For $\dot{x}=\alpha x-y+y^3$, $\dot{y}=-x$, the energy $H=x^2-y^2+y^4/2$ satisfies $\dot{H}=2\alpha x^2$. At $\alpha =0$, its compact level sets give two families of closed periodic orbits around $(0,\pm 1)$ and an outer family around both; $H=0$ is a figure-eight homoclinic orbit pair through the saddle point at the origin. The two minima of $H$ are center equilibria for zero damping, stable foci for small negative $\alpha$, and unstable foci for small positive $\alpha$. For $\alpha \ne 0$, strict monotonicity along nonconstant solutions excludes periodic orbits and homoclinic orbits.

For $R(\theta )=\mathrm{diag}(1,e^{i\theta })$, the difference vanishes on $|0⟩$ and multiplies $|1⟩$ by $e^{i\theta }(e^{i\delta }-1)$. Its operator norm is therefore $|e^{i\delta }-1|=2|\sin (\delta /2)|$. Choosing the nearest angle on the grid $2\pi m/2^n$, with circular distance, gives $|\delta |\le \pi /2^n$ and a uniform bound of this size on the output-state norm error. This bound concerns state vectors, not an asserted equality with measurement-probability error.

The quantum effective action is the Legendre transform of the generating functional of connected correlation functions. Its functional derivatives are the one-particle-irreducible vertex functions.

Wick theorem expresses a time-ordered product of free fields as its normal-ordered product plus the sum over every possible contraction. It turns the Dyson series into Feynman diagrams.

A permutation with no fixed points. Applying the inclusion-exclusion principle to the events that each element is fixed gives $D_n=n!{\sum }_{k=0}^n(-1{)}^k/k!$. Therefore $D_n/n!\to e^{-1}$, and the alternating-series remainder is at most $1/(n+1)!$.

// Destination: foundations-of-mathematics.bigb

In a uniformly random permutation of $N$ objects, the cycle containing one specified object has a uniform length on $\{1,\dots ,N\}$. For length $\ell$, choose the other $\ell -1$ objects, arrange their order around the tagged object, and permute all remaining objects. The count is $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{N-1}{\ell -1}\right)(\ell -1)!(N-\ell )!=(N-1)!$, independent of $\ell$. Its mean is $(N+1)/2$, while the mean number of other elements in that cycle is $(N-1)/2$.

A uniform random permutation of $n$ distinct objects gives each of the $n!$ permutations the same probability. Restricting the order to any fixed subset gives a uniform ordering on that subset. Relative ranks encode such a permutation bijectively by independent choices of an insertion position.

A finitely supported permutation fixes every element outside some finite subset. The finitely supported permutations of $\mathbb{N}$ are the union of the finite symmetric groups acting on $\{1,\dots ,k\}$, and hence form a countable set. All permutations of $\mathbb{N}$ form an uncountable set: independently swapping or fixing each pair $(2j-1,2j)$ injects the power set of $\mathbb{N}$ into this larger set.

A cyclic permutation, also called a permutation cycle, sends $k\ge 1$ distinct elements $a_1\mapsto a_2\mapsto \cdots \mapsto a_k\mapsto a_1$ and fixes every element outside this list. Its notation is $(a_1{a}_2\dots a_k)$. For example, $(1342)$ is the permutation with image list $(3,1,4,2)$: all four labels lie on one directed loop. In contrast,has two separate loops, exchanging $1$ with $3$ and $2$ with $4$. It is a permutation composed of two transpositions, rather than a single cyclic permutation.

Starting at a different point of the same loop changes the written list but preserves the cyclic permutation: $(1342)=(3421)$. Reversing the direction generally changes the permutation; it gives the inverse function, here $(1243)$. A transposition is a cyclic permutation of length two; a one-element permutation cycle records a fixed point. In a cycle decomposition of a permutation, one-element permutation cycles are usually omitted, with the underlying set understood.

The beauty of this representation is that repeated rearrangements become motion around independent loops. Applying $(1342)$ four times returns every label to its start, while applying $(13)(24)$ twice already does so. Disjoint permutation cycles commute under function composition, since each moves only labels the others fix. On $n\ge 1$ labels, there are $(n-1)!$ cyclic permutations whose single loop contains every label: fix $1$ as the first written entry and order the other $n-1$ labels freely, giving a factorial. This is also the count of cyclic orderings; choosing a starting position would otherwise count each loop $n$ times. Rotations are identified here, while reversing direction is allowed to give a different cyclic ordering.

Proof outline for decomposition. Starting at any label in a finite set, repeatedly apply the permutation. The pigeonhole principle forces a repeated label. If the first repetition were at a label other than the starting one, its two predecessors would be different labels with the same image, contradicting the injective function property. This produces a permutation cycle returning to the start. Start again at a label not yet visited; the new permutation cycle cannot meet an earlier one, since the bijection gives every label a unique predecessor. Continue until every label belongs to a loop. The resulting cycle decomposition of a permutation is unique up to the order of the disjoint permutation cycles and the starting point written in each one. ^[ref]

The motivating observation is that inserting an insulating material between fixed capacitor plates increases its capacitance. ^[ref]. To investigate this response, use two flat parallel metal electrodes with measured overlapping area $A$ and separation $d$, a uniform specimen filling the gap, and an instrument that measures electrical impedance. Record the capacitance with and without the specimen at the same small applied electric potential difference, frequency and temperature, after capacitance measurement calibration. An increase in corrected capacitance indicates a larger permittivity, provided the geometry is unchanged. A guard electrode reduces the contribution of the fringing field of a capacitor. ^[ref].

For negligible dielectric loss in the parallel-plate capacitor approximation,An air reference approximates $C_0$; it is not an exact vacuum reference. For the following synthetic example, stipulate $A=0.010{\mathrm{m}}^2$, $d=1.00\mathrm{mm}$ and the rounded vacuum permittivity ${ϵ}_0\approx 8.854\times 10^{-12}F/m$. Then $C_0=88.54\mathrm{pF}$ in this model, and relative permittivity four gives $C=354.16\mathrm{pF}$. A residual parallel capacitance of $20\mathrm{pF}$ would make an uncorrected sample/reference ratio $374.16/108.54\approx 3.447$, rather than four. This additive error does not cancel in a ratio.

At nonzero frequency $f$, measure both magnitude and phase of the electric current relative to the applied electric potential difference. Define $Y=I/V=1/Z$, where $Z$ is electrical impedance. For the stated complex permittivity convention, the ideal uniform specimen givesThus a parallel capacitor and electrical conductance describe the readout at that frequency; a single scalar capacitance cannot describe both components. The diagram's assumed dielectric relaxation gives $C_p=265.62\mathrm{pF}$ and $C_0{ϵ}_r^{\prime \prime }=88.54\mathrm{pF}$ at $1\mathrm{kHz}$. These are model predictions, not observations.

Repeat the reference measurement after removing the specimen and vary the small applied electric potential difference to test drift and linearity. Record specimen thickness, electrode area, contact conditions, frequency and temperature. Air gaps act as additional layers in series and can lower inferred relative permittivity; roughness, uncertain thickness and the fringing field of a capacitor limit the geometric formula. At sufficiently high frequency, the fixture itself changes the electromagnetic field, so low-frequency guarding and a lumped capacitor model require reassessment. ^[ref].

For harmonic electric fields with time convention $e^{i\omega t}$, write $\mathbf{D}={ϵ}^{\ast }(\omega )\mathbf{E}$ for their complex amplitudes, where $\omega$ is angular frequency. The real part ${ϵ}^{\prime }$ describes the in-phase electric displacement field; the minus imaginary part ${ϵ}^{\prime \prime }$ describes the loss component. The sign reverses with the opposite time convention. Complex permittivity can also be a tensor in a linear anisotropic dielectric.

A dielectric is a material in which an electric field produces electric polarization while transport of electric charge is sufficiently small for the intended use. An insulating solid in a capacitor is an example; real dielectrics can still have dielectric loss and nonzero electrical conductivity.

The important distinction is between rearranging bound electric charge and transporting mobile charge carriers through the specimen. Bound electric charges can move a little within a chemical atom or molecule, or an existing electric dipole can turn. Their averaged electric dipole moments produce electric polarization even if there is negligible steady electric current between the electrodes. A changing electric polarization does give a bound current; the absence of steady conduction does not mean that the material is electrically unresponsive.^[ref]

For uniform electric polarization $\mathbf{P}=P\hat{\mathbf{x}}$ in a rectangular slab, polarization density gives zero bound volume charge density in the interior and opposite bound surface charge densities $-P,+P$ on the left and right faces. The electric charge has been redistributed, not created. More generally, the divergence theorem makes the cancellation explicit:Here $\mathbf{n}$ is the outward normal vector on the material boundary. This accounts for both bound volume charge density and bound surface charge density; omitting either can falsely suggest that an initially neutral dielectric acquired net electric charge.

An electrical insulator between capacitor plates supports a useful combination: appreciable electric polarization, little leakage electric current, and tolerance of the intended electric field. This lets a small parallel-plate capacitor store separated electric charge and recoverable capacitor energy. The comparison in dielectric capacitor response explains why specifying fixed electric charge or fixed electric potential difference changes the answer. High relative permittivity alone does not establish good insulation or a large usable energy density; dielectric loss and dielectric breakdown matter as well.

Thawing permafrost makes previously frozen organic matter available for decomposition, releasing carbon dioxide and, in waterlogged oxygen-poor conditions, methane. These greenhouse gases amplify warming, which can cause further thaw. The amount reaching the atmosphere depends on decomposition, transport and oxidation; this feedback does not imply an inevitable abrupt release of an entire carbon reservoir.

A periodic table period is a horizontal row of the periodic table, read in increasing atomic number. Periodic table period 2 runs from lithium, $Z=3$, to neon, $Z=10$: $10-3+1=8$ chemical elements. In these neutral ground states, the second electron shell gains electrons while the first retains two.

A periodic group is a vertical column of the periodic table. For example, fluorine and chlorine are in periodic group 17, with seven valence electrons in each neutral ground state chemical atom. A shared outer electron configuration supports similarities in chemical reactions, rather than equality of every property.

A periodic orbit of a map whose least period is two. Its two points are fixed by the second iterate but are not fixed by the original map.

A periodic orbit of a differentiable interval map is superstable when its periodic-orbit multiplier vanishes. A cycle passing through a critical point has zero multiplier because the derivative product includes $f^{\prime }(c)=0$. For the nonconstant quadratic family $f_{\mu }(x)=1-\mu x^2$, a superstable $2^n$ cycle satisfies $f_{\mu }^{2^n}(0)=0$ and does not have a smaller critical period.

// Target: dynamical-systems.bigb

Somatostatin is a peptide hormone that inhibits secretion in several endocrine and digestive contexts. Pancreatic delta cells release it locally, where it can restrain insulin and glucagon secretion. Its effects depend on receptor subtype and target cell rather than a universal suppression of all cellular activity. Processing of a common precursor generates biologically active peptide forms of different lengths. ^[ref]

With Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, let $G$ count copies of the risk allele. The penetrance $p{\theta }^G$ must lie in $[0,1]$ for every possible genotype. Writing $\alpha =1-\varphi +\varphi \theta$ and $\beta =1-\varphi +\varphi {\theta }^2$ gives $\mathbb{E}(q_G)=p{\alpha }^2$ and $\mathbb{E}(q_G^2)=p^2{\beta }^2$.

For a binary disease trait $Y$ with genotype $G$, the genetic variance of penetrance is the between-genotype term in the law of total variance. The averaged within-genotype term is $\mathbb{E}[q_G(1-q_G)]$. Under multiplicative diallelic penetrance, the genetic term is $p^2({\beta }^2-{\alpha }^4)$. This decomposition attributes variance to the modeled locus, not automatically to all hereditary causes.