Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 20 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Work on a closed compact smooth Riemannian manifold without boundary, as in the usual discrete spectral setting here. Use the paper's , and put . The Riemannian heat kernel is the smooth kernel, for , representing the solution ofThus and its distributional initial value in is the Dirac delta distribution at . The heat trace isThe heat invariants are the coefficients in the short-time heat trace expansion specified below.
To derive its spectral form, take an orthonormal eigenbasis , with , repeating eigenvalues according to multiplicity. For the initial datum , the function solves the heat equation. Uniqueness identifies it with the heat-kernel solution. Expanding arbitrary initial data in this basis therefore gives the spectral expansion of the Riemannian heat kernel:Standard elliptic estimates and eigenvalue growth imply smooth convergence for bounded away from zero: polynomial bounds on derivatives of eigenfunctions are dominated by the exponential factors. On the diagonal all summands are nonnegative, so monotone convergence also justifies integration without needing an interchange of conditionally convergent terms. Since each eigenfunction has unit norm,Equivalently, if the paper's Laplacian eigenvalues are written , the formula is ; a growing exponential is not the heat semigroup.
Here are the needed heat kernel expansion facts, stated without proof. On a closed -dimensional smooth Riemannian manifold,with the diagonal remainder uniform in after any finite truncation. The coefficients are smooth local geometric quantities; . Compactness therefore allows integration term by term:These integrated coefficients are the heat invariants. The uniform leading remainder in particular gives .
Isospectral manifolds have identical heat traces by the derived spectral formula. If their dimensions were , multiplying the common trace by would give a finite positive limit on the -dimensional manifold but divergence on the -dimensional one. Thus the dimensions are equal, and equality of the leading coefficient gives equal Riemannian volume. Explicitly,The absence of a boundary fixes this particular integer-power expansion. With a boundary one must first specify boundary conditions and include the appropriate half-integer boundary terms; the leading dimension-and-volume conclusion remains valid in the usual compact smooth setting.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 71 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A spatially uniform pressure is a useful leading approximation when the sound speed makes the acoustic crossing time much shorter than the radiative cooling and thermal conduction times. The motions must remain at low Mach number, and gravity and other stresses must be negligible. Sound then redistributes pressure before appreciable thermal evolution occurs. Small pressure corrections can still drive the slow motion; imposing exactly zero pressure gradient in the full momentum equation at every order would be a stronger assumption.
The equation of state gives the specific internal energy of an ideal gas as . With , the continuity equation is . Differentiating therefore yieldsInsert this into the internal energy equation, whose compressional term is , and use spatially uniform pressure, so . The result isFor temporally constant pressure put , so the mass density is . The continuity equation now gives . Multiplication of the last equation by , with , givesThis is the isobaric conductive cooling in mass coordinates transformation before changing coordinates.
There is a boundary assumption implicit in the proposed Lagrangian coordinate. For a mass integral from a fixed origin, integration of the continuity equation givesThus is material when the base mass flux vanishes, as appropriate for the stationary cold reservoir below. If the origin permits mass flux, replace by ; this corrected label has zero material derivative. In a material mass coordinate, and . In particularThe conduction coefficient therefore becomes , with the same as the cooling coefficient. With , the equation is
In the hot gas there is no volumetric radiative cooling. The initial temperature is uniform and the cold boundary introduces no finite mass length. The remaining nonlinear diffusion equation is invariant under , with the same temperature scale. Its natural similarity solution is thereforeThe far-field condition also recovers the initial temperature at every fixed as . Substitution gives the ordinary differential equationFor , this reduces to . Integrating first for gives . The two boundary conditions fix , hence the error-function isobaric cooling front isHere the error function has normalization , as printed in the original PDF; the converted TeX's is incorrect. The following original sketch shows the temperature profiles. The cooling layer broadens as , and at fixed positive mass label the temperature falls as time increases, while the remote hot gas remains at .
For , the magnitude of the heat flux into the cold reservoir isAlthough the thermal conductivity tends to zero there, the physical temperature gradient diverges: their product has this finite limit. The stationary reservoir has no incoming advective energy flux and radiates the conducted energy immediately. Since , the radiated power per unit area isThus the requested exponent is . The initial divergence is the usual idealization of an instantaneous temperature discontinuity in a diffusion equation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 72 1 2 Solution 2026-10-14
Use the relative potential and integrate the stated, untruncated Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution over . The normalization cancels its three Gaussian integrals:The gravitational potential sign reverses under the relative-potential convention, so the spherical Poisson equation for Newtonian gravity isAlso , with . Differentiating the density relation yieldsAn ideal gas with constant temperature has . Its hydrostatic equilibrium equation is precisely the same whenTogether with the same enclosed-mass equation, central density and boundary conditions, this proves the isothermal stellar and gas density equivalence. In dimensionless terms, and obey with in both systems.
This calculation uses the distribution as printed for all velocities. Imposing an additional cutoff at positive relative energy changes the integral to , where , and no longer gives an exactly isothermal gas profile. An untruncated self-gravitating isothermal sphere also needs an outer modification for finite total mass. The function here is the error function. Finally, the half-line Gaussian integral printed in the note lacks a factor: the correct value is .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 73 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Work at one radius and write . Use the surface density to fix the mass density normalization and introduce the height scaleChoose the dimensionless variablesThe pressure and temperature scales make the hydrostatic and ideal gas equations parameter-free. The flux scale fixes the heating coefficient at , and the choice of makes the diffusion coefficient unity. Direct substitution gives the universal ordinary differential equationsFor example, the dimensionless coefficient in the temperature equation is .
Let the upper free surface be at , so its physical semithickness is . Midplane symmetry and the radiative-zero disk surface conditions giveThe last condition is precisely . The unknown surface position and the two positive midplane values are determined as part of the normalized boundary value problem. Symmetry makes even and odd; already follow from the equations and are not additional independent boundary conditions.
The zero conditions do not mean zero surface flux. Integrating the heating equation gives . Near a regular surface with finite outgoing flux, dividing the hydrostatic equation by the temperature equation yields . Thus , and , so mass density also vanishes. The apparent singular quotient in the diffusion equation has a finite regular limit. All boundary conditions and equations are independent of the physical parameters: this is homologous vertical structure of a constant-opacity alpha disk.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 73 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let the perturbation phase be and write . Incompressible flow imposes . Applying the background advective derivative to the phase givesCancel this position-dependent phase by choosingThe perturbation acting on the basic flow gives . Its self-advection vanishes exactly: the physical velocity is perpendicular to , while every spatial derivative of is proportional to a component of . Thus , including the products between the complex mode and its conjugate. Substituting into the full Navier-Stokes equation therefore gives an exact incompressible shearing wave, with no small-amplitude approximation:In components these equations areDifferentiating the transversality constraint closes the pressure:The coefficient includes both the shear term in the momentum equation and ; treating the wavevector as fixed would miss one contribution. Initial data with remain transverse under this closed evolution. These shearing waves are exact in an unbounded local shear flow or with compatible shearing-periodic boundaries; arbitrary rigid boundary conditions need not admit a single such wave.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 75 2 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Suppress the common Fourier mode factor and define the transverse and full divergences of the fluid Lagrangian displacement byThe perturbed magnetic field is . Its components areThus the magnetic part of the energy integrand isUse from force balance. The pressure-gradient cross term isThe current term has the azimuthal cross-product component , givingEvery term involving cancels in the sum, including the possibly complex terms. The magnetohydrodynamic energy principle therefore reduces exactly toFor physical and positive adiabatic index , every surviving term is nonnegative. On the admissible displacement domain for the supplied functional, squared ideal-mode frequencies cannot be negative. This is the positive ideal energy of a theta pinch, proving absence of exponentially growing ideal modes. The qualification is stable or marginal, not strictly positive energy for every motion: at , suitable incompressible displacements can have zero energy. As usual, the energy principle presumes regularity and boundary conditions eliminating unwanted surface terms; additional external systems are not part of the given functional.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 79 5 a ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For , put and define the Squire transformationThe two-dimensional Orr-Sommerfeld equation then has the same transverse operator because , and the same viscous coefficient because . Its boundary conditions on and are unchanged. Thus it has the same eigenfunction and the same phase-speed eigenvalue.
If the original disturbance grows, , so the transformed disturbance also grows. Since , every unstable three-dimensional mode maps to an unstable two-dimensional mode at a no larger Reynolds number. It follows that the minimum critical Reynolds number is attained among two-dimensional disturbances. This is the Squire theorem for temporal normal-mode onset, not a statement that three-dimensional transient amplification is impossible. The case is treated separately without dividing by ; its streamwise-uniform viscous normal modes decay, although coupling can produce transient growth.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 79 5 a i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let and , with chosen for the temporal mode convention. In the inviscid limit, the Orr-Sommerfeld equation reduces to the Rayleigh equation for inviscid shear flow:The impermeability boundary condition is ; the extra viscous derivative condition is not an independent condition for this reduced second-order equation. For an unstable mode , the denominator has no real zero. Multiply by and apply integration by parts to obtainIts imaginary part givesFor a nontrivial mode, the weight is nonnegative and is positive except at isolated mode zeros. Thus must take both signs, unless it vanishes identically. The identically zero case also has no unstable nontrivial mode, by the positive first integral in the displayed identity. Therefore the smooth real base-flow profile must have an interior inflection point. This proves Rayleigh's inflection-point theorem; it is a necessary condition, not a sufficiency test.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 ii Paper 1 24H ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let , , and . In coordinate charts centered at and , write the map as . Surjectivity of its derivative gives an invertible minor; reorder the domain coordinates so it is the first one. The maphas invertible derivative at the point. By the inverse function theorem, it is a local coordinate change. In these coordinates the fiber is simply the set whose first coordinates are zero, so it is locally a coordinate plane of dimension . These charts are inherited from , provingIf the fiber is empty, it is the empty submanifold under the usual convention. The no-boundary assumptions avoid any extra boundary conditions in this local model.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 ii Paper 2 33B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a normalized trial state in the quadratic-form domain of a self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator bounded below, its expectation of is at least the ground energy . Minimizing this Rayleigh quotient over a tractable trial family therefore supplies an upper bound.
For the two states, set . Their quotient isThe strict assumption excludes , since equality in the overlap Cauchy-Schwarz bound would then force the two states to be proportional and . Thus . The two generalized eigenvalues are , and their difference has the sign of . The symmetric trial is the lower one, so
For the single attractive delta well, the supplied wavefunction has norm one because . Its kinetic energy in quadratic-form notation is , and its delta potential energy is . With this givesIts derivative jump is , exactly the delta boundary condition, so it is an eigenstate. A decaying bound state on the two half-lines must have a common decay rate fixed by this same jump; there is only this one negative-energy state, confirming it is the ground state.
For , integrate the overlap on the three regions , , . Put . The result isThe second equality is the single-well energy plus the extra delta expectation; the third follows by applying either single-well eigenvalue equation in the cross matrix element. Moreover , so the preceding bound applies. Substitution givesFor widely separated wells, each localized orbital is close to an isolated-well ground state and the low-energy subspace is accurately their span; the symmetric combination captures the leading tunneling energy lowering. In the limit both exact and trial energies approach . This illustrates electronic molecular binding: sharing an orbital between attractive centers can lower its energy below the separated-center value. A full equilibrium bond length would also require the repulsion of the positive centers.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 23 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take the nonnegative scalar Laplace-Beltrami operator on a closed compact Riemannian manifold, and include every eigenvalue with its multiplicity. The spectrum contains substantial global geometric information, but generally does not determine the Riemannian metric up to isometry. Specifying the operator and its domain matters: the spectrum on functions is different information from the spectra of the Hodge Laplacian on differential forms, and a boundary requires fixed boundary conditions.
The Weyl law makes dimension and volume audible. If counts eigenvalues at most , thenwhere is the volume of the Euclidean unit ball. Thus the growth exponent recovers , and its leading coefficient recovers . The multiplicity of zero gives the number of connected components: a function in the kernel has and hence is constant on each component.
More detailed invariants come from the heat trace, which is determined directly by the spectrum:The first heat invariants for a closed manifold areHere is scalar curvature, the Ricci curvature, and the Riemann curvature tensor. A divergence term in the local coefficient integrates to zero on a closed manifold. The expansion supplies further integrated curvature expressions, rather than a pointwise curvature map.
On a closed surface, , and , so the same coefficients becomeThe Gauss-Bonnet theorem gives ; hence the constant term of the heat trace is . In particular the Euler characteristic, and for a connected orientable surface its genus, are spectrally determined. There is even spectral determination of hyperbolic curvature on a surface: if this spectrum agrees with that of a curvature- surface, the coefficients give and , whenceThus everywhere. This determines local curvature, while leaving room for globally nonisometric hyperbolic surfaces.
Geodesic information is also accessible in important settings. For closed hyperbolic surfaces, the Selberg trace formula makes the scalar spectrum equivalent to the unmarked length spectrum with its appropriate multiplicities. This does not supply a marked length spectrum: it does not identify which group element or intersecting curve has a given length. For general manifolds, one must not simply assert this equivalence; the singularities of the wave trace can be affected by degeneracies and cancellations.
The historic development separates these positive results from the inverse problem. Weyl's 1911 eigenvalue asymptotics established the leading geometric information. The Minakshisundaram-Pleijel heat expansion of 1949 brought local curvature into the short-time analysis. In 1964 Milnor exhibited nonisometric flat tori in dimension sixteen with identical scalar spectra, showing that all eigenvalues together need not recover the metric. Kac's 1966 question about a vibrating drum popularized the corresponding inverse problem for planar domains. Vignéras's 1980 hyperbolic examples and the Sunada theorem of 1985 extended the supply of counterexamples; the latter turns Gassmann equivalence of finite subgroups into a geometric construction. The four-dimensional tetracode length-isospectral lattice construction and the planar examples of Gordon, Webb and Wolpert in 1992 made nonuniqueness explicit in smaller dimensions and in the original drum setting.
Nor is scalar isospectrality a universal topological invariant strong enough to determine the manifold. For example, Tetra and Didi are scalar-isospectral closed orientable flat three-manifolds with first Betti numbers one and zero. Their topology therefore differs. The spectra of all Hodge Laplacians would detect these Betti numbers through the dimensions of their zero eigenspaces, illustrating the extra information obtained by changing the operator. Dimension, volume and many integrated invariants are determined; the full metric and, in general, the topology are not.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 51 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An order parameter distinguishes phases by a macroscopic quantity that changes at the transition. For an Ising model ferromagnet it is the magnetization per Ising spin, . At zero magnetic field the statistical Hamiltonian is invariant under spin inversion symmetry. The disordered phase preserves this symmetry, whereas a selected ordered phase has and a spin-reversed partner with . At finite volume with symmetric boundary conditions the expected value is zero even below the transition; spontaneous magnetization means taking the thermodynamic limit before sending a symmetry-breaking field to zero.
Landau-Ginzburg theory introduces a coarse-grained local order parameter and a symmetry-constrained free-energy functional. For a short-range system with scalar spin inversion symmetry, a useful expansion isThe coefficients vary smoothly with microscopic control parameters at the level of the Landau approximation; normally with . The gradient term penalizes spatial variation. The magnetic field is conjugate to the order parameter, and odd powers at are excluded by spin inversion symmetry. With , the sextic term may be omitted locally; with , a stabilizing positive is essential. The equilibrium uniform order parameter minimizes the local potential , givingThis equation of state follows from minimization, rather than being imposed as an independent assumption. Vector or tensor order parameters and their allowed invariants describe other symmetry classes.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 68 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take . The Airy equation is . To discuss positivity of this linear operator, use its homogeneous variation domain . Integration by parts givesThe boundary term is zero at both ends. The same calculation with two different functions proves that the associated form is a symmetric bilinear form. Positivity here concerns the homogeneous domain; the condition instead defines an affine set of admissible solutions.
For the variational problem defineand minimizeThe Sobolev trace at zero is meaningful in . No derivative boundary value is imposed on this trial space: the Neumann boundary condition will emerge naturally. For , Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and integration giveso . Thus is a bounded, symmetric, coercive bilinear form on the Hilbert space . The Lax-Milgram theorem says that a bounded coercive bilinear form and a bounded linear functional determine a unique weak solution. Apply it toand set . This is precisely the first variation condition for .
Compactly supported test functions first yield in the sense of distributional derivatives. Since , the solution is in . Integration by parts then leaves for every , hence . The other boundary condition is built into . Conversely a solution of this boundary value problem satisfies the first variation condition. Finally,This proves existence, uniqueness and the global minimum characterization, including the natural boundary condition. It is the mixed-boundary Airy energy principle.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 74 3 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put and . The plane-layer poloidal-toroidal decomposition supplies the assumed poloidal fields asSince and , potentials proportional to have the required vertical components. Their horizontal components are proportional to , satisfying the stress-free boundary conditions and the horizontal-field boundary conditions. The double-curl representation automatically enforces incompressibility and the solenoidal magnetic-field constraint.
Let be the amplitudes of . The temperature and resistive induction equations immediately giveEliminate the total-pressure perturbation by applying to the vertical momentum equation and subtracting times its divergence. The resulting vertical equation isIn particular, shows explicitly that magnetic tension opposes the displacement.
Taking the determinant of these three amplitude equations gives the horizontal-field magnetoconvection dispersion relation:This cubic polynomial includes all roots of the assumed poloidal coupled system; using its determinant form avoids discarding possible roots by dividing by or . As a check, factors off magnetic diffusion and leaves the standard stress-free Rayleigh-Bénard convection growth equation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 74 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be the reference mass density, the kinematic viscosity, the thermal diffusivity, the magnetic diffusivity, and the coefficient of thermal expansion. The conductive state of Rayleigh-Bénard convection is . For the Boussinesq approximation, density variation is retained only in buoyancy. Linearizing about this state and the imposed magnetic field givesHere and is the perturbation of magnetohydrodynamic total pressure. The gradient part of the Lorentz force has been absorbed into ; the remaining term is magnetic tension. The sign in the temperature equation follows from .
Use the thermal-diffusion scaling of a convection layer: length , time , velocity , temperature perturbation , field perturbation , and total-pressure perturbation . Dropping dimensionless-variable decorations giveswithThese are respectively the Rayleigh number, Chandrasekhar number, Prandtl number, and magnetic-to-thermal diffusivity ratio. In particular, the magnetic coefficient is , not alone, in these thermal-time units. At , the boundary conditions are , , and .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 77 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a constant reference density and define total buoyancy acceleration by . Absorb the reference hydrostatic pressure into a kinematic pressure . The ideal nonrotating Boussinesq equations areFor a resting density profile , the background satisfies and the squared buoyancy frequency isStable stratification has . The Boussinesq approximation requires fractional density variations to be small over the domain and parcel excursions, so density can be replaced by in inertia while its small variation is retained in the gravitational force. For an approximately uniform density gradient over height , this requires . The stipulated incompressibility alone does not justify neglecting density variation in inertia.
Put and . To linear order the two-dimensional internal gravity wave equations areThe exact impermeability condition on is the kinematic boundary conditionTaylor expansion about permits at leading order if the boundary slope and its displacement relative to the vertical wave scale are small: and . The second condition controls both the omitted evaluation correction and the product , since continuity gives . Hence for the harmonic forcing,The propagating calculation assumes and ; a time-independent boundary does no oscillatory work on fluid initially at rest. If but , incompressibility forces the vertical velocity to be independent of height, so the unbounded column has no finite-energy radiating internal-wave solution. The propagating wave-generation problem therefore needs the stated nonzero horizontal wavenumber.
For a plane mode with phase , let be its complex amplitudes. The linear equations giveSubstituting into gives the dispersion relationNo waves enter from above. The appropriate radiation condition therefore selects upward vertical group velocity, not upward phase propagation:The boundary-forced internal gravity wave satisfying the boundary condition isThe displacement is , consistent with times the displacement. For a right-moving boundary choose , without loss of generality. Then , and the constant-phase lines of an internal gravity wave have slope : the crests rise toward the right. Their acute angle with the horizontal isThe group velocity is along these crests in the upward-right direction, whereas the wavevector and phase propagation point downward-right.
Rising wave crests with upward group velocity and downward phase propagation above a right-moving boundary
. Details. The physical pressure perturbation is . Pressure work at the lower boundary, to second order in amplitude, is its period-mean pressure times vertical boundary velocity. Static hydrostatic terms average to zero over a cycle. ThereforeAs an independent energy check, the wave's mean kinetic-plus-buoyancy energy density is , and multiplication by gives exactly this upward energy flux.
For the exact horizontal mean-momentum equation, incompressibility writes the horizontal momentum equation asAverage over a horizontal period. Require the pressure and velocity fluxes to be periodic, or more generally their horizontal derivative averages to vanish; in particular there must be no imposed mean pressure gradient. ThenHorizontal averaging also makes ; the zero mean boundary displacement rate gives . These conditions exclude an independent mean mass flux or horizontal force. The mean equation applies in the fluid, with flattening of the small moving boundary understood at the order used above.
For slow switch-on, define , using for . The outgoing internal-wave envelope radiation condition is . Replace in the oscillatory fields by . A modulation time must satisfy and , with a frequency bandwidth sufficiently narrow to linearize the dispersion relation. The exact boundary derivative also contains ; it is smaller by the slow-modulation parameter and is beyond this leading envelope approximation.
To leading slow-modulation order, the wave momentum flux isSince , integrating the mean-momentum equation from rest gives the internal-wave momentum depositionThis is second order in wave amplitude, with smaller relative slow-modulation corrections. Mean-flow feedback on the leading wave is higher order. The mean current is created as the wave envelope arrives; an already uniform wavetrain has no local flux divergence.
Finally move horizontally with speed . The initial uniform relative flow is , with infinite total energy in the unbounded column. Its finite mean-energy change is insteadAt finite time the envelope is absent sufficiently far above, so integrating the momentum equation givesThis is the boundary work and mean-flow energy of an internal wave relation. In the moving frame the boundary pattern is stationary to leading modulation order. It extracts energy from the incident mean flow and converts it to outgoing internal-wave energy; in the laboratory frame the same energy is supplied as boundary work.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 77 4 vi Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Potential-vorticity conservation makes the evolving PV distribution a set of parcel-carried labels. In the ideal model it can be rearranged into filaments and complicated geometry, but it is not created or destroyed by advection. Apparent homogenization, such as that assumed for the shallow-water experiment, describes a coarse-grained mixed distribution rather than pointwise destruction of materially conserved PV.
Within a balanced regime, potential-vorticity inversion turns those labels and the boundary data into a velocity field. This makes understanding a flow a coupled geometric problem: determine how PV is rearranged, invert the resulting distribution, and use the recovered velocity to find the next rearrangement. Inversion is nonlocal, so a compact PV anomaly influences fluid well outside its support, as the spherical example explicitly demonstrates.
The quasi-geostrophic potential-vorticity equation has only one time derivative:An initial PV field and the inversion data determine the balanced evolution; an independent initial acceleration is not needed. Pressure, buoyancy and the leading velocity are diagnosed from that field at each instant. This reduced initial-data requirement reflects the removal of freely oscillating inertia-gravity waves, which in the full fluid equations require additional initial information. The principles are consequently powerful for slow large-scale flow, but do not recover every unbalanced motion or remove the need to state boundary conditions and the balance approximation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 80 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the standard bounded uniform ellipticity assumption: for some , with bounded periodic coefficients. It holds for the usual finite set of positive-conductivity phases. Pointwise positivity alone, without coefficient regularity or a uniform bound, is insufficient for a general rigorous corrector theory. The calculation below is the requested formal bulk expansion; for nonsymmetric uniformly elliptic coefficients the flux derivation still works.
Set . In a two-scale expansion for periodic conductivity, differentiation becomesThe leading, order , equation isFor fixed , multiply by minus its cell mean and integrate over the periodic cell. Opposite-face terms cancel, givingHence is independent of .
The order equation is nowFor each coordinate direction, choose a periodic zero-mean corrector satisfying the periodic conductivity cell problemThe right side has zero cell mean. In weak form,for every periodic test function . On the space of zero-mean periodic functions, the Poincaré inequality and uniform ellipticity give coercivity, so the corrector exists and is unique by the Lax-Milgram theorem. Discontinuous phase coefficients are handled by this weak formulation.
The order solution iswhere the last term is independent of and does not affect leading flux. Thus the leading microscopic flux isAt order one the equation readsAverage over . The second term integrates to zero by periodicity, and . ThereforeThe effective tensor is constant, so the last equation is exactly . The macroscopic boundary condition is on . Higher bulk correctors usually do not individually vanish on the physical boundary; a boundary corrector in periodic homogenization handles this without changing the leading homogenized equation.
For symmetric , a useful check on the effective conductivity isThe extra term involving vanishes by the weak cell equation. This formula proves symmetry. With , it also gives , confirming that the effective tensor is positive-definite.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 83 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let measure height from the lower edge and distance from one face of the vertical plate. Use the steady Boussinesq approximation, homogeneous isotropic permeability of a porous medium , reference fluid mass density , dynamic viscosity , thermal expansion coefficient , effective thermal conductivity and liquid volumetric heat capacity . Define and , consistently with the thermal convention used above. Write , where is the uniform ambient temperature.
Interpret as uniform wall heat-flux density: a plate segment of height inputs heat per unit horizontal span. The cumulative heat input up to height is therefore . If instead denotes the sum of flux densities into two identically heated faces, replace it by in each face formula before summing. A specification only of total power per span, without its distribution in height, would not determine this uniformly heated-wall problem. We calculate one heated face; identical heating on both faces doubles the integrated fluxes.
Away from the leading edge, suppose the boundary layer is slender, , and porous inertia and longitudinal heat conduction are negligible. Lateral pressure adjustment leaves the vertical Darcy velocity proportional to buoyancy:At the plate, and ; in the far field . Darcy law permits tangential discharge at an impermeable plate, so imposing a further no-slip condition would be inappropriate in this leading porous model.
Balance , and to obtainThus the warmed layer thickens and accelerates upward. Define a streamfunction by , and setThe last two expressions agree because . Differentiation gives . Substituting in the thermal equation leaves the single nonlinear equation for the uniformly heated vertical plate in a porous medium:The first condition is impermeability; the second fixes the wall heat flux; the third fixes ambient temperature and vertical velocity. Seek the positive-temperature branch with and finite . Decay also gives . The far-field transverse inflow need not vanish: supplies the increasing discharge.
An approximate solution can be obtained without a numerical shooting calculation. Integrate the differential equation over . The boundary conditions and integration by parts giveThus the exact thermal budget is . Assume an exponential thermal shape, . The wall derivative requires , and the integral condition requires . Hence , and the integral exponential profile for porous wall convection isIt satisfies all boundary conditions, has positive decaying temperature, and matches the exact integrated heat budget. It is an integral approximation, not an exact pointwise solution of the differential equation; its mass-flux coefficient should be read accordingly.
Define the volume discharge, kinematic Darcy momentum flux and buoyancy flux per horizontal span byWith these standard discharge conventions the mass flux is . Their similarity expressions areThe integral identity evaluates two of them exactly:Equivalently : all the heat supplied below height is carried upward through that section. Although these fluxes are exact within the boundary-layer equations, porous drag means that the momentum flux itself is not conserved with height.
The approximate mass flux isFor clarity, if “momentum flux” means actual pore-fluid momentum rather than the commonly quoted kinematic Darcy diagnostic, constant porosity and pore speed give . The mass flux remains because already denotes discharge per bulk area. Stating both prevents an implicit porosity error. Validity also requires and a sufficiently slender, low-inertia porous boundary layer; the approximation is not the immediate leading-edge conduction field.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 2 5D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the mixed Dirichlet-Neumann modes on an interval. To justify their Fourier series, extend evenly across to , then oddly across , and repeat with period four. The condition makes the odd extension continuous, and makes the even reflection continuously differentiable. The resulting periodic function has a convergent Fourier sine series. Reflection about eliminates the even sine harmonics, leavingAlternatively these values follow directly from and . Fourier orthogonality givesThe extension argument also supplies completeness, not merely orthogonality, of this Fourier sine basis.
Expand the forcing as . Product-to-sum and integration by parts giveEach mode of the differential operator has eigenvalue . Hence, for real , the solution isThe coefficients are , so the series and its first two differentiated series converge uniformly. Therefore it solves the equation and the boundary conditions term by term. Uniqueness follows by multiplying the homogeneous equation by its real solution and integrating: the boundary terms vanish and , forcing .

