No. Consider the triangular functions . The absolute-value and positive-part maps are Lipschitz continuous, so . Each is therefore uniformly continuous on the whole real line. For its value is always one; for every fixed it eventually vanishes. Hence its pointwise limit is
This limit is not continuous at zero: along , . Individual uniform continuity does not provide a modulus uniform in .
Yes; in fact the limit is uniformly continuous. Given , uniform convergence provides one with . Uniform continuity of this particular provides such that implies . The triangle inequality then gives
This same works at every point of , proving uniform continuity and therefore continuity. The use of one global is exactly what fails for mere pointwise convergence.
The Fourier sine series has coefficients
by integration by parts. Thus
Its odd extension is on , continued with period . The usual Fourier convergence result for a piecewise smooth periodic function gives the value at a continuous point and the mean of one-sided limits at a jump. At , subtracting one period gives , a continuous point of this extension. Therefore the sine series converges to there.
For the Fourier cosine series, the even extension is on , continued with period . Its triangular wave is continuous even at the joining points, so the cosine series converges to that extension everywhere. On the requested interval its graph is
The vertices are . In particular, its value at is .
Figure 1.
The even periodic extension represented by the cosine series
. Details.
For a dominated family of sample distributions, a statistic is a sufficient statistic precisely when the probability mass function or density factors as
where does not depend on the parameter. This is the Fisher-Neyman factorization theorem.
Here is the discrete proof in both directions. Suppose the factorization holds, and write . Then . Whenever this probability is positive, is finite and positive and
is independent of . Thus the conditional distribution of the whole sample given is parameter-free, which is the definition of a sufficient statistic.
Conversely, if is sufficient, let denote this common conditional mass function on each possible fiber. Then
Take and to obtain the factorization. Fibers impossible for every parameter can be assigned ; conditional probabilities are required only for fibers with positive probability.
For the independent Poisson sample the joint mass function is
All parameter dependence is through
so this is a one-dimensional sufficient statistic. The sample mean contains the same information, since is known.
Let be the finite group and choose a point . Its orbit is a nonempty finite set. Every group element permutes and maps a closed metric disc onto a disc of the same radius. By the permitted uniqueness of the smallest enclosing disc, it fixes that disc and therefore its centre . Thus lies in the orientation-preserving stabilizer of one point.
In the Euclidean plane, translate to zero. Every isometry fixing zero is an orthogonal linear map: distance preservation gives preservation of inner products by the polarization identity, and its values on an orthonormal basis then determine the linear map. Orientation preservation gives determinant one, so it is a rotation. Consequently embeds in the circle group of rotation angles.
For the hyperbolic plane, use this precise standard fact about its isometries: after placing a point at the origin of the Poincare disc model, every orientation-preserving isometry fixing it has the form . Equivalently, its point stabilizer is the rotation group, and its action on directions at the point is faithful. This is a general hyperbolic-plane fact allowed by the question. It again identifies with a finite subgroup of the circle group.
Finally, a nontrivial finite rotation group has a least positive angle in . Divide any other angle by : the remainder is another group angle in , so it must be zero. Similarly the remainder of is zero, and for an integer . The rotation through generates the group. The trivial group is cyclic as well. Therefore both finite orientation-preserving plane isometry groups are cyclic. This proves the finite orientation-preserving plane isometry groups are cyclic result using the same enclosing-disc argument in both geometries.
Relative to the coordinate basis, the linear map has matrix
Expanding in its first column gives the monic characteristic polynomial
Its eigenvalues are and , three distinct complex numbers. Eigenvectors corresponding to distinct eigenvalues are linearly independent, so they form a basis of and is diagonalizable.
Every annihilating polynomial must vanish at all three eigenvalues: applying to a corresponding eigenvector gives . Conversely, in the eigenbasis the product of the three distinct linear factors annihilates . Hence the minimal polynomial is
If with scalars not both zero, the nonzero polynomial of degree at most two would annihilate , contradicting this minimal degree of three. Thus and are linearly independent endomorphisms.
The divergence is , so this is an incompressible flow. With the planar convention , one stream function is
At a fixed nonzero , the streamlines have and , since the instantaneous velocity is purely axial. If , every point is instantaneously stationary and there is no distinguished streamline direction.
Follow a marked particle initially at . Its trajectory satisfies and , so
These points form a straight segment on , , not an instantaneous horizontal streamline. Its length is
The directed angle of its vector from the origin to the marked endpoint is
For and , this is ; it equals at . If an unoriented acute angle to the axis is intended, use , with when . This distinction handles a negative value of the given constant as well. If , the marked set is a single point: the length formula gives zero and no line direction is defined.
Fix real and use a rectangle with vertical sides at real coordinates . The function is entire, so its closed contour integral is zero by Cauchy's integral theorem. The bottom horizontal side contributes and the top contributes the negative of . This identity applies for either sign of , with the corresponding oriented rectangle.
On a vertical side, with , and
The sum of the two vertical integrals in absolute value is at most . Both horizontal improper integrals converge absolutely, since . Letting therefore proves
Complete the square in the Fourier transform:
The shifted-integral identity applies after scaling by . The Gaussian integral is : the square of becomes in polar coordinates. Thus the Gaussian Fourier transform yields
The eigenvalue reflects the unnormalized transform convention in this question.
For a real symmetric bilinear form, a basis puts its quadratic expression in diagonal form with positive, negative and zero squares. Its rank is , the rank of the coefficient matrix, or equivalently the codimension of its radical. Its signature is ; the signature pair is , another common convention.
These quantities do not depend on the basis. A basis change replaces the matrix by with invertible, preserving matrix rank. The number is intrinsically the largest dimension of a subspace on which the form is positive definite. In a diagonal representation the positive coordinate space attains this dimension; any subspace of dimension greater than intersects the negative-plus-null coordinate space nontrivially and therefore cannot be positive definite. The same argument with signs reversed characterizes . This proves the needed invariance, rather than assuming it from a chosen representation.
Decompose the full matrix space as
using the symmetric traceless, skew-symmetric and scalar parts. The summands are orthogonal for the given form. Indeed for symmetric and skew-symmetric , by transposition and cyclic invariance of trace, while both non-scalar summands are traceless and hence orthogonal to . On them,
for nonzero vectors in their respective summands. The dimensions are , and one. Therefore the modified trace form on real matrices has
There is no radical for .
A normalizable bound state has : the potential is nonnegative, while exponential decay is needed on the infinite right-hand region. Set and . The hard-wall condition and decay select
Continuity at has already been used. Since the finite step contains no delta interaction, integrating the Schrödinger equation across it also requires derivative continuity. Thus , giving
The ground-state solution uses the first branch and has no internal node. It starts at zero, rises to one maximum inside the well, decreases to a positive value at , and joins smoothly onto a decaying exponential tail.
Figure 1.
Nodeless bound state in a finite well with a hard wall
. Details.
To see the precise existence condition, set and . The first-branch matching equation gives on . This increases strictly from to infinity, since its derivative is . Thus the bound ground state exists exactly when , or , as in the bound-state thresholds for a square well with one hard wall. At equality and the exterior solution is not square-integrable. Below it there is no normalizable energy eigenfunction of the requested ground-state type. The sketch assumes the binding condition and uses one representative solution, not a specified numerical well depth.
Take any sequence in . Surjectivity lets us choose with . By sequential compactness of , some . Continuity gives . Thus has the Bolzano–Weierstrass property.
Now suppose is a bijection. To prove continuity of its inverse, let and put , . If , there are and a subsequence with . Sequential compactness supplies a further subsequence converging to . By continuity of , . Injectivity implies , contradicting the fixed lower distance bound. Hence . Sequential continuity is equivalent to continuity in metric spaces, proving is continuous.
Apply this to on , mapping onto the closed right semicircle . This interval is sequentially compact, and is a continuous bijection: two equal exponential values differ by an integral multiple of , impossible for distinct points of an interval of length . Consequently is continuous. For , the normalization is continuous and takes values in the open right semicircle. Therefore
is a continuous argument satisfying . Equivalently it is .
Put and separate . Multiplying Laplace's equation by gives
For the regular polynomial angular modes, and is a Legendre polynomial. The radial equation has branches and . Regularity at the origin keeps only the first inside, and decay at infinity keeps only the second outside. Continuity at identifies their coefficients, so a mode has
Its outward-minus-inward radial derivative is . The prescribed angular dependence decomposes as , since and . Hence and , with no other required modes. The spherical harmonic matching with a derivative jump gives
Both branches are harmonic in their respective regions. They agree at the sphere, and their derivative jump is . The interior is regular at zero and the exterior decays at infinity. An additional homogeneous matching mode would satisfy , so its coefficient vanishes.
Treat the two row totals as fixed sample sizes, with independent multinomial observations within each row. More generally let be an by table, row totals , column totals and total . Under the unrestricted alternative, row has its own category probabilities ; independence means that all rows have the same probabilities .
Ignoring the multinomial coefficients, which cancel in a likelihood ratio, the unrestricted likelihood is . Maximizing under gives . Under the null, the log likelihood is , giving . Thus the null fitted counts are , and the generalized likelihood ratio is
A zero observed count contributes zero by continuity. Small , equivalently large , is evidence against independence. The unrestricted model has free probabilities and the null has , a difference of . Under the usual large-sample likelihood-ratio approximation at an interior null, has a chi-squared distribution with that many degrees of freedom. This is the likelihood-ratio test of independence in a contingency table. Sampling the entire table multinomially instead gives the same statistic and degrees of freedom after estimating the row probabilities.
For the supplied data the fitted counts are
Substitution gives
There are degrees of freedom. The supplied 1% critical value is , and . Do not reject independence at the 0.01 level. The approximate chi-squared tail probability is . This lack of rejection does not establish that the classifications are independent; the test supplies no evidence against that null here. All fitted counts are at least ten, making the stated asymptotic approximation reasonable.
For with real coefficients and , direct subtraction from its conjugate gives
The imaginary part remains positive, and the inverse transformation has the same form, so is a bijection of the upper half-plane. Moreover
Thus every path has the same hyperbolic length as its image. Taking the infimum over connecting paths, and using the inverse for the reverse inequality, proves every is an isometry.
Likewise
Its squared modulus and the two imaginary-part factors cancel in the quotient, proving
We can normalize any ordered distinct pair to with . First send to by , a real determinant-one Möbius transformation after rescaling its representing matrix. The stabilizer transformations
fix . Under the Cayley map , direct substitution gives . Choose to rotate the second point's nonzero disc coordinate onto the positive real axis. Its inverse image is with .
The vertical path from to has length . Any other path has length at least , so . Consequently
Invariance of both quantities transfers this equality back to every pair; coincident points satisfy it as well. Therefore
For the right-triangle identity, normalize its right vertex to and one leg to the vertical geodesic, with endpoint , . The other leg lies on the unit semicircle, with endpoint , , . These geodesics meet orthogonally at , since the metric is conformal to the Euclidean metric. The semicircle is a geodesic because a real Möbius transformation sends it to a vertical line; vertical lines are minimizing by the same length bound. The stabilizer rotations above can align any given tangent direction, giving this normal form for every right triangle.
If the legs have lengths and the opposite side has length , the distance formula gives
and
Thus the hyperbolic Pythagorean theorem is
After choosing a basis of , a linear endomorphism is specified by an by matrix, with freely chosen coefficients. Therefore
The endomorphisms are linearly dependent. Some nonzero coefficient list gives a nonzero polynomial satisfying .
For nonzero , the minimal polynomial is the monic polynomial of least degree annihilating . It is unique: subtracting two monic least-degree choices would give a lower-degree annihilator. More generally division of any annihilator by gives , with , and evaluation implies . Minimality forces , so every annihilator is divisible by . If , the convention handles the degenerate case.
The arguments work over the underlying scalar field. In part (b), roots in that field correspond to eigenvalues there; to discuss other roots one extends scalars, for example by complexifying a real vector space.
If with , then . The left side vanishes, so .
Conversely, if , write . Then . If were invertible, multiplying by its inverse would imply , contradicting the minimal degree. Thus is not invertible. In finite dimension this means it has a nonzero kernel, furnishing an eigenvector with eigenvalue . Hence the eigenvalues are exactly the roots of the minimal polynomial, with the scalar-field convention stated in part (a).
Invariance of means every power of restricts to the corresponding power of . Therefore is the restriction of , and it is zero. Divide with . Evaluation at gives . By minimality of , , proving
The zero-subspace case has and satisfies the same conclusion.
Take , and . Then is a proper invariant subspace, and the restriction has matrix . In each case annihilates the operator, while any annihilator must vanish at both zero and one. Consequently
This same example works over any scalar field.
For an inviscid fluid of constant density, with irrotational velocity and conservative body-force potential , the Unsteady Bernoulli equation is
It holds throughout a connected irrotational fluid region, up to the time-dependent gauge of . Indeed the Euler equations and imply that the gradient of the left side is zero. In the bubble problem there is no body-force contribution compatible with the assumed spherical symmetry.
Spherical incompressibility gives . The moving interface imposes , so
This potential tends to zero at infinity, where the velocity tends to zero and . Differentiate at fixed spatial , not along the moving interface: . At , pressure continuity without surface tension gives . Bernoulli therefore yields , or the Rayleigh equation for an inviscid spherical bubble
Integrating the kinetic energy over the exterior fluid gives
Differentiate and use the radius equation:
With and , the pressure-work energy balance for a spherical bubble integrates to
or
The collapsing branch takes the negative square root for . The energy gain is exactly the pressure difference times the lost bubble volume, providing a check on the sign and numerical factor.
Let two regular differentiable paths through have nonzero tangent vectors . The chain rule gives tangent vectors and for their images. Multiplication by a nonzero complex number is a positive scaling and rotation: writing scales lengths by and adds the same angle to both tangents. Equivalently,
Thus the oriented angle between the paths is preserved, proving is conformal at . The nonzero derivative also gives local invertibility; a zero derivative could multiply angles through branching instead.
Use the Möbius transformation
The lens's boundary intersections are . Write . Substitution in the inverse gives , and
Consequently the two domain inequalities are exactly , or . This algebra proves that maps the lens bijectively onto the quarter-sector, not merely that its boundary curves go to rays.
The map maps this sector bijectively onto the upper half-plane: the argument increases from to , and the positive modulus map is bijective. Its inverse is the fourth-root branch with argument in . Therefore the quarter-sector mapping of a circular lens is
Its derivative is nonzero in the lens, since and there. Finally the Cayley transform maps bijectively to the unit disc, because exactly when . A required conformal bijection is thus
All poles and branching endpoints of the construction lie outside the open domain.
By orthogonal diagonalization of the positive-definite symmetric matrix , form its positive symmetric inverse square root . Then , and is real symmetric. Let have an orthonormal eigenbasis of as its columns, so . Taking gives
Both factors of are invertible. This proves the simultaneous congruence diagonalization with a positive form by an explicit construction; it is congruence rather than simultaneous similarity.
To find the entries without constructing , take determinants in
Since , the entries are precisely the roots, with multiplicity, of . Equivalently they are the eigenvalues of , although that matrix need not itself be symmetric.
For the given , its leading principal minors are , so it is positive definite. Expanding the determinant gives
Thus the diagonal entries, in any order, are
The attractive potential has . Its time-independent Schrödinger equation is
Integrate from to . Continuity makes the delta term equal to , while the integral of tends to zero as the interval shrinks. The second-derivative term integrates to the difference of first derivatives. Hence
This expresses the point interaction through a derivative jump while the wavefunction remains continuous.
For a negative energy write , . Away from the delta interaction the decaying solutions are for and for , with the same by continuity. The derivative jump is , giving . Thus the bound state in a delta potential has
The normalization follows from . This is a genuine square-integrable negative-energy state.
For the symmetric double-delta potential, take an odd state at , . On odd parity selects . For , decay and continuity give ; extend to negative by oddness. At the jump condition is
For a nonzero state this means , and therefore
Oddness makes the jump at follow automatically: both its derivative jump and its required wavefunction value have the corresponding opposite signs.
There is a positive solution precisely when . To see this, rewrite the equation as
The right side decreases strictly from to zero as increases from zero to infinity: its derivative has the sign of . Hence for there is exactly one positive solution, while is a nonnormalizable zero-energy threshold and gives no odd bound state. This verifies the stated sufficiently-small- condition and identifies its exact boundary, consistent with the odd bound state of a symmetric double-delta potential.
A metric space is a complete metric space when every Cauchy sequence converges to a point of that space. It is a totally bounded space when, for every , finitely many open metric balls of radius cover the space.
With their usual distances, is complete but not totally bounded, and is totally bounded but not complete. The Cauchy sequence in has its limit outside the space; no finite collection of balls of a fixed radius covers .
For the requested continuous functions, take
and
Both are continuous and onto. The domain of is a complete metric space, but its image is not complete because tends to the missing point . The domain of is a totally bounded space, but its unbounded image is not totally bounded. Uniform continuity, unlike mere continuity, would preserve total boundedness.
Let be the components of an orthogonal matrix relating two Cartesian frames by . Repeated indices are summed from to . The tensor component transformation law for a Cartesian second-rank tensor is
For a proper rotation, ; the transformation law itself also holds for orthogonal changes of Cartesian frame with determinant .
To find a cubically invariant second-rank tensor, first square each of the prescribed quarter-turns. For example the half-turn about the first axis is . Invariance under forces to vanish. The corresponding half-turns about the other axes eliminate the remaining off-diagonal components, even though symmetry of was never assumed.
Now write . A quarter-turn about the third axis interchanges , so ; a quarter-turn about the first axis gives . Conversely a scalar multiple of the identity matrix is invariant under every rotation. Thus the most general answer is
Represent a possibly randomized statistical test by a function taking values in , its conditional probability of rejection. Its power function is , and its size of a statistical test is the supremum of this probability over the null hypothesis. At a prescribed significance level , a uniformly most powerful test has at least as much power as every other level- test at every parameter in the alternative.
Put . For any fixed alternative , the likelihood ratio is
which is strictly increasing in . The Neyman-Pearson lemma therefore selects the upper tail . Its cutoff is determined solely by the null distribution, not by , so the same statistical test is most powerful against every allowed alternative and hence uniformly most powerful.
Under rate , has a gamma distribution with shape and rate . For completeness, convolution starts with and, if the -term density is , convolving once more gives . Integrating this density by parts repeatedly gives its upper-tail probability. Consequently reject precisely when , where
and the power function is
For the continuous strictly decreasing null tail gives a unique positive cutoff, with exact size and no boundary randomization.
Use the one-sided product bound for an entire function by considering
This is an entire function, and gives . If , then everywhere. The Liouville theorem therefore makes constant.
Because an exponential never vanishes, differentiating yields , and hence . Thus is constant. If that constant is zero, ; otherwise takes values in the two square roots of one nonzero constant. Continuity on the connected space prevents switching between those two values. Therefore is constant.
Let denote the columns. The Gram-Schmidt process begins with , so
The second column has and residual
This residual has norm , giving and .
For the third column the orthogonal projections are and . Subtracting them gives
Its norm is , so and . Thus the requested thin QR decomposition is
The three displayed columns have pairwise zero inner products and unit norms; direct multiplication gives .
The minimal polynomial divides the annihilating polynomial , since . Every nonconstant monic divisor can occur in dimension four: use Jordan blocks of sizes at most two at eigenvalue and of size one at eigenvalue , adding scalar blocks as needed. The complete list is
For example the first four occur for , , , and , respectively; the final one occurs for .
Failure to be diagonalizable requires a size-two Jordan block at zero. The condition requires at least one block at one, since every allowed zero block squares to zero. A size-two zero block and one scalar block at one leave only one dimension. It can carry zero or one. Thus, up to permutation of blocks, the only possible Jordan normal forms are
Write the holomorphic function as , with . If then . If , differentiating the constant modulus with respect to both coordinates, and using the Cauchy-Riemann equations , , gives
The coefficient matrix has determinant , so . The Cauchy-Riemann equations then also give . Along a straight segment inside the disk, both real components have zero derivative and hence are constant. Thus is constant throughout the disk.
Use the convention that a sesquilinear form is linear in its first argument and conjugate-linear in its second: for complex scalars ,
No symmetry or positivity is assumed. Put . Its diagonal vanishes. Expansion at gives
while expansion at gives
These two equations force . This is the polarization argument for a vanishing quadratic form, and proves on every pair of vectors.
For the final deduction, the linear map makes another sesquilinear form. Its diagonal agrees with that of , so the result just proved gives
Use the position-space momentum operator and set . Direct differentiation gives
To compute the squared orbital angular momentum, write , , , so . Expanding the products, including derivatives of their variable coefficients, gives
For example ; summing the three cyclic expressions proves the identity.
Here and , so . Therefore
This is the angular momentum of a homogeneous harmonic polynomial, with angular quantum numbers . The polynomial is a nonzero angular eigenfunction; by itself it is not a normalizable full-space wavefunction.
The contraction mapping theorem says that a self-map of a nonempty complete metric space satisfying for a constant has exactly one fixed point. Apply it to to obtain with .
No continuity of itself is needed: composition gives
Thus is also a fixed point of , whose uniqueness forces . Conversely any fixed point of is fixed by , so it must equal . The unique fixed point of the contracting iterate is also the unique fixed point of . The usual nonempty-space hypothesis is necessary; an empty space has no fixed point.
The strict distance inequality implies for all points, so is Lipschitz continuous. Hence
is a continuous function, since . On the nonempty compact metric space, attains its minimum at some .
If , the strict distance inequality applied to gives
a contradiction. Thus . If were different fixed points, then , again impossible. There is exactly one fixed point. This proves strict distance decrease on a compact metric space without assuming a uniform contraction constant.
Let . It is nonempty, closed and bounded in finite-dimensional Euclidean space, hence compact by the Heine-Borel theorem. The strict distance inequality again makes Lipschitz continuous. If , choose a sequence converging to . Then , and continuity gives , so . This proves .
The restriction to satisfies strict distance decrease on a compact metric space, so part (b) produces a fixed point there. If a second fixed point existed anywhere in , the same strict distance inequality applied to the two points would contradict equality of their distance. Therefore the fixed point is unique in all of . This is the bounded-orbit fixed point for a strictly distance-decreasing Euclidean map.
Under a Cartesian frame change , where is an orthogonal matrix. Orthogonality gives and . Therefore
which is the tensor component transformation law. Also directly, proving that it is a symmetric Cartesian second-rank tensor for every choice of the two scalars.
For , the direction of is an eigenvector with eigenvalue . Every vector perpendicular to is an eigenvector with eigenvalue , a two-dimensional eigenspace. If , these eigenvalues coincide and every nonzero vector is an eigenvector. If , the tensor is zero and again every nonzero vector is an eigenvector, now with eigenvalue zero.
For the position-dependent field with zero divergence, the product rule gives
Contraction of the two Levi-Civita symbols in the curl and cross product gives
Consequently
These constants give the magnetic part of the Maxwell stress tensor, with its physical prefactor suppressed. They are forced if the identity is to hold for every divergence-free field: forces ; at the origin then forces .
Apply the divergence theorem separately to each component:
Since the whole vector field vanishes on , all components of vanish there, and hence the vector volume integral is zero. The argument assumes a differentiable field and a boundary for which the divergence theorem applies.
For independent observations from a normal distribution with unknown mean and positive variance, the maximum likelihood estimation of the mean gives
Indeed , which is minimized at . The likelihood is
For fixed , differentiation in gives the maximizer . Thus the unrestricted fit has , whereas under the null hypothesis the fitted variance is . Both maximize rather than minimize the likelihood: it tends to zero at either variance endpoint when the residual sum of squares is positive.
The restricted-to-unrestricted likelihood ratio is therefore
The generalized likelihood-ratio test rejects for small , equivalently large . Under the null, is standard normal, has a chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom, and they are independent. To see the independence, apply an orthogonal matrix to the standardized normal sample, taking its first row to be : the transformed coordinates remain independent standard normal variables, and is the sum of squares of the other coordinates. Hence has Student's t-distribution with degrees of freedom.
For this two-sided test at , the cutoff is the percentile of , namely . The data give
Since , do not reject the manufacturer's mean-hardness claim at the level. This is a failure to reject, not proof that the mean equals .
Define to be the family of all unions of members of , including the empty union. We will verify that this is a topology and that is a basis of a topology. The two conditions play different roles: the covering condition supplies the whole space, while the local intersection condition supplies closure under finite intersections.
By the covering condition, belongs to . The empty set belongs to as the empty union. An arbitrary union of sets that are themselves unions of members of is still a union of members of . Thus contains and is closed under arbitrary unions, as required for a topology.
Take and . Their representations as unions provide with and . The intersection condition supplies with .
It follows that is the union of all members of contained in it, and hence belongs to . Induction gives closure under every finite intersection. Together with part (i), this proves that is a topology. Each belongs to as a union with one member, and every open set is a union of such members by construction. Thus is a basis for . Here the printed subset sign is interpreted as inclusion, allowing equality, as in the usual basis criterion.
The lexicographic order is a total order. Each point lies in the order interval between and , so the order intervals cover .
If lies in both and , let and in that total order. Then and
In particular an order interval contains and is contained in the intersection. Both conditions of part (a) hold, proving that these intervals form a basis of a topology. The resulting topology is the lexicographic order topology on the real plane.
For every , the nonempty order interval
is open in the lexicographic order topology on the real plane. The sets are pairwise disjoint.
Suppose were a countable basis of a topology. For each , the basis of a topology property gives a member containing and contained in . Let be the least index of such a member. The same nonempty cannot lie in two disjoint , so is an injection from the uncountable set into , a contradiction. This topology is not second countable.
For distinct interpolation nodes , let be the unique polynomial of degree at most satisfying . Existence follows from the Lagrange polynomial expression
uniqueness follows because the difference of two interpolants has distinct zeros but degree at most .
Define the divided difference to be the coefficient of in , even when that coefficient is zero. For this gives . Permuting the nodes does not change the interpolation conditions, so it does not change their unique interpolant or this coefficient. The divided difference is symmetric in all the nodes. Equivalently its symmetric expression is
Articles were limited to the first 100 out of 269 total.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.