In the given basis, the matrix is . Let , a primitive cube root of unity. For each ,Thus these are eigenvectors with distinct eigenvalues , respectively, and form an eigenbasis. SetThe columns are mutually orthogonal with squared norm three, so . The diagonalization and characteristic polynomial areScaling by gives a unitary diagonalizing matrix.
For a geodesic spherical triangle on a sphere of radius , the Gauss-Bonnet theorem giveswhere are its interior angles. Indeed, its geodesic sides have zero geodesic curvature, its Gaussian curvature is , and its three exterior turning angles sum to .
Choose a point strictly inside a full-dimensional convex polyhedron and radially project its boundary onto the unit sphere. Triangulate each projected face by diagonals, using only its existing vertices. Convexity ensures that the resulting spherical triangles cover the sphere once, with disjoint interiors. A face with edges gives triangles, so their number is , since every original edge belongs to two faces.
Sum the spherical excess formula over all triangles. The total area is , and the angles incident to each projected vertex sum to . No additional vertices were introduced by the face triangulations. HenceThis is the spherical-triangle proof of the polyhedron Euler formula.
The partial fraction decomposition is . Put and expand each reciprocal by a geometric series:Adding gives the Taylor seriesEquivalently, since , its coefficient is . The first terms are .
The nearest nonremovable poles are and , both at distance from the center. The function is holomorphic throughout the open disk of that radius and cannot be holomorphic across either pole. Therefore the largest radius of convergence is .
Use the position four-vector and Minkowski signature . Along a massive particle's timelike path,Thus its four-velocity is , and multiplying by the invariant rest mass givesIts temporal component is , and the invariant relation is .
For a massless particle, use the null energy–momentum relation rather than substituting into : a massless particle has no proper-time parametrization of a timelike rest frame. With positive energy, implies . HenceThe original PDF retains the spatial vector in this expression; the TeX conversion incorrectly replaced it by its magnitude.
The vorticity is the curl of the velocity, perpendicular to the flow plane:The planar rotation rate is half this scalar vorticity, not the vorticity itself.
The velocity divergence is , satisfying the constant-density incompressible flow condition. Choose the stream function convention . Integration then givesIndeed, and . Streamlines are contours of this function. The vector field is also compatible with steady inviscid momentum balance without body forces: is balanced by pressure .
Rotate coordinates to and . The stream function becomesFor , both coefficients are negative, so every nonzero contour is a bounded ellipse surrounding the stationary origin. For , the form is indefinite: nonzero contours are unbounded hyperbolas, and the zero contour consists of straight separatrices. Consequently all nonstationary streamlines are bounded exactly when . The origin is itself a stationary bounded trajectory in every case; the assertion about boundedness concerns the nonstationary streamlines. The equality case is handled separately below. These are the linear planar strain and rotation streamlines.
If , . Its contours are the parallel lines . On each such line,For this is an unbounded straight streamline. Every point on has zero velocity, so that diagonal is a line of equilibria, rather than one moving streamline.
The first matrix column is already the unit vector , so the first QR elimination needs no reflection. In the remaining three coordinates, the second column is , with norm three. To map it to , use the Householder transformationIt is symmetric and orthogonal and satisfies . Extend it to . The QR decomposition and transformed right side areFor the lower right-side block, , so its transformed value is .
Orthogonality preserves the least-squares residual norm. Thus the first two squared residual terms can and must be set to zero, while the last two are independent of the unknowns:The minimum squared residual is . The solution is unique since the triangular factor has nonzero diagonal entries. No normal equations are used.
Write , , and . The normal likelihood is proportional to . Its unrestricted maximizers are , . Under the null the variance maximizer is . Substitution gives the generalized likelihood-ratio test statisticThe ratio decreases as increases, so the likelihood-ratio rejection region is two-sided in . Under , is standard normal and is independent chi-squared with degrees of freedom. Independence follows by resolving the isotropic Gaussian sample vector into its projection on the constant vector and its orthogonal complement. Hence has the exact Student t-distribution with degrees of freedom.
For a chosen significance level , compute the sample mean and the sample standard deviation with denominator , and reject precisely whenEquivalently, report the two-sided -value . This requires and positive population variance; holds almost surely under that model. The nuisance variance is removed by the exact null distribution, so one should not substitute a normal critical value or a large-sample chi-squared approximation. This is the normal-mean likelihood ratio with unknown variance.
For a finite directed flow network with nonnegative finite edge capacities, a source and a distinct sink , the max-flow min-cut theorem states that the largest feasible flow value equals the smallest capacity of a cut separating from . A feasible flow has on each directed edge and flow conservation at all other vertices. Its value is the net outflow at .
For any cut containing but not , sum conservation over vertices of . Internal edges cancel, givingThus every flow value is bounded by every cut capacity.
A maximum flow exists: the feasible set is nonempty, closed and bounded in a finite-dimensional edge-coordinate space, hence compact, and the flow value is continuous. For such a flow, form its residual network: each original edge has forward residual capacity and backward residual capacity . Keep these as edge-labelled arcs if the original network already has edges in both directions. If a directed positive-residual path joined to , increasing the flow along its forward arcs and decreasing it along its backward arcs by the path's positive bottleneck capacity would preserve feasibility and increase the value. That contradicts maximality.
Let be the vertices reachable from by positive residual arcs. Then . Every original edge from to is saturated, otherwise its forward residual arc would extend reachability. Every original edge from to has zero flow, otherwise its backward residual arc would extend reachability. ThereforeTogether with the bound for every flow and cut, this provesThe compactness step makes the proof valid for arbitrary real capacities; it does not assume that a particular augmenting-path algorithm terminates after finitely many augmentations.
Sylvester's law of inertia states that a real quadratic form can be brought by an invertible real change of coordinates towith remaining zero coordinates, and that the integers are uniquely determined. To prove existence, represent it by a symmetric matrix. The allowed orthogonal diagonalization yields real eigenvalues, and scaling each nonzero eigen-coordinate by the square root of its absolute eigenvalue changes its coefficient to or .
For uniqueness, is the largest dimension of a subspace on which the form is positive definite. The positive coordinate subspace attains . Any subspace of dimension greater than intersects the -dimensional span of the negative and zero coordinates nontrivially, by the dimension formula. A nonzero vector in that intersection has nonpositive quadratic value, contradicting positive definiteness. Similarly, is the maximal dimension of a negative-definite subspace. These descriptions are independent of coordinates, and is then fixed. This proves existence and uniqueness, including degenerate forms.
For the final application, nonsingularity gives . In diagonal coordinates write , with . If projects to zero in the positive coordinates, forces , so projection is injective. The same argument applies to the negative coordinates. Hence and , and their sum is . ThereforeThe inertia signature is , or signature difference if that convention is used. This is the isotropic dimension bound from real inertia.
The Fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups says that every finitely generated abelian group is isomorphic toThe rank of an abelian group and the invariant factors are uniquely determined, with the finite summand allowed to be absent. Equivalently, one can decompose the torsion subgroup into cyclic groups of prime-power orders. The infinite cyclic part and torsion part must both be included in the statement.
A nonzero polynomial of degree over a field has at most distinct roots in that field. For a proof, the factor theorem gives whenever . Distinct linear factors are coprime in , a unique factorization domain, so for distinct roots their product divides . Its degree is , giving . One may equivalently remove one linear factor at a time and argue by induction.
If the field has at least elements, this bound is attained by a product of distinct linear factors. For a fixed finite field with fewer than elements, the largest possible number of distinct roots is instead; multiplicities do not create more distinct roots. The zero polynomial is excluded since it has no finite degree.
Let be a finite subgroup of . It is abelian since multiplication in the field commutes. The structure theorem therefore writes as a product of cyclic groups with invariant factors , omitting trivial factors. Every element satisfies , so consists of roots of . The root bound from part (ii) giveswhile the decomposition gives . Equality forces every factor except the last to be trivial. Hence is cyclic. The trivial subgroup is cyclic as well. This is the finite multiplicative subgroup of a field is cyclic theorem, proved here using the preceding two parts.
The infinite case is false. In , the group of all roots of unity is infinite, but every element has finite order. If it were cyclic, its generator would have finite order and the whole group would be finite, a contradiction.
Differentiability at means there is a linear map such thatThis is the Fréchet derivative definition; the same linear approximation must work in every direction, not merely along coordinate axes.
The chain rule says that if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at andFor its proof, put , , and . Since a linear map between these finite-dimensional normed spaces is bounded, . Differentiability of gives with . ThereforeIf , take ; otherwise . This proves the required full linear approximation.
For the Euclidean norm, at every the ordinary one-coordinate differentiation givesAt the origin its difference quotient in direction is , whose right and left limits are and . Thus none of its coordinate partial derivatives exists at the origin.
The product topology on has as a basis the rectangles , where is open in and is open in . Equivalently, it is the coarsest topology making both coordinate projections continuous.
To show that the product of two Hausdorff spaces is Hausdorff, take distinct points and . If , choose disjoint open neighborhoods in ; the rectangles and separate the product points. If the first coordinates agree, the second coordinates differ, and the same argument uses disjoint open neighborhoods in . Thus every pair of distinct product points has disjoint open neighborhoods.
The three implications below prove the requested equivalence without assuming metrizability.
Assume is Hausdorff. For any outside the diagonal, the points differ, so choose disjoint open neighborhoods . Their rectangle contains and misses the diagonal. Thus the complement of the diagonal is open in the product topology, proving (i) implies (ii). This is one direction of the closed diagonal theorem.
Assume the diagonal is closed. For continuous , the map , , is continuous: the inverse image of a basic rectangle is . Thereforeis closed as the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous map. This proves (ii) implies (iii).
Assume (iii). Take and let be the two coordinate projections, continuous by the definition of the product topology. Their equality set is the diagonal, so it is closed. For distinct , the point lies in its open complement. Choose a basic rectangle containing it and contained in that complement. If were nonempty, a point in their intersection would give in the rectangle, impossible. Thus are disjoint open neighborhoods of , proving that is Hausdorff. Hence (iii) implies (i), completing all three equivalences.
Integrate the entire function around the positively oriented sector boundary: the real segment , the arc for , and the radial segment back to zero. Cauchy integral theorem givesThe last term follows from and ; its minus sign is the return orientation.
On the arc, . The supplied sine bound gives throughout this sector, soThe Gaussian integral then yields . Taking real and imaginary parts proves both Fresnel integrals:The contour estimate proves existence of the improper oscillatory integrals as well as their values; absolute convergence is neither asserted nor required.
Use the Fourier transform conventionDecay alone does not guarantee existence of the ordinary integrals, so impose the usual integrability and regularity assumptions. One sufficient version of the Fourier inversion theorem is that and are integrable and is continuous, in which case the inversion integral recovers . Under the standard piecewise-smooth Dirichlet assumptions, inversion instead gives the midpoint of the two one-sided limits at a jump, with a suitable improper integral interpretation.
For integrable , define . The convolution theorem statesTo prove it, absolute integrability permits Fubini's theorem. Set in the inner integral:The absolute double integral is , justifying the interchange. The computations below assume and use the source PDF's factor in the final integral, omitted in the converted TeX.
Split the exponential kernel at zero. For ,Thus its Fourier transform isBoth half-line integrals converge absolutely because .
The interval indicator has transformwith continuous value at . By the convolution theorem, has transform . Fourier inversion therefore expresses the requested integral asFor , , so . Symmetry gives the same expression with for . For , splitting the integral at givesConsequently the value for every real isThe two expressions agree at . This is the exponential kernel convolved with an interval indicator. The spectral integral is absolutely convergent: its apparent singularity at zero is removable, and the tail decays as .
For a stationary spherically symmetric state, set . The Schrödinger equation becomesA bound state must have , while the well's lower bound gives for a nonzero square-integrable eigenstate. Define and . Regularity at the origin requires , so the interior cosine solution is excluded; square integrability at infinity excludes the growing exterior exponential. Matching and at therefore givesThe limit at the origin is the finite value . Continuity of is equivalent here to continuity of at the finite potential jump. If desired, the normalized state hasThe equation for implicitly determines the energy, with .
Write and . The matching condition is . The first possible solution has . If , every permitted interior has nonnegative cotangent and cannot match a negative exterior logarithmic derivative. If , at the sum is positive; it is negative either at when , or at when . Continuity supplies a first bound-state solution. Thus at least one spherically symmetric bound state exists exactly whenAt equality the limiting energy is zero and the exterior wave is proportional to , whose norm diverges. Hence the inequality is strict. Deeper wells can support additional radial states; their negative-energy matching solutions have the same displayed form. This is the spherically symmetric bound state of a finite well.
A steady localized electric current density satisfies , from charge conservation or the divergence of Ampère's equation. Choose an enclosing region whose boundary lies outside its support; extending the integration region does not change the source integrals. The divergence theorem applied componentwise givesTheir boundary fluxes vanish, proving the localized steady-current moment identitiesFor discontinuous but localized currents the same argument uses the distributional steady conservation law and an outer enclosing surface.
The magnetic vector potential is a vector field with , consistent with . It is defined up to . The steady Maxwell equation givesIn the Coulomb gauge , the equation is , whose decaying Green-function solution is the one supplied in the source.
Let and expand its kernel uniformly over the bounded source region:The first term integrates to zero. Put , an antisymmetric tensor by the earlier identity. Define the magnetic dipole moment , so . ConsequentlyorThe displayed dipole term has size . If , it vanishes and a higher multipole determines the leading magnetic field instead.
For a steady inviscid incompressible fluid of constant density in uniform gravity , the Euler equation for fluid motion and continuity equation areTaking the scalar product with givesThus Bernoulli's quantity is constant along each streamline. For an irrotational connected flow it is constant throughout the flow; constancy across different streamlines is not assumed in general.
Since incompressibility makes , integrating over a fixed control volume and applying the divergence theorem yields the integral momentum balanceHere is outward and the left side is the net outgoing momentum flux. Uniform atmospheric pressure has zero resultant on a closed control surface, so it may be subtracted from all pressures in the jet calculations.
The free jet is at atmospheric pressure. Bernoulli's equation from the nozzle to height gives . Conservation of volume flux gives . HenceFor the prescribed well-below-apex regime, and . The slowing jet therefore thickens. These expressions use the slender-jet, nearly uniform cross-sectional speed approximation underlying the question; the formal vanishing-speed apex is outside that approximation.
Choose a control volume containing the small impingement region, with an inlet section across the incident jet and an outlet annulus across the conical sheet. The remaining boundary follows free surfaces and the wetted cone. Subtract atmospheric pressure and neglect gravity. Bernoulli's equation gives the same speed in the outgoing sheet as in the incoming jet, and its total volume flux is .
The incoming axial momentum rate is . The outgoing velocity makes angle with the cone axis, so its axial momentum rate is ; transverse components cancel by axisymmetry. The integral momentum equation says that the cone's axial force on the water is their difference, . By equal and opposite reaction, the jet's force on the cone is along the incident jet, with magnitudeThe outlet control surface is across the sheet, not along it, so its entire outgoing volume flux is counted.
At the cone's vertex height , the first part gives and . Insert these into the assumed local impingement force from part (ii). Static support requires upward force equal to , givingEquivalently,For a nonnegative support height the ratio in parentheses must not exceed one, and the prescribed requires that ratio to be close to one. If the weight exceeds the lift available at the nozzle, this model has no supported height above the nozzle.
Let and . The likelihood is , so for its unique maximizer is . By invariance of maximum likelihood estimation,For or , the strict parameter interval has no attained likelihood maximum; the usual extended estimate takes the limiting endpoint and gives . Thus the displayed estimator is the conventional extended MLE on those samples, an important boundary qualification. This is the first estimator in estimating Bernoulli variance.
Independence gives , proving unbiasedness. Conditional on , all binary sample strings with ones are equally likely. ThereforeThe Rao-Blackwell theorem, or the tower property and total variance decomposition directly, yields the improved estimatorIt is unbiased by conditional expectation and is a function of the requested MLE. Its variance is strictly smaller, sinceFor , the event has positive probability. On it, has probability of being one, strictly between zero and one for . Thus the final expectation is strictly positive. This proves strict variance reduction, not merely a weak inequality.
The uniform prior and likelihood give the posterior densitya Beta distribution with parameters . Under squared-error loss for , the posterior expected loss is , minimized uniquely at the posterior mean of , not at the product of the two posterior mean factors.
Using the supplied beta integral,Thus the Bayes estimate isThis remains positive even on the endpoint samples, unlike the extended MLE; it integrates over the posterior uncertainty in .
Put and . The Markov property and first-step conditioning give . Consider a finite history ending at state and having positive conditional probability given . The chance of eventual absorption at zero after that history is : the future depends only on the present state, and if zero has already been reached, absorption keeps the chain there. If the next state is , this chance is . Bayes' rule therefore givesThis depends on the history only through , proving the conditional Markov property. The conditional transition matrix isIts row sums are one by harmonicity of , and . State is never visited under the conditioning and is naturally removed; any row assigned there on an enlarged formal state space is immaterial, since conditioning starting at is undefined. State zero stays absorbing. For a random initial law , its conditional law is . This is the Doob h-transform with the absorption probability as harmonic function.
For the simple symmetric walk, solves the linear harmonic recurrence and its boundary values. ThusIn particular, the conditioned chain moves downward with probability one from .
Let be the first hit of in the original walk and let . Its absorption time has finite expectation: from any transient state a run of at most downward steps hits zero with probability at least , giving a geometric tail bound by blocks. First-step conditioning then givesEquivalently, . The cubic polynomialhas exactly these second differences and boundary values. It is the unique solution, since the difference of any two solutions is a linear sequence vanishing at both endpoints. Conditional on , is the first time in zero, so division by provesThis is the duration of gambler's ruin conditioned on a chosen boundary.
Each endomorphism has three distinct eigenvalues in a three-dimensional complex vector space. Choose a nonzero eigenvector for each eigenvalue; these vectors are linearly independent and hence form an eigenbasis. Both operators are therefore diagonalizable with diagonal matrix .
Their characteristic polynomials areIf a polynomial annihilates either operator, applying it to each eigenvector gives . Thus its minimal polynomial must contain all three factors. Conversely, their product annihilates the diagonal matrix, soFinally, send an ordered eigenbasis of to the correspondingly ordered eigenbasis of . The resulting invertible map satisfies , and hence : the two endomorphisms are conjugate.
A Euclidean domain is an integral domain with a function such that, for every and nonzero , there are satisfying , with either or .
For the integers, take . Given and , put and choose the integer . Then with . Setting when and when gives . A nonzero remainder has , and the integers are an integral domain. Thus is a Euclidean domain with Euclidean function .
Write for the 2-adic valuation of a nonzero integer . Then for unequal arguments. It is positive for , vanishes exactly when , and is symmetric because .
For the triangle inequality, if divides and divides , then divides their sum . ThusCoincident arguments also satisfy these inequalities immediately. Consequently is a metric, and indeed an ultrametric induced by the 2-adic absolute value.
For the sequence, , soThe same sequence diverges in the usual Euclidean metric; the convergence here depends on the 2-adic absolute value.
True. Let be an open cover of in its subspace topology. Write with open in . Since is continuous, the sets are open in and cover . By compactness, finitely many cover . Their corresponding then cover , proving that the continuous image of a compact space is compact.
False. Give its usual topology, let be a one-point space, and take the constant continuous map . The set is compact, but is not compact. For example, the open cover has no finite subcover. Thus continuity alone does not preserve compactness under inverse images.
False. The real line with its usual metric is complete and is homeomorphic to with its usual metric, throughIts inverse is , so both maps are continuous. However, is a Cauchy sequence in and has no limit there: its only possible real limit is zero. Hence is not a complete metric space. Completeness is a property of the metric, not just of its topology.
Use the mixed Dirichlet-Neumann modes on an interval. To justify their Fourier series, extend evenly across to , then oddly across , and repeat with period four. The condition makes the odd extension continuous, and makes the even reflection continuously differentiable. The resulting periodic function has a convergent Fourier sine series. Reflection about eliminates the even sine harmonics, leavingAlternatively these values follow directly from and . Fourier orthogonality givesThe extension argument also supplies completeness, not merely orthogonality, of this Fourier sine basis.
Expand the forcing as . Product-to-sum and integration by parts giveEach mode of the differential operator has eigenvalue . Hence, for real , the solution isThe coefficients are , so the series and its first two differentiated series converge uniformly. Therefore it solves the equation and the boundary conditions term by term. Uniqueness follows by multiplying the homogeneous equation by its real solution and integrating: the boundary terms vanish and , forcing .
In a steady state, Maxwell's equations imply , since the magnetic field is time independent. The divergence of the steady Ampère equation gives . With uniform electrical conductivity, Ohm's law is , soFor the usual straight-wire model, the cylindrical side is insulating and the two flat end faces are equipotentials. Put . The electric potential solves Laplace's equation, with constant end values and zero normal derivative on the side. The linear axial potential satisfies all these conditions. It is unique: the difference of two solutions has zero end values and zero side normal derivative, and integration by parts gives . ThusThis proves uniform current in a straight homogeneous wire with the usual contact conditions. Integrating the electric current density over a cross-section and using Ohm's law then givesThe second expression is the rate of Ohmic heating.
Strictly, steady current and uniform conductivity alone do not force uniformity; the contact conditions are implicit in the wire model. For example, let be a nonconstant transverse Neumann eigenfunction on the disk, satisfying and zero normal derivative at its edge. Then is harmonic and preserves an insulating cylindrical side, but its nonconstant end potentials produce nonuniform current. Its added axial current has zero cross-sectional mean. This supplies a counterexample if arbitrary contacts are permitted.
A bend generally redistributes the electric current density: the inner side of the bend carries more current than the outer side, as illustrated by in an annular conductor. Exact resistance and local Ohmic heating can therefore change. For a slender, gently curved wire the straight-wire formulas remain the leading approximation; the identity remains valid for the total steady dissipation.
With coincident origins and aligned axes, the Lorentz transformation isIts inverse replaces by . Along the worldline of the origin of , . Differentiating the inverse Lorentz transformation givesTaking the ratio yields the relativistic velocity-addition formulaFor , the denominator tends to one, recovering . Simultaneously , so and : these are the Galilean transformation and its Newtonian velocity rule.
The free surface is a material surface. For , the material derivative vanishes on . Since the velocity is , this gives the exact kinematic boundary condition for a free-surface graphAt the surface the pressure equals the constant atmospheric pressure. Absorbing that constant into the time-dependent potential gauge in Unsteady Bernoulli equation yields the exact dynamic boundary condition for an inviscid interfaceThere is no surface-tension term in this model.
Write and linearize in the small perturbation and the surface displacement. The base value is , and evaluation at the displaced surface can be replaced by evaluation at zero to first order. ThusIncompressibility requires Laplace's equation . For , the complex perturbation satisfies this equation and decays with depth. Put and . The linear boundary conditions becomeThey are consistent precisely whenConsequently the two laboratory phase velocities of a deep-water gravity wave areIf propagation of a wave packet is intended, its group velocities are instead .
The row player maximizes the payoff and the column player minimizes it. Row three is weakly dominated by row one, so the row player can discard it. On the remaining two rows, column two is weakly dominated by column three, so the column player can discard column two. The reduced zero-sum game has payoff matrixIf the first row is chosen with probability , the expected payoffs against its two columns are and . Equalizing them gives and value . If the first column is chosen with probability , the payoffs of the two rows are and . Equalizing them gives .
Restoring the original indexing, the optimal mixed strategies and value of a zero-sum game areTo verify these against every original strategy, the row mixture gives the three column payoffs , each at least . The column mixture gives the three row payoffs , each at most . Thus each mixed strategy guarantees the stated value, including against the discarded strategies. The strict inequalities for column two and row three also force those probabilities to be zero in any optimal strategy, and the remaining equalities determine the displayed mixtures uniquely.
The integral is linear in its first argument and conjugate-linear in its second, and complex conjugation of the integrand shows . Thus it is a Hermitian form.
If , Fourier orthogonality givesThis is nonnegative and vanishes only when every coefficient vanishes, that is, only for the zero polynomial. Hence the Hermitian form is positive definite.
Articles were limited to the first 100 out of 263 total.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.