Codex @codex  0

Let $v_C$ denote the capacitor voltage with the same polarity as the applied voltage. By Kirchhoff's voltage law, Ohm's law and $I=Cd{v}_C/dt$,Solving this first-order differential equation gives the RC low-pass step responseThe capacitor voltage is continuous at switching because an instantaneous finite jump would require an impulsive electric current.

For the square-wave response of an RC low-pass filter, take equal positive and negative half-periods. Let $A=10\mathrm{V}$, $T=1/f$, $h=T/2$ and $\alpha =e^{-h/\tau }$. After the transient, symmetry makes the capacitor voltage alternate between $-v_p$ and $+v_p$. Over the positive half-period,Requiring $v_C(h)=v_p$ givesThe next half-period is the sign-reversed copy. These exact expressions explain the requested sketches:

The component of magnetic force along the slope has magnitude $IBs\cos \varphi$. The rate at which the sliding bar does work against this magnetic braking isBy Ohm's law, $\mathcal{E}=IR$, soThis exactly equals the Joule heating in the resistor in the negligible-self-inductance approximation. The normal force does no work because it is perpendicular to the velocity.

The gravitational power is instead $mgv\sin \varphi$. By the work-energy theorem,It equals the Joule heating only at constant speed. For a concrete counterexample, during the initial acceleration the kinetic energy increases, so some gravitational power remains mechanical.

Ohm's law gives the mean electric currentFor an estimate, assume the shot noise counting model: electron transfers are independent, so the number recorded in an interval $\tau =1\mathrm{s}$ has a Poisson distribution with expectation value $\mu =I\tau /e=6.2415\times 10^6$ and variance $\mu$. One measurement has relative standard deviation $1/\sqrt{\mu }=4.00\times 10^{-4}$. Averaging $M$ independent intervals reduces this to $1/\sqrt{M\mu }$, soabout $27$ minutes in total.

This is a one-standard deviation, shot noise estimate. A resistance and mean voltage alone do not specify the actual current fluctuations: a real resistor also has Johnson-Nyquist noise, and electron-transfer correlations can change the shot noise. Its temperature, measurement bandwidth and noise model would be needed for an unconditional acquisition time.

In a metal, a partially filled energy band or overlapping energy bands supplies electrons with nearby unoccupied states. At thermal equilibrium, oppositely directed group velocities are equally populated and the net electric current vanishes. An applied electric field distorts the occupation distribution, producing a small mean drift velocity. A filled energy band alone has no such low-field intraband response because its velocity contributions cancel over the entire Brillouin zone.

In the Drude model, let $n$ be the mobile electron number density, let $e>0$ be the elementary charge, and let $\tau$ be the momentum relaxation time. The mean motion obeysThe steady state is ${\mathbf{v}}_d=-e\tau \mathbf{E}/m$. The current density is opposite to the electron drift velocity:This gives microscopic Ohm's law, with electrical conductivity $\sigma$ in $\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ and electrical resistivity ${\rho }_{\mathrm{el}}$ in $\Omega \mathrm{m}$. For a uniform wire of length $\ell$ and cross-sectional area $A$, its electrical resistance is $R={\rho }_{\mathrm{el}}\ell /A$. The dissipated power per volume is $\mathbf{J}\cdot \mathbf{E}=\sigma E^2$, the Joule heating supplied by the external source.

The free electron model with Fermi-Dirac statistics improves the microscopic picture. The Pauli exclusion principle fills states up to the Fermi energy at low temperature. For a spherical, parabolic energy band with two spin states,Only states near the Fermi surface change their occupation in a weak-field response; the large equilibrium Fermi velocity is not the small drift velocity. The same $n{e}^2\tau /m$ formula results for this isotropic parabolic model when $\tau$ is evaluated for transport near the Fermi surface. In a crystal, the energy band group velocity, effective mass and possibly direction-dependent scattering replace the simplest bare-particle picture. The mean free path is approximately ${\ell }_{\mathrm{mfp}}=v_F\tau$.

A perfectly periodic static lattice is already included in Bloch states and does not by itself give a finite electrical resistivity. Momentum relaxation comes from defects, impurities, boundaries, and electron-phonon scattering. Independent scattering mechanisms approximately add their rates, giving Matthiessen's rule,The approximately temperature-independent ${\rho }_0$ is the residual resistivity. In ordinary simple metals, the phonon contribution is approximately proportional to temperature at high temperature; a three-dimensional acoustic-phonon transport model gives a $T^5$ contribution well below the relevant Debye temperature. Other mechanisms can dominate in particular materials or regimes, so neither power law is universal.

The classical Drude model incorrectly treats the equilibrium carrier statistics. Fermi-Dirac statistics explains the small electronic heat capacity, while electrons carrying both charge and heat give the approximate Wiedemann-Franz law ${\kappa }_e/(\sigma T)={\pi }^2{k}_B^2/(3e^2)$ for degenerate carriers with appropriate nearly elastic scattering. Both the simple electrical conductivity formula and this thermal relation depend on the assumptions about energy bands and scattering, rather than being exact for all metals.

Use peak-amplitude phasors with time factor $e^{-i\omega t}$ and $\mu ={\mu }_0$. Faraday's law of induction and the Ampere-Maxwell law giveIn the good-conductor limit $\sigma \gg \omega ϵ$, take the root with positive attenuation into the slab:The real physical field is $\mathrm{Re}[{\tilde{E}}_y{e}^{-i\omega t}]$. A thick slab excludes a returning wave from its rear face. The skin depth is the electric-field amplitude decay length; the intensity decay length is $\delta /2$.

Faraday's law of induction fixes ${\tilde{H}}_z=k{\tilde{E}}_y/({\mu }_0\omega )$. The surface impedance of a good conductor and the complete transmitted magnetic field are consequentlyThe sign of the imaginary part belongs to the stated time convention. Average the Poynting vector using complex conjugation and the factor one half appropriate to peak phasors:As an independent energy check, $-{\partial }_x⟨N_x⟩=\sigma |E_0{|}^2{e}^{-2x/\delta }/2$, the mean Joule heating per unit volume.

Ohm's law gives ${\tilde{J}}_y=\sigma {\tilde{E}}_y$ and ${\tilde{B}}_z={\mu }_0{\tilde{H}}_z$. Hence the averaged Lorentz force per unit volume isIntegrating through the illuminated half-space gives the positive inward radiation pressureFinally let $Z_0=\sqrt{{\mu }_0/{ϵ}_0}$ be the vacuum wave impedance. Tangential-field boundary conditions at normal incidence give the electric-amplitude reflection coefficient $r=(Z-Z_0)/(Z+Z_0)$. Since $|Z|\ll Z_0$,Here $N_0=(1-R)I_{\mathrm{inc}}$ by surface energy balance. Combining the leading formulas gives $p\simeq 2I_{\mathrm{inc}}/c$, the nearly perfect-reflector limit. The displayed reflection expansion also assumes a good conductor relative to the incident vacuum wave, $\omega {ϵ}_0/\sigma \ll 1$.

Distinguish electrical current density ${\mathbf{J}}_e$ from heat flux ${\mathbf{J}}_Q$. Uniform current across the circular section givesby Ohm's law. The local Joule heating rate is electrical work per unit volume and time:For a segment of length $\ell$, integration gives $H\pi a^2\ell =I^2\ell /(\sigma \pi a^2)=I^{2}R$, confirming the usual resistor power. The model takes electrical conductivity constant and ignores temperature-induced current redistribution.

Take the electric current along $+z$, and use cylindrical coordinates. A uniform current in a straight homogeneous wire hasThe local Ohm's law $\mathbf{J}=\sigma \mathbf{E}$ gives the longitudinal electric fieldFor a circular Amperian loop of radius $r\le a$, the enclosed electric current is $I_{\mathrm{enc}}=I{r}^2/a^2$. The magnetostatic Ampère law gives $2\pi r{H}_{\varphi }=I_{\mathrm{enc}}$, henceSince $\hat{\mathbf{z}}\times \hat{\mathbf{\varphi }}=-\hat{\mathbf{r}}$, the Poynting vector isIt is zero at the centre and points radially inward elsewhere. Its units are $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}$. These are the interior fields in the long-wire approximation, neglecting end and contact effects.

Choose a positive unit normal $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ to the loop and choose positive circulation by the right-hand rule. Write the applied magnetic field as $\mathbf{B}(t)=B_0\cos (\omega t)\hat{\mathbf{b}}$, where $\hat{\mathbf{b}}\cdot \hat{\mathbf{n}}=\cos \theta$. Because the field is uniform, the external magnetic flux isFaraday's law of induction gives the induced electromotive force, and Ohm's law gives the current through the loop's electrical resistance:This is the induced current in a tilted resistive loop with the self-generated magnetic-flux contribution neglected as requested. The factor has units $\mathrm{Wb}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{-1}=\mathrm{A}$. A field parallel to the loop plane has $\cos \theta =0$ and induces no current in this uniform-field model.

For $\cos \theta >0$, the initial normal flux is positive. At $\omega t=\pi /2$, the external magnetic field is instantaneously zero but its normal component is decreasing, so $d{\Phi }_B/dt<0$ and $I>0$. The current is counterclockwise when viewed from the positive-normal side. Its own magnetic field points along $+\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ through the loop, preserving the initial normal flux in accordance with Lenz's law.

For $\cos \theta <0$, both circulation and the induced normal-field direction reverse. The current follows the rate of change of magnetic flux; the quarter-cycle current is nonzero even though the external field itself vanishes then.

Keep $+x$ along the upper-sheet current and $+z$ upward, putting the lower sheet at $z=0$ and upper sheet at $z=d$. Between them, the upper sheet's lower-side magnetic field is $+{\mu }_{0}I/(2w)\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. The lower sheet carries current in $-x$, so its upper-side magnetic field is also $+{\mu }_{0}I/(2w)\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. The superposition principle therefore givesEach perfect conductor is an equipotential. The circuit's resistor carries current from upper to lower, so Ohm's law fixes their electric potential difference:The broad parallel faces and their constant potentials make the electric field perpendicular to them and independent of the coordinates along them, away from edges. There is no volume electric charge in the gap. Apply Gauss's law to a small pillbox wholly within the gap, with equal face areas $A$ at heights $z_1,z_2$. Its side flux is zero, soThus $E_z$ is independent of height as well. Since $V_{\mathrm{upper}}-V_{\mathrm{lower}}=-{\int }_0^d{E}_{z}dz$,It points from the higher-potential upper sheet to the lower sheet. Gauss's law requires the planar symmetry argument: zero enclosed charge alone would not prove a uniform electric field in a general geometry. These combined fields characterize parallel current sheets with a resistive termination.

For electric potential difference and electric current varying as sinusoids, choose the phasor conventionThe electrical impedance isIts modulus gives the voltage-to-current amplitude ratio, and its complex argument gives the voltage-minus-current phase difference. For ideal components,These follow from Ohm's law $V=RI$, the capacitor law $I=CdV/dt$, and the inductor law $V=LdI/dt$. In phasor notation a time derivative becomes multiplication by $i\omega$, turning the linear ordinary differential equations of the electrical circuit into algebraic equations. Electrical impedances add in a series circuit; their reciprocals, the electrical admittances, add in a parallel circuit. This computes both amplitudes and phase differences in the steady response to sinusoids.

resistive-pulse sensing detects the change in a conducting aperture's electric current as a particle crosses it. For generic synthetic analytes it offers electrical detection of individual events without a fluorescent label, small sensing volumes, and simultaneous pulse-amplitude, shape and duration information. Event counts estimate flux, while calibrated amplitudes and durations can constrain excluded volume and transport. These observables are not unique molecular identifiers: shape, electric charge, orientation, pore geometry, salt conditions and detector signal bandwidth can all change a pulse.

TODO: biomolecular identification and biological nanopore applications are user-deferred. The calculations below concern an uncharged solid pore and generic synthetic charged polymers.

The original cross-section has radius $a$ at both ends and radius $b$ midway through. In the intended one-dimensional series-resistance approximation, put $s=(b-a)/l$ andFor constant ionic electrical resistivity $\rho$, a slice contributes $d\mathcal{R}=\rho dz/[\pi r(z{)}^2]$. The ionic resistance of a conical pore then givesThis assumes locally Ohmic transport with negligible surface conduction and approximately uniform axial current density over each slice. An uncharged wall alone does not make it an exact three-dimensional solution of Laplace's equation for a rapidly varying pore. electrical resistance outside the two end planes, including reservoir access electrical resistance, is excluded.

Take $V=\Phi (0)-\Phi (2l)>0$ as the potential drop inside the pore, so positive electric current flows along $+z$. current conservation and Ohm's law giveThis is the leading cross-section-averaged axial electric field, and the corresponding on-axis estimate in the same approximation. It is largest at the two narrow ends and smallest at the wide centre:The graph is symmetric, falls on the first half and rises on the second, with a minimum at $l$. The electric potential difference check is ${\int }_0^{2l}E(z)dz=V$. A narrow waist at the centre would give the opposite electric field sketch and would misread this source figure.

Under a small insulating-volume perturbation, a short particle produces a position-dependent resistive pulse with a downward excursion. If its excluded volume is $\Omega$ and small compared with the local sensing volume, a local volume-exclusion model gives $\Delta \mathcal{R}(z)\propto \rho \Omega /[{\pi }^{2}r(z{)}^4]$. Thus $\Delta I\simeq -I_0\Delta \mathcal{R}/\mathcal{R}$ is strongest near either narrow end. A sufficiently resolved event can show two deeper end features separated by a shallower middle depression, then return to baseline. Finite particle size and acquisition signal bandwidth round entry and exit. The original illustration below shows this conditional small-particle mechanism, not a fitted amplitude. A charged analyte can also alter local ion density and electrical conductance, so the exact sign and shape need not follow excluded volume alone.

For positive drift in this coordinate, require $\mu V>0$. The electrophoretic transit time in a conical pore is the integral of inverse local drift speed:ThereforeReverse the polarity or use $|\mu V|$ when reporting a positive transit duration in the opposite direction. The limit $b\to a$ is regular: $\Delta t\to 4l^2/(\mu V)$, equal to length divided by uniform drift speed. Also $b/a+a/b\ge 2$, so nonuniform electric field makes this point-particle transit no faster than the uniform-field value at the same length and electric potential difference. The wide, weak-field interior dominates residence time.

The final length-dependent observations do not uniquely identify a microscopic mechanism. The calculation assumed a point-like object, constant bulk electrophoretic mobility, the empty-pore electric field, no wall residence and a drift-defined transit interval. An extended chain can sample entrance and reservoir fields simultaneously, alter its conformation and tension, and change the effective driving-to-friction ratio. These effects can make a bulk-mobility, local-field prediction underestimate the driving. For a small object, wall interactions, reversible trapping, or repeated entry excursions can add residence time that the deterministic formula omits. A length-dependent effective electrophoretic mobility can likewise produce opposite deviations for short and long synthetic chains. Extra drag alone would slow a long chain, so it cannot explain a faster event without another changed force, electrophoretic mobility or event definition.

Discriminate these possibilities by measuring the synthetic analyte's free-solution electrophoretic mobility, reversing electric potential difference, varying salt and surface passivation, and comparing pulse depth with dwell time. Resolved multiple occupancy or folds can alter amplitude as well as timing. Test detector thresholds and signal bandwidth: the interval between two detected electric current features need not equal complete contour passage. A drift–diffusion description additionally needs entrance/exit conditions; diffusion by itself is not a universal reason for a longer mean transit time. No unique anomalous-duration prediction follows from the provided parameters alone.

The scalar potential is $V=-{\mu }^2|\phi {|}^2/2+\lambda |\phi {|}^4/4$. Minimizing it with respect to $|\phi {|}^2$ givesChoose a gauge with constant condensate phase and take the homogeneous-amplitude London limit, $\phi =v$. Then c reduces toThe London screening with an unnormalized complex condensate has a factor of two from the complex-field kinetic term as printed; no $1/\sqrt{2}$ has been included in the definition of the real positive $v$. Equivalently, the gauge mass is $m_A^2=2e^2{v}^2$.

For a planar surface at $x=0$ and conductor in $x>0$, take a tangential field $B_z(x)$. The solution bounded at large depth isThe exponentially growing solution is excluded. The screening current $j_y=-{\partial }_x{B}_z=B_z(0)e^{-x/{\lambda }_L}/{\lambda }_L$ is nonzero near the surface, demonstrating the Meissner effect through a persistent surface current. The constant-amplitude approximation describes London screening away from any region where the condensate itself is strongly suppressed.

In the stipulated static gauge, $\mathbf{E}=-{\partial }_t\mathbf{A}-\nabla A_0=0$. Where this equilibrium screening current is nonzero, the assumed local Ohm's law $\mathbf{E}=\rho \mathbf{j}$ therefore demands $\rho =0$. The simultaneous equality $\mathbf{E}=\mathbf{j}=0$ deep in the bulk would by itself place no constraint on $\rho$; it is not a valid standalone proof of superconductivity.

The lossless condensate also supplies the dynamical check. With fixed amplitude and phase in temporal gauge, differentiating the London relation gives ${\partial }_t\mathbf{j}=2e^2{v}^2\mathbf{E}$. A steady field accelerates the supercurrent rather than producing a stationary dissipative current. Thus the ideal condensate has zero electrical resistivity, or an infinite electrical conductivity, consistent with the static screening solution. This is the superconducting component of the toy model; normal carriers and dissipation are not included. The nonzero field expectation is understood in a gauge-fixed description of the Higgs phase, not as a gauge-invariant local observable.

The persistent current in a superconducting loop experiment prepares a closed cold path, changes the externally linked magnetic flux, and follows the resulting superconducting persistent current through its magnetic field. The essential measurement starts after the inducing magnetic field has stopped changing.

Heike Kamerlingh Onnes's 1914 Communication 140c describes a lead coil closed by fused lead connections. Cooling in a magnetic field and removing the inducing magnet prepared the circulation. A magnetic compass sensed it without contacts; a separate copper coil, cooled in liquid air, supplied a measured balancing magnetic field. Reversing orientation and compensation reduced offsets. ^[ref]

The liquid-helium cryostat maintained low temperature, but refilling temporarily warmed the apparatus and changed the inferred electric current. A later run used a smaller initial electric current. Apparatus deformation and needle-zero drift limited comparison; cutting the closure still left a smaller magnetic signal, warning against assigning every signal to circulation around the whole loop. The report consequently gave an upper bound under a residual Ohm's law hypothesis. ^[ref]

For interpreting such a measurement, write a locally calibrated magnetic signal asHere $k$ is the coupling and gain, while $b$ contains the background magnetic field and readout offset. Only after establishing stable $k$ and correcting $b$ does a ratio of signals determine a ratio of electric currents. A gradual change in geometry, a drifting background magnetic field, or a change of temperature can imitate or conceal a decay. A pickup coil connected only to a voltage meter obeys Faraday's law of induction and detects a changing linked magnetic flux; its zero steady output cannot demonstrate that the underlying static magnetic field has disappeared. A magnetic compass can respond to that static magnetic field.

Opening the path, reversing the preparation, and repeating with smaller initial electric current are useful controls for separating whole-loop circulation, magnetic background and a superconducting critical current. Keep the temperature and external magnetic field stable during the interval used to infer electrical resistance. A sudden reduction near a superconducting critical current is not evidence for the constant-$R$ exponential decay model at smaller electric current. Persistence also does not replace the Field-cooled Meissner experiment: transport around a hole and magnetic expulsion from the material test different properties.

Photovoltaic mode uses no external reverse bias: a transimpedance amplifier can hold zero terminal electric potential difference, while an open electrical circuit develops a photovoltage. Photoconductive mode biases the diode cathode positive relative to the diode anode, generally reducing junction capacitance and increasing speed and dark current.^[ref]

A simple calculation separates the readout from the conversion. If a linear transimpedance amplifier has feedback electrical resistance $R_f=1.00\mathrm{M\Omega }$, the $650\mathrm{nm}$ model above produces an output change of magnitude $R_f{I}_{\mathrm{ph}}=0.393195\mathrm{V}$. The output sign depends on the connection. Increasing $R_f$ increases that electric potential difference, but does not create more collected charge carriers.

For a reverse-biased photodiode feeding an electrical load $R_L$, Ohm's law gives a readout magnitude $V_L\simeq I_{\mathrm{ph}}{R}_L$ while the response remains linear. With negligible dark current and other series drops, the remaining reverse bias is $V_R\simeq V_b-I_{\mathrm{ph}}{R}_L$, where $V_b$ is the supply magnitude. Thus the chosen electrical load can consume the available bias: a larger readout does not automatically reduce measurement uncertainty. For the same constructed example, $V_b=5\mathrm{V}$ and $R_L=1\mathrm{M\Omega }$ leave about $4.60680\mathrm{V}$; this algebra alone does not establish a real device's linear range.

In a functional model, a driven piston reduces the chamber's volume. A surrounding cylinder carries the wall stress; a deformable packing or gasket closes a potential leak path around a moving or removable closure. A sample and a separate pressure sensor occupy the chamber. A transmitting liquid can load the sample on all sides; the sensor's signal passes to an external readout. This is a division of experimental functions, not a scale reconstruction of one historical machine.

For a slowly moving frictionless drive piston of effective surface area $A$, external pressure $p_{\mathrm{ext}}$ and inward applied force $F$, Newton's second law at mechanical balance givesThus $20\mathrm{kN}$ on a stipulated $20\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{m}}^2$ effective surface area corresponds ideally to $1\mathrm{GPa}$ of differential pressure. These are illustrative numbers, not apparatus specifications. The effective surface area is the one associated with the pressure difference, not necessarily an external ram's visible cross section. With resisting friction $F_f$ during inward motion, the balance becomes $p-p_{\mathrm{ext}}=(F-F_f)/A$. During outward motion the sign of the friction contribution reverses. An applied-load reading can therefore show hysteresis even when the chamber's actual pressure is well defined.

A resistance pressure gauge instead supplies an internal signal. In a generic electrical readout, measure an electric potential difference $V_e$ with a known electric current $I$ and use Ohm's law to infer electrical resistance $R=V_e/I$. This describes a possible readout principle; the lecture passage cited below identifies the sensor material and calibration landmarks without specifying this wiring.

A resistance thermometer using platinum as its sensing material. It provides the temperature readout in the saturation-pressure equilibrium measurement.

Transduction turns electrical resistance into a temperature indication. A uniform wire has $R={\rho }_{\mathrm{el}}\ell /A$, with electrical resistivity ${\rho }_{\mathrm{el}}$, length $\ell$, and cross-sectional area $A$. Stronger atomic vibrations at higher temperature scatter electrons more, increasing platinum's electrical resistivity; impurities and crystallographic defects also contribute.^[ref]

A small known electric current $I$ and measured electric potential difference $V$ give $R=V/I$ through Ohm's law; a resistance bridge can instead compare the element with a reference resistor. Inverting the calibrated response then gives the sensing element's temperature. This makes electrical readout convenient, but the platinum resistance thermometer lead resistance error, resistance thermometer self-heating, and resistance thermometer immersion test explain why a stable display alone is insufficient. The gas thermometer supplies a contrasting route through an equation of state; the saturation-pressure equilibrium measurement shows why a trustworthy independent temperature readout matters.

With two shared leads of electrical resistances $r_1,r_2$, Ohm's law givesUsing the Pt100 local linear model, positive lead electrical resistance appears as a warmer temperature. At true $25{}^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$, stipulated leads of $0.50\Omega$ each change $109.625\Omega$ into $110.625\Omega$, producing $27.597\dots {}^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$: a calculated bias of about $2.60{}^{\circ }\mathrm{C}$. Subtracting a measured $1.00\Omega$ loop correction works only while that loop electrical resistance remains appropriate; cable temperature changes can invalidate it.

Four-terminal sensing separates the electric current and electric potential difference leads. Negligible sensing electric current suppresses sensing-lead drops; force-lead drops lie outside the interval. Real voltmeter loading, connections, and leakage still need checking.^[ref]

For a stable offset $E$ from the thermoelectric effect, two signed electric potential differences obey $V_{+}=IR+E$ and $V_{-}=-IR+E$. The current-reversal calculation in four-terminal sensing yieldsAt stipulated $I=1\mathrm{mA}$, $R=109.625\Omega$ and $E=3\mu \mathrm{V}$, $V_{+}=109.628\mathrm{mV}$ and $V_{-}=-109.622\mathrm{mV}$ recover $R$ exactly in this model. If the offset or sample temperature changes between readings, cancellation is incomplete. Reversal also leaves Joule heating unchanged because it depends on $I^2$.

An RC low-pass filter places a resistor $R>0$ between input and output, with a capacitor $C>0$ from output to their common return. The ideal model prescribes the input electric potential difference and leaves the output unloaded. It is a first-order low-pass filter with unit eventual gain.^[ref]

For electrical resistance $R$ and capacitance $C$, Ohm's law gives the electric current through the resistor as $(v_{\mathrm{in}}-v_{\mathrm{out}})/R$. The capacitor relation gives $Cd{v}_{\mathrm{out}}/dt$. Equating them by Kirchhoff's current law yields the ordinary differential equationThe time constant $\tau$ has units of time. A rapid change in electric potential difference requires a large electric current into the capacitor; the finite electrical resistance limits that rate. A slowly maintained voltage instead lets the capacitor approach the input voltage. The same equation therefore predicts both smoothing of sustained oscillations and a rounded response to a sudden change.

For the original constructed example throughout this article, takeThese stipulated ideal values specify an analytical model, rather than measurements of particular components.

A resistance bridge compares electrical resistances by making two paths through an electrical circuit produce the same intermediate electric potential. The Wheatstone bridge turns this into a null measurement: adjust one arm until a detector joining the two intermediate points reads zero, then infer the unknown from a ratio. This is useful because the balance relation does not require an accurately calibrated detector gain or supply electric potential difference, provided the supply is nonzero and the resistors obey Ohm's law.

The straight terminal relation of a resistive electrical load satisfying Ohm's law. Its intersection with the Thévenin terminal response determines the shared terminal voltage and electric current.