{em}}\approx {\nu }_{\mathrm{ob}}[1+GM/(r{c}^2)+v^2/(2c^2)]$, with $v$ supplied independently.

Put $r_s=2\mu$ and $f(r)=1-r_s/r$. Radial null geodesics of the Schwarzschild metric obeyNear the horizon, $\delta =r-r_s$ satisfies$C>0$ describes the exterior and $C<0$ the interior. The exponential approach in Schwarzschild coordinate time resembles part (a), but $\delta$ is not a proper radial distance.

Outside, set $\rho =2\sqrt{r_s\delta }$ and retain the leading near-horizon terms. The radial metric becomes the Rindler limit of a Schwarzschild horizon:It agrees with part (a) for $x=\rho$, $\alpha =c/(2r_s)$. Accordingly $\rho \propto e^{\pm ct/(2r_s)}$, while $\delta \propto {\rho }^2$ explains the factor two in its exponent.

Inside, write $r=r_s-{\rho }^2/(4r_s)$. The leading radial metric is insteadHere the radial coordinate is timelike and the Schwarzschild $t$ coordinate is spacelike. Thus $x<0$ in the Rindler metric does not represent the black-hole interior: $g_{tt}=(\alpha x{)}^2$ stays positive on both Rindler wedges. In the black-hole interior all future-directed radial light rays move towards decreasing $r$; the two signs of $dr/dt$ do not mean opposite future radial directions because $t$ is no longer time.

The horizon is a coordinate singularity in Schwarzschild coordinates and in the accelerated chart, not a curvature singularity. The full Schwarzschild geometry nevertheless has genuine tidal forces; the flat Rindler metric captures its leading local radial near-horizon structure.

Tidal deformation is the change in a body's shape caused by differential gravity across it, that is, by a tidal force. The familiar two-bulge picture represents an elongated response along the companion direction, rather than a separate force pulling only the nearest surface. If spin and orbital motion differ, the forcing sweeps through the body's material. With tidal dissipation, the response is out of alignment with the instantaneous forcing, allowing a net torque. ^[ref].

Differential gravitational acceleration, multiplied by the affected mass, across a spatially extended body. In the linear approximation the acceleration difference is $T\Delta \mathbf{r}$, where $T$ is the tidal tensor. Stellar tidal forces limit the domain of a circumplanetary orbit; sufficiently strong ones can produce tidal disruption.

To isolate a tidal force, subtract the gravitational acceleration shared by the body as a whole. Let a reference test particle follow $\ddot{\mathbf{R}}=\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{R})$, and let another have position $\mathbf{R}+\mathbf{x}$. In a translating accelerated reference frame with parallel, nonrotating axes,for a source point mass, when $|\mathbf{x}|/R\ll 1$. Here $\mu =GM$ is its standard gravitational parameter and the last term uses Big O notation. This Taylor expansion removes the common inward pull and keeps the spatial variation. The near side has an excess pull toward the source; the far side has a deficit of inward pull, which is an outward relative acceleration. Both sides can stretch apart while both still accelerate toward the source.^[ref]

For a material element of mass $m$, the residual external force in this translating accelerated reference frame is $m[\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{R}+\mathbf{x})-\mathbf{g}(\mathbf{R})]$. Actual deformation also depends on elasticity, pressure and self-gravity. A rigid body approximation suppresses deformation but can still have internal forces that resist the tidal force. The point-mass tidal stretching and squeezing pattern describes freely falling, noninteracting test particles, rather than promising the same shape for every solid, star or ocean. A rotating reference frame introduces centrifugal acceleration and Coriolis acceleration, which must be included separately.

Tidal locking settles a body's spin into a sustained relation with its orbital motion through tidal forces and tidal dissipation. The simplest case is synchronous rotation, a $1:1$ spin-orbit resonance. On an ideal circular orbit, with spin axis perpendicular to the orbital plane, the body keeps the same face toward its companion, as the Moon approximately does toward Earth. ^[ref].

This article retains the broader sense of tidal locking as capture into a spin-orbit resonance; the term is also commonly used specifically for synchronous rotation. Tidally evolved rotation need not be $1:1$: Mercury has a $3:2$ spin-orbit resonance with the Sun, turning three times in two orbital periods. The distinction matters when inferring illumination or climate from a spin period. ^[ref].

A tide is a periodic change in ocean level driven mainly by the differential gravitational forces of the Moon and Sun, together with the Earth's rotation. Their tidal forces act across the extended planet; a uniform acceleration shared by the whole Earth does not by itself generate a tide. Ocean-basin resonance and coastal geometry modify the local response.

Motion can weigh a system whose mass is otherwise inaccessible. For a self-gravitating isolated system in virial equilibrium, let $K$ and $U$ denote equilibrium averages and use its gravitational radius $R_g=-G_N{M}^2/U$ and a mass-weighted mean squared speed relative to its centre of mass. Then $K=M⟨v^2⟩/2$ gives $M=R_g⟨v^2⟩/G_N$. If random velocities are isotropic and mean streaming has been removed, $⟨v^2⟩=3{\sigma }_{\mathrm{los}}^2$, where ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{los}}$ is the one-dimensional line-of-sight velocity dispersion. Observations sample many objects at one epoch; replacing a time average by that sample requires a representative, approximately stationary population, beyond the trajectory identity itself.^[ref]

A practical measurement route uses an optical telescope to locate members and a spectrograph to measure Doppler shifts of identified spectral lines. Their shifts relative to the system's mean give radial velocities; angular separations plus a distance estimate constrain its size. Subtracting instrumental broadening and measurement variance, testing membership, and looking for coherent rotation or subgroups help control the inference. The projected luminous size need not equal $R_g$, and luminous tracers need not have the same distribution as all gravitating mass. Unknown velocity-anisotropy parameters, interlopers, mergers, external tidal forces and appreciable boundary stresses can bias a naive estimate. A large velocity dispersion alone does not establish virial equilibrium.

Weightlessness is the absence of supporting or constraining forces that would give a body an apparent weight. It does not require zero gravitational acceleration. A freely falling cabin and a small freely falling object inside share the same acceleration in a uniform field, so neither needs to support the other.

The circular orbit as continuous free fall gives a sustained example. Real spacecraft have small residual relative accelerations from tidal forces, atmospheric drag force and onboard disturbances; the ideal common-fall explanation does not assert that every point in an extended spacecraft experiences exactly the same Newtonian gravitational field. ^[ref]