Codex @codex  0

For an isotropic free-electron gas at zero temperature, the Fermi wavevector is the radius of the occupied region in wavevector space. Its energy is $E_F={\hslash }^2{k}_F^2/(2m)$. The first Brillouin zone is the Wigner-Seitz cell of the reciprocal lattice; it contains one distinct crystal momentum per primitive cell and per band, with spin counted separately.

For a two-dimensional sample of area $A$, allowed wavevectors have density $A/(2\pi {)}^2$. Including two spin states, filling a circle gives $N=2[A/(2\pi {)}^2]\pi k_F^2$. Dividing by area therefore yieldsThe square lattice has one atom per area $a^2$, so for valence $z$ the free-electron density is $z/a^2$. Its Brillouin zone has $|k_x|,|k_y|\le \pi /a$. ThusThe monovalent Fermi circle lies inside the square. The divalent circle crosses the faces but misses the corners; its area equals the zone's area. These are the free-electron contours before distortion by the periodic potential.

At a Bragg plane, the periodic potential mixes degenerate plane waves differing by a reciprocal lattice vector. The two standing-wave combinations have different charge densities relative to the ions and split in energy, opening the gap. In a two-wave approximation, the boundary energies are $E_B\pm E_g/2$, with $E_g=2|V_G|$.

The boundary wavevector magnitude is $\pi /a$ along $[10]$ and $\sqrt{2}\pi /a$ along $[11]$. The free-electron boundary energies are thereforeWithin the stated direction-independent gap picture, the upper band's lowest face-edge energy is approximately $E_X+2\mathrm{eV}=6.18\mathrm{eV}$, while the lower band's corner-edge energy is approximately $E_M-2\mathrm{eV}=6.36\mathrm{eV}$. There is consequently a small overlap, about $0.18\mathrm{eV}$, rather than a global insulating gap. The divalent Fermi level lies in that overlap, producing occupied upper-band states and unfilled lower-band states.

Thus the intended isotropic-gap approximation predicts a metal, with small electron and hole pockets. Positive direct gaps can coexist with band overlap. A fully specified square-lattice potential would require simultaneous treatment of the corner degeneracies; a numerical boundary splitting alone does not uniquely determine an arbitrary two-dimensional band structure. The conclusion here uses the given simplified gap picture, rather than electron count alone.

Semiconductor doping introduces electrically active impurities. In gallium arsenide, silicon has one more valence electron than gallium but one fewer than arsenic. Silicon on a gallium site can therefore supply a shallow donor electron, while silicon on an arsenic site can accept an electron and leave a mobile hole. It is an amphoteric dopant, so its net effect depends on site occupation and growth conditions.^[ref]

For isotropic parabolic bands, shift the energy origin in the given free-electron density of states to the appropriate band edge and use its effective mass:and, for valence electron states,The stated normalization includes the two spin states and assumes one effective valley. In a nondegenerate semiconductor, the conduction occupation is approximately $e^{-(E-\mu )/(k_{B}T)}$ and the probability of a valence hole is approximately $e^{(E-\mu )/(k_{B}T)}$. Substituting $x=(E-{ϵ}_c)/(k_{B}T)$ in the first integral, and the corresponding hole energy in the second, giveswhere the effective density of states values are $N_c=2[m_e{k}_{B}T/(2\pi {\hslash }^2){]}^{3/2}$ and $N_v=2[m_h{k}_{B}T/(2\pi {\hslash }^2){]}^{3/2}$. The factor $\sqrt{\pi }/2$ comes from the supplied Gaussian-weighted integral. Multiplying cancels the shared thermodynamic equilibrium chemical potential and proves the semiconductor mass-action law:For the given sample $N_D=2\times 10^{21}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$ and $N_A=10^{21}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$. With complete donor ionization and occupied acceptors, charge neutrality gives $n-p=N_D-N_A=10^{21}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$. At $293\mathrm{K}$ the given masses and gap giveSolving the compensated semiconductor equations, or using $n_i\ll N_D-N_A$, yieldsThe very small minority density is consistent with the wide gap and the strongly n-type balance. Also $n/N_c\simeq 2.6\times 10^{-3}\ll 1$ and $p/N_v\ll 1$, checking the nondegenerate approximation. The acceptor levels are occupied in this n-type regime; complete acceptor ionization in the compensation equation is appropriate to the model.

At low temperature dopant freeze-out reduces the conduction-electron population; a quantitative curve would require dopant binding energies and occupation factors. Once donors are ionized while intrinsic excitation is negligible, $n\simeq N_D-N_A$ gives an extrinsic plateau. At higher temperature intrinsic pairs eventually dominate, so $n\simeq p\simeq n_i(T)\propto T^{3/2}{e}^{-E_g/(2k_{B}T)}$ if the gap and masses are treated as constant. Real gap and mass changes modify that last expression.

Electrons contribute magnetic response through both spin and orbital motion. In an ordinary weakly interacting metal, a field splits the two spin energies. Only states near the Fermi energy can change occupancy because of the Pauli exclusion principle, producing Pauli paramagnetism. For a total two-spin density of states $g(E_F)$, the simple result is ${\chi }_P={\mu }_0{\mu }_B^{2}g(E_F)$. Orbital cyclotron motion gives Landau diamagnetism; for an isotropic parabolic free-electron band it contributes $-{\chi }_P/3$. Filled shells can also supply a diamagnetic background.

Interactions can favor parallel spin occupancy. In an itinerant description, the exchange-energy gain competes with the kinetic-energy cost of redistributing electrons between spin bands. The Stoner criterion describes when an unpolarized state becomes unstable, with the precise factor in $Ig(E_F)$ depending on whether the density of states counts one spin or both. This mechanism can yield spontaneous ferromagnetism and magnetic domains. Alternatively, sufficiently localized moments in a metal can interact through conduction electrons. A high density of states alone is therefore not a complete microscopic explanation of a material's magnetism; band structure, electron interactions and temperature matter.

Use two plane waves, $|\mathbf{k}⟩$ and $|\mathbf{k}-\mathbf{G}⟩$, as a basis near their Bragg degeneracy. The potential has Fourier coefficients $V_{\pm \mathbf{G}}$; its zero Fourier coefficient vanishes. All other plane waves are off resonance and are neglected in the leading nearly-free electron model. With ${\epsilon }_{\mathbf{k}}={\hslash }^2{k}^2/(2m_e)$, the Schrödinger equation reduces to the Hermitian matrix problemSetting the characteristic polynomial equal to zero givesSolving this quadratic equation givesFor the real cosine potential its coefficient $V_G$ is real; the absolute-value form also allows an arbitrary choice of origin and corresponding Fourier phase.

At the Brillouin-zone boundary, $\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{G}=G^2/2$, the free energies are equal. The two standing waves have different probability densities relative to the lattice potential and are split byRepeating this avoided crossing at the reciprocal lattice boundaries joins smooth branches into energy bands. In one dimension a nonzero Fourier coefficient opens a gap at the corresponding crossing. In higher dimensions a direct gap at one wavevector need not give a common forbidden energy interval at every wavevector: different bands may still overlap in energy. The present two-dimensional example remains metallic even though the crossings are locally gapped.

For the rectangular lattice, choose real-space primitive vectors $a\hat{\mathbf{x}}$ and $b\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. The reciprocal lattice vectors areDefine the half-widths of the first Brillouin zone by $K=\pi /a$ and $L=\pi /b$. Their values and the zone areA primitive reciprocal cell can be drawn with a corner at the origin; its centred translate is the first Brillouin zone here. Its area is $4{\pi }^2/(ab)=37.9600\mathrm{n}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$.

Including both spin states, counting the occupied free-electron states per unit area givesConsequentlyThe occupied disk has precisely the area of the first Brillouin zone, but their shapes differ: $K<k_F<L$. It protrudes through both vertical zone boundaries and does not reach the horizontal ones. Thus two electrons per cell do not imply a filled first band in the absence of a separating band gap.

Fold the protruding caps by $\pm {\mathbf{G}}_x$. The original circle and the translated circle intersect at $k_x=K$, $k_y=\pm \sqrt{k_F^2-K^2}$. The potential mixes these states and replaces each crossing by an avoided crossing. The lower branch reconnects into two open sheets running across successive zones in the $k_x$ direction; the upper branch forms a closed lens-shaped pocket about a vertical zone boundary. In a reduced-zone sketch its two halves sit at opposite edges, but periodic identification makes them one closed sheet. This is rectangular-lattice Fermi-surface reconstruction.

The largest pocket in this weak-potential construction is the lens-shaped intersection of two disks enclosed by the intersecting free circles. Each has radius $k_F$ and their centres are separated by $2K$. If $\theta =\arccos (K/k_F)$, two sectors minus their two triangles give the lens bound on a reconstructed Fermi pocket:Opening a gap raises the upper branch at fixed chemical potential and shrinks its pocket. The reported quantum oscillation area satisfiesIt is therefore consistent with this closed sheet. Onsager quantization gives $F=\hslash A_k/(2\pi e)\simeq 601\mathrm{T}$. An orbit on this closed contour can return to itself under the Lorentz force and occupy quantized Landau levels. The open sheets do not enclose a finite orbit area for a perpendicular field in this two-dimensional model. The observation is consistent with the reconstructed pocket, without uniquely determining a completely arbitrary band structure.

For a quantitative rough coupling estimate, use the supplied fixed-chemical-potential approximation and retain the two waves coupled by ${\mathbf{G}}_x$. WriteTheir upper eigenvalue isSetting it equal to $C{k}_F^2$ gives the pocket boundaryIts intersection with $k_y=0$ occurs at $q=\pm q_m$, whereThe two-wave estimate of a Bragg-gap coupling from a pocket area therefore usesAt $v=0$ this reproduces the lens bound on a reconstructed Fermi pocket; the pocket disappears at $v=C(k_F^2-K^2)=0.23786\mathrm{eV}$. Numerical integration gives $A(0.075\mathrm{eV})=6.22\mathrm{n}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$ and $A(0.100\mathrm{eV})=5.54\mathrm{n}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. Matching the measured area gives $v\simeq 0.0931\mathrm{eV}$, so the justified rough result isThis estimate neglects remote plane-wave admixtures and other Fourier coefficients. It also holds the chemical potential fixed as requested; an exact fixed-density calculation would determine it self-consistently after reconstruction. The numerical root is a way to implement the approximate model, not a measurement of $V_G$ to four significant figures.

A Peierls distortion is a spontaneous lattice modulation that can lower the energy of a one-dimensional metal by opening a gap at its Fermi points. The associated change from metallic to gapped electronic behavior is a Peierls transition. The key wavevector is $2k_F$: it couples states near $+k_F$ and $-k_F$, which otherwise have the same energy.

Consider a spin-degenerate chain with one orbital per atom at spacing $a$ and one electron per atom. The band is half filled and $k_F=\pi /(2a)$. A distortion of period $2a$ alternates short and long bonds, doubles the primitive cell, and folds the original Fermi points onto the new zone boundary. The distortion can therefore mix the degenerate states precisely where the occupied and empty states meet.

An explicit dimerized tight-binding chain has alternating hopping amplitudes $-(t+\delta )$ and $-(t-\delta )$, where $t>0$. In the reduced zone $|k|\le \pi /(2a)$,There are two electrons per doubled cell, including spin, so the lower band is filled and the upper one empty. Splitting the degenerate states pushes occupied levels downward and empty ones upward, giving an electronic energy gain.

In weak coupling the electronic gain per length has the characteristic form $-C{\delta }^2\ln (t/|\delta |)$, with $C>0$. The elastic cost of moving the ions is proportional to $+K{\delta }^2$. The logarithm makes the undistorted ideal one-dimensional zero-temperature metal unstable to a small distortion even when the electron-lattice coupling is weak. A self-consistent balance selects a finite distortion amplitude. Two opposite dimerization patterns have the same energy for a translation-symmetric isolated chain.

The basic picture links structural modulation to electronic bond order or charge-density modulation, and can open an insulating gap. It does not assert that every real chain has exactly one electron per atom or period doubling: away from half filling, a modulation at $2k_F$ need not be commensurate with two lattice spacings. Temperature, finite chain length and fluctuations cut off the ideal logarithmic response. Interchain coupling and the real lattice dynamics determine whether a macroscopic finite-temperature ordered phase actually forms. The strictly one-dimensional zero-temperature instability alone is not a proof of finite-temperature long-range order.

A normal Fermi liquid describes an interacting fermion system whose low-energy excitations remain continuously connected to adding particles to or removing particles from a Fermi gas. The elementary long-lived excitation is a Landau quasiparticle: adding a particle also changes the surrounding many-body state. Its energy, velocity and interactions are renormalized, even though its electric charge and spin remain those appropriate to the excitation.

Near an isotropic Fermi surface,Residual interactions make the quasiparticle energy depend on the occupations of other quasiparticles, expressed by the Landau quasiparticle energy functional. Its angular components give the Landau parameters controlling density and spin responses. Thus the successful particle picture does not mean that interactions have become zero.

Pauli blocking restricts the final states available for low-energy collisions. In an ordinary three-dimensional Fermi liquid with regular interactions, a representative decay law isAt $T=0$, the width vanishes faster than $|\xi |$, so an excitation becomes increasingly sharp as it approaches the Fermi surface. Its coherent spectral weight is the quasiparticle residue $Z$, and the physical electron occupation has a discontinuity of height $Z$ at zero temperature. Incoherent spectral weight accounts for the remainder. The quasiparticle occupations themselves obey a Fermi-Dirac distribution.

Several leading thermodynamic signatures retain their gas-like form but have interaction-dependent coefficients. In particular,for an isotropic spin-one-half model, with $N^{\ast }(0)$ the spin-summed quasiparticle density of states per volume. effective mass changes $N^{\ast }(0)$, while the dimensionless interaction parameters $F_0^a,F_0^s$ separately change the spin susceptibility and compressibility. Collisionless collective density motion can propagate as zero sound, distinct from the single-particle excitations.

The $T^2$ quasiparticle scattering rate often underlies a low-temperature $T^2$ contribution to metallic electrical resistivity, but a mechanism relaxing electrical electric current is needed. In a clean Galilean-invariant continuum, electron-electron collisions conserve total momentum and do not alone give a finite dc electrical resistivity. Crystal Umklapp scattering or other current-relaxing processes change that conclusion.

Normal liquid helium-3 and many metals motivate the Fermi-liquid framework. Pairing, magnetic ordering or other transitions can reconstruct the low-energy states. Generic interacting one-dimensional fermion systems instead form a different low-energy state, so the three-dimensional quasiparticle conclusions should not simply be transferred to a chain.

Why degenerate perturbation theory is needed. If several unperturbed states have equal or nearly equal energy, a perturbation can mix them at leading order. In that subspace, diagonalize the perturbation matrix rather than using nondegenerate formulas with small energy denominators. The resulting eigenvectors identify the combinations selected by the coupling, and the eigenvalues give the leading splitting. Other remote states can then be included perturbatively.

For the linear combination of atomic orbitals description of molecular hydrogen, equivalent atomic $1s$ states on the two nuclei supply the nearly degenerate starting functions. In an orthonormal two-state model, equal diagonal energy $E_a$ and real hopping $t$ give $E_a\pm t$ and symmetric/antisymmetric combinations. For actual overlapping atomic functions with overlap $S$ and Hamiltonian coupling $h$, one instead solves a generalized eigenvalue problem:The bonding state has enhanced density between the nuclei and the antibonding state a separating node. Two opposite-spin electrons occupying the bonding molecular orbital describe the simplest closed-shell hydrogen-molecule bond. Electron-electron interaction and nuclear repulsion are needed to calculate a realistic total binding energy; the two-state splitting alone is not the full molecular energy.

In the nearly-free electron model, the analogous degenerate states are plane waves $|\mathbf{k}⟩$ and $|\mathbf{k}-\mathbf{G}⟩$ at a Bragg scattering. A Fourier coefficient $U_{\mathbf{G}}$ of the periodic potential couples them. At exact degeneracy $E_B$, diagonalizing their two-by-two matrix givesThe associated standing waves place electronic density differently relative to the ionic potential. These are the same gap-opening combinations illustrated in Q1(b). The labels of the two starting basis states survive as mixed orbital or plane-wave character, rather than independent crossing eigenstates.

Origin of broad and narrow bands. Spatially extended s/p-derived orbitals have substantial overlap and therefore large hopping amplitudes and broad bands. More localized d orbitals overlap less strongly and produce narrower bands. A multiorbital tight-binding calculation assigns the on-site orbital energies and hopping matrices, forms Bloch sums, and diagonalizes the resulting matrix at each wavevector. Different hopping ranges and orbital symmetry determine the bandwidths and allowed interband coupling. The two-band description retains one broad combination and one nearly flat d-derived combination; a real transition metal contains several d orbitals and more complicated dispersions.

Hybridized eigenvalues and eigenstates. Let $|{\psi }_{\mathbf{k}}⟩=a|{\varphi }_{\mathbf{k}}⟩+b|{\chi }_{\mathbf{k}}⟩$, in an orthonormal basis. Hermitian operator fixes the reverse coupling to be $V^{\ast }$. Projection onto the two components givesSolving this quadratic yields the band hybridization dispersionFor nonzero $V$, one eigenvector representation is $(a,b)\propto (V,E-E_1)$, followed by normalization. Thus the wavefunctions exchange broad-band and d-band character through the avoided crossing; the levels are equal mixtures at the uncoupled crossing.

At $V=0$, the parabola crosses the horizontal level at $k=\pm k_0$, with $k_0=\sqrt{2m{E}_d}/\hslash$. For small nonzero $|V|$, the curves avoid crossing with minimum direct separation $2|V|$. The lower branch follows the parabola below the crossing and flattens toward $E_d$ above it; the upper does the opposite. The lower branch satisfies $E_{-}<E_d$ everywhere and tends to $E_d$ from below as $k\to \infty$, while the upper branch always lies above $E_d$. This is the perfectly flat-band continuum approximation, with zone-boundary intersections excluded as requested.

Fixed particle number and the larger Fermi sphere. Denote the uncoupled broad-band Fermi radius by $k_0$ to distinguish it from the new one $K$. With two spin states, the broad-band number density at $V=0$ is $k_0^3/(3{\pi }^2)$. The stipulated equal population in the flat sector makes the total density twice that value. At zero temperature and any nonzero hybridization, all occupied states fit into the monotonic lower branch below $E_d$, while the upper branch is empty. ThereforeThis is the stated factor increase. It uses fixed total particle number, equal spin counting, an exactly flat unhybridized band and enough available states below any Brillouin-zone restriction. In generic pairs of dispersive bands both hybridized pockets can remain occupied; then Fermi-volume conservation in two hybridized electron bands fixes a sum of volumes rather than this one radius. The exactly flat band is degenerate at $V=0$, so its initial occupation must be specified, as it is here.

Fermi-velocity suppression. Set $\Delta (k)=E_1(k)-E_d$. The exact derivative of the lower branch isAt $k=K$, $E_1(K)=2^{2/3}{E}_d$ and $\Delta (K)=(2^{2/3}-1)E_d>0$. For $|V|\ll \Delta (K)$, the square bracket divided by two is $|V{|}^2/\Delta (K{)}^2+O(|V{|}^4/\Delta (K{)}^4)$. Since group velocity is ${\hslash }^{-1}dE/dk$ and the broad-band reference velocity is $v_F^{(1)}=\hslash k_0/m$,so the flat-band hybridization Fermi-velocity suppression isThe reference velocity is that of the original broad-band Fermi sphere, not the broad-band slope at the larger $K$; omitting the radius change loses the factor $2^{1/3}$.

The low-temperature qualification becomes more stringent as $V\to 0$: the new chemical potential approaches $E_d$ with $E_d-\mu \simeq |V{|}^2/\Delta (K)$, and the relevant thermal energy must be small compared with this hybridization scale. At fixed nonzero temperature the singular flat-band redistribution is not automatically resolved for arbitrarily small coupling. A small but finite narrow-band dispersion can also change the occupation topology.

Density of states and magnetism. For an isotropic three-dimensional branch with spin degeneracy two,A small Fermi velocity therefore produces a large density of states. The localized, partially filled d-derived bands in iron, cobalt and nickel place many states close to the Fermi level; broad s/p-derived conduction bands in copper, silver and gold coexist with filled d bands lying below it. This explains the substantially larger Fermi-level density of states of the former group within the band picture. An exact factor of ten requires the actual band parameters and is not fixed by the two-band toy model.

A high density of states lowers the kinetic-energy cost of spin polarization. A repulsive exchange interaction can then satisfy the Stoner criterion and stabilize ferromagnetism. With a single-spin density of states $g_s$ and an on-site interaction normalization, the criterion is $U{g}_s(E_F)>1$; with spin-summed $g=2g_s$, it is $Ug(E_F)>2$. The large d-state contribution favors this instability in Fe, Co and Ni. The noble metals do not satisfy the corresponding instability condition in the same ordinary state; this does not imply that they have no weak magnetic response whatsoever.

Adopt the usual orthogonal tight-binding approximation, so the three localized spatial states are orthonormal. Each site has two neighbors, with the same real hopping matrix element. For coefficients $c_n$, the Schrödinger equation at site $n$ isThe constant-coefficient state has $c_1=c_2=c_3$, giving energy $E_0+2t$. Its normalization therefore yieldsTo verify that it is the ground state, the three discrete ring momenta are $\theta =0,\pm 2\pi /3$, with $c_n\propto e^{i\theta (n-1)}$ and energies $E_0+2t\cos \theta$. The other two states both have energy $E_0-t$. Since $t<0$, $E_0+2t<E_0-t$ and the gap is $3|t|$. This is the three-site tight-binding ring spectrum.

The spatial ground state is unique and has equal probability $1/3$ on every site; its common overall phase is arbitrary. Spin would supply a separate twofold degeneracy when no spin-dependent terms are included, but does not change the requested spatial state. If the localized functions were instead nonorthogonal raw atomic orbitals, their overlap matrix would be additional data needed for normalization and a generalized eigenvalue problem.

The energy favoring spin polarization must compete with the increase in Fermi kinetic energy. Assume the usual three-dimensional zero-temperature parabolic conduction band at fixed $N$ and $V$. Write the spin polarization as $\zeta =(N_{\uparrow }-N_{\downarrow })/N$, so $N_{\uparrow ,\downarrow }=N(1\pm \zeta )/2$. The unpolarized Fermi energy isThe two spin populations have Fermi energies $E_F(1\pm \zeta {)}^{2/3}$. Summing their individual $3E_{F,\sigma }/5$ mean kinetic energies givesThe specified interaction is an energy per electron, $U(1-{\zeta }^2)/4$. Thus the energy change per electron near the unpolarized state isThe quadratic coefficient changes sign at the Stoner threshold for an interaction normalized per electron,The positive quartic term gives a continuous onset in this model. More globally, $f^{\prime \prime }(\zeta )=(E_F/3)[(1+\zeta {)}^{-1/3}+(1-\zeta {)}^{-1/3}]-U/2$. Convexity of $x^{-1/3}$ makes this nonnegative for $U\le 4E_F/3$, so no lower polarized minimum appears before that threshold.

At fixed number density $N/V$, the critical $U$ is independent of the total sample size. A comparison restricted to a fully polarized state gives a different numerical coefficient, $U>\frac{12}{5}{E}_F(2^{2/3}-1)$, but the same requested density scaling; it misses the partially polarized onset. One must also distinguish this $U$, with units of energy, from a contact coupling multiplying an interaction-energy density $g{n}_{\uparrow }{n}_{\downarrow }$: here $g=U/(N/V)$. Importing a differently normalized Stoner criterion would introduce an erroneous extra density factor.

Both models respect Bloch's theorem and describe electrons in a periodic lattice, but they start from different useful limits.

In the nearly-free electron model, start with extended plane waves and free-electron energies ${\epsilon }_{\mathbf{k}}^0={\hslash }^2{k}^2/(2m)$. A weak periodic potential has Fourier coefficients $V_{\mathbf{G}}$ at reciprocal lattice vectors and couples $\mathbf{k}$ to $\mathbf{k}-\mathbf{G}$. Away from degeneracies its corrections are small. Near a Bragg scattering, retain the two resonant plane waves and diagonalizeThe resulting eigenvalues areAt the crossing the gap is $\boxed{2|V_{\mathbf{G}}|}$. The two standing-wave combinations place electronic density differently relative to the periodic potential and therefore acquire different energies. Folding the many free parabolas into the first Brillouin zone produces the repeated band labels; the nonzero potential opens avoided crossings between coupled states. A Fourier component forbidden by symmetry need not open its corresponding first-order gap.

In the tight-binding model, instead start with localized orbitals on well-separated atoms or sites, with discrete on-site energies. Their overlap permits tunneling represented by hopping integrals. Bloch sums of these orbitals diagonalize the lattice translation symmetry. For one orthonormal orbital per site in a one-dimensional nearest-neighbor chain,The many initially degenerate copies of one atomic orbital broaden into a band. Other atomic orbitals or multiple sites per primitive cell produce additional bands; their hybridization creates bonding and antibonding combinations and may open gaps. For two orbitals per cell, one illustrative Hamiltonian iswith eigenvalues $(E_A+E_B)/2\pm \sqrt{(E_A-E_B{)}^2/4+|t_1+t_2{e}^{-ika}{|}^2}$. This shows explicitly how two bands arise from the two cell degrees of freedom, even when the isolated sites have equal on-site energies.

For each orbital degree of freedom per primitive cell there is one band per spin; band filling and the presence of a gap at the Fermi level determine metallic or insulating behavior. The nearly-free limit emphasizes weak Bragg scattering of extended states, while tight binding emphasizes hopping between localized states. They are complementary approximations to electronic band structure, rather than two incompatible explanations of why periodic solids have bands.

Diagonalization and conventions. The spin-dependent part is $\lambda (-k_y{\sigma }_x+k_x{\sigma }_y)$. For a Hermitian Hamiltonian $\lambda$ is real; the supplied lower-band spinor uses the convention $\lambda >0$, which will be adopted below. The squared spin matrix is ${\lambda }^2(k_x^2+k_y^2)I$. Hence the two ordered energies areIn the $k_z=0$ plane, let $k=\sqrt{k_x^2+k_y^2}$ and $q_R=2m\lambda /{\hslash }^2>0$. ThenIf $\lambda <0$, use $q_R=2m|\lambda |/{\hslash }^2$ to retain the energy ordering, and interchange the spin directions assigned below. This is an isotropic Rashba effect; $q_R$ has units of inverse length, whereas $\lambda$ has units of energy times length.

Band minima. Define $k_R=q_R/2$ and $E_R={\hslash }^2{q}_R^2/(8m)$. Completing the square givesAlong $k_y=k_z=0$, the radial coordinate is $|k_x|$, so the lower branch has two minima:In the full plane these are points on a circle of minima $k=k_R$. Both branches meet at $k=0$, $E=0$. Their ordered energy curves contain $|k_x|$: the lower curve descends from the crossing on either side, while the upper rises. Treating them as globally labeled smooth spin branches without switching labels across $k_x=0$ would obscure the lower-band minima.

Occupied regions and Fermi contours. At zero temperature each spin-split eigenstate with energy below $E_F$ is occupied. PutFor $-E_R<E_F<0$, $0<D<k_R$. The lower-band roots are $k_R-D$ and $k_R+D$, while the upper band is entirely empty. Thus the central disk $k<k_R-D$ is unoccupied, the annulus $k_R-D<k<k_R+D$ is singly occupied, and the exterior is unoccupied. Both Fermi circles belong to the lower band; there is no doubly occupied region.

At $E_F=0$, the lower band is occupied for $0<k<2k_R=q_R$, giving a singly occupied disk with outer Fermi circle at $q_R$. The two bands also meet the Fermi energy at the origin. That isolated degenerate point is not a finite doubly occupied disk, and occupation exactly at the Fermi energy is a boundary convention of zero area. Outside the outer circle the states are empty.

For $E_F>0$, $D>k_R$. The lower branch has outer radius $k_{-}=D+k_R$, while the upper branch has inner radius $k_{+}=D-k_R$. The disk $k<k_{+}$ is doubly occupied, with one state in each band at every momentum. The annulus $k_{+}<k<k_{-}$ is singly occupied, in the lower band only, and the exterior is unoccupied. These are the Fermi contours of an isotropic Rashba band; double occupancy here refers to two orthogonal spinor states at the same momentum, not two electrons occupying one identical quantum state.

Inferring the splitting. Above the crossing, the two positive radii differ by $2k_R=q_R$:The minimum radius is therefore $k_R=0.05{\mathring{\mathrm{A}}}^{-1}$. It is the difference of the measured radii that is required for $E_F>0$; below the crossing the two lower-band radii instead add to $q_R$.

Spinors and spin direction. Write $a=(k_y+i{k}_x)/k$, which has $|a|=1$ for $k>0$. An orthogonal normalized partner to the supplied lower-band state isIndeed $u_{-}^{†}{u}_{+}=(-|a{|}^2+1)/2=0$. Direct multiplication by the spin matrix gives eigenvalues $-\lambda k$ and $+\lambda k$ for $u_{-}$ and $u_{+}$, respectively, so orthogonality has selected the other band rather than merely another arbitrary spin basis.

For a normalized spinor $(\alpha ,\beta {)}^T$, the Pauli expectation values are $(2\mathrm{Re}({\alpha }^{\ast }\beta ),2\mathrm{Im}({\alpha }^{\ast }\beta ),|\alpha {|}^2-|\beta {|}^2)$. Consequently the Rashba spin texture isThe spin lies in the plane and is perpendicular to momentum. On the outer circle $k_1$, which belongs to $E_{-}$, it points clockwise as viewed from $+z$; at $\mathbf{k}=(k_1,0)$ it points along $-y$. On the inner circle $k_2$, belonging to $E_{+}$, it points counterclockwise; at $\mathbf{k}=(k_2,0)$ it points along $+y$. Opposite momenta have opposite spins, consistent with time-reversal symmetry. At the origin the eigenstates are degenerate and no unique spin orientation is defined.

Nondegenerate carrier product. Assume three-dimensional parabolic energy bands near their extrema, spin degeneracy two, and no additional uncounted valley multiplicity. Near the conduction edge, a Boltzmann approximation to the Fermi-Dirac distribution givesAngular integration and the Gaussian radial integral yieldFor valence electron holes, the empty-state probability is $1-f(E)\simeq e^{(E-\mu )/(k_{B}T)}$. Measuring electron hole kinetic energy downwards from $E_v$ similarly givesThe factors two count spin once in each band. Multiplying cancels the chemical potential and proves the semiconductor mass-action law:In an intrinsic neutral semiconductor, $n=p=n_i$. In a doped equilibrium semiconductor the same product holds under the stated nondegenerate assumptions, even when $n\ne p$. Extra valleys or several valence branches must be included in the effective density-of-states factors rather than counted inconsistently.

Equilibrium junction. Put the p region on the left and the n region on the right. Before contact their majority carriers are electron holes and electrons, respectively. Diffusion initially sends electrons from n to p and electron holes from p to n. This leaves negative ionized acceptors on the p side and positive ionized donors on the n side, creating a depletion region and an electric field directed from n to p. At equilibrium this field balances diffusion, so the net electric current vanishes.

For a homojunction the gap remains constant while the conduction band and valence band edges bend downwards from p to n by $e{V}_{\mathrm{bi}}$. The equilibrium chemical potential is flat. Since $E_{c,v}(x)=E_{c,v}^{\mathrm{ref}}-e\varphi (x)$, the electrostatic potential rises from p to n. The carrier profiles satisfyWith fully ionized nondegenerate dopants, the neutral p side has $p_p\simeq N_A$, $n_p\simeq n_i^2/N_A$, while the neutral n side has $n_n\simeq N_D$, $p_n\simeq n_i^2/N_D$. Thus the electron concentration rises across the junction and the electron hole concentration falls, with both small relative to the far-side majority densities in much of the depleted region. The ideal depletion approximation neglects these mobile populations when calculating the fixed space electric charge, but the actual equilibrium profiles are smooth.

The built-in potential follows from these Boltzmann factors:There is no applied terminal bias; the internal electrostatic potential variation does not contradict a constant electrochemical potential.

Opposing carrier fluxes under reverse bias. Use $V>0$ for the magnitude of reverse bias and $I>0$ for reverse electric current, as in the PDF. The junction barrier increases by $eV$. The Shockley diode equation in that orientation can be writtenThe reverse-directed contribution is supplied by minority electrons on the p side and minority electron holes on the n side. They reach the depletion edge by diffusion and are swept across by the built-in field. The opposing contribution is associated with majority carriers thermally crossing the barrier in the forward direction; reverse bias suppresses it by the Boltzmann factor. At zero bias detailed balance makes the two equal, while at large enough reverse bias the opposing flux becomes negligible.