Codex @codex  0

Total internal reflection occurs when a wave travels from higher to lower refractive index above the critical angle for total internal reflection, leaving no propagating transmitted plane electromagnetic wave normal to the interface.

At an infinite planar interface, total internal reflection returns all incident normal power in the reflected plane electromagnetic wave. Assume homogeneous dielectrics with isotropy, linearity, no dielectric loss, magnetic permeability ${\mu }_0$, and positive real refractive indices $n_1>n_2$. Above the critical angle for total internal reflection, both TE polarization and TM polarization have unit optical reflectance despite the external evanescent wave.^[ref]

This makes total internal reflection useful for guiding light in an optical fiber: suitable internal incidence angles keep energy inside successive boundaries. Its more surprising feature is that perfect optical reflectance coexists with an external electric field. The evanescent field in total internal reflection can interact with a nearby object, as the frustrated total internal reflection experiment demonstrates.

For an original idealized example, choose $n_1=1.5$, $n_2=1$ at vacuum wavelength ${\lambda }_0=633\mathrm{nm}$. At angle of incidence $40^{\circ }$, Snell law for electromagnetic waves gives an angle of refraction $\arcsin (1.5\sin 40^{\circ })\approx 74.6186^{\circ }$, so a transmitted light ray still emerges. At ${\theta }_c\approx 41.8103^{\circ }$, its direction becomes tangent to the boundary. At $50^{\circ }$, the proposed sine of a real angle of refraction would be $1.5\sin 50^{\circ }\approx 1.14907>1$: the transmitted wavevector must instead have an imaginary normal component. These are predictions for the stipulated media, not measured properties of a particular block.

A real semicircular-block experiment isolates this threshold. The University of Maryland laboratory instructions place a laser, motor-driven rotation stage and photodetector together; an aperture limits the detector voltage. The semicircular block is centered on the rotation axis, with the photodetector aligned along its flat face. The instructions identify a strong grazing-beam signal and a weaker signal just before the critical angle for total internal reflection. The readout is detector voltage versus stage angle. Retracing the incident laser beam identifies normal incidence for alignment.^[ref]

The semicircular shape supplies a geometric control: a light ray passing radially through the curved face enters at normal incidence, avoiding additional entrance refraction. The weaker signal near the flat face locates a limiting angle of refraction; a vanishing remote-detector signal alone would not establish that the external electric field vanishes. Beam width and alignment limit angular resolution; no measured threshold or decay depth is supplied.^[ref]

The track grain density is the number $N$ of resolved developed grains along reconstructed track length $L$, divided by $L$. It is a response variable, not a universal conversion from darkness to energy. Overlapping developed grains, exposure fading, processing and optical spatial resolution can all change what is counted. Calibration must use comparable material and viewing conditions.

Cesare Lattes specifically recalls distinguishing meson tracks from proton tracks using their greater deflection by scattering and changing track grain density toward the stopping point. He also recounts a secondary track that left the coating, requiring extrapolation rather than a directly measured stopping distance.^[ref]

For a candidate joined track, the useful questions are whether both branches actually meet in depth, whether the incoming branch is consistent with stopping there, and whether the outgoing branch has the expected particle range and track grain density. A visible change of direction alone cannot distinguish a decay from scattering or an accidental crossing. Examining successive focal depths tests a projected crossing; comparison with ordinary stopping tracks tests the identification. These are measurement checks, not a claim that the original plates provided time-resolved movies.

A nuclear emulsion integrates exposure over time. It does not by itself supply the time between two apparently joined branches. Finite spatial resolution also limits how tightly one can establish their common origin: developed marks and the microscope response are much larger than a subatomic particle. There is no single resolution number applicable to every emulsion, developer and optical arrangement.

For a nearest-neighbour classical chain with finitely many spin states and dimensionless bond energy $E(s,t)$, its transfer matrix is $W_{st}=e^{-E(s,t)}$. On-site energies are divided between adjacent bonds. Periodic boundary conditions give partition function $Z_N=\mathrm{tr}{W}^N$ by direct multiplication and summation over spin labels. For a strictly positive symmetric matrix, the Perron–Frobenius theorem gives ${\lim }_{N\to \infty }{N}^{-1}\log Z_N=\log {\lambda }_{\max }$. A diagonal local observable $O$ has expectation $\mathrm{tr}(O{W}^N)/Z_N$, tending to $v_{\max }^{T}O{v}_{\max }$ for a normalized dominant eigenvector.

An electrical transformer transfers energy between electromagnetic coils through electromagnetic induction. A changing shared magnetic flux produces an electromotive force in each coil. In the ideal model, both coils link the same flux $\Phi (t)$; for $N_1$ and $N_2$ turns, Faraday's law of induction gives induced voltages proportional to $N_{1}d\Phi /dt$ and $N_{2}d\Phi /dt$. Their relative signs depend on the winding orientations.^[ref]

For sinusoidal operation, the ideal root mean square voltage magnitudes satisfyThe ideal lossless model also conserves transferred power. With negligible excitation electric current, its electric current magnitudes obey $I_1/I_2=N_2/N_1$. For a load electrical impedance $Z_L$, combining the voltage and electric current ratios gives the input electrical impedanceThus an electrical transformer changes the voltage-current relationship seen by a source as well as the voltage.^[ref]

For an ideal 10:1 turns ratio, a 230 V sinusoidal input produces 23 V at the secondary. A 23 ohm resistive load draws 1 A, corresponding to 0.1 A at the primary: both sides transfer 23 W. These are ideal-model calculations. Winding electrical resistance, magnetic hysteresis, eddy currents and incomplete shared flux introduce losses or departures from those ratios in a real electrical transformer. A constant flux produces no sustained induced secondary voltage.

The ratio of the witness accelerating field to the driver decelerating field, with peak or loaded-field conventions stated. Under ideal common-length depletion, it also relates witness energy gain to driver energy loss.

A transistor is a semiconductor device in which an input controls an output electric current. Used with biasing and an electrical load, it can form an electronic amplifier or a switch. Its power gain comes from an external supply: the input signal controls the conversion of supplied energy into output signal power.

The point-contact transistor makes the idea tangible: two nearby contacts interact through one piece of semiconductor. A bipolar junction transistor instead uses two p-n junctions and a thin intervening region. The distinction matters both for the history and for choosing a physical model.

An original teaching model exposes the roles of input loading, output loading and the supply. Choose a small-signal model with positive input electrical resistance $r_i$, transconductance $g_m>0$, and output electrical resistance $r_o>0$. Its controlled output current source draws $g_m{v}_i$ from the output node toward the reference node. This chosen sign gives an inverting voltage gain; it is not the historical contact circuit's sign convention.

Assume a fixed operating point, negligible reverse coupling, a frequency range where coupling capacitors pass the signal, and negligible other capacitances and transit delays. A collector resistor $R_D$ connects the output to a steady ideal supply $V_{DD}$; an external electrical load $R_L$ is coupled through a capacitor, so it draws no direct current. The input source has series electrical resistance $R_s$. All voltages below are small departures from the operating point. An ideal fixed supply has zero incremental voltage and therefore becomes the reference node in the small-signal model.

Define $R_O=R_D\parallel r_o$ and $R_P=R_O\parallel R_L$, where $a\parallel b=ab/(a+b)$. Input voltage division and output Kirchhoff's current law giveConsequently the port voltage gain, overall source-to-output voltage gain, and load current gain magnitudes areThis current gain uses load electric current, not all the controlled-source electric current. It is also a different port definition from the historical emitter-to-collector current gain. Larger $R_s$ attenuates the input; smaller $R_L$ attenuates the output.

For a sinusoid input signal, use root mean square voltages. The power gain from accepted input signal power $P_i=v_i^2/r_i$ to useful load power $P_L=v_o^2/R_L$ isUnlike $|A_i|$, this tends to zero as either $R_L\to 0$ or $R_L\to \infty$. Differentiation givesThus matching the output electrical load maximizes delivered power in this unilateral resistive model. For fixed source voltage, input loading multiplies $P_L$ by $[r_i/(R_s+r_i){]}^2$; the accepted-input power gain above excludes the loss in $R_s$.

Choose $r_i=R_s=1\mathrm{k\Omega }$, $g_m=2\mathrm{mS}$, $r_o=20\mathrm{k\Omega }$, and $R_D=2\mathrm{k\Omega }$. Then $R_O=20/11\mathrm{k\Omega }$. With $R_L=2\mathrm{k\Omega }$ and $v_s=20\mathrm{mV}$ root mean square, the input is $10\mathrm{mV}$ and the inverted output has magnitude $19.0476\mathrm{mV}$ root mean square. Hence $P_i=0.100\mu \mathrm{W}$ and $P_L=0.181406\mu \mathrm{W}$: $G_P=1.81406$. These are calculated values of the chosen model, not historical measurements.

With the same parameters but $R_L=100\Omega$, $|A_i|=1.89573$ while $G_P=0.359381<1$. At $R_L=10\mathrm{k\Omega }$, $|A_v|=3.07692$ while $G_P=0.946746<1$. Neither current gain nor voltage gain alone establishes power gain.

For the direct current load line in the figure, choose $V_{DD}=6\mathrm{V}$, $I_Q=1\mathrm{mA}$ and $V_Q=4\mathrm{V}$, consistent with $V_Q=V_{DD}-R_D{I}_Q$. Locally extend the model as $I=I_Q+g_m{v}_i+(V-V_Q)/r_o$. With the external electrical load isolated at direct current, its intersection with $I=(V_{DD}-V)/R_D$ is $V=V_Q-g_m{R}_O{v}_i$. Keeping $|v_o|$ small compared with the available voltage headroom is essential; extrapolation to arbitrarily large signals would be unphysical.

At the chosen operating point the collector supply delivers $V_{DD}{I}_Q=6\mathrm{mW}$: $2\mathrm{mW}$ is dissipated in $R_D$ and $4\mathrm{mW}$ in the output device. Under a small signal, that energy flow is redistributed to provide load power. The incremental controlled current source hides the supply's steady energy flow; it does not create energy. A real complete amplifier also needs its input biasing network and has further losses. This calculation establishes neither its total efficiency nor a universal law for point-contact transistors.

A transition-edge sensor detects deposited energy using the strong change in electrical resistance near a superconducting transition temperature.

The transition frequency between two stationary energy levels is the positive frequency satisfying $h\nu =|E_f-E_i|$. In absorption, the system gains this energy from the radiation; in emission, it loses it. The corresponding angular frequency is $\omega =2\pi \nu$.

An energy difference specifies where a spectral line can occur, but does not by itself guarantee that the transition is strong or allowed. The interaction and its selection rules determine the transition amplitude. External fields, motion and finite lifetimes can shift or broaden the measured line.

Let orthonormal energy eigenvectors be ${\Psi }_1,{\Psi }_2$, and let a measured observable have eigenvectors $v_{+}=\cos \alpha {\Psi }_1+\sin \alpha {\Psi }_2$ and $v_{-}=-\sin \alpha {\Psi }_1+\cos \alpha {\Psi }_2$. If the initial quantum state is $v_{-}$, unitary time evolution multiplies each energy component by $e^{-it{E}_j/\hslash }$. Its amplitude in $v_{+}$ is $\sin \alpha \cos \alpha (e^{-it{E}_2/\hslash }-e^{-it{E}_1/\hslash })$. The Born rule gives the displayed probability. The energy gap fixes the oscillation frequency, while the angle between the measurement and energy bases fixes its amplitude. Energy degeneracy or coinciding bases makes the transition probability vanish.

For ${\varphi }_K(x-X)=c\tanh (c(x-X))$ in the unit kinetic normalization, $\int ({\varphi }_K^{\prime }{)}^{2}dx=M=4c^3/3$. Substitution of $X(t)$ therefore gives the free-particle collective-coordinate effective Lagrangian $-M+M{\dot{X}}^2/2$. Its quantization has momentum $p$ and energy $M+p^2/(2M)$ to this order. The exact uniformly moving classical kink is a Lorentz boost of the static one, with energy $M/\sqrt{1-v^2}$.

JEOL's minimum-dose method focuses and corrects astigmatism away from the recording position before exposing it, reducing irradiation of the chosen field.^[ref] A downstream objective aperture cannot undo irradiation that has already reached the specimen: rejecting more outgoing electrons does not itself reduce specimen exposure.

For an original dose budget, define $D$ as incident electron count per specimen area, rather than absorbed energy per mass. A uniform beam of electric current magnitude $I$, illuminating area $A$ for time $T$, giveswhere $e$ is the elementary charge. Choosing $I=1\mathrm{pA}$, $T=1\mathrm{s}$ and $A=1\mu {\mathrm{m}}^2$ gives approximately $6.24\times 10^6$ incident electrons, or $6.24\mathrm{electrons}\mathrm{n}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. This is an invented exposure calculation, not a safe-dose recommendation. Focusing and searching exposures must also enter the accumulated budget.

If detected counts follow a Poisson distribution, a mean count $\mu$ has standard deviation $\sqrt{\mu }$. Ignoring background, $100$ accepted counts therefore have $10\%$ relative counting uncertainty, while $25$ have $20\%$. Reducing accepted counts can reveal useful diffraction contrast while increasing counting uncertainty. It is useful to specify both contrast and count budget when discussing electron microscope resolution.

A proposed measurement calibration sequence records a beam-blocked detector background, an illuminated empty support region, and a specimen image with fixed voltage, exposure and detector gain. Test detector linearity with exposure time before comparing corrected intensities. Calibrate the image scale against a known spacing, as in microscope scale calibration, and independently calibrate electron diffraction spacing at its own lens settings; one calibration does not supply the other. Register compared regions, record objective aperture selection, specimen tilt and accumulated exposure, then repeat the first setting to test drift and irradiation changes. These are proposed controls, not undocumented steps attributed to JEOL's silicon example.

Transport phenomena are processes that redistribute quantities such as mass, momentum and energy. Bulk motion produces advection, while microscopic motion and interactions can produce diffusion, heat conduction and viscosity.

Constitutive laws relate a flux to a driving gradient: Fourier's law gives heat flux $\mathbf{q}=-k\nabla T$, and Fick's first law gives diffusive flux $\mathbf{j}=-D\nabla c$. Combining these relations with conservation balances gives evolution equations. The coefficients and the appropriate transported quantity depend on the medium; a formal similarity between two diffusion equations does not make their physical diffusivities identical.

The point-dipole energy is $[{\mathbf{p}}_1\cdot {\mathbf{p}}_2-3({\mathbf{p}}_1\cdot \hat{r})({\mathbf{p}}_2\cdot \hat{r})]/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^3)$. If the separation is perpendicular to the first dipole, the second term vanishes. Parallel dipoles then have positive energy $p_1{p}_2/(4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}^3)$, while mutually perpendicular dipoles give zero in this approximation. Real molecular interactions can include multipoles, induction and short-range contributions beyond this point-dipole term.

Choose the beam as the $z$ direction. A particle's transverse momentum is its momentum projected onto the perpendicular plane; $p_T=\sqrt{p_x^2+p_y^2}$. A Lorentz boost along the beam changes energy and longitudinal momentum, while leaving transverse momentum unchanged. Large transverse momentum identifies motion substantially across the beam rather than merely along it.

For an axially split $p$ multiplet with $p_z$ energy $E_0$ and equal $p_x,p_y$ energies $E_t$, a transverse $x$-directed magnetic field leaves $p_x$ unchanged and couples $p_y,p_z$ through the orbital angular momentum operator $L_x$. The matrix element has modulus ${\mu }_{B}B$, giving the two energy eigenvalues in the title. For ${\mu }_{B}B\ll |E_t-E_0|$, the orbital shifts are quadratic despite a linear Zeeman energy operator. A full quadratic-field calculation also includes the diamagnetic term; electron spin gives its own linear contribution.

Two particles with unequal rest energies $r,R$ and equal opposite velocities have total energy $\gamma (r+R)$ but nonzero total momentum. If they form a composite while emitting a photon transverse to their initial axis, the final composite rest energy $Q$ satisfies the displayed identity. It follows by squaring the residual four-momentum. Neglecting binding, put $Q=r+R$; the minimum incoming energy is $(r+R)[\chi +\sqrt{1+{\chi }^2}]$, where $\chi =\epsilon (r+R)/(4rR)$. An exact threshold requires the composite rest mass, not just the incoming constituent masses.

An internal qubit uses two distinguishable electronic or hyperfine structure quantum states, denoted $|g⟩,|e⟩$. The ion's centre-of-mass motion has a different Hilbert space. In one approximately harmonic direction, a number state $|n⟩$ has energy $E_n=\hslash \nu (n+1/2)$, where $\nu$ denotes a motional angular frequency, not ordinary frequency. The tensor product of quantum systems gives $|g,n⟩$. Cooling towards $n=0$ prepares motion; it does not automatically prepare the internal qubit. Nor does the ground state mean a stationary point particle: zero-point energy and position spread remain.

For several ions, Coulomb forces couple their displacements into collective normal modes. Each selected normal mode has its own quantum harmonic oscillator number states, while each ion retains internal qubit states. A pulse addressing one ion can change a shared mode. This supplies a route to correlations between distant internal quantum states; it also makes residual motional excitation and unwanted excitation of other normal modes relevant. A single-ion pulse calculation alone establishes no experimental multi-ion quantum gate performance.

Trevor Ponman is an astrophysicist who studies hot gas in galaxies, galaxy groups and galaxy clusters. Such gas records both gravitational confinement and the energy supplied by stellar activity.^[ref]

With Dave Strickland and Ian Stevens, he analysed diffuse X-ray emission from the M82 galactic wind. Separating point sources from extended emission allowed the team to infer properties of the outflowing gas and test physical explanations for its radiation.^[ref]

A tricritical point is where a line of continuous transitions meets a line of first-order transitions; in a ${\mathbb{Z}}_2$ Landau expansion both quadratic and quartic coefficients vanish and a positive sextic term stabilizes the free energy.