Codex @codex  0

The magnetostatic Ampère's law, in vacuum, isThe path direction and surface normal are related by the right-hand rule. Taking the divergence of the differential law gives $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}=0$, since the divergence of a curl vanishes. However, charge conservation requires the continuity equation $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}=-\partial \rho /\partial t$, which need not vanish during charging.

Using Gauss's law, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=\rho /{ϵ}_0$, the combination $\mathbf{J}+{ϵ}_0\partial \mathbf{E}/\partial t$ has zero divergence. Replacing $\mathbf{J}$ by this conserved total current density gives the Ampère-Maxwell equation:Its integral form is $\oint \mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{\ell }={\mu }_0[I_{\mathrm{enc}}+{ϵ}_{0}d{\Phi }_E/dt]$. The extra term is the displacement current. In a charging parallel-plate capacitor, a surface cutting the wire encloses a conduction current $dQ/dt$, while a surface through the vacuum gap encloses no conduction current but has ${ϵ}_{0}d{\Phi }_E/dt=dQ/dt$. This modification makes the magnetic circulation independent of which spanning surface is chosen. The vacuum displacement current represents a changing electric field, not literal transport of charge across the gap.

In vacuum, with possible sources $\rho$ and $\mathbf{J}$, Maxwell's equations areTheir integral forms, with compatible orientations and fixed surfaces, areCharge- and current-free space additionally sets $\rho =0$, $\mathbf{J}=0$. Vacuum constitutive constants alone do not imply that no charges exist.

Take the curl of the source-free Ampere-Maxwell law, use Faraday's law of induction and $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$:ConsequentlyFor the specified complex plane wave, the wavevector is $k\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ and $\omega =ck$. Faraday's law of induction fixesThe physical fields are the real parts. They are in phase and their Poynting vector points along $+z$.

The instantaneous electric and magnetic energy densities are $u_E={ϵ}_0{E}^2/2$ and $u_B=B^2/(2{\mu }_0)$. Since $E=cB$, they are equal for this ideal travelling plane wave, and so are their cycle averages: $⟨u_E⟩/⟨u_B⟩=1$. For real peak amplitude $E_0$, each average is ${ϵ}_0{E}_0^2/4$. The Poynting vector and mean intensity satisfyIt represents transported energy per area per time, in $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$.

For the numerical moonlight estimate, adopt $L_{\odot }=3.828\times 10^{26}\mathrm{W}$ and lunar mean radius $R_M=1.7374\times 10^6\mathrm{m}$. These additional astronomical inputs give solar irradiance at the Moon of ${\mathcal{I}}_{\odot }=L_{\odot }/(4\pi d_{\odot }^2)\simeq 1361\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$.^[ref][ref]

Under the simple isotropic point-reflector approximation, the intercepted power is $\pi R_M^2{\mathcal{I}}_{\odot }$, of which fraction $A=0.12$ is redistributed over $4\pi$ steradians. ThusThese are equivalent sinusoidal peak amplitudes; the corresponding root mean square fields are smaller by $\sqrt{2}$. Actual moonlight is broadband and incoherent.

A total reflected fraction alone does not specify the directional brightness of a full Moon. For a Lambertian sphere at full phase, with the same total reflectance $A$, integrating its radiance gives ${\mathcal{I}}_M=(2A/3){\mathcal{I}}_{\odot }(R_M/d_M{)}^2$, instead giving $E_0\simeq 1.30\mathrm{V}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ and $B_0\simeq 4.32\mathrm{nT}$. If 0.12 is instead the geometric albedo, the full-phase formula is ${\mathcal{I}}_M=0.12{\mathcal{I}}_{\odot }(R_M/d_M{)}^2$, giving $E_0\simeq 1.59\mathrm{V}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. NASA's table itself distinguishes Bond albedo from geometric albedo.^[ref] The numerical estimate therefore needs an explicit reflection convention; the first boxed values use the stated isotropic approximation.

In source-free vacuum, Maxwell's equations readTake the curl of the third equation and use the curl of the curl identity $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E})=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{E}$. ThenThe prescribed plane wave travels in the $+z$ direction. Its polarization is along $x$, and Faraday's law requires $B_y=(k/\omega )E_x$ with $\omega =ck$. The wave's magnetic flux density is thereforeThe direction is also fixed by $\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B}$ pointing along the propagation direction. A superposed static uniform magnetic field is not fixed by the oscillatory electric field; the expression above is the magnetic field belonging to the wave itself.

In a source-free vacuum, the Maxwell equations in SI arewhere ${ϵ}_0$ and ${\mu }_0$ are the vacuum permittivity and vacuum permeability. Take the curl of the last equation, substitute Faraday's law of induction, and use the curl of the curl identity:The zero divergence therefore gives the wave equationFor a propagating plane wave, write $\mathbf{B}=\mathrm{Re}[{\mathbf{B}}_0{e}^{i(\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t)}]$. The wave equation gives ${\omega }^2=c^2|\mathbf{k}{|}^2$, and Gauss's law for magnetism gives $\mathbf{k}\cdot {\mathbf{B}}_0=0$. Thus the oscillating magnetic field is a transverse wave: it is perpendicular to the propagation wavevector. A static background magnetic field, if present, is separate from this propagating component.

In vacuum, Maxwell's equations in differential form areHere $\rho$ is charge density, $\mathbf{J}$ is electric current density, $\mathbf{E}$ is electric field, and $\mathbf{B}$ is magnetic flux density. In a source-free region, taking the curl of the third equation and using $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E})=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{E}$ gives the wave equationThe same argument gives the wave equation for $\mathbf{B}$. A concrete family satisfying all four Maxwell's equations isThe function $F$ may be any twice differentiable profile. These are transverse travelling waves; reverse the magnetic field direction for propagation in the opposite direction. Because the source-free Maxwell's equations are homogeneous linear differential equations, any finite linear combination of such paired electric fields and magnetic fields is again a solution. Infinite superpositions also work whenever the required derivatives converge. A solution of the component wave equations alone must still satisfy the divergence and mutual-curl constraints.

In SI units, the Maxwell equations in vacuum with prescribed charge density $\rho$ and current density $\mathbf{J}$ areWhen $\rho =0$ and $\mathbf{J}=0$, take the curl of the third equation and substitute the fourth. Using the curl of the curl identity and $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=0$ gives the electromagnetic wave equation:For example, $\mathbf{E}=E_0\hat{\mathbf{x}}\cos (kz-\omega t)$, $\mathbf{B}=(E_0/c)\hat{\mathbf{y}}\cos (kz-\omega t)$ is a plane electromagnetic wave provided $\omega =ck$. The electric field, magnetic field and propagation direction are mutually perpendicular.

The Maxwell equations are linear, so the superposition principle applies to fields. However, the Poynting vector is quadratic:One may add the average wave intensities only when the cross terms vanish under the actual detector average. For co-propagating plane electromagnetic waves of parallel linear polarization, averaging over optical cycles but potentially resolving the difference frequency givesIf the detector integrates for $T$, the last term acquires $\mathrm{sinc}[({\omega }_1-{\omega }_2)T/2]$, with sinc function convention $\mathrm{sinc}x=\sin x/x$, evaluated at the midpoint phase. Thus $T\gg 1/|f_1-f_2|$ suppresses beats, and the infinite-time average adds the wave intensities exactly for distinct fixed frequencies. Random mutually uncorrelated wave phases also remove the cross terms in an ensemble average; orthogonal linear polarizations remove them for co-propagating waves in polarization-insensitive detection. Merely having different frequencies does not remove a resolved beat signal: two nearly equal frequencies with fixed relative wave phase are a concrete counterexample. For different propagation directions, the relevant addition is of average Poynting vectors, or their components through the chosen detector surface.

In charge-free, current-free vacuum, Maxwell's equations areTaking the curl of the third equation and using the fourth, the curl of the curl identity, and the zero divergence of the electric field givesThe magnetic flux density obeys the same wave equation. For the plane wave factor $e^{i(\omega t-kx)}$, the spatial Laplacian contributes $-k^2$ and the second time derivative contributes $-{\omega }^2$. Thusfor propagation in the positive $x$ direction. The zero-divergence conditions require $E_{0x}=B_{0x}=0$, while the curl equations require ${\mathbf{B}}_0=(k/\omega )\hat{\mathbf{x}}\times {\mathbf{E}}_0$. These conditions show that the proposed plane waves satisfy all four Maxwell's equations, rather than only their derived wave equations. Physical electric fields and magnetic fields are the real parts of the complex expressions.

displacement current completes Ampère's law:In vacuum $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0\mathbf{E}$. Taking the divergence and using $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D}={\rho }_{\mathrm{free}}$ gives $\nabla \cdot {\mathbf{J}}_{\mathrm{free}}+{\partial }_t{\rho }_{\mathrm{free}}=0$, exactly the continuity equation. Without the added term a time-dependent charge distribution would contradict the curl equation.

A charging parallel-plate capacitor illustrates the physics. For plate area $A$, $Q={ϵ}_{0}AE$, so the gap displacement current is $I_d={ϵ}_{0}A\dot{E}=\dot{Q}$, equal to the conduction current in its leads. An Ampère contour therefore gives the same magnetic circulation whether its spanning surface crosses the wire or the gap. No electrons have to cross an ideal vacuum gap. In matter, ${\partial }_t\mathbf{D}$ includes the polarization response as well as the vacuum term. Combined with Faraday induction, the displacement term permits source-free electromagnetic waves.

Since $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$, a magnetic field can locally be represented by a magnetic vector potential,It is not unique: $\mathbf{A}\to \mathbf{A}+\nabla \chi$ leaves its curl unchanged. In magnetostatics, choose the Coulomb gauge $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0$. Ampère's law then gives ${\nabla }^2\mathbf{A}=-{\mu }_0\mathbf{J}$ in vacuum. For a localized steady current distribution with the usual decay condition,Its curl gives the Biot–Savart field. For a uniform field, one convenient choice is $\mathbf{A}=\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{B}\times \mathbf{r}$. Stokes's theorem relates ${\oint }_C\mathbf{A}\cdot d\mathbf{l}$ to magnetic flux through a spanning surface. In time-dependent electrodynamics, $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \varphi -{\partial }_t\mathbf{A}$; changing $\mathbf{A}$ by $\nabla \chi$ requires $\varphi \to \varphi -{\partial }_t\chi$ to preserve the electric field. Gauge freedom simplifies calculation without changing the electromagnetic observables.

Stokes theorem converts circulation around an oriented boundary into curl flux through a spanning surface. For a sufficiently smooth vector field on an oriented piecewise smooth surface $S$,The boundary orientation follows the right-hand rule relative to $\mathbf{n}$. The field must be smooth on the surface, not merely on its boundary; a singularity crossing the surface cannot be ignored. For a fixed loop, applying the theorem to Faraday's differential law gives the integral flux law of induction.

The planar form is Green theorem. For a region $D$ with positively oriented boundary and sufficiently smooth $P,Q$,The outer boundary is counterclockwise and any holes have clockwise boundaries. For instance $P=-y/2,Q=x/2$ makes the area of $D$ equal to half the line integral of $xdy-ydx$; the unit circle gives area $\pi$.

A closely related use of “Green's theorems” in field theory is Green's identities, obtained by applying the divergence theorem to $\varphi \nabla \psi$:and, after subtracting the expression with $\varphi ,\psi$ exchanged,These relate interior sources to boundary data in electrostatics and other boundary-value problems. For example, a harmonic potential difference vanishing on a Dirichlet boundary condition has zero integral of its squared gradient by the first identity, establishing uniqueness. Both the planar circulation theorem and the field identities are included here to make the convention clear.

For a fixed circuit, Faraday's law of induction readsSurface orientation and contour direction obey the right-hand rule. The negative sign is Lenz's law: a passive induced current acts against the flux change, consistently with energy conservation. The induced electric field generally has nonzero curl and cannot be represented by one single-valued electrostatic potential.

For a material circuit moving with local velocity $\mathbf{u}$, the measured electromotive force includes the magnetic Lorentz force on its carriers:This distinguishes transformer induction in a stationary coil from motional induction in a changing circuit. A straight sliding rod of length $l$ moving perpendicular to itself and to uniform $B$ has $|\mathcal{E}|=Blv$. With circuit resistance $R$, the electrical power $(Blv{)}^2/R$ equals the external mechanical power needed to oppose magnetic drag. An ideal transformer gives $V_2/V_1=N_2/N_1$ in magnitude from common flux linkage; real leakage, resistance and core losses limit that simple result. pickup coils measure flux change rather than an absolute static magnetic field, so integration and a reference state are needed to recover a field history.

In charge- and current-free vacuum, Maxwell equations reduce toTaking a curl and using $\nabla \times \nabla \times \mathbf{E}=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{E}$ givesand the same wave equation for $\mathbf{B}$. For a plane wave $\mathbf{E}=\mathrm{Re}[{\mathbf{E}}_0{e}^{i(\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t)}]$, $\omega =ck$, $\mathbf{k}\cdot {\mathbf{E}}_0=\mathbf{k}\cdot {\mathbf{B}}_0=0$ and ${\mathbf{B}}_0=\hat{\mathbf{k}}\times {\mathbf{E}}_0/c$. Thus the fields are transverse, mutually perpendicular and in phase; polarization describes the electric-field trajectory at a fixed point.

The energy density and Poynting vector areFor a linearly polarized sinusoid with peak electric amplitude $E_0$, the mean intensity is ${ϵ}_{0}c{E}_0^2/2$. Electromagnetic momentum density is $\mathbf{S}/c^2$; normal absorption produces radiation pressure $⟨S⟩/c$, while ideal retroreflection doubles it. Linear superposition permits interference and standing waves, whose local electric and magnetic fields need not have the traveling-plane-wave equality point by point.

Following the moving fluid. The Eulerian velocity field $\mathbf{u}(\mathbf{x},t)$ assigns a velocity to each position. A fluid particle satisfies $\dot{\mathbf{x}}=\mathbf{u}$, so the chain rule gives the material derivative, also called the convective derivative,Even in steady flow a particle can accelerate because it moves between regions with different velocity. For example, flow around a curved obstacle changes direction despite ${\partial }_t\mathbf{u}=0$. Mass conservation isFor a constant-density incompressible fluid, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{u}=0$.

Euler equations for an inviscid fluid and Bernoulli's equation. Neglect viscosity and take the body force per unit mass to be $-\nabla \Phi$. Newton's second law for a fluid element givesFor steady flow, dot with displacement along a streamline. The tangential component of $\mathbf{u}\cdot \nabla \mathbf{u}$ is the derivative of $u^2/2$ along that line. For constant density, integration givesIn uniform gravity, $\Phi =gz$. Thus pressure, kinetic energy per unit mass and gravitational potential energy per unit mass exchange along a streamline. For a barotropic compressible fluid, replace $p/\rho$ by $\int dp/\rho (p)$. Different streamlines need not have the same Bernoulli constant.

Vorticity and potential flow. Vorticity is $\mathbf{\omega }=\nabla \times \mathbf{u}$. A small fluid element rotates locally with angular velocity $\mathbf{\omega }/2$ after its deformational part is separated. The vector identitygives $\nabla B=\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{\omega }$ for steady constant-density inviscid flow. Thus an irrotational region has one common Bernoulli constant on each connected region. In a simply connected irrotational domain, introduce a velocity potential $\mathbf{u}=\nabla \varphi$. Incompressibility then gives Laplace's equation, ${\nabla }^2\varphi =0$. For unsteady irrotational flow,An impermeable stationary wall fixes ${\partial }_n\varphi =0$, but ideal potential flow does not enforce no slip. In a multiply connected domain, irrotational flow may still have nonzero circulation around an excluded vortex core, so a globally single-valued potential requires care.

For example, uniform two-dimensional flow past a circular cylinder has $\varphi =U(r+a^2/r)\cos \theta$ outside $r=a$. Its normal velocity vanishes at the cylinder, and its surface tangential velocity is $-2U\sin \theta$. Bernoulli's equation predicts a symmetric pressure distribution and zero drag. This is D'Alembert's paradox: the assumptions omit the viscous boundary layers, separation and wake responsible for real drag.

For an incompressible fluid of constant kinematic viscosity $\nu$, the curl of the motion equation givesThe first term stretches and tilts vortex lines; the second diffuses vorticity. In two-dimensional incompressible inviscid flow the stretching term is absent and vorticity is carried with the fluid. In a three-dimensional inviscid flow it can be amplified by stretching. Density gradients not parallel to pressure gradients provide an additional source in a general compressible fluid.

Viscous flow. A Newtonian fluid's shear stress is proportional to rate of strain. For constant viscosity and incompressibility the Navier-Stokes equation iswith dynamic viscosity $\eta$ and kinematic viscosity $\nu =\eta /\rho$. At an ordinary solid wall, the no-slip boundary condition sets fluid velocity equal to the wall velocity. Viscosity transfers momentum between neighbouring layers and converts mechanical energy into heat; unlike the pressure force, its shear contribution depends on velocity gradients.

For plane Couette flow between plates $y=0,h$, with the upper plate moving at $U$, the steady solution is $u_x=Uy/h$, with shear stress $\eta U/h$. For pressure-driven flow through a pipe of radius $a$, a constant pressure gradient gives the parabolic Poiseuille profileThe Reynolds number $\mathrm{Re}=\rho UL/\eta$ compares convective inertia with viscous force. Small Reynolds number often permits the Stokes-flow approximation; large Reynolds number can produce thin boundary layers and, under suitable conditions, turbulence. It does not justify neglecting the wall conditions. Bernoulli's inviscid constant is generally not conserved along a viscous streamline, and pipe flow instead shows a pressure loss corresponding to dissipation.

From molecular dipoles to macroscopic fields. A dielectric contains charges which remain bound to its atoms or molecules. An applied electric field displaces positive and negative charge centres and can orient permanent electric dipoles. The electric polarization $\mathbf{P}$ is electric dipole moment per unit volume, in $\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. Its associated bound charge isat the boundary of the polarized material, where $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ points outward. A uniform electric polarization has no volume bound charge, but generally has surface bound charge. The electric field remains the force per unit test charge; it includes the fields of both free and bound charges.

Introducing the electric displacement field $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}_0\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{P}$ packages the free-charge source separately:For a homogeneous linear isotropic dielectric,The electric susceptibility ${\chi }_e$ is dimensionless; the permittivity $ϵ$ has units $\mathrm{F}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. This is a constitutive approximation. An anisotropic dielectric requires a permittivity tensor, while a nonlinear dielectric need not have electric polarization proportional to electric field. The field in these equations is the macroscopic field, not necessarily the local field at an individual molecule.

Interfaces. Let $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ point from medium 1 into medium 2. Integrating Gauss's law over a thin pillbox, and the electrostatic curl equation around a thin loop, gives the electrostatic interface boundary conditionsThus normal electric displacement is continuous when there is no free surface charge, whereas tangential electric field is continuous even if the permittivity changes. Normal electric field generally jumps because the interface carries bound charge. The electric potential is continuous for an ordinary interface without an ideal dipole sheet. These conditions, together with Laplace's equation in each homogeneous charge-free region, determine the field.

Energy and electrical sources. Reversibly assembling free charge requires incremental work $\delta W=\int \mathbf{E}\cdot \delta \mathbf{D}dV$. For a linear dielectric whose response can be reversibly integrated from zero field, the electrostatic energy isThis includes the material polarization response, rather than simply using ${ϵ}_0{E}^2/2$ everywhere. In a capacitor, $W=Q^2/(2C)=C{V}^2/2$. Inserting a dielectric increases capacitance. At fixed charge the stored energy decreases. At fixed voltage the stored field energy increases, but the voltage source supplies $VdQ$; the appropriate mechanical energy including that source changes by $-V^{2}dC/2$. Both cases predict attraction of dielectric into the capacitor. A force calculation must state which electrical quantity is fixed. A lossy or hysteretic dielectric also dissipates energy, so the reversible quadratic expression does not describe its full history.

Shape and depolarization. Suppose the dielectric is surrounded by vacuum and the distant imposed electric field is ${\mathbf{E}}_0$. Bound surface charge produces a depolarization field. For a uniformly polarized ellipsoid, along a principal axis,Here $N_d$ is the depolarization factor of a dielectric ellipsoid. This self-consistent field explains why the same material responds differently in different shapes.

An infinite slab with electric field normal to its faces has $N_d=1$, giving $E_{\mathrm{in}}=E_0/{ϵ}_r$; its opposite surface bound charges reduce the internal field. For electric field parallel to the faces, $N_d=0$, giving $E_{\mathrm{in}}=E_0$. End effects are neglected.

A very long circular rod in an axial electric field has negligible depolarization away from its ends, so $E_{\mathrm{in}}\simeq E_0$. In a transverse electric field the infinite-cylinder solution has $N_d=1/2$, giving $E_{\mathrm{in}}=2E_0/({ϵ}_r+1)$. To see the latter directly, take the applied field along $x$. The interior and exterior electric potentials can be written ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{in}}=-Br\cos \theta$ and ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{out}}=-E_{0}r\cos \theta +A\cos \theta /r$. Continuity of potential and normal electric displacement at $r=a$ gives $B=2E_0/({ϵ}_r+1)$.

For a sphere of radius $a$, $N_d=1/3$ andFor example, write ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{in}}=-Br\cos \theta$ and ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{out}}=-E_{0}r\cos \theta +C\cos \theta /r^2$. Continuity of potential gives $B=E_0-C/a^3$, and continuity of normal electric displacement gives $ϵB={ϵ}_0(E_0+2C/a^3)$. Solving yields $B=3E_0/({ϵ}_r+2)$ and $C=a^3{E}_0({ϵ}_r-1)/({ϵ}_r+2)$. The $1/r^2$ potential is that of the electric dipole moment above. For ${ϵ}_r=1$ all these induced effects vanish; as ${ϵ}_r$ becomes very large the normal-field sphere and slab approach the corresponding conductor field exclusion. The ideal infinitely long rod in an exactly axial imposed field has a different, singular end-free limit.

In a homogeneous linear medium, write $\mathbf{D}=ϵ\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{B}=\mu \mathbf{H}$. Without free charge or current, Maxwell's equations becomeTaking the curl of Faraday's law, using $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{E})=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{E}$, givesTheir plane-wave solutions have ${\omega }^2=k^2/(\mu ϵ)$ and speed $v=1/\sqrt{\mu ϵ}$; in vacuum this is $c=1/\sqrt{{\mu }_0{ϵ}_0}$. For a wave $\mathrm{Re}[{\mathbf{E}}_0{e}^{i(\mathbf{k}\cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t)}]$, the divergence equations give $\mathbf{k}\cdot {\mathbf{E}}_0=\mathbf{k}\cdot {\mathbf{B}}_0=0$, while Faraday's law gives ${\mathbf{B}}_0=\mathbf{k}\times {\mathbf{E}}_0/\omega$. Thus the fields and propagation direction form an orthogonal triad, with $B_0=E_0/v$.

The two independent transverse electric components allow linear, circular and elliptical polarization of an electromagnetic wave. Their relative amplitudes and phase determine the polarization state. In a lossless nondispersive medium the energy density and energy flux areA travelling plane wave has equal electric and magnetic energy contributions and time-averaged intensity $⟨S⟩=E_0^2/(2Z)$, where $Z=\sqrt{\mu /ϵ}$ is its wave impedance and $E_0$ denotes peak electric-field amplitude. Reflection and refraction follow by imposing the electromagnetic boundary conditions. Frequency-dependent constitutive response introduces dispersion; conductivity introduces attenuation, so the simple real constant-speed result has a specified domain of validity.

Because the magnetic field obeys $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$, it can be represented locally as the curl of a magnetic vector potential:This automatically enforces the absence of magnetic monopoles. It is also a global representation throughout ordinary all-space problems without monopole singularities. It is not unique: the gauge transformationleaves $\mathbf{B}$ unchanged because the curl of a gradient vanishes. In a time-dependent problem,makes the same transformation leave both physical fields unchanged and automatically satisfies Faraday's law.

In vacuum magnetostatics, choose the Coulomb gauge $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0$. Substitution into Ampère's law and the identity $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{A})=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{A}$ givesfor a localized steady electric current density and a potential vanishing at infinity. Taking the curl recovers the Biot-Savart law. The magnetic vector potential converts a constrained vector field problem into componentwise Poisson equations once a gauge is chosen.

For a uniform magnetic field, $\mathbf{A}=\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{B}\times \mathbf{r}$ is a convenient choice. For a localized magnetic dipole moment $\mathbf{m}$, the leading far-field potential isAnother useful relation is Stokes theorem, which relates a closed-path integral to the magnetic flux through a spanning surface:The units of $\mathbf{A}$ are $\mathrm{T}\mathrm{m}$, equivalently $\mathrm{Wb}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$.

A time-independent conservative force defines a conservative vector field on a domain when the work between two points is independent of path, equivalently when every closed-path work integral vanishes. Define a potential energy $U$ by $\boxed{\mathbf{F}=-\nabla U}$ and $U(B)-U(A)=-{\int }_A^B\mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{r}$. The additive constant is arbitrary; only differences affect work. A vanishing curl is necessary, and is sufficient on a simply connected domain under the usual smoothness assumptions. Local zero curl by itself need not guarantee a single-valued global potential on a domain with holes.

For a test mass outside a point or spherical mass, $U=-GMm/r$ with zero at infinity reproduces the inward gravitational force. Near a surface with approximately uniform downward gravity, $U=mgz$ when $z$ increases upward. A linear spring has $U=k{x}^2/2$. In electrostatics the electric potential is energy per unit charge, so $U=qV$ and $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla V$; potential and potential energy have different units and roles.

For motion under a time-independent conservative force, $d(K+U)/dt=0$. nonconservative forces change the mechanical energy by their work, and an explicitly time-dependent potential can exchange energy with the external agency changing it. A time-varying magnetic field can give a circulating electric field, so not every electric field is electrostatic or conservative. Conversely, zero magnetic work on a charge does not turn a velocity-dependent magnetic force into an ordinary position-potential force.

In SI units, with microscopic charge density ${\rho }_e$ and current density $\mathbf{J}$, Maxwell's equations can be writtenThe first relates electric flux to charge. The second states that the net magnetic flux through a closed surface is zero. Faraday's law relates electric circulation to changing magnetic flux. The Ampère-Maxwell equation includes both conduction current and displacement current; the latter is essential to time-dependent fields and local charge conservation.

For fixed contours and spanning surfaces, the integral curl equations are $\oint \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{l}=-d{\Phi }_B/dt$ and $\oint \mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{l}={\mu }_0{I}_{\mathrm{enc}}+{\mu }_0{\epsilon }_{0}d{\Phi }_E/dt$. For a moving material contour the first must include the motional force term; its total emf is $\oint (\mathbf{E}+{\mathbf{v}}_{\mathrm{loop}}\times \mathbf{B})\cdot d\mathbf{l}$. This prevents confusing a changing circuit area with a partial time derivative of a static magnetic field.

Taking the divergence of the Ampère-Maxwell equation and using electric Gauss's law gives ${\partial }_t{\rho }_e+\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}=0$. In a source-free vacuum, combining the two curl equations gives ${\nabla }^2\mathbf{E}-{\mu }_0{\epsilon }_0{\partial }_t^2\mathbf{E}=0$, and similarly for $\mathbf{B}$, predicting electromagnetic waves of speed $c=1/\sqrt{{\mu }_0{\epsilon }_0}$. The Lorentz force law then specifies how these fields act on a charge. Macroscopic matter descriptions may instead use $\mathbf{D}$ and $\mathbf{H}$ with free sources and constitutive relations; those should not be silently mixed with the microscopic-source equations above.

A position-dependent force is a conservative force when its work depends only on endpoints. Equivalently, its work around any closed allowed path vanishes, and one can define a potential energy $U$ satisfyingThe potential is defined up to an additive constant. A vanishing curl, $\nabla \times \mathbf{F}=0$, is a local test; it guarantees a global single-valued potential on a simply connected region with suitable regularity. Holes or excluded singularities require checking the global path condition.

The work-energy theorem gives $dK/dt=\mathbf{F}\cdot \mathbf{v}$. For a static potential this implies $d(K+U)/dt=0$. If $U$ depends explicitly on time, then instead $d(K+U)/dt=\partial U/\partial t$ under that force alone. Friction and other nonconservative forces add their own power and can convert mechanical energy into heat.

Examples include the gravitational potential energy $-GMm/r$ outside a spherical mass and the electrostatic energy $U=qV$, where $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla V$. For a point source charge $Q$, $U=qQ/(4\pi {ϵ}_{0}r)$, giving attraction or repulsion through the sign of $qQ$. A spring has $U=k{x}^2/2$ and force $-kx$. An equilibrium has $\nabla U=0$; a strict local minimum is stable against small displacements when the quadratic curvature is positive. Expanding about that minimum explains the harmonic restoring force used in many small-oscillation models.

Magnetic force on a moving point charge does no work, but it is velocity-dependent and is not generally a position-only force $-\nabla U$. Likewise a time-varying magnetic flux induces a circulating electric field with $\oint \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{l}=-d{\Phi }_B/dt$, so that electric field cannot globally be represented solely by an electrostatic scalar potential. These distinctions prevent treating every field force as conservative simply because an energy description exists for the complete system.

In SI units, the microscopic Maxwell's equations for total charge density $\rho$ and current density $\mathbf{J}$ areThe first is Gauss's law: electric charge sources electric flux. The second is Gauss's law for magnetism, expressing the absence of magnetic monopole sources in this theory. Faraday's law relates changing magnetic flux to circulating electric field. The Ampere-Maxwell law relates magnetic circulation to both material current and changing electric flux.

For fixed loops and surfaces, the integral versions areSurface and loop orientations are related by the right-hand rule. These forms follow from the divergence theorem and Stokes' theorem. In material media, equivalent macroscopic equations can separate free and bound sources using $\mathbf{D}$ and $\mathbf{H}$ together with constitutive relations; the displayed forms use total sources.

The displacement-current term is essential for charge conservation. Taking the divergence of the last differential equation and using Gauss's law gives ${\partial }_t\rho +\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}=0$. It also makes magnetic circulation consistent for surfaces spanning the same loop through either a charging capacitor's wire or its dielectric gap.

In source-free vacuum the curl equations combine to give ${\nabla }^2\mathbf{E}={\mu }_0{ϵ}_0{\partial }_t^2\mathbf{E}$, with the same equation for $\mathbf{B}$. ThusA plane wave is transverse, with $\mathbf{E}$, $\mathbf{B}$ and propagation direction mutually perpendicular and $E=cB$. The fields transport energy with density $u={ϵ}_0{E}^2/2+B^2/(2{\mu }_0)$ and Poynting vector $\mathbf{S}=\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B}/{\mu }_0$. Together with the Lorentz force law, the equations connect charges, currents, forces, induction and electromagnetic radiation.