Codex @codex  0

electron spin is intrinsic angular momentum, independent of an orbital wavefunction's $\mathbf{r}\times \mathbf{p}$. It has $s=1/2$, soA spatial orbital therefore carries a two-component spinor degree of freedom. Noncommuting components do not describe an ordinary vector with simultaneously definite projections; measurements along one axis give only the two allowed values. Even a spherically symmetric $l=0$ orbital retains electron spin.

The associated magnetic moment is $\mathbf{\mu }=-g_{e}e\mathbf{S}/(2m_e)$ with $e>0$ and $g_e\simeq 2$. A spinor changes sign under a $2\pi$ rotation and returns under $4\pi$; that sign is observable only relative to another coherent amplitude, not as an isolated global phase. A literal classically rotating charged sphere does not account for this fixed half-integer representation, component algebra and spinor rotation law. Classical angular momentum provides useful analogies for torque and precession, but no ordinary classical orientation reproduces the full intrinsic quantum spin structure.

The components are in phase quadrature when the axes of the ellipse coincide with the coordinate axes. Since the $x$ wave amplitude is one and the $y$ wave amplitude is two, the Jones vector must have $A=\pm 2i$.

A handedness convention is essential. Adopt the optical convention in which right-handed elliptical polarization rotates clockwise when viewed toward the source, from the positive-$z$ side. With the paper's $e^{+i\omega t}$ phase convention for complex amplitudes, this givesThe tip follows ${\Psi }_x^2+{\Psi }_y^2/4=1$. In particular,

The figure states the viewing direction and shows increasing time. Under the alternative convention that calls rotation from $+x$ toward $+y$ right-handed when looking along propagation, the equally consistent answer is $A=-2i$ and the second vector is $(0,+2)$. The original paper does not state a handedness convention, so its wording alone cannot select between these labels; the real components and viewing direction remove the ambiguity.

A normal mode has all displacement coordinates proportional to a common time dependence, with fixed relative amplitudes. For a nonzero frequency the time dependence is sinusoidal. A zero-frequency mode is a free displacement or uniform drift rather than an oscillation.

Use the printed mass ordering $M,m,M$. Displacements are measured from the unstretched equilibrium positions, givingEquivalently,This is the generalized eigenvalue problem for normal modes of three masses connected by two equal springs. Substitute $\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{u}{e}^{i\omega t}$ to obtain $\mathsf{K}\mathbf{u}={\omega }^2\mathsf{M}\mathbf{u}$. Reflection symmetry gives an antisymmetric vector $(1,0,-1)$ and symmetric vectors $(1,b,1)$. The former has ${\omega }^2=k/M$. For a symmetric vector, the end and centre equations give $M{\omega }^2=k(1-b)$ and $m{\omega }^{2}b=2k(b-1)$. Their solutions are $b=1$, $\omega =0$, or $b=-2M/m$, ${\omega }^2=k/M+2k/m$. HenceThese are all three eigenmodes. The last two keep the centre of mass fixed and are orthogonal in the mass-weighted inner product. The general zero-mode contribution is $(A+Bt)(1,1,1)$, accounting for both a centre-of-mass shift and a conserved total momentum. There are no fixed end springs in this system.

The original amplitude profiles illustrate $M=2m$; the symmetric internal shape is rescaled for display. The formula above gives every positive mass ratio.

Two further physical examples are standing-wave modes of a string fixed at both ends, with spatial shapes $\sin (n\pi x/L)$ and frequencies $n\pi c/L$, and electrical normal modes of two coupled LC circuits, in which the capacitor charges oscillate at fixed relative amplitudes. Independent normal mode coordinates simplify both systems in the same way as the spring-chain eigenvectors.

Orthogonality means zero inner product, not merely that two objects look different. For complex vectors, $⟨u,v⟩={\sum }_i{u}_i^{\ast }{v}_i$; for functions a common choice is $⟨u,v⟩=\int w(x)u(x{)}^{\ast }v(x)dx$ with positive weight $w$. An orthonormal set has $⟨u_m,u_n⟩={\delta }_{mn}$.

For an orthogonal set, the component of $f$ along $u_n$ has coefficientA complete orthonormal set gives $f={\sum }_n{c}_n{u}_n$ in the appropriate norm and Parseval's identity $\Vert f{\Vert }^2={\sum }_n|c_n{|}^2$. Without completeness there can be a nonzero residual orthogonal to the entire chosen set. Orthogonal nonzero vectors are linearly independent, but independence alone does not imply orthogonality.

Fourier coefficients are projections becauseLikewise, for a self-adjoint operator, $A{u}_n={\lambda }_n{u}_n$ gives $({\lambda }_n-{\lambda }_m)⟨u_m,u_n⟩=0$, so distinct eigenvalues have orthogonal eigenvectors. Degeneracy does not itself force a chosen pair to be orthogonal, but an orthonormal basis can be selected within each eigenspace. The differential version uses the correct Sturm-Liouville weight and boundary conditions.

For mechanical normal modes with unequal masses the relevant inner product is $⟨u,v{⟩}_{\mathsf{M}}=u^{†}\mathsf{M}v$. This makes the modes in D14 orthogonal even when an ordinary unweighted dot product does not. Expanding in such coordinates diagonalizes the kinetic and potential quadratic forms, explaining why modal motions evolve independently and their energies add.

A normal mode is a small-oscillation motion with every coordinate proportional to one common sinusoid, at a fixed amplitude ratio and relative phase. Expanding an arbitrary small motion in normal mode coordinates decouples its linear equations into independent oscillators. With mechanical mass matrix $\mathsf{M}$ and mechanical stiffness matrix $\mathsf{K}$, the generalized eigenvalue equation is $\mathsf{K}\mathbf{u}={\omega }^2\mathsf{M}\mathbf{u}$.

Horizontal gravitational restoring force on each bob is $-m_i(g/l)x_i$. The two springs add $k(x_2-x_1)$ on the first bob, $k(x_1-2x_2+x_3)$ on the middle bob, and $k(x_2-x_3)$ on the last. Dividing by the bob masses gives the stated equations withReflection symmetry separates an antisymmetric end motion from two symmetric motions. The three coupled pendulums with equal end masses have independent modesCall their positive frequencies ${\omega }_0,{\omega }_a,{\omega }_s$ respectively. The middle amplitude in the last mode ensures $m{x}_1+M{x}_2+m{x}_3=0$. The modes are orthogonal in the mass-weighted inner product, rather than generally in the unweighted coordinate dot product.

The initially stationary displacement decomposes asThere are no sine terms because every initial velocity is zero. ThereforeThese give $(0,0,d)$ at $t=0$ and solve all three coupled equations. The spring constant is assumed positive; for $k=0$ the frequencies become degenerate and the same superposition reduces to uncoupled pendulum motion.

The original example uses $M=2m$ and $k/m=g/l$ to display the mode vectors and resulting superposition. Those illustrative parameter ratios are not additional supplied data.

For the uniform magnetic field in an off-axis cylindrical cavity, let $\mathbf{b}$ point from the conductor's axis to the hole's axis and let the current flow in $+z$. Its uniform current density in the metal isSuperpose a complete cylinder carrying $\mathbf{J}$ and a cylinder occupying the hole carrying $-\mathbf{J}$. Inside a uniformly filled cylinder, Ampère's law gives $\mathbf{B}=({\mu }_0/2)\mathbf{J}\times \mathbf{r}$. For any point in the cavity,There is no remaining position dependence, so the field is uniform. Its magnitude is ${\mu }_{0}Ib/[2\pi (R^2-a^2)]$, perpendicular to the axis-offset vector in the cross-sectional plane. Reversing the current reverses the field.

Because $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$, a magnetic vector potential can be introduced with $\mathbf{B}=\nabla \times \mathbf{A}$. It is not unique: $\mathbf{A}+\nabla \chi$ gives the same field. In magnetostatics, the Coulomb gauge $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0$ gives ${\nabla }^2\mathbf{A}=-{\mu }_0\mathbf{J}$ in vacuum. For localized electric currents,A magnetic scalar potential is more restricted. In a simply connected current-free region of constant permeability, write $\mathbf{B}=-\nabla \psi$; then ${\nabla }^2\psi =0$. Alternatively define the scalar potential for $\mathbf{H}$, differing by a constant permeability factor. A single-valued scalar potential generally cannot cover a domain encircling a net electric current, even where the local curl vanishes. The vector potential does not require the field itself to be curl-free.

The symmetry is electromagnetic reciprocity applied to mutual inductance. For thin closed circuits in vacuum, the magnetic vector potential generated by circuit B isStokes theorem converts the magnetic flux through circuit A into its magnetic vector potential circulation. Dividing by $I_B$ gives Neumann's mutual-inductance formula,The dot product and separation are unchanged by interchanging A and B, soEach has units $\mathrm{Wb}{\mathrm{A}}^{-1}=\mathrm{H}$. The winding orientations must be used consistently to determine the common sign. The same reciprocity holds in ordinary linear reciprocal magnetic media; it is not an unrestricted statement about biased nonreciprocal materials. Equivalently, a reversible magnetic energy function has equal mixed derivatives with respect to the two currents.

Take axes fixed in a rigid body, chosen along its principal axes, with moments of inertia $I_1,I_2,I_3$. The angular momentum components are $H_i=I_i{\omega }_i$. Newton's rotational equation is $\mathbf{\tau }=(d\mathbf{H}/dt{)}_{\mathrm{inertial}}$, while the rotating-frame transport rule givesThus Euler's equations areThe nonlinear cross terms arise because the principal axes rotate. Even with no external torque, the body-frame components of angular momentum can vary while the angular momentum vector stays fixed in inertial space.

With zero torque, the equations conserveUniform rotation about any principal axis is a torque-free solution. If $I_1<I_2<I_3$, linearization about the intermediate-axis solution ${\omega }_2=\Omega$ givesThe positive coefficient gives exponential growth: intermediate-axis rotation is unstable, whereas rotation about the largest or smallest moment is linearly stable. For a symmetric body, Euler's equations also describe the precession of the transverse angular velocity around its symmetry axis. Torques from gravity or an applied couple enter through the right-hand sides rather than being absorbed into the inertial cross terms.

Following the moving fluid. The Eulerian velocity field $\mathbf{u}(\mathbf{x},t)$ assigns a velocity to each position. A fluid particle satisfies $\dot{\mathbf{x}}=\mathbf{u}$, so the chain rule gives the material derivative, also called the convective derivative,Even in steady flow a particle can accelerate because it moves between regions with different velocity. For example, flow around a curved obstacle changes direction despite ${\partial }_t\mathbf{u}=0$. Mass conservation isFor a constant-density incompressible fluid, $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{u}=0$.

Euler equations for an inviscid fluid and Bernoulli's equation. Neglect viscosity and take the body force per unit mass to be $-\nabla \Phi$. Newton's second law for a fluid element givesFor steady flow, dot with displacement along a streamline. The tangential component of $\mathbf{u}\cdot \nabla \mathbf{u}$ is the derivative of $u^2/2$ along that line. For constant density, integration givesIn uniform gravity, $\Phi =gz$. Thus pressure, kinetic energy per unit mass and gravitational potential energy per unit mass exchange along a streamline. For a barotropic compressible fluid, replace $p/\rho$ by $\int dp/\rho (p)$. Different streamlines need not have the same Bernoulli constant.

Vorticity and potential flow. Vorticity is $\mathbf{\omega }=\nabla \times \mathbf{u}$. A small fluid element rotates locally with angular velocity $\mathbf{\omega }/2$ after its deformational part is separated. The vector identitygives $\nabla B=\mathbf{u}\times \mathbf{\omega }$ for steady constant-density inviscid flow. Thus an irrotational region has one common Bernoulli constant on each connected region. In a simply connected irrotational domain, introduce a velocity potential $\mathbf{u}=\nabla \varphi$. Incompressibility then gives Laplace's equation, ${\nabla }^2\varphi =0$. For unsteady irrotational flow,An impermeable stationary wall fixes ${\partial }_n\varphi =0$, but ideal potential flow does not enforce no slip. In a multiply connected domain, irrotational flow may still have nonzero circulation around an excluded vortex core, so a globally single-valued potential requires care.

For example, uniform two-dimensional flow past a circular cylinder has $\varphi =U(r+a^2/r)\cos \theta$ outside $r=a$. Its normal velocity vanishes at the cylinder, and its surface tangential velocity is $-2U\sin \theta$. Bernoulli's equation predicts a symmetric pressure distribution and zero drag. This is D'Alembert's paradox: the assumptions omit the viscous boundary layers, separation and wake responsible for real drag.

For an incompressible fluid of constant kinematic viscosity $\nu$, the curl of the motion equation givesThe first term stretches and tilts vortex lines; the second diffuses vorticity. In two-dimensional incompressible inviscid flow the stretching term is absent and vorticity is carried with the fluid. In a three-dimensional inviscid flow it can be amplified by stretching. Density gradients not parallel to pressure gradients provide an additional source in a general compressible fluid.

Viscous flow. A Newtonian fluid's shear stress is proportional to rate of strain. For constant viscosity and incompressibility the Navier-Stokes equation iswith dynamic viscosity $\eta$ and kinematic viscosity $\nu =\eta /\rho$. At an ordinary solid wall, the no-slip boundary condition sets fluid velocity equal to the wall velocity. Viscosity transfers momentum between neighbouring layers and converts mechanical energy into heat; unlike the pressure force, its shear contribution depends on velocity gradients.

For plane Couette flow between plates $y=0,h$, with the upper plate moving at $U$, the steady solution is $u_x=Uy/h$, with shear stress $\eta U/h$. For pressure-driven flow through a pipe of radius $a$, a constant pressure gradient gives the parabolic Poiseuille profileThe Reynolds number $\mathrm{Re}=\rho UL/\eta$ compares convective inertia with viscous force. Small Reynolds number often permits the Stokes-flow approximation; large Reynolds number can produce thin boundary layers and, under suitable conditions, turbulence. It does not justify neglecting the wall conditions. Bernoulli's inviscid constant is generally not conserved along a viscous streamline, and pipe flow instead shows a pressure loss corresponding to dissipation.

The absence of magnetic monopoles is expressed by $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$. In a regular simply connected region, a magnetic vector potential may be introduced so thatIts units are $\mathrm{T}\mathrm{m}=\mathrm{Wb}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$. It is not unique: adding a gradient leaves the magnetic field unchanged because $\nabla \times \nabla \chi =0$. In time-dependent electromagnetism,is a gauge transformation preserving both physical fields. Stokes theorem gives ${\oint }_C\mathbf{A}\cdot d\mathbf{\ell }={\int }_S\mathbf{B}\cdot d\mathbf{S}={\Phi }_B$ for a contour bounding an appropriate surface.

For localized steady currents, choose the Coulomb gauge $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0$. Substitution into Ampère's law and the curl-of-curl identity givesBoundary conditions are needed in addition to the gauge choice. For a uniform magnetic field one convenient choice is $\mathbf{A}=\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{B}\times \mathbf{r}$. For a magnetic dipole, $\mathbf{A}={\mu }_0\mathbf{m}\times \mathbf{r}/(4\pi r^3)$ outside its source. The magnetic vector potential simplifies field calculations and appears directly in the Lagrangian of a charged particle, $L=\frac{1}{2}m{v}^2+q\mathbf{v}\cdot \mathbf{A}-q\varphi$. In multiply connected regions, a field-free region can retain nontrivial circulation of $\mathbf{A}$, relevant to the Aharonov-Bohm effect; a local gauge argument cannot remove every global circulation.

Let a coordinate frame rotate with angular velocity $\mathbf{\Omega }$ relative to an inertial frame. For any vector $\mathbf{u}$,Applying this twice to position, with coincident nonaccelerating origins, givesNewton's second law written using rotating coordinates therefore contains the Coriolis forceThe other inertial corrections are the centrifugal force and, for changing rotation rate, the Euler force. An accelerating origin introduces an additional translational fictitious force.

The Coriolis force depends on velocity and is perpendicular to it, so ${\mathbf{F}}_C\cdot {\mathbf{v}}_{\mathrm{rotating}}=0$: the Coriolis force does no work in the rotating frame. It bends trajectories without directly changing their rotating-frame speed. It is absent for motion parallel to the rotation axis.

For locally horizontal motion on Earth at latitude $\lambda$, take $x$ east, $y$ north and $z$ up. Keeping the vertical component $\Omega \sin \lambda$ givesHorizontal motion is deflected right in the northern hemisphere and left in the southern hemisphere. In the ideal absence of other horizontal forces these equations give inertial circles with angular frequency $|f|$. The same velocity-dependent correction explains the precession of a Foucault pendulum, whose precession-rate magnitude is $\Omega |\sin \lambda |$. Terrestrial vertical motions also involve Earth's horizontal rotation component, so the reduced horizontal equations are not the full force law.

Definition and equations. A normal mode is a motion in which every component of a linear system has the same time dependence with fixed amplitude ratios and phases. For a conservative system near equilibrium, the most useful form isThe vector $\mathbf{u}$ describes the mode shape, while $\omega$ is its angular frequency. Linear combinations of modes describe arbitrary sufficiently small motions when the modes form a complete basis.

Let $q_i$ be displacements of independent generalized coordinates from equilibrium. Expand the Lagrangian to quadratic order:The mass matrix $M$ defines a positive-definite quadratic form on the independent coordinates, while the stiffness matrix $K$ is the Hessian of the potential energy. Substituting a mode gives the generalized eigenvalue problem for small oscillationsA practical calculation identifies the equilibrium, chooses independent coordinates, computes the quadratic kinetic and potential energies, solves for the eigenvalues and then obtains their eigenvectors. One can equivalently diagonalize the real symmetric matrix $M^{-1/2}K{M}^{-1/2}$. This guarantees real ${\omega }^2$ and a complete orthogonal basis in mass-weighted coordinates.

For distinct eigenvalues, the fact that $K$ and $M$ are real symmetric matrices impliesThus distinct modes are orthogonal in the inner product weighted by the mass matrix. Choosing ${\mathbf{u}}_i^{\mathsf{T}}M{\mathbf{u}}_j={\delta }_{ij}$ decouples the motion into ${\ddot{Q}}_i+{\omega }_i^2{Q}_i=0$, with total energy ${\sum }_i({\dot{Q}}_i^2+{\omega }_i^2{Q}_i^2)/2$. A positive-definite matrix $K$ gives positive eigenvalues and oscillatory stability. Zero modes can describe rigid translations or rotations without restoring force; a negative eigenvalue gives exponential instability rather than an oscillatory mode.

Symmetry. A symmetry preserving both quadratic energies maps modes into modes of the same frequency. Coordinates adapted to symmetry divide the eigenvalue problem into smaller independent blocks. For two identical subsystems, exchanging them gives symmetric and antisymmetric modes. The degeneracy of normal modes means that independent modes share one frequency. Higher-dimensional group representations of a symmetry can enforce such degeneracies; symmetry does not require every pair of modes to be degenerate, and accidental degeneracies can also occur. Within a degenerate eigenspace, orthogonal linear combinations are equally valid mode shapes.

For two equal masses $m$, each attached to a fixed support by a spring of stiffness $k$ and coupled to the other by a spring of stiffness $k_c$,The symmetric mode ${\mathbf{u}}_{+}\propto (1,1)$ leaves the coupling spring unstretched and has ${\omega }_{+}^2=k/m$. The antisymmetric mode ${\mathbf{u}}_{-}\propto (1,-1)$ stretches it and has ${\omega }_{-}^2=(k+2k_c)/m$. Superposing the two gives beats when their frequencies are close.

Continuous systems. The same idea replaces matrices by differential operators and mode vectors by functions satisfying boundary conditions. For a taut string of length $L$, tension $\mathcal{T}$ and mass per unit length ${\mu }_{\ell }$, the wave equation and fixed endpoints giveOrthogonality of the sine functions allows an arbitrary initial displacement to be decomposed into modes. Changing the endpoints changes the spectrum: boundary conditions are part of the physical mode problem.

A uniform chain of equal masses $m$ joined by springs $k_s$, with spacing $a$, has travelling normal modes $q_j\propto e^{i(kja-\omega t)}$ withTheir quantization gives phonons; the long-wavelength limit is a sound wave. Rectangular electromagnetic cavity modes satisfy Maxwell's equations and conductor boundary conditions, with $\omega =c|\mathbf{k}|$ in vacuum. An elastic beam instead has a fourth-order spatial equation and flexural dispersion $\omega \propto k^2$. These examples show how restoring forces and geometry determine the frequency spectrum.

Real systems. Small-amplitude motion is often approximately linear even when the full equations are nonlinear. Large amplitudes produce frequency shifts, mode coupling and transfer of energy between modes. Friction broadens resonances and makes free oscillations decay. A damping matrix proportional to $M$ or $K$ can retain the undamped mode shapes; general damping need not, and the appropriate eigenfrequencies and modes can be complex. External periodic forcing predominantly excites modes near resonance, with amplitude set by coupling to the forcing and dissipation. Imperfections split ideal degeneracies, while radiation or coupling to a surrounding fluid can remove energy from the chosen subsystem. Normal modes remain useful when linearization, the boundary conditions and the treatment of damping accurately describe the motion being measured.

Let the rotating frame have origin acceleration ${\mathbf{A}}_0$ and angular velocity $\mathbf{\Omega }(t)$ relative to an inertial frame. For a vector referred to the moving axes, the transport rule isApply it twice to position. With rotating-frame velocity $\mathbf{v}$ and acceleration ${\mathbf{a}}_R$,Thus Newton's equation expressed in the rotating frame isThe added terms are translational, Coriolis, Euler and centrifugal fictitious forces. They reflect the frame's acceleration, rather than additional interactions with nearby objects.

The centrifugal force points outward from the rotation axis and, for constant $\mathbf{\Omega }$, has potential $-m|\mathbf{\Omega }\times \mathbf{r}{|}^2/2$. The Coriolis force is perpendicular to velocity, so does no work on the particle measured in that rotating frame; it changes direction rather than speed directly. The Euler force is present when the frame's rotation rate or direction changes.

On Earth, gravity and centrifugal acceleration combine into effective gravity. For slow horizontal motion at latitude $\lambda$, the vertical component of Earth's rotation gives Coriolis parameter $f=2\Omega \sin \lambda$: an initially northward motion deflects eastward in the northern hemisphere. This supplies a useful local explanation of rotating flows and Foucault precession. A bucket of rotating liquid illustrates the centrifugal potential: its steady free surface is an equipotential of $gz-{\Omega }^2{r}^2/2$, giving $z={\Omega }^2{r}^2/(2g)+\mathrm{constant}$. These equations require a declared frame; adding a centrifugal force while retaining inertial-frame acceleration would count the same kinematic effect twice.

A normal mode of a linearized mechanical system is a motion in which every generalized displacement oscillates at a single common angular frequency, with fixed relative amplitudes and phases. In coordinates $q_j$, an undamped oscillatory mode may be writtenwhere the amplitude vector $(A_1,\dots ,A_n)$ is fixed; negative components describe relative phase $\pi$. An arbitrary small motion is a linear combination of the normal modes when the mode vectors form a complete basis.

To find the two-mass three-spring normal modes, choose both displacements positive to the right, measured from mechanical equilibrium. The middle spring's extension changes by $x_2-x_1$. Hooke's law and Newton's second law therefore giveIn a normal mode both displacements have the same angular frequency: take $x_j=A_j\cos (\omega t+\varphi )$. A nonzero amplitude vector exists when the determinant vanishes:Writing $D=\sqrt{m_1^2-m_1{m}_2+m_2^2}$, the two angular frequencies areThe corresponding eigenvectors can be specified bySince $D>|m_2-m_1|$ for positive masses, the lower normal mode ${\omega }_{-}$ has $A_2/A_1>0$: both bodies move in the same direction at any instant. The higher normal mode ${\omega }_{+}$ has $A_2/A_1<0$: they move in opposite directions. Their amplitudes are generally unequal. For the useful check $m_1=m_2=m$, these reduce to ${\omega }_{-}=\sqrt{k/m}$ with $A_2=A_1$, and ${\omega }_{+}=\sqrt{3k/m}$ with $A_2=-A_1$. Each angular frequency has units $\mathrm{rad}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$.

Use orthonormal basis vectors ${\mathbf{e}}_i(t)$ fixed in the rotating reference frame, and expand the angular momentum as $\mathbf{J}={\sum }_i{J}_i{\mathbf{e}}_i$. Over time $dt$, the basis undergoes infinitesimal rotation $\mathbf{\Omega }dt$, soThe product rule gives the rotating-frame derivative formula:Since the applied couple is the rate of change of angular momentum in the inertial frame,The second term accounts for the changing basis, even when the components of angular momentum are constant in the rotating reference frame.

For this gyrocompass, let $\mathbf{n},\mathbf{w},\mathbf{z}$ be local north, west and upward unit vectors, forming a right-handed basis. Earth's rotation has local componentsLet the spin axis point along $\mathbf{u}=\cos \theta \mathbf{n}+\sin \theta \mathbf{w}$, and write its dominant angular momentum as $J_s\mathbf{u}$, where $J_s=I_1\omega >0$. In mechanical equilibrium relative to Earth, this leading angular momentum is fixed in the terrestrial rotating reference frame. The bearings can exert horizontal torques to keep the axle horizontal, but free rotation about the vertical implies $G_z=0$. The vertical component of the rotating-frame derivative formula therefore requiresAway from either geographical pole, $\cos \lambda \ne 0$, henceThis is a necessary equilibrium condition; the next part distinguishes its stable and unstable spin orientations. The rapid-spin approximation neglects angular momentum terms of order $I_2{\Omega }_E$ compared with $I_1\omega$. At either pole the horizontal component of Earth's rotation vanishes, and this north-seeking mechanism gives no preferred horizontal direction. The paper explicitly excludes $90^{\circ }$; if latitude is signed, $-90^{\circ }$ must likewise be excluded.

Newton's second law takes its familiar form $m\mathbf{a}=\mathbf{F}$ in an inertial frame. Axes fixed to a turning apparatus or to the Earth form a rotating reference frame. Extra inertial forces account for the acceleration of these coordinates. Their values depend on the chosen reference frame; physical interactions such as gravity, tension and contact forces must still be included separately.

Let the rotating origin have inertial acceleration $\mathbf{A}$, and let its axes have angular velocity $\mathbf{\Omega }(t)$. For any vector $\mathbf{q}$, the rotating-frame derivative formula isEach rotating basis vector changes by $\mathbf{\Omega }\times {\mathbf{e}}_i$, which proves this rule by expanding $\mathbf{q}$ in that basis. Apply it twice to the position relative to the moving origin. With ${\mathbf{v}}^{\prime }$ and ${\mathbf{a}}^{\prime }$ measured in the rotating axes,Consequently the equation in the rotating reference frame isThe additional terms are the translational inertial force, Coriolis force, Euler force and centrifugal force, respectively. The last two simplify when the angular velocity is constant: the Euler force vanishes, while the other rotation terms remain.

The centrifugal force points away from the rotation axis. If ${\mathbf{r}}_{\perp }$ is the perpendicular displacement from that axis, thenFor uniform rotation it has potential energyA mass at rest relative to a turntable can therefore be described as having an inward tension or friction balancing its outward centrifugal force. In an inertial frame, the inward physical force instead produces the required centripetal acceleration. These are two descriptions of the same motion; one must not insert the rotating-frame outward term into the inertial equation as an additional physical interaction.

A rotating liquid gives a useful quantitative example. For a liquid in hydrostatic equilibrium relative to a vessel rotating uniformly about the vertical axis,Along the free surface the pressure is constant, so ${\Omega }^{2}sds-gdz=0$ andThe surface is a elliptic paraboloid. This is the balance of gravity and the centrifugal force in the rotating description. On the Earth, the same outward acceleration reduces effective gravity, most strongly at the equator, and contributes to the planet's equatorial bulge.

The Coriolis force depends on relative motion:It is perpendicular to both $\mathbf{\Omega }$ and ${\mathbf{v}}^{\prime }$, vanishes for motion along the rotation axis, and reverses when the relative velocity reverses. The dot product givesThus the Coriolis force does no work in the rotating reference frame: it changes the direction of motion rather than directly changing the rotating-frame kinetic energy. For example, on a horizontal turntable rotating anticlockwise as viewed from above, an outward-moving slider has a clockwise Coriolis acceleration, whereas an inward-moving slider has an anticlockwise one. The deflection can be observed by comparing a laboratory camera with a camera rotating with the table.

For slow horizontal motion on the Earth at latitude $\lambda$, keep the vertical component ${\Omega }_E\sin \lambda$ of its angular velocity. In east-north coordinates $(u,v)$ the horizontal Coriolis acceleration isIt deflects motion to the right in the northern hemisphere and to the left in the southern hemisphere. In large-scale atmospheric and oceanic motion it can balance a horizontal pressure gradient, giving geostrophic balance. With $\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ upward, the steady horizontal equation without friction isThe resulting velocity runs along lines of equal pressure. This approximation requires rotation to dominate local inertial changes; it is inappropriate close to the equator where $f$ tends to zero.

The Foucault pendulum gives another terrestrial example. In the small-angle approximation, its horizontal coordinates satisfyTo first order in the small ratio ${\Omega }_E/{\omega }_0$, the oscillation plane precesses relative to the ground at angular rate $-{\Omega }_E\sin \lambda$: clockwise in the northern hemisphere, zero at the equator, and one revolution per sidereal day at a pole. The Coriolis force explains this changing orientation without requiring energy input. Together these examples show why inertial forces are useful whenever the apparatus or environment supplies naturally rotating coordinates.

Because the magnetic field obeys $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B}=0$, it can be represented locally as the curl of a magnetic vector potential:This automatically enforces the absence of magnetic monopoles. It is also a global representation throughout ordinary all-space problems without monopole singularities. It is not unique: the gauge transformationleaves $\mathbf{B}$ unchanged because the curl of a gradient vanishes. In a time-dependent problem,makes the same transformation leave both physical fields unchanged and automatically satisfies Faraday's law.

In vacuum magnetostatics, choose the Coulomb gauge $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0$. Substitution into Ampère's law and the identity $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{A})=\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A})-{\nabla }^2\mathbf{A}$ givesfor a localized steady electric current density and a potential vanishing at infinity. Taking the curl recovers the Biot-Savart law. The magnetic vector potential converts a constrained vector field problem into componentwise Poisson equations once a gauge is chosen.

For a uniform magnetic field, $\mathbf{A}=\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{B}\times \mathbf{r}$ is a convenient choice. For a localized magnetic dipole moment $\mathbf{m}$, the leading far-field potential isAnother useful relation is Stokes theorem, which relates a closed-path integral to the magnetic flux through a spanning surface:The units of $\mathbf{A}$ are $\mathrm{T}\mathrm{m}$, equivalently $\mathrm{Wb}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$.