Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 2 8D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The free surface is a material surface. For , the material derivative vanishes on . Since the velocity is , this gives the exact kinematic boundary condition for a free-surface graphAt the surface the pressure equals the constant atmospheric pressure. Absorbing that constant into the time-dependent potential gauge in Unsteady Bernoulli equation yields the exact dynamic boundary condition for an inviscid interfaceThere is no surface-tension term in this model.
Write and linearize in the small perturbation and the surface displacement. The base value is , and evaluation at the displaced surface can be replaced by evaluation at zero to first order. ThusIncompressibility requires Laplace's equation . For , the complex perturbation satisfies this equation and decays with depth. Put and . The linear boundary conditions becomeThey are consistent precisely whenConsequently the two laboratory phase velocities of a deep-water gravity wave areIf propagation of a wave packet is intended, its group velocities are instead .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 3 17E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Neglect end effects, so the electrostatic potential depends only on the cylindrical radius . The radial Laplace equation is , with general solution . Imposing the conductor boundary conditions givesThe radial electric field is . Just inside the middle cylinder it is , directed towards the inner cylinder; just outside it is , directed towards the outer cylinder. By Gauss's law, its charge per unit length isHence the capacitance per unit length isThe two coaxial cylindrical capacitors contribute in parallel because both connect the middle cylinder to the same grounded potential. This is the coaxial capacitor with grounded inner and outer cylinders construction.
For with , while . ThereforeThe inner gap has width and area per unit length approximately . Its parallel-plate capacitor approximation gives exactly the same leading result; the outer gap contributes only a bounded correction.
For the extremum, set , , so . ThenThus the unique stationary point is . Strict convexity and divergence at both endpoints show it is a global minimum:There is no maximum on .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 20 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
On a closed compact Riemannian manifold, the heat kernel for the positive Laplace-Beltrami operator is the smooth kernel of for . It solves and tends to the delta kernel as , so thatFor an orthonormal eigenbasis with eigenvalues repeated according to multiplicity,The exponential factors and elliptic regularity ensure smooth convergence for positive time. If a boundary is present, the same construction uses a specified boundary condition preserved by the covering; the closed-manifold case is the one needed below.
Let be the finite normal locally isometric covering map. The heat equation for on is the lift of the one for on . Integrate the lifted solution over a fundamental domain for the deck transformation group , splitting the integral over into its translates. This givesThere is no averaging factor in this kernel formula: each translate accounts for one lift of the integration variable. To verify it directly, the sum solves the lifted heat equation and its integral against converges to ; uniqueness of the heat solution identifies the kernel. Replacing either lift or only permutes the sum, since isometries preserve the heat kernel.
Integrating the diagonal and using the covering degree gives the heat trace formulaSuppose is contained in a finite group of isometries of . For , change variables and use invariance of both volume and the heat kernel. ThenThus is a class function on , and for its conjugacy classes ,
Consequently, if are Gassmann equivalent and act freely, their orders are equal and the displayed class-by-class sums give for every . Equal heat traces determine equal eigenvalues with multiplicities: the least eigenvalue at which the multiplicities differed would give a nonzero leading exponential in their trace difference as , a contradiction. Hence the two smooth quotient manifolds are isospectral. This proves the Sunada theorem, with the free-action hypothesis ensuring that the quotients are manifolds rather than orbifolds. The theorem alone makes no nonisometry claim.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 43 5 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A natural cubic spline interpolant satisfies , is twice continuously differentiable, and is a polynomial of degree at most three on each interval . Its natural boundary conditions areIf defined outside the data interval, it continues linearly on both exterior intervals. Thus function values and the first two derivatives match at the knots, but the third derivative may jump.
For an explicit construction, let and . Set and solveOn , putThis formula interpolates the values and matches second derivatives; the tridiagonal equations enforce first-derivative matching. The homogeneous system has only the zero solution: in a row with maximal nonzero , its diagonal coefficient strictly exceeds the sum of its neighbour coefficients, making cancellation impossible. Thus the natural interpolant exists uniquely.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 43 5 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
With the convention that the residual term is a sum rather than an average, the penalised least squares criterion isMinimize over functions whose first derivative is absolutely continuous and whose second derivative is square-integrable, that is, the usual Sobolev space . The cubic smoothing spline is its minimizer, with natural boundary conditions and linear continuation outside the data range. It is a natural cubic spline with possible knots at the observed , but usually does not interpolate the noisy .
To see why the minimizer is a natural spline, for any take the natural cubic spline interpolant through its values and write . Then . Integrating by parts on every knot interval twice gives zero: the terms involving vanish at knots, the terms involving cancel because is continuous there, and the outer terms vanish by the natural boundary conditions. Hencewhile their residual sums of squares agree. Replacing by never increases the criterion. This proves the minimum roughness property of the natural cubic spline interpolant needed here.
For fitted values , write , where is positive semidefinite and has the sampled affine functions as its two-dimensional nullspace. The finite-dimensional minimization becomes . Its strictly positive definite Hessian is , so it has the unique solutionThis is the roughness-matrix formula for a natural cubic smoothing spline. Larger penalizes curvature more strongly. As the fit approaches interpolation; as it approaches the ordinary least-squares affine line.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 65 4 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
To distinguish Eulerian and Lagrangian fluid perturbations, use for the fluid displacement, for the Eulerian potential perturbation, and for the Eulerian mass density perturbation. The equilibrium mass density is the profile from part (a); subscript below denotes differentiation. Linearized mass conservation and the isothermal equation of state giveThe velocity perturbation is . Linearized momentum initially has the formSince , the pressure and perturbed mass density gravity terms combine into . Define . The closed linearized system isThe component is a neutral transverse sector; it vanishes for nonzero-frequency modes.
To prove reality rather than assume it, multiply momentum by and integrate over . With , integration by parts and the conjugate continuity equation giveUsing the conjugate Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity in the last integral givesTake disturbances with finite , finite pressure and gravitational integrals, and vanishing pressure work and gravitational boundary terms. For , require the potential to decay at both infinities and the fluid displacement to make as well. In a source-free outer region the decaying potential is proportional to . The isothermal displacement energy of a self-gravitating slab then givesSince is strictly positive for a nonzero displacement, is real. Positive values describe oscillations; negative values give pure growth and decay. The result is the energy identity for the pressure-gravity displacement operator, a self-adjoint operator in the mass density-weighted inner product. The identity excludes an oscillatory growing eigenmode under these boundary conditions. At the same identity applies when its boundary terms vanish and its integrals remain finite, with the gravitational integral involving only .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 75 2 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The solenoidal magnetic-field constraint impliesWith and , the right-hand side is . Thus the leading, order- perpendicular field is divergence-free. On a simply connected perpendicular patch, or for the nonzero perpendicular Fourier modes of a periodic domain, it has a stream function. Choose its normalization byConsequently the leading reduced electron magnetohydrodynamics representation isThe error denotes an order- field relative to . The parallel perturbation is an independent scalar and is not removed by leading perpendicular solenoidality.
For clarity, the representation is asymptotic rather than an exact decomposition of an arbitrary three-dimensional solenoidal field. If depends on , exact solenoidality can be restored by adding to , where . Its amplitude is , so it lies beyond the retained field order. A perpendicular harmonic component can be absorbed into the guide field or fixed separately by boundary conditions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 77 1 Solution 2026-10-14
In the Boussinesq approximation, density departures from a constant reference density are small enough to neglect in inertia and mass continuity, but their gravitational effect is retained. Write the total buoyancy acceleration as , choose a hydrostatic background , and set . Thus is the buoyancy perturbation, positive for a parcel lighter than the background at its present height. The squared buoyancy frequency isStable stratification has . A small vertical displacement of a parcel conserving its buoyancy gives , explaining the restoring acceleration and the name of .
Let be pressure with the background hydrostatic pressure removed, , and the material derivative. The ideal, nonrotating Boussinesq equations areThe last equation is equivalent to . There is neither viscosity nor buoyancy diffusion. The reference density occurs in the pressure normalization, while the small density anomaly occurs only through buoyancy.
For the two-dimensional disturbance, linearization about rest givesA plane internal gravity wave proportional to therefore satisfiesThese internal-wave polarization relations and the dispersion relation determine the individual responses in parts i and ii. A radiating response has no incoming internal gravity wave from ; an evanescent response is bounded there. The harmonic solutions describe the response after excluding arbitrary initial transients.
For the localized oscillatory boundary, define and . Both signs of vertical wavenumber must radiate into . Their horizontal wavenumber is , so the positive- contribution involves and the negative- contribution involves . Consequently the complex horizontal velocity isTaking its real part provesThe positive- internal-wave polarization has and the negative- one has . HenceIn particular, , so the boundary condition is recovered exactly. This is two-beam radiation from a localized oscillating boundary.
Take a smooth localized profile, for example . Its effective support is a neighbourhood of width a few ; increasing that neighbourhood makes the tails arbitrarily small. The boundary displacement is to first order, so at it is flat and moving at maximum speed. At that instant,There are two narrow oblique beams centered on and . Away from their overlap, the velocity is parallel to the relevant beam, in the directions and . The figure uses and measures velocities in units of .
Velocity in two internal-wave beams when the oscillating boundary is flat and moving fastest
. Details. At other phases the terms contribute. For the positive-frequency convention above, is the Hilbert transform of ; it generally has longer tails than . Thus even when the boundary is nearly stationary, the interior need not be stationary or confined to the bright cores shown here. Half a period later all velocities reverse. The beam directions remain the same, but the instantaneous velocity profile and its quadrature component change.
A short pulse has a broad frequency spectrum. Frequencies below produce outgoing internal gravity wave packets with frequency-dependent ray slopes ; frequencies above contribute an evanescent near-boundary response. Moreover the group velocity depends on wavelength as well as direction. The radiated packet therefore spreads into a dispersive fan or wake, with different frequencies traveling at different angles and different scales separating along those directions. After the forcing ends the propagating packet travels away, rather than maintaining the two permanently driven monochromatic beams.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 77 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Define the quasi-geostrophic streamfunction by . Leading horizontal geostrophic balance, , gives . The hydrostatic approximation gives , henceThus is the material derivative along the leading geostrophic flow, and the vertical derivative of pressure determines the buoyancy perturbation. This also gives thermal wind: and .
The balanced regime is favored by small Rossby number, a shallow aspect ratio, and a Burger number of order one. Equivalently the stratified Froude number is small. On a beta plane, require , and take slow, initially balanced motion away from the equator. Under the traditional approximation, the horizontal Coriolis force generated by vertical velocity is small because vertical velocity is small, while the vertical rotational force is small compared with the leading hydrostatic pressure and gravity terms. Strong stratification and small aspect ratio justify retaining only the vertical component of Earth's rotation in this regime; this argument is not uniform near the equator.
Put . The buoyancy equation gives . Substitution into the vertical vorticity equation yieldsThere is an important commutator cancellation. With ,Also for . Adding terms therefore proves potential-vorticity conservation:This is the three-dimensional quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity.
At an impermeable stationary lower boundary , the kinematic condition is . For small elevation and slope, evaluate this at the reference level to leading order. Combining it with the buoyancy equation gives the rigid-boundary buoyancy condition for quasi-geostrophic wavesThe quantity in parentheses is the boundary displacement plus its buoyancy-equivalent displacement.
Now take constant and the mean quasi-geostrophic streamfunction . Its mean buoyancy perturbation is , consistent with thermal wind, and its interior potential vorticity is constant. In the boundary condition, the perturbation velocity advects the mean boundary buoyancy gradient. Keeping this contribution givesIn particular the term must not be omitted.
The linear interior potential-vorticity equation is . Starting with zero interior perturbation potential vorticity, and with forcing only through the boundary, it remains zero. For a steady solution this is also the regular zero-interior-PV choice, continued through any isolated zero of . The inversion equation for a horizontal mode isThe printed convention takes ; for either hemisphere the decay rate is defined using . Boundedness aloft selects the decaying mode. Writewith real part understood. The linear boundary condition becomesFor , a steady quasi-geostrophic mountain wave is thereforeOn , its real meridional velocity isFor the positive-parameter convention and , the velocity minimum lies one quarter wavelength downstream of each topographic maximum; its maximum lies one quarter wavelength downstream of each topographic minimum. If the velocity prefactor changes sign, maxima and minima interchange. The condition alone does not fix that prefactor if is allowed to be negative. The upper panel shows the positive-current convention.
Meridional velocity relative to topography for a steady mountain wave and a resonantly growing edge wave
. Details. At , the free boundary Eady edge wave has zero frequency in the ground frame. If , a steady amplitude cannot satisfy the forced amplitude equation. With , integration givesConsequentlyThe symbol multiplying here is the horizontal wavenumber , as in the PDF. Taking the real part and differentiating in givesFor , positive , and , the meridional-velocity minima coincide with topographic maxima, and its maxima with topographic minima. This is the lower panel. The change from quadrature to opposition is the phase of a resonantly forced topographic edge wave.
The stationary relief continuously excites a boundary Rossby wave whose intrinsic propagation exactly cancels mean advection. The forcing therefore remains coherent with that wave; with no damping or radiation loss for this trapped mode, its linear amplitude grows secularly. This is a resonant topographic quasi-geostrophic wave. Unlimited growth is a conclusion of the linear idealization: eventually the small-disturbance approximation fails.
The assertion that resonance must be unsteady needs nonzero forcing. If , then and the boundary current does not cross the relief; if , the forcing also vanishes. In either case the zero disturbance is a steady solution even if . For example, choose , , and ; this is a concrete exception to an unconditional resonance claim. When both horizontal wavenumbers vanish, and the stated decaying-wave ansatz itself does not apply.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ib Paper 1 17B Solution 2026-10-14
Distinguish the full velocity potentials from their perturbations . The linear boundary conditions use the perturbations. This distinction reconciles the notation in the printed conditions with the full potentials written in the mode ansatz. All equations below neglect products of perturbations. Assume positive densities and no surface tension.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ib Paper 3 18B i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The rigid-rotation velocity field is , with spatially uniform . Its divergence is zero, since . It therefore satisfies the incompressible continuity equation. On the cylindrical wall, , so it has zero normal velocity; on either end cap its vertical component is zero. These are the impermeability boundary conditions for an inviscid flow. Tangential slip is permitted; a no-slip condition is not part of this inviscid model.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 80 5 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The necessary formulation uses a real Hilbert space of functions satisfying the essential boundary conditions, a continuous symmetric bilinear form , and a continuous linear functional . Assume constants withThe latter is coercivity, the positive-definiteness condition needed in the chosen complete space. On the domain of the strong differential operator, integration by parts and the boundary conditions identify ; this form extends to . Let for admissible forcing. DefineWhen has the regularity to belong to the strong operator domain, this is with its boundary conditions. For complex spaces use a Hermitian form and to make the functional real.
Here is an existence proof by minimization. Continuity of and coercivity give , so is finite and a minimizing sequence is bounded. The quadratic parallelogram identity isSince its left side is at least ,Coercivity makes Cauchy in . Completeness gives , and continuity of the form and forcing gives .
For every , differentiation along yieldsThus the Euler-Lagrange equation is exactly the stated weak solution equation. Conversely, if satisfies it, expansion givesThis proves that the weak solution is the unique global minimum and that two weak solutions coincide. It proves the symmetric coercive case underlying the Lax-Milgram theorem directly, rather than taking existence as a theorem name. The framework is symmetry and coercivity in quadratic energy minimization.
The qualifications matter if positive definiteness is read more weakly. For a nonsymmetric operator the derivative of uses , so it need not give . For example, on smooth periodic real functions has , but the functional's equation is , not . Even a symmetric operator can be strictly positive without being coercive: on l2 sequence space, with would require a solution , which is not square summable. The associated functional has values on vectors with the first entries equal to one, so it has no minimum in that space. This is strict positivity without coercivity can fail variational solvability. Under the usual symmetric coercive meaning of positive definiteness, the proof above supplies every assertion requested.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 82 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Retaining the nonlinear factor determines the order- forcing and the matching constants. Write . The inner leading equation and its boundary condition at give . Matching to the far-field value fixes .
The tail becomes under , so a regular expansion in integer powers of cannot suffice. This is a matched expansion with square-root and logarithmic corrections. DefineThe exponential integral here is normalized by the displayed definite integral. Integration by parts also gives , using the complementary error function.
For the outer asymptotic expansion, put andThe transformed equation gives and , with both corrections vanishing at infinity. Matching the leading inner tail determines . Multiplying the equation for by its integrating factor yieldsFix the particular solution unambiguously byThen , , and has no term at zero. The general outer correction is , whereThe logarithm in this asymptotic expansion explains why the inner expansion needs an term.
For the inner asymptotic expansion, all corrections larger than order solve the homogeneous leading equation and vanish at . At order , the forcing isIntegration gives the particular solution , which vanishes at . Thus writeExpress this inner expansion in and compare the terms that survive in the overlap . The order- constant gives . At order , the term becomes , so . The singular term matches , giving . Finally, the regular constants give .
The requested expansions, including every correction through order , are thereforeThe inner formula satisfies the boundary condition at term by term; the outer formula satisfies the condition at infinity. Each formula has its own stated region of validity, and the matched asymptotic expansion relates them in their overlap.
The constant can also be made explicit. Integration by parts in the definition of gives , and . Squaring the complementary error function expression for separates the integral into three elementary pieces:The first piece is , where is the Euler--Mascheroni constant. Substitution makes the second integral tend to , because . Integration by parts in the third integral gives . ConsequentlyEquivalently, defining by its convergent integral already determines the same matching constant without needing this closed form.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 86 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be the liquid density and neglect atmospheric shear. The shallow-channel lubrication approximation makes the surface nearly horizontal in each cross-section, at , with hydrostatic pressure . At fixed , the floor is and the local liquid thickness is . Axial momentum and boundary conditions areWriting , integration givesThe wetted interval is . Its cross-sectional area and total axial flux areThe shallow V-channel lubrication flux and volume conservation therefore giveThe slope makes transverse shear small relative to vertical shear; the longitudinal current must also be slender for this reduction.
For typical height and axial length , fixed volume gives , while the equation gives . Eliminating either scale yieldsThus the current grows in length like and thins like . Equivalently, the porous-medium transformation of V-channel spreading sets and gives with constant mass .
Seek a symmetric solution with . Substitution into the conservative depth equation givesThe left side is . Symmetry sets the integration constant to zero, so within the support. Integrating gives . In physical variables the constant-volume similarity in a V-shaped channel iswhere is the half-length of its support and the positive part makes outside it.
Define the positive normalizationThe first substitution is ; the gamma form follows from the beta function integral. Conservation of volume now givesand consequentlyThe full current length is . Its flux vanishes at the two noses, since the integrated similarity equation gives there, so no volume is lost at the support boundary. A shifted origin or a positive shift of time gives the corresponding translated similarity family.
In an intended trigonometric notation, requires either cosine integrated over or absolute cosine over . The printed on is not a positive real normalization for the required fractional exponent: with a real cube-root interpretation at , its two halves cancel, while the principal complex power is not real. The similarity normalization uses the positive sine integral above.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 48 1 a Solution 2026-10-14
Use position eigenstates normalized by , and the free Hamiltonian operator . The time-sliced path integral is the matrix element of the time-evolution operator:Insert momentum eigenstates, with . The free-particle propagator becomesComplete the square in the exponent:The Fresnel integral, defined by the damping prescription , gives, for ,The square-root branch is ; it is fixed by the regulated Gaussian integral and the short-time Dirac delta distribution limit, rather than an arbitrary phase.
The Euler-Lagrange equation for the free particle is . Its unique classical path satisfying the endpoint boundary conditions is . Therefore its classical action isSubstituting into the operator result yields , with independent of the endpoint positions.
The same independence is transparent directly in the path integral. Write , with . The cross term in the action is , so . The fluctuation integral depends only on . Because the action is quadratic, the factorization is exact; the semiclassical propagator already equals the full answer.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 72 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The eigenvalue stability analysis of a finite difference method reduces a linear evolution discretization to its modal behavior, but it must retain the norm and the dependence on the mesh. For a homogeneous system obtained by the method of lines, , the solution is . A one-step time discretization gives ; for a Runge-Kutta method, where its stage matrices are invertible, . With a multistep method one instead uses an amplification matrix on the augmented vector of several time levels.
The relevant finite-time stability estimate iswith independent of the refining spatial mesh and allowed time steps. Similarly, semidiscrete stability requires for . The norm should represent the continuum problem, such as the discrete L2 norm in one dimension. A fixed finite matrix having decaying solutions as is not by itself a mesh-uniform result for the partial differential equation.
If , thenThus eigenvalues of modulus at most one give a uniform bound when the diagonalizing bases have uniformly bounded condition numbers. For a normal matrix in the chosen inner product, the spectral theorem for normal operators supplies an orthonormal basis, so the condition number is one and the norm of is exactly . For a self-adjoint or skew-adjoint spatial matrix, applying a scalar stability function preserves this favorable modal structure. This is the setting where eigenvalue calculations provide especially clean, reliable step restrictions.
A precise fixed-matrix statement is also useful: a matrix is power bounded for all nonnegative integers if and only if all its eigenvalues lie in the closed unit disk and every Jordan block at a unit-modulus eigenvalue has size one. Indeed, powers of an interior Jordan block contain a polynomial in times a decaying geometric factor and are bounded; a larger block on the unit circle produces unbounded polynomial growth. For a family of matrices, the resulting bounds must still be uniform. Moreover, finite-time stability versus power boundedness distinguishes this all-time condition from the physical-time estimate above. For example , , has , bounded for despite a nontrivial Jordan block at one. Even the scalar update is stable on fixed intervals, since , although it represents a growing equation rather than a contraction.
For a constant-coefficient periodic difference operator, Fourier modes diagonalize the spatial matrix. The discrete Fourier transform is a unitary operator, so Parseval's identity identifies its modal maximum with the operator norm. The eigenvalue stability analysis of a finite difference method then becomes von Neumann stability analysis. For the Dirichlet discrete Laplacian, a discrete sine transform plays the same role. These facts explain its advantages: a large matrix calculation becomes a scalar symbol or a known spectral interval, and the extremal eigenvalue directly determines a safe time step.
As a first example, centered space discretization of the heat equation has eigenvaluesForward Euler method gives with . Requiring all factors in yields for all periodic meshes. In two dimensions the corresponding uniform bound is . Because these are normal matrices, these scalar bounds prove contraction rather than merely suggest it.
Backward Euler method has , so the centered discretization of the heat equation is contractive for every . The Crank-Nicolson method has and is likewise contractive for these negative real modes. However, its factor tends to for very stiff modes, leaving high-frequency oscillations weakly damped; Backward Euler method tends to zero. The eigenvalues therefore expose the presence of stiff differential equations and damping as well as binary stability. Unconditional stability does not remove accuracy requirements.
For an advection equation example, the upwind finite difference scheme for , , has factor , with . Sinceit is a contraction in the periodic discrete L2 norm exactly for . In contrast, Forward Euler method with centered advection has factor . Its modulus exceeds one at nonzero active frequencies, and repeated amplification makes it unstable under fixed nonzero Courant refinement. A much smaller scaling can bound its finite-time growth, demonstrating again that exact contraction and the most general stability estimate are different claims.
The major limitation is the possible presence of a nonnormal matrix. For example,Both eigenvalues are negative, yet at the second unit vector is amplified by at least . This proves that negative spectra do not imply uniform semidiscrete stability. Ill-conditioned eigenvectors, Jordan normal form and transient amplification can invalidate a spectral-only argument. Direct energy estimates or estimates for the resolvent can supply the missing norm control.
Boundary conditions are another limitation. A periodic symbol proves a periodic or whole-line result, not an arbitrary initial-boundary-value problem. Boundary closure of a difference scheme can introduce growing modes or mesh-dependent amplification. A spatial operator with variable coefficients can still be studied through its assembled matrix, but then whether it is a normal matrix, its condition number and the physical inner product must be checked rather than borrowed from a Fourier stability analysis. For the finite element method the natural mass matrix inner product often turns a generalized eigenvalue problem into a self-adjoint one.
For time-dependent or split updates, separate spectra are insufficient to control products. For instance, and each have only zero eigenvalues, while has eigenvalue . For , alternating the two is unstable. A common contractive norm would control the products, but their individual eigenvalues do not.
Finally, stability and consistency of a numerical method have different roles. The Lax equivalence theorem states that, for a well-posed linear initial-value problem and a consistent finite difference method on compatible grid spaces, stability on every fixed time interval is equivalent to convergence of a numerical method as the admissible meshes refine. Bounded grid representation and the correct initial and boundary setup are part of that framework. An eigenvalue estimate can establish its stability hypothesis in the favorable settings described above; it neither proves consistency of a numerical method nor bypasses its uniformity requirements. The method is therefore a powerful modal tool, provided its spectral calculation is connected to a genuine norm estimate.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 76 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let , , , and . At a regular neutral Rayleigh equation for inviscid shear flow mode, multiply the equation by and evaluate it at the critical layer in a shear flow. The term multiplying vanishes, leaving . Therefore . If this condition failed, the coefficient would have a simple pole and a nonzero would force a logarithmically singular slope instead of a regular eigenfunction.
There is a sign error in the printed first-order equation. Direct expansion of the original Rayleigh equation for inviscid shear flow givesThe coefficient on the left must have a minus sign. Indeed, , and moving both first-order parameter corrections to the right gives exactly this equation. The plus sign printed there is incompatible with the original equation and its neutral eigenfunction. The later matching and integral formulas follow from the corrected equation. The PDF also has in the Taylor expansion of , and in the requested logarithmic coefficient; these are mistranscribed in the converted TeX.
Near zero, and . Thus , whereas . The singular part of the first-order equation isIntegrating twice on either side givesThe constant is common because the inner solution is continuous. The coefficient necessarily also contains : rescaling the neutral eigenfunction rescales its correction. One may choose the normalization if a formula only in terms of the flow derivatives and is wanted.
The outer expansion of fails when is comparable with . Therefore the distinguished limit isIn this inner variable, the original equation becomesAt orders one and , its right side is zero. Matching the outer expansion therefore selects and . At order , . The outer term becomes , so the required switchback term is . At order ,Integrating, or using the supplied hint, givesThe constants are homogeneous matching freedoms; they do not affect the slope jump. The quadratic term agrees with , another check on the sign of .
For , runs below the real axis. Choose the continuous branch of the complex logarithm there. At positive infinity its argument tends to zero; at negative infinity it tends to . Thus the linear parts of the two large- expansions of areThese expressions omit the already matched common quadratic term and terms only logarithmic or constant in . Matching the linear coefficients to proves the neutral-mode critical-layer matching relationThe sign comes from passing below the pole; taking would reverse it.
Finally use the Wronskian . Since and , subtraction gives . The wall boundary conditions give , soThis is the requested excised-interval identity. As , the equal logarithmic slope terms cancel andThe remaining real singular integral is interpreted as a Cauchy principal value, consistent with excision on both sides of the critical layer in a shear flow. DefineThen the neutral Rayleigh-mode dispersion correction iswhere the last form assumes a nonzero denominator. For real , , so the assumed growing branch must have the corresponding sign. If , the displayed logarithmic coefficient and jump vanish; further degeneracy can require higher-order analysis. No nonzero growth rate follows from that degenerate first-order calculation alone.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 81 3 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be the cell number density. The steady cell conservation equation with isotropic translational diffusion isUsing the rapid-rotation mean gyrotactic orientation, put , so the swimming drift is . In the transverse plane, and . Thus andMultiplying the conservation equation by giveswith and . The base fluid velocity is tangent to the wall. Zero normal cell flux there is , orNormalization requires the cross-sectional mean of to be one.
For , set . The drift term acting on the leading constant vanishes, and the first angular harmonic satisfiesWriting turns this into the Modified Bessel differential equation of order one. Its regular solution iswhere is the Modified Bessel function of the first kind. The singular second solution is excluded at the axis, and the displayed coefficient enforces the wall boundary condition. The angular harmonic has zero area average, so the normalization is satisfied at this order.
When , the gyrotactic concentration layer at a rotating-cylinder wall has stretched coordinate . The leading radial equation is . The solution decaying into the interior is proportional to ; the wall condition fixes its coefficient to . HenceThis also follows from the large-argument asymptotic expansion of , which gives near the wall; within the layer. Its thickness is . The quoted exponential is a wall-layer approximation, not an exact solution all the way to ; the Modified Bessel function of the first kind formula supplies the regular continuation through the axis.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 81 4 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Set under the assumed stationary-onset hypothesis, and let with fixed nonzero . Substitute , , and into the modal equations and plate boundary conditions.
At leading order the concentration equation is , with at both plates. Normalize its nonzero constant to . The first nonzero momentum equation isIntegrating four times and imposing all four clamped boundary conditions givesAt the next concentration order, and , so the vertical advection of the basic concentration does not yet contribute. ThusIntegration gives . The constant is an amplitude-normalization freedom; set it to zero, obtainingThere is no need to require zero depth average of this concentration eigenfunction: for a nonzero horizontal wavenumber the horizontal average is already zero.
Use and . At order , the concentration equation isThe corresponding cell-flux boundary conditions are at both plates. Integrate the equation from to zero. Its left derivative term satisfiesThe terms therefore cancel. The no-slip conditions imply . Also integration by parts givesConsequently the solvability condition is simplysince . For every fixed nonzero , the long-wave bioconvection threshold in weak stratification is thereforeThe cancellation shows why does not enter this leading coefficient; neither does at stationary onset. In dimensional terms, the leading critical mean number density and volume fraction areThese assume heavier-than-fluid cells, . Exactly makes the integrated equation identically zero and corresponds to a spatially uniform change of conserved cell number, not a convective mode; the statement independent of is interpreted for nonzero long waves or their limit. This is the leading threshold within the specified long-wave, real-eigenvalue assumptions. It does not by itself rule out a different finite-wavelength or oscillatory instability outside those assumptions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 ii Paper 2 37E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Incompressibility gives , permitting a stream function with , . Its axial vorticity is . Taking the curl of the Stokes flow momentum equation eliminates pressure and gives of that vorticity zero, hence .
At an impermeable constant-angle plane, means is constant along that boundary. Fix that constant to zero. A rigid boundary also requires . The tangential stress is ; along an impermeable boundary its first two terms vanish, so a stress-free boundary requires .
Write . The biharmonic equation becomes . The boundary conditions are and . ConsequentlyThe requested is . Evaluating givesIts small-angle ratio is , so and have the same sign for sufficiently small positive angle. At the first nonzero critical root, , the denominator vanishes while the numerator does not. The pure similarity solution is then resonant and cannot satisfy the forcing; logarithmic radial terms or additional global boundary data are needed. Just beyond this angle, and up to , the denominator is negative and numerator positive, so the formal surface flow reverses relative to . This is not a contradiction of viscous dissipation: the wedge is radially unbounded and its radial-end energy flux has not been prescribed. A physical finite-domain flow needs those outer conditions, and the Stokes approximation also fails sufficiently far out when the velocity grows with .

