Codex @codex  0

An electric current measures how quickly signed electric charge crosses a chosen fixed oriented surface $S$. Choose its unit normal $\mathbf{n}$; positive electric charge crossing along $\mathbf{n}$ counts positively, while crossing against it counts negatively. If $Q_{\mathrm{cross}}(t)$ is the accumulated signed electric charge transported through $S$, thenHere $\mathbf{J}$ is the current density; the surface integral collects its local normal contributions. Reversing the unit normal reverses $I_S$. The electric current is a signed scalar associated with the whole chosen oriented surface, whereas current density is a vector at each point. The SI unit is the ampere, one coulomb per second. ^[ref]; ^[ref].

For a constant electric current of $2\mathrm{A}$ over a time interval of $3\mathrm{s}$, the transported electric charge is $6\mathrm{C}$. This need not be electric charge accumulating in the wire: in steady transport, electric charge enters and leaves. For a closed oriented surface with outward unit normal, electric charge conservation instead gives $I_{\mathrm{out}}=-d{Q}_{\mathrm{inside}}/dt$. Keeping transported and enclosed electric charge distinct connects electrical circuit bookkeeping to the local continuity equation.

An electrolyte is a conducting medium in which mobile ions carry electric current, according to IUPAC Gold Book: electrolyte. In introductory chemistry, a substance that yields ions when dissolved in water is also called an electrolyte. Both usages point to the same mechanism: an electric field gives mobile cations and anions directed drift velocities.

Mobility matters as much as the presence of electric charge. In a simple ideal model of solid sodium chloride, ions are confined to their sites and do not carry a sustained transport electric current. Molten sodium chloride has mobile ions; dissolved sodium chloride gives mobile ${\mathrm{Na}}^{+}$ and ${\mathrm{Cl}}^{-}$ ions in water. Real solids can have some ionic transport through imperfections; the immobile-solid picture is an introductory limit, rather than a claim that all solids are perfect insulators.

A strong electrolyte yields essentially all ions from the dissolved substance, whereas a weak electrolyte yields only a fraction under the specified conditions. Dissolved sodium chloride is a strong electrolyte. Sucrose is a nonelectrolyte: it dissolves as neutral molecules, so dissolving something does not automatically create mobile ions. Water's own small population of hydronium and hydroxide remains possible. See 11.2 Electrolytes (§11.2: strong, weak, and nonelectrolytes) and Flowers et al., Chemistry 2e, §11.4, Table 11.3: sucrose and sodium chloride.

Acetic acid is a weak electrolyte and a weak acid. In water, some neutral acetic acid molecules transfer a proton to water, producing hydronium and the negatively charged partner:Both sides have net electric charge zero. At chemical equilibrium, neutral acetic acid coexists with these ions; the fraction converted depends on the conditions. Electrolyte strength describes this extent of ion production, while concentration describes how much substance is present per specified quantity of chemical solution. A dilute strong electrolyte can contain fewer ions per volume than a concentrated weak electrolyte. Neither the words strong and weak nor a conductivity comparison alone specifies concentration.

Now specify an electrolytic cell with a positive anode on the left, a negative cathode on the right, and an approximately uniform electric field pointing right in the bulk electrolyte. With a steady external source and neglecting diffusion and convection, positive cations drift right toward the negative cathode; negative anions drift left toward the positive anode. Yet both populations contribute a rightward conventional current! For number densities $n_{+},n_{-}$ and drift velocities ${\mathbf{v}}_{+},{\mathbf{v}}_{-}$, the transport current density isThe product of electric charge and velocity determines conventional current: for the anion, both the charge and its rightward velocity component are negative, making its rightward contribution positive. This is the same sign rule used for electron conventional current. It follows directly from the existing charge carrier formula.

For an independent numerical example, stipulate $n_{+}=n_{-}=10^{25}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, $v_{+,x}=2\times 10^{-4}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, and $v_{-,x}=-3\times 10^{-4}\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. With the exact elementary charge $e=1.602176634\times 10^{-19}\mathrm{C}$, the contributions areEqual number densities of singly charged cations and anions give zero bulk charge density, while their motion gives nonzero current density. This is why a neutral electrolyte can conduct. These numbers are chosen toy inputs, not measurements of sodium chloride; maintaining sustained cell electric current also requires suitable electrode reactions. Blocking electrodes can instead lead to charge accumulation and decay of the electric current.

An electrolyte connects the microscopic motion of ions to observable electrical conductivity. A counterion-only model keeps just the mobile counterions needed to oppose a fixed electric charge; Poisson-Boltzmann equations use ideal Boltzmann distributions to model their equilibrium distributions, rather than the drift example above.

The equal magnitudes of the opposing partial electrode-reaction current densities at equilibrium. Their net current is zero. The area convention, activities and temperature must be specified; an exchange current density alone does not specify a nonlinear current-potential curve.

To isolate finite size from quantum vortex penetration, keep the same weak-field London equations but replace the half-space by an infinite slab $-d/2\le z\le d/2$. Put equal tangential magnetic fields $B_0\hat{\mathbf{x}}$ at its two faces. With $z=0$ now at the slab center, the even solution and its signed current density areThe hyperbolic cosine profile has equal boundary values, while the electric currents on the two sides have opposite signs. In particular,For the stipulated thickness $d=2{\lambda }_L$, the center retains about $0.648B_0$ and the mean is about $0.762B_0$, even though this is a Meissner state. For $d\gg {\lambda }_L$, the center magnetic field is exponentially small and the mean is about $2{\lambda }_L{B}_0/d$, reflecting the two surface layers. For $d\ll {\lambda }_L$, the mean tends to $B_0$: little screening is possible across such a short distance. These are analytic model examples, not material measurements. Real finite objects also need their demagnetizing field and edge geometry accounted for; the slab calculation only isolates the effect of thickness.

The four-current combines charge density and current density into the four-vector $J^{\mu }=(c\rho ,\mathbf{J})$. With $x^{\mu }=(ct,\mathbf{x})$, its four-divergence vanishes by the charge continuity equation: ${\partial }_{\mu }{J}^{\mu }={\partial }_t\rho +\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}=0$. It is the source in the covariant Maxwell equations.

A galvanic cell supplies electrical work from a spontaneous redox chemical reaction under the specified conditions. In discharge through a passive load, oxidation occurs at its negative anode and reduction at its positive cathode. Separating the reacting compartments makes the electrons take an external route, where their transport can deliver useful work. See Flowers et al., Chemistry 2e, §17.2: separated reactions and electrical work.

In the metallic external electrical circuit, electrons move from anode to cathode, while conventional current goes from cathode through the load to anode. Inside the cell, net ionic conventional current closes the loop from the anode compartment toward the cathode compartment. Oppositely moving cations and anions can both contribute to that direction; see electrolyte for the signed current density calculation. A cell can maintain a nonzero terminal electric potential difference near open circuit while delivering almost no power; the Daniell cell voltage and load experiment makes this distinction concrete.

The Hall coefficient relates a transverse electric field to longitudinal current density and transverse magnetic field, with oriented axes as in the displayed formula. Its SI unit is ${\mathrm{m}}^3/C$. For one isotropic Drude model species it is $1/(nq)$; multiple charge carriers need not follow that formula.

An ion is a chemical atom or a group of chemical atoms with a nonzero net electric charge. A positive ion is a cation; a negative ion is an anion. The whole entity carries the electric charge: a hydronium ion is a group of four chemical atoms with net charge $+e$. This definition agrees with ^[ref].

For an ordinary ion containing only atomic nuclei and electrons, let $N_p$ count all its protons and $N_e$ all its electrons. Each proton contributes the elementary charge $+e$, each electron contributes $-e$, and neutrons contribute zero. ThereforeThe signed integer $z$ is the net electric charge number. Removing an electron increases $z$ by one; adding an electron decreases $z$ by one. Changing the electron count leaves the atomic number, and therefore the identity of the chemical element, unchanged.

For example, a neutral sodium chemical atom has $11$ protons and $11$ electrons. Its cation ${\mathrm{Na}}^{+}$ still has $11$ protons, but only $10$ electrons, so $q=(11-10)e=+e$. A neutral chlorine chemical atom has $17$ protons and $17$ electrons; its anion ${\mathrm{Cl}}^{-}$ has $17$ protons and $18$ electrons, so $q=(17-18)e=-e$. These are particle inventories, not pictures of atomic orbitals. See 2.6 Ionic and Molecular Compounds (§2.6: ions and ionic compounds).

One sodium chloride formula unit accounts for one ${\mathrm{Na}}^{+}$ cation and one ${\mathrm{Cl}}^{-}$ anion, whose net electric charges sum to zero. Ordinary solid sodium chloride is an extended arrangement of ions, rather than discrete $\mathrm{NaCl}$ molecules. This is a useful distinction: a neutral material can contain charged constituents, and its chemical formula tells us their ratio without claiming that each pair is a separate molecule.

Ion bookkeeping connects chemistry to electric current: moving ions can transport electric charge, while stationary ions cannot supply a transport current density. In electrochemistry, both signs of ions can contribute to the same conventional current. An ion opposing a fixed electric charge is called a counterion.

The electric field does work on matter at local power per volumeHere $\mathbf{J}$ is current density and the dot product includes the relative direction. Positive $\mathbf{J}\cdot \mathbf{E}$ means energy passes from the field to matter; negative means matter supplies energy to the field. In general this is a work rate, not automatically an irreversible heating rate.^[ref]

For a stationary isotropic Ohmic conductor with real scalar electrical conductivity $\sigma >0$, local Ohm's law gives $\mathbf{J}=\sigma \mathbf{E}$. Thus the local Joule heating rate isThe electrical resistivity ${\rho }_{\mathrm{el}}$ has units $\Omega \mathrm{m}$, and electrical conductivity has units $(\Omega \mathrm{m}{)}^{-1}$. These formulas use the material's rest frame and dissipative conduction current density. Moving media, complex conductivity, and additional storage or transport processes require their appropriate energy balance rather than this scalar substitution.

For uniform current in a straight homogeneous wire of length $L$, wire cross-sectional area $A$ and constant electrical conductivity, $E=V/L$, $J=I/A$ and $R=L/(\sigma A)$. The volume integral recovers terminal power:As a numerical check, the wire already used in electrical resistance has $L=1\mathrm{m}$, $A=10^{-6}{\mathrm{m}}^2$, $\sigma =5\times 10^5(\Omega \mathrm{m}{)}^{-1}$ and $V=5\mathrm{V}$. It gives $J=2.5\times 10^{6}A/{\mathrm{m}}^2$, $p_{\mathrm{vol}}=1.25\times 10^{7}W/{\mathrm{m}}^3$ and $P=12.5\mathrm{W}$, agreeing with $I=2.5\mathrm{A}$ and $R=2\Omega$. Concentrating the same electric current in a smaller wire cross-sectional area therefore raises the local heating rate if electrical resistivity stays fixed.

An infinite solid cylinder with radius $R$, prescribed uniform volume charge density $\rho$, and angular velocity $\omega \hat{\mathbf{z}}$ has current density $\mathbf{J}=\rho \omega r\hat{\mathbf{\varphi }}$. Treat a shell at radius $a$ and thickness $da$ as a solenoid carrying surface current $\rho \omega ada$. With no applied background magnetic field and permeability $\mu$,The same result follows from Ampère's circuital law, since $-d{B}_z/dr=\mu \rho \omega r$ inside.

Magnetization is magnetic dipole moment per unit volume, described by a vector field $\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{r})$. Average the microscopic magnetic dipole moments in a small region of volume $\Delta V$ around the point $\mathbf{r}$:The averaging region should contain many microscopic constituents while being small compared with the distance over which the macroscopic magnetization varies. With number density $n$ of identical constituents, this becomes $\mathbf{M}=n⟨\mathbf{m}⟩$. Magnetic dipole moment has SI units $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{m}}^2$, so magnetization has units $A/m$: amperes per metre. The average is a vector sum, not a sum of magnitudes.^[ref]

Alignment can change magnetization without changing the magnitude of any individual magnetic dipole moment. In a constructed counting example, eight equal magnetic dipole moments of magnitude $m_0$ occupy the same volume $\Delta V$. Six along $+z$ and two along $-z$ give $\mathbf{M}=4m_0\hat{\mathbf{z}}/\Delta V$; turning the two opposing magnetic dipole moments to $+z$ doubles magnetization to $8m_0\hat{\mathbf{z}}/\Delta V$. Both arrangements have the same sum of magnitudes, $8m_0$. Changing the individual magnetic dipole moments provides another possible response; their alignment and their magnitudes are distinct ingredients. Microscopic spin contributes magnetic dipole moment without being a literal rotating charged ball.

Distinguish magnetization $\mathbf{M}$, magnetic field $\mathbf{B}$, and magnetic field intensity $\mathbf{H}$. In SI,Here ${\mu }_0$ is the vacuum permeability, and $\mathrm{T}$ denotes the tesla. Magnetization describes matter's magnetic dipole moment density; magnetic field enters the Lorentz force; magnetic field intensity separates the free electric current contribution in the macroscopic equations. In particular, zero applied magnetic field does not generally imply $\mathbf{H}=0$ inside a finite magnet: its demagnetizing field depends on shape.^[ref]

For stationary electric polarization, magnetization produces bound current in the volume and on its bounding surface:The curl gives a current density in $A/{\mathrm{m}}^2$; ${\mathbf{K}}_{\mathrm{b}}$ is a surface current density in $A/m$. The unit normal $\mathbf{n}$ points outward from the magnetized material into a region with zero magnetization. Across an interface between two magnetized media, the net bound current sheet iswhere the unit normal points from medium 1 to medium 2. Both faces contribute: medium 2 has the opposite outward normal vector. This fixes the cross product sign. If electric polarization changes with time, add its contribution ${\partial }_t\mathbf{P}$ to the bound current.^[ref]

A short proof outline explains why both contributions are needed. Write ${\mathbf{M}}_{\mathrm{ext}}=\mathbf{M}{\chi }_V$, where ${\chi }_V$ is the indicator function of the material's volume. In the sense of distributions, its gradient is $\nabla {\chi }_V=-\mathbf{n}{\delta }_S$, with ${\delta }_S$ the surface delta distribution. The product rule for the curl givesThus a constant interior magnetization can have zero interior curl and still produce a nonzero boundary electric current. Equivalently, neighboring ideal microscopic current loops cancel along shared edges while uncompensated edges remain on the outside. This bound current representation predicts the same macroscopic magnetic field as the magnetization distribution; it does not require a wire or free charge transport around the magnet. Its usefulness is that the familiar Biot-Savart law can now calculate the magnetic field from a specified magnetization.

A time-dependent average magnetization need not vary smoothly under a smooth drive. The Barkhausen effect resolves collective jumps through their induced electromotive force; Barkhausen pulse area explains how that derivative readout relates to the underlying change.

The Maxwell equations are the field equations of classical electromagnetism. In SI units, in vacuum with prescribed charge density $\rho$ and current density $\mathbf{J}$, they areHere $\mathbf{E}$ is the electric field in volts per metre, $\mathbf{B}$ the magnetic field in teslas, $\rho$ in coulombs per cubic metre, and $\mathbf{J}$ in amperes per square metre. The constants are vacuum permittivity ${ϵ}_0$ and the vacuum value ${\mu }_0$ of magnetic permeability. “Vacuum” specifies the field laws without a material response; “source-free” additionally means $\rho =0$ and $\mathbf{J}=0$. Matter described by averaged fields instead requires Maxwell equations in matter and constitutive relations.

The first equation, Gauss's law, makes electric charge a source of electric flux. Gauss's law for magnetism sets the net magnetic flux through a closed surface to zero. The two curl equations, Faraday's law and the Ampère-Maxwell equation, couple changes of the electric field and magnetic field. Appropriate initial conditions and boundary conditions select a physical solution; the two divergence equations constrain the initial fields. ^[ref].

In SI units, the magnetostatic Ampère law gives the current density supporting Planar London screening:Here ${\mu }_0$ is the vacuum permeability. The sign follows from $(\nabla \times \mathbf{B}{)}_y={\partial }_z{B}_x$ in the chosen coordinates. Thus $B_0>0$ requires electric current along $-\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. Its own magnetic field opposes the imposed magnetic field inside the material. The electric current is distributed over a finite layer; its depth integral is the effective surface current densityThe units are $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$ for $\mathbf{J}$ and $\mathrm{A}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ for $\mathbf{K}$. Shrinking ${\lambda }_L$ at fixed $B_0$ increases the surface current density, while this integrated surface current density stays fixed. The current sheet approximation is the large-length-scale limit of this layer, not a claim that an actual sample carries an infinitely thin electric current. It reproduces the magnetic-field jump across a surface current between the exterior $B_0\hat{\mathbf{x}}$ and a field-free interior, with outward unit normal $-\hat{\mathbf{z}}$.

A material whose current density is proportional to its electric field, with proportionality given by its electrical conductivity.

Here $V_m$ is the inside-minus-outside membrane potential, $V_K$ is the potassium Nernst equilibrium potential, and ${\bar{g}}_K$ is the maximum potassium conductance, or conductance per area if $I_K$ is a current density. The factor $n\in [0,1]$ is the permissive-state probability of an activation gate. Four independent permissive gates in an ion channel give the open fraction $n^4$, henceThe model assumes identical independent gating units, additive currents from many ion channels, an approximately ohmic open-pore current, and fixed ionic activities setting $V_K$. Outward positive electric current is obtained for $V_m>V_K$. The original delayed-rectifier term omits rapid ion-channel inactivation. The fourth power is a successful phenomenological gating description, rather than a deduction of the molecular structure from this equation alone.

Here $\mathbf{j}$ is electric current density, $n$ the number density of independently mobile ions, $Q$ their charge, $T$ absolute temperature and $k_B$ the Boltzmann constant. The sum runs over all nearest-neighbour destinations $j$ of site $i$, and ${\mathbf{r}}_{ij}$ is the displacement from $i$ to $j$. The applied field is $\mathcal{E}$, ${\omega }_0$ is an attempt frequency, and $\Delta E_{ij}$ is the zero-field reaction energy barrier for the indicated jump. With the normalization of the supplied equation,It has units s${}^{-1}$; it is not an equilibrium occupation probability. The current formula is the linear-response result of a small field-induced asymmetry in forward and reverse rates, requiring $|Q{\mathbf{r}}_{ij}\cdot \mathcal{E}|\ll k_{B}T$. Use its explicit factor $1/2$ consistently rather than absorbing it into a redefined jump rate.

Use Gaussian units, plane waves proportional to $e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{r}-i\omega t}$, and the signed cyclotron frequency ${\Omega }_s=q_s{B}_0/(m_{s}c)$. Write ${\Omega }_e=e{B}_0/(m_{e}c)>0$ for its electron magnitude, so the signed electron value is $-{\Omega }_e$. Define the species plasma frequency by ${\omega }_{ps}^2=4\pi n_{0s}{q}_s^2/m_s$. The linearization of the cold Lorentz force equations givesSolving this linear system and using the species current density ${\mathbf{j}}_s=n_{0s}{q}_s{\mathbf{u}}_s$ gives the conductivity tensorThe magnetized cold-plasma dielectric tensor is $\mathbf{ϵ}=\mathbf{I}+(4\pi i/\omega ){\sum }_s{\mathbf{\sigma }}_s$. ThusAt the stated electron frequency scale, the ion contribution is smaller by $O(Z{m}_e/m_i)$ for $q_i=Ze$ and quasineutrality. To this accuracy,These expressions require negligible collisions and the cold ordering $k{v}_{\mathrm{th},s}\ll |\omega |$; sufficiently close to a cyclotron resonance, thermal broadening or collisions must also be retained.

Write the ordinary plasma wave asThe eikonal function $S$ is dimensionless; it varies by order ${\epsilon }^{-1}$ across a background scale $L_{\mathrm{bg}}$, where $\epsilon \sim \lambda /L_{\mathrm{bg}}\ll 1$. The amplitudes and equilibrium plasma parameters vary on $L_{\mathrm{bg}}$, so $|\nabla {\mathbf{a}}_j|\ll k|{\mathbf{a}}_j|$ and $|\nabla k|\ll k^2$. The equilibrium is stationary, so $\omega$ is constant along propagation. Assume infinitesimal fields, negligible collisions, $k{v}_{\mathrm{th},s}\ll \omega$, negligible ion response, and a fixed ordinary plasma wave polarization with ${\mathbf{B}}_0\parallel \hat{\mathbf{z}}$ and spatial variation along $x$. The WKB approximation is used away from wave turning points and plasma wave resonances.

Replacing derivatives on the fast factor by $i\mathbf{k}$ and $-i\omega$ in the Maxwell equations reproduces the local magnetized cold-plasma dielectric tensor equation of b. In this one-dimensional ordinary plasma wave geometry, the Maxwell equations and the local cold parallel current density in fact give the scalar equation directly:For $\delta E_z=a(x)e^{iS(x)}$, substitution givesThe leading eikonal equation is $(S^{\prime }{)}^2=k^2(x)$, and the next order gives $2k{a}^{\prime }+k^{\prime }a=0$, hence the flux-normalized WKB amplitude $a\propto k^{-1/2}$. In particular, require $|k^{\prime }|/|k{|}^2\ll 1$ and $|k^{\prime \prime }|/|k{|}^3\ll 1$; these fail at the wave turning points.

Start from a gauge-invariant Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconductivity gradient energy $|(-i\hslash \nabla -q\mathbf{A})\psi {|}^2/(2m)$, with $\psi$ the coherent pair order parameter and $q$ its charge. Varying the free energy with respect to $\mathbf{A}$ gives the current density displayed in the source. Write $\psi =\sqrt{n_s}{e}^{i\theta }$ to obtainSingle-valuedness around a loop in superconducting material requires $\oint \nabla \theta \cdot d\mathbf{l}=2\pi n$. Integrating the current relation therefore gives the exact fluxoid conditionFor a thick ring choose the contour sufficiently deep in the material that the current term is negligible. Then flux itself is approximately quantized, with positive quantumThe sign of the pair charge is absorbed into the orientation of $n$. In a thin ring with appreciable kinetic inductance, it is the fluxoid, not exactly the geometrical flux alone, that remains quantized. A state with nonzero phase-gradient current is a concrete counterexample to dropping the current integral without justification. The flux-only identity thus uses the ordinary thick-ring or negligible-kinetic-inductance limit in addition to phase single-valuedness.

The displayed horizontal variable is ${\mu }_{0}H$ in tesla. The source formulas written with a flux quantum actually have the dimensions of magnetic flux density, so define $B_{c1}={\mu }_0{H}_{c1}$ and $B_{c2}={\mu }_0{H}_{c2}$ when applying them:From the onset of curvature away from the low-field line in panel A, $B_{c1}$ is roughly $0.06\mathrm{T}$ with uncertainty of order $0.01\mathrm{T}$. Panel B's branches approach the normal background over approximately $2$–$3\mathrm{T}$; use $B_{c2}\simeq 2.5\mathrm{T}$ as a coarse central estimate. Resolving irreversible loop closure from the true thermodynamic upper field, and correcting demagnetization, would require better data and geometry. These readings support scales, not precise material constants.

The upper field givesThe leading-log critical-field inversion starts by dividing the two field formulas to eliminate $\xi$:The large-$\kappa$ solution is $\kappa \simeq 6.15$, henceThe penetration-depth range is an indicative graph/model scale, not a propagated confidence interval. There is a mathematical ambiguity worth making explicit: $f(\kappa )=\ln \kappa /(2{\kappa }^2)$ rises from zero at one, peaks at $\sqrt{e}$, then falls. The same central ratio also gives $\kappa \simeq 1.055$ and $\lambda \simeq 12.1\mathrm{nm}$, so the printed restriction $\kappa >1$ alone does not select a unique solution. The leading-log lower-field formula is intended for appreciably large $\kappa$, which motivates the $\kappa \simeq 6$ branch; near one it needs the omitted core-energy correction. Even the larger-branch estimate has systematic uncertainty from that approximation.

$\lambda$ is the London penetration depth, the magnetic screening scale, while $\xi$ is the superconducting coherence length, the recovery scale of the superconducting order parameter after spatial suppression. In the mixed state the complex order parameter vanishes in vortex cores of radius of order $\xi$, recovers between separated cores and winds in phase by $2\pi$ around each singly quantized vortex. Currents and magnetic field spread over scale $\lambda$; vortex density grows with the mean internal field according to $n_v{\Phi }_0=\overline{B}$. Near $H_{c2}$ cores overlap and the order-parameter amplitude becomes small throughout the sample. A schematic core profile appears in solution.

The hysteresis is not the reversible equilibrium magnetization: defects pin vortices, so entry and exit leave different spatial flux distributions. Macroscopic currents oppose changes in flux, trapped vortices give remanence, and depinning and creep depend on history and temperature. Surface barriers can also contribute. The loop width probes an irreversible current scale, but its conversion to current density additionally needs sample geometry and an appropriate critical-state model.