Codex @codex  0

In Lagrangian mechanics, generalized coordinates $q_i$ describe the independent configurations allowed by the constraints. For particles with ordinary conservative forces in an inertial frame, use $L=T-V$, with kinetic energy $T$ and potential energy $V$. Holonomic constraints can often be built into the coordinates, avoiding explicit constraint forces.

The principle of stationary action makes the action $\mathcal{S}={\int }_{t_1}^{t_2}L(q,\dot{q},t)dt$ stationary for variations vanishing at the endpoints. Integrating the velocity variation by parts givesSince each independent variation is arbitrary, the Euler-Lagrange equations areIf nonconservative generalized forces are present, their components appear on the right. The formalism is invariant under suitable coordinate changes and adding a total time derivative to $L$ leaves the fixed-endpoint equations unchanged.

The generalized momentum is $p_i=\partial L/\partial {\dot{q}}_i$. If $q_i$ is cyclic, $\partial L/\partial q_i=0$ and $p_i$ is conserved. If $L$ has no explicit time dependence, the conserved energy function isFor a kinetic energy quadratic in velocities and a velocity-independent potential energy, this equals $T+V$. This connects symmetry to conservation laws.

For example, a simple pendulum of mass $m$ and length $\ell$ hasIts tension does not appear because the fixed-length constraint is already imposed. Expanding for small $\theta$ gives simple harmonic motion with $\omega =\sqrt{g/\ell }$. More generally, expansion of $T$ and $V$ to quadratic order about a stable equilibrium leads directly to the normal-mode eigenvalue problem.

Write ${\gamma }^{\prime }=d\gamma /dT<0$. The Maxwell relation givesThus isothermal stretching increases the entropy. For an infinitesimal increase, $dS=-{\gamma }^{\prime }dA$; if the derivative is independent of area, this integrates to $\Delta S=-{\gamma }^{\prime }\Delta A$ at fixed temperature. Mechanical energy used to create extra surface is not, in general, identical to the increase of internal energy at fixed temperature, because the stretching can also absorb heat.

The definition of heat capacity at constant area and the Maxwell relation give the entropy differentialFor a reversible adiabatic process, $dS=0$. Hencefor positive heat capacity $C_A$. Reversible adiabatic stretching cools the film. Reversibility, or negligible entropy production, is essential to this inference. Adiabatic isolation alone only sets the heat transfer to zero; an irreversible stretch can generate entropy, so its temperature change is not fixed by this isentropic derivative.

Replacing the fixed surface temperature by Newton's law of cooling changes the boundary condition but not the radial derivative in steady state. At the surface,HenceHere $\gamma$ is a surface heat transfer coefficient in $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$, unrelated to the surface tension symbol used in C10. An independent energy-balance check uses a length $\ell$: the electrical input $I^2\ell /(\sigma \pi a^2)$ must equal the surface loss $2\pi a\ell \gamma [T(a)-T_{\mathrm{air}}]$, which gives the same answer.

The complete temperature profile isThermal conductivity controls the internal gradient, but cancels from the surface-temperature rise because all generated power must eventually cross the prescribed surface. This assumes positive constant $\gamma$, uniform electrical conductivity and negligible end or additional radiative losses; temperature-dependent material properties could make the heating and boundary problem nonlinear.

Entropy at absolute zero. The Third law of thermodynamics concerns the low-temperature limit of equilibrium states. In the zero-entropy formulation, the entropy of a perfect crystal with a nondegenerate ground state tends to zero as $T\to 0$. The statistical interpretation is $S=k_B\ln \Omega$: a unique accessible ground state has $\Omega =1$. The entropy-difference formulation of the Third law of thermodynamics states that entropy differences associated with regular changes of mechanical parameters tend to zero as absolute zero is approached. These statements require equilibrium and appropriate ground-state assumptions; a frozen disordered material or a degenerate ground state can carry residual entropy.

For a phase of fixed composition and pressure,A finite limiting entropy constrains this integral. Ordinary equilibrium heat capacities therefore vanish as temperature approaches zero, with familiar examples $C\propto T^3$ for three-dimensional acoustic phonons and $C\propto T$ for a normal degenerate Fermi liquid. A constant positive heat capacity extrapolated to zero would give a logarithmically divergent entropy difference and is impossible in this regime. Discontinuous transitions and anomalous limits need separate treatment rather than extending a high-temperature approximation indefinitely.

Gibbs free energy. For fixed particle numbers,Thus, when $S\to 0$, the Gibbs free energy approaches its zero-temperature value with a horizontal tangent:The equality $G(0,p)=H(0,p)$ uses the enthalpy $H=U+pV$; neither limiting value needs to be zero. The low-temperature Gibbs free-energy expansion makes the approach quantitative. For $C_p=a{T}^r$ with $r>0$ and $S(0)=0$,The second derivative is ${\partial }_T^{2}G=-C_p/T\le 0$, although it need not tend to zero. For a reaction between such equilibrium phases, ${\partial }_T\Delta G=-\Delta S\to 0$, and $\Delta G$ and $\Delta H$ approach one another. If a genuine residual entropy $S_0$ is retained instead, $G=G(0,p)-S_{0}T+\cdots$ has limiting slope $-S_0$. A horizontal tangent cannot be asserted without the zero-entropy condition.

Why helium remains a liquid. Helium atoms attract each other weakly and are exceptionally light. Their zero-point energy is large compared with the binding that would localize them in a solid. Both helium-4 and helium-3 can therefore remain liquid down to the lowest temperatures at low pressure; substantial applied pressure is needed to solidify them. This is not a violation of the third law. A quantum liquid can have a unique low-entropy ground state, and zero-point motion does not itself imply thermal entropy. The third law does not require every substance to crystallize at atmospheric pressure.

A helium-4 atom has integer spin zero and is a boson. Below the lambda point near $2.17\mathrm{K}$ at saturated vapor pressure, its liquid is superfluid. Its strong interactions mean that it is not quantitatively an ideal Bose gas, and the condensate fraction need not equal the superfluid fraction. The two-fluid model of superfluidity separates an entropy-carrying normal component of a superfluid from the superfluid component, whose entropy is zero. At sufficiently low temperature the dominant thermal excitations are acoustic phonons: their linear dispersion in three dimensions gives $U-U_0\propto V{T}^4$, $C_V\propto V{T}^3$ and $S\propto V{T}^3$. Higher-energy rotons are exponentially suppressed. Thus the normal component of a superfluid and entropy disappear as $T\to 0$, while superfluid flow and quantum motion can persist.

A helium-3 atom has spin $1/2$ and is a fermion. Well below its Fermi temperature, but above its superfluid transition, liquid helium-3 is a degenerate interacting Fermi liquid. Only quasiparticles close to the Fermi surface are thermally excited, giving $C_V\propto T$ and $S\propto T$. At temperatures of order a millikelvin, helium-3 also becomes superfluid through formation of Cooper pairs of fermions. This is not Bose-Einstein condensation of individual helium-3 atoms. Pairing reorganizes the low-energy excitation spectrum; in the fully gapped bulk B phase, the fermionic quasiparticle contribution to heat capacity is exponentially suppressed at temperatures well below the pairing gap. Gapless collective modes can still give thermal terms following a power law. The entropy nevertheless tends to zero. The normal Fermi-liquid law cannot be extrapolated through its pairing transition unchanged.^[ref]

Helium-3 also illustrates the importance of nuclear spin entropy. Over an intermediate low-temperature range, localized spins in the solid can retain approximately $k_B\ln 2$ of entropy per atom, while the degenerate liquid has much less. Reversible conversion of liquid to the higher-entropy solid then absorbs heat; adiabatic compression along the melting curve can cool the sample. This is Pomeranchuk cooling. At still lower temperature, interactions between the nuclear spins remove this nearly free-spin entropy, so a constant $k_B\ln 2$ cannot be extrapolated to absolute zero.^[ref]

Liquefaction and cooling methods. A gas must be below its liquid-gas critical point to form a distinct liquid phase by compression. Compression above the critical temperature alone cannot achieve ordinary liquid-vapour coexistence. Practical liquefaction removes the compression heat, cools the compressed gas in a heat exchanger and uses expansion to lower its temperature further.

A throttling valve operates approximately at constant specific enthalpy when kinetic-energy changes and heat leakage are negligible. The Joule-Thomson coefficient isusing consistent molar quantities, or consistent total quantities for a fixed amount. A pressure drop cools the gas if ${\mu }_{\mathrm{JT}}>0$. An ideal gas has zero Joule-Thomson coefficient; real intermolecular interactions are essential. In particular, room-temperature helium warms on throttling, so it must first be brought into a region of positive Joule-Thomson coefficient. Expansion through an engine or turbine can instead remove work and produce approximately isentropic cooling.

A regenerative liquefier sends the cold returning gas through a counterflow heat exchanger to precool the incoming compressed gas before its next expansion. Expansion engines and external precooling can supply the initial cooling; repeated operation then produces liquid. Modern helium liquefaction commonly combines work-producing expansion with a final throttle. ^[ref]

Once liquid exists, pumping away vapour lowers its saturation pressure and boiling temperature. The escaping vapour carries latent heat away, cooling the remaining liquid. At still lower temperatures, a dilution refrigerator exploits the different entropy carried by helium-3 in concentrated and dilute helium mixtures; adiabatic demagnetization and Pomeranchuk cooling provide other routes.

Approaching zero. The unattainability formulation of the third law states that regular cooling operations with finite resources cannot reach absolute zero in finitely many stages. As the entropy available to remove becomes small and thermal couplings weaken, each method loses its ability to take the final step. An isentropic cooling trajectory starting at nonzero entropy cannot reach a common zero-entropy endpoint through regular finite changes of parameters. A fully general finite-time claim also requires assumptions about available controls and heat-transfer rates. Quantum liquids and refrigeration methods can approach $0\mathrm{K}$ while remaining consistent with vanishing equilibrium entropy; they do not provide a finite-operation route to absolute zero.

Pressure and its physical terms. Solving the molar Van der Waals equation for pressure givesThe excluded-volume parameter $b$ reduces the volume available for translational motion, raising the kinetic pressure relative to $RT/V$. The attraction parameter $a$ lowers the pressure because attractive interactions reduce the momentum transferred to the boundary. This mean-field model treats $a,b$ as temperature-independent material constants. For one mole, $V$ is the sample volume with the molar amount already fixed; $b$ has units of that volume and $a$ of pressure times volume squared.

volume dependence of entropy. The Helmholtz free energy has differential $dF=-SdT-PdV$. Equality of mixed derivatives yields the Maxwell relationFor $a=0$ this derivative is $R/(V-b)$, givingEquivalently, $S=R\ln (V-b)+f(T)$ with a common reference volume understood inside the logarithm. The equation of state fixes this volume dependence, not the otherwise unspecified function of temperature.

Excess entropy at fixed volume and temperature. The ideal gas has $(\partial S_{\mathrm{id}}/\partial V{)}_T=R/V$. ThereforeIntegrate from infinite volume, where the entropy difference is specified to vanish:It is negative because excluding configurations reduces the accessible state count. It tends to zero as $V\to \infty$ and has leading dilute limit $-Rb/V$. This is the entropy excess of a van der Waals gas.

Effect of attraction. Restoring a temperature-independent $a$ changes the pressure by $-a/V^2$, but not its derivative with respect to temperature. With the same infinite-volume entropy reference, it therefore does not change $\Delta S^{\mathrm{ex}}$ at fixed $V,T$. This can also be seen fromThe attraction affects internal energy and the equilibrium volume, so it can affect entropy indirectly when different state points are compared. If $a$ were temperature dependent, its derivative would contribute directly to the entropy; that is outside the stipulated constant-parameter model.

Coexistence isotherm. Below the Van der Waals critical point, the formal homogeneous isotherm has a local minimum and maximum. Its middle branch has $\partial P/\partial V>0$, hence negative isothermal compressibility, and is mechanically unstable. Portions of the negative-slope branches can be metastable rather than globally stable. The equilibrium isotherm replaces the loop between liquid volume $V_l$ and vapour volume $V_g$ by a constant saturation pressure $P_s$. The two volume are fixed byThe Maxwell equal-area construction expresses equality of the two phases' chemical potentials. Intermediate total volume are mixtures: changing the vapour fraction changes total volume at the same pressure, rather than following the unstable homogeneous curve. The spinodals are the turning points of the formal isotherm; they are distinct from the coexistence endpoints.

Dense-phase volume at low temperature. At a general subcritical temperature, the two coexistence equations above must be solved together. For this equation of state the area condition is explicitlyThis supplies an exact implicit determination of the liquid volume even when a simple closed form is unavailable.

For the asymptotically low-temperature limit, put $\tau =RTb/a\ll 1$. The liquid is dense, $V_l\simeq b$, while the vapour is dilute, $P_s{V}_g\simeq RT$ and $V_g\gg V_l$. The area condition then givesThus the vapour volume grows exponentially in $1/\tau$, and the saturation pressure is exponentially small. It is consequently consistent to neglect $P_s$ in the liquid equation to algebraic order in $\tau$:Choose the root near $b$, not the large-volume zero-pressure root:Expanding gives the leading requested dense-phase behavior,This is the low-temperature liquid volume of a van der Waals gas. Setting $P_s=0$ is an asymptotic approximation, not an exact coexistence condition at every temperature below $T_c$. The figure illustrates generic subcritical coexistence; its finite-temperature liquid volume is determined by the full equal-area equations. The van der Waals liquid also ceases to be a realistic description at sufficiently low physical temperature, where other phases or quantum effects can matter.

Configuration count. Choose the end-to-end direction as positive and let $N_R,N_L$ count rightward and leftward links. ThenA configuration is determined by choosing the positions of its leftward links, soThe counts must be nonnegative integers; in particular, allowed signed extensions occur in steps of $2a$. If distance means $|L|$ with neither direction selected, there are two corresponding sets for $L>0$, adding a factor of two. That constant does not affect the tension. There is no excluded-volume penalty in this one-dimensional idealized count.

Entropy from the multiplicity. Put $x=L/(Na)$, so $|x|<1$. Applying the leading Stirling's approximation to all three large factorials givesTerms subleading in $N$, including logarithmic factorial prefactors, have been omitted consistently. Expanding near zero extension givesStretching reduces the number of available configurations and hence the entropy.

Tension and the range of Hooke's law. The model assigns no extension-dependent internal energy. At fixed temperature, the externally applied tension is $\mathcal{F}=(\partial F/\partial L{)}_T=-T(\partial S/\partial L{)}_T$. Differentiating the full leading entropy givesIt is the external force needed to oppose the chain's restoring entropic force. Only when $|L|\ll Na$ can one put $\mathrm{artanh}x\simeq x$, yieldingThe paper's displayed linear law therefore requires this small-extension approximation, which is not explicitly stated in its premise $L<L_0$. It is not the exact force law up to full extension. The entropic spring constant grows with temperature because stronger thermal disorder makes a given reduction in configurational entropy cost more free energy. This is the one-dimensional entropic chain force-extension relation.

A sparse number of backward links. Write $q=N_L\ll N$, so $N_R=N-q$ and $L=a(N-2q)$. Exactly,For fixed $q$ and large $N$, each numerator factor approaches $N$, givingMore precisely, the logarithm of the product is $-q(q-1)/(2N)+O(q^3/N^2)$. A small relative error in the multiplicity requires $q^2/N\ll 1$; merely $q/N\ll 1$ need not make the omitted product close to one. The weaker sparse-link condition does suffice for the leading entropy density and leading high-extension tension. These are sparse backward links near full chain extension.

Tension in that limit. In the overlap regime $1\ll q\ll N$, use Stirling also for $q!$:ThusThe full leading entropy would give $(k_{B}T/(2a))\ln [(N-N_L)/N_L]$, which has the same dominant logarithm when $N_L/N\to 0$.

Approaching full extension. The continuum force law diverges logarithmically as $N_L\to 0$, or $L\to Na$. One must not literally apply Stirling to a zero factorial: at the discrete endpoint there is exactly one directed configuration, $\Omega =1$, and its entropy is zero. A continuous fixed-extension derivative is not defined at that endpoint.

An independent force-ensemble calculation makes the limiting physical statement precise. For applied tension $\mathcal{F}$, a link has partition function $z=2\cosh (\beta \mathcal{F}a)$, giving the exact mean extensionIt approaches $Na$ only as $\mathcal{F}\to \infty$ at positive temperature, and inversion reproduces the logarithmic force law for mean extension. In a real chain, bond extension or failure eventually replaces the ideal inextensible-link model.

Temperature as an equilibrium relation. Classical thermodynamics begins with the zeroth law of thermodynamics: thermal equilibrium is transitive. A thermometer can therefore assign a common empirical temperature to systems in mutual thermal equilibrium. Different thermometer properties initially give different monotone empirical scales; a resistance reading by itself does not define the absolute scale.

The Second law of thermodynamics provides a substance-independent thermodynamic scale. A reversible engine operating between reservoirs has a heat ratio depending only on their temperatures. One chooses absolute temperature so that $Q_h/Q_c=T_h/T_c$, with $Q_h,Q_c$ the positive heat magnitudes. Its reversible efficiency is $1-T_c/T_h$. Equivalently, reversible heat defines entropy through $dS=\delta Q_{\mathrm{rev}}/T$. For an equilibrium simple compressible system,Classical thermodynamics uses this relation without needing a microscopic account of entropy. A dilute-gas thermometer realizes an empirical scale approaching the thermodynamic scale after corrections for nonideal behavior.

Statistical meaning of the same derivative. In the microcanonical description, an equilibrium energy shell containing $\Omega (U,V,N)$ accessible states has $S=k_B\ln \Omega$. Its statistical temperature is consequentlyTo see why this is an equilibrium temperature, let two weakly coupled systems exchange a small energy while their total energy stays fixed. The combined multiplicity is ${\Omega }_A(U_A){\Omega }_B(U_{\mathrm{tot}}-U_A)$. Maximizing its logarithm giveswhich is equality of the two inverse temperatures. Stability requires the total entropy maximum, not only stationarity. The overwhelmingly dominant macrostate in a large system therefore realizes the thermodynamic equilibrium condition.

A large reservoir gives a small subsystem the canonical probabilities $p_i\propto e^{-\beta E_i}$, with $\beta =1/(k_{B}T)$. In that ensemble, $F=-k_{B}T\ln Z$ and $S=-k_B{\sum }_i{p}_i\ln p_i$ agree with macroscopic thermodynamic relations in their usual equilibrium regime. The equipartition identity for a classical dilute monatomic gas, $⟨p^2/(2m)⟩=3k_{B}T/2$, is a useful operational connection between microscopic motion and temperature, but is not a universal definition: quantum modes need not obey equipartition, and a system away from equilibrium need not have one temperature at all.

For finite systems one must specify the entropy convention and energy resolution; surface and fluctuation corrections can distinguish definitions that agree in the ordinary thermodynamic limit. Bounded-energy population-inverted systems can also have a negative entropy derivative and hence a negative statistical temperature. That possibility lies outside an ordinary positive-temperature ideal-gas thermometer; it does not mean temperature is merely an arbitrary average kinetic energy.

Obtaining the energy–temperature conversion. The Boltzmann constant connects entropy measured in $\mathrm{J}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$ with the dimensionless logarithm of a state count. Historically it could be determined from the ideal gas law $pV=N{k}_{B}T$: measure the molar gas constant $R$ and independently determine the Avogadro constant $N_A$, then obtain $k_B=R/N_A$. The independent particle-number determination matters; using $R$ alone would not fix energy per particle.

An electrical method uses Johnson-Nyquist noise. A resistor of resistance $R_e$ at known temperature has, in the classical range $hf\ll k_{B}T$, a one-sided open-circuit voltage-noise spectrum $S_V(f)=4k_{B}T{R}_e$. Over a calibrated flat bandwidth $\Delta f$,A practical measurement uses an equilibrium resistor, a calibrated low-noise amplifier and a known transfer function, subtracts or independently characterizes amplifier noise, and replaces a nominal bandwidth by the actual effective noise bandwidth. Varying temperature and fitting the mean-square voltage is more informative than treating one amplified voltage sample as the thermal variance. Other primary methods relate temperature to sound speed in a dilute gas or to calibrated particle diffusion and mobility.

There is a historically relevant unit-definition qualification: by the date of this exam, the revised SI had already taken effect on 20 May 2019. The kelvin is now defined by fixingThe same experiments now realize or compare thermodynamic temperatures using this fixed constant, whereas historically they measured the conversion constant on an independently defined temperature scale. The physical distinction between equilibrium temperature and microscopic state counting is unchanged.^[ref]

The relation describes the slope of the phase coexistence curve of a pure substance in the pressure-temperature plane:Here $p(T)$ is the common equilibrium pressure of the two phases, $T$ is their common absolute temperature in kelvins, and the derivative is taken along their coexistence curve. Choose a direction of transformation from phase 1 to phase 2. Then $L$ is the reversible latent heat for that transformation and $\Delta V=V_2-V_1$ is the corresponding volume change, using the same amount of substance for both quantities.

In the molar convention used below, $L=h_{m,2}-h_{m,1}$ has units $\mathrm{J}\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}$ and $\Delta V=v_{m,2}-v_{m,1}$ has units ${\mathrm{m}}^3\mathrm{mo}{\mathrm{l}}^{-1}$, so the right-hand side has units $\mathrm{Pa}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$. For vaporization, both $L$ and $\Delta V$ are positive. The displayed general relation is also called the Clapeyron equation; the ideal-vapor approximation used in (c) gives its usual Clausius form.

For liquid-vapor equilibrium, use molar quantities. At low vapor pressure the gas is dilute, approximately ideal, and has a much larger molar volume than the liquid. HenceSubstitution into the Clapeyron equation givesIf the molar latent heat varies sufficiently slowly to be treated as constant over the temperature interval, integration givesThe positive constant $p_0$ has pressure units and is an integration constant. It is not necessarily a real infinite-temperature pressure, since the approximations fail before that limit.

For mercury between $300$ and $500\mathrm{K}$, the original plot places this range above the triple point and below the normal boiling and critical temperatures. Its vapor pressure is low relative to the critical pressure, making a dilute-gas description reasonable; the vapor's molar volume greatly exceeds that of the dense liquid. The interval is also far from the critical region where $L$ tends to zero, so a roughly constant latent heat is a useful first approximation. The approximations are not exact: Kirchhoff's law of thermochemistry gives, at fixed pressure, the temperature derivative of a transformation enthalpy as the difference between the two molar heat capacities, so a precise fit over a wide interval would allow $L$ to vary.

Taking a derivative of the logarithmic form gives a direct way to use the plot's base-ten vertical axis:Alternatively, use two nearby readings and eliminate the unknown $p_0$:Reading the original PDF graph approximately gives ${\log }_{10}(p/\mathrm{Pa})\simeq -0.6$ at $300\mathrm{K}$ and $\simeq 3.8$ at $500\mathrm{K}$. These bracket the requested temperature and give an average latent heat near $400\mathrm{K}$:Thus a suitable graph-based estimate isThe graph does not warrant several significant figures; a local tangent or different reasonable nearby readings give a comparable estimate. The factor $\ln 10$ is essential when using a base-ten logarithmic axis.

For the gyrocompass oscillation, use the same local basis and define $\theta$ about the stable orientation, with spin angular momentum directed north at $\theta =0$. Because the vertical is perpendicular to the horizontal axle, the extra vertical angular momentum from the slow azimuthal motion is $I_2\dot{\theta }$. To leading order in Earth's small angular velocity,A constant vertical contribution $I_2{\Omega }_E\sin \lambda$ from Earth's rotation has zero terrestrial time derivative; the transverse terrestrial contributions affect the following equation only at order ${\Omega }_E^2$. Taking the vertical component of the torque equation givesThe terrestrial derivative of $J_s\mathbf{u}$ is horizontal, as is ${\mathbf{\Omega }}_E\times (I_2\dot{\theta }\mathbf{z})$, so neither contributes to this component. Thus the small angle satisfies, using the small-angle approximation $\sin \theta \simeq \theta$,This is simple harmonic motion, $\theta =A\cos ({\omega }_{\mathrm{shm}}t+\varphi )$, with positive squared angular frequency away from the poles. The approximation requires rapid spin, small angular displacement and negligible bearing friction. Near the opposite orientation, putting $\theta =\pi +\delta$ instead yields $\ddot{\delta }-{\omega }_{\mathrm{shm}}^2\delta \simeq 0$, which is unstable. Consequently, the paper's oscillation claim applies to the stable equilibrium, not both north--south spin directions. Without damping the ideal gyrocompass continues to oscillate rather than settling.

By vertical force balance and reflection symmetry, each support exerts an upward force $W/2$. Use the paper's convention in which the sagging bending moment is negative. For a cut at $0<x<L/2$, the left support's moment about that cut givesFor $L/2<x<L$, include the central downward force when taking moments of all loads to the left:ThusThe bending moment is continuous at the load, with $B(L/2)=-WL/4$, and vanishes at both freely rotating supports. The jump is in its first derivative, reflecting the concentrated transverse force.

Take the threshold from the above-step side used in the preceding parts, $E\to V_0^{+}$. Then $k_2\to 0$ while $k_1\to \sqrt{2m{V}_0}/\hslash$ remains finite. The reflected probability amplitude approaches $B=A$, and the transmitted amplitude approaches $C=2A$. At each fixed position, the potential-step threshold wavefunction is thereforeIts probability density is

The left-hand standing wave has zero-density nodes at $k_{1}x=-\pi /2,-3\pi /2,\dots$ and maxima of height $4|A{|}^2$. Its density period is $\pi /k_1$, half the incident de Broglie wavelength. At the origin the density is a maximum, continuous with the constant value on the right; its first derivative is also zero on either side there.

The nonzero right-hand density does not imply transmitted flux: $j_{\mathrm{tr}}=\hslash k_2|C{|}^2/m\to 0$, so $R\to 1$ and $T\to 0$. The exact threshold solution with no incoming component from the right is the limiting constant solution of ${\psi }^{\prime \prime }=0$ in the raised region. These stationary scattering states are not normalized over the whole real line; finite-interval density ratios are nevertheless well defined.

Translation and rotation. For particles constituting a rigid body, the total linear momentum isThus the total external force governs the motion of the centre of mass. About that centre of mass, the angular momentum and applied torque arewhere primes denote relative positions and velocities. The derivative of the vector is taken relative to nonrotating axes. The inertia tensor relates angular momentum to angular velocity, ${\mathbf{L}}_{\mathrm{CM}}=\mathsf{I}\mathbf{\omega }$. For rotation about a fixed unit direction $\mathbf{n}$, the moment of inertia is $I_{\mathbf{n}}=\int r_{\perp }^{2}dm=\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathsf{I}\mathbf{n}$; it measures the resistance to changing that rotation and gives rotational kinetic energy $I_{\mathbf{n}}{\omega }^2/2$. The simpler vector relation $\mathbf{L}=I\mathbf{\omega }$ applies when the rotation axis is a principal axis, not for every orientation of an arbitrary rigid body. These translational and rotational balances must be applied together; a nonzero torque does not replace the net-force equation.

Gyroscope precession. A rapidly spinning gyroscope has a large angular momentum approximately along its spin axis. The torque component parallel to this vector changes its magnitude, while the perpendicular component turns its direction. If the vector undergoes precession with angular velocity $\mathbf{\Omega }$, then over $dt$ its change is the infinitesimal rotation $d\mathbf{L}=(\mathbf{\Omega }dt)\times \mathbf{L}$. HenceThis describes direction-changing precession at constant $|\mathbf{L}|$; any spin-up contribution must be added separately. For perpendicular torque and angular momentum, the precessional component perpendicular to $\mathbf{L}$ is ${\mathbf{\Omega }}_{\perp }=\mathbf{L}\times \mathbf{G}/L^2$. The familiar tendency of a supported gyroscope to turn sideways is this vector balance, not the absence of gravitational force.

Wheel-lift threshold without the flywheel. Let $h=0.50\mathrm{m}$ be the centre of mass height, $a=1.0\mathrm{m}$ half the wheel separation, and $R_b=10\mathrm{m}$ the bend radius. The required inward force is $F=M{v}^2/R_b$, provided by static friction. Let $N_o,N_i$ be the summed outer and inner wheel normal forces. Vertical balance gives $N_o+N_i=Mg$. Moment balance about the centre of mass givesThe inner wheels lift when $N_i=0$. Thus the vehicle rollover threshold isThe stated mass cancels. This assumes the rigid geometry and sufficient static friction specified in the paper; the threshold is set by loss of contact, not by sliding.

Engine flywheel. The moment of inertia of a uniform disc givesIts spin angular speed, spin angular momentum, and turn angular speed at $40\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{h}}^{-1}$ areThe transverse flywheel axis is perpendicular to the vertical turn axis, soTo specify its direction, use right-handed axes $+x$ forward, $+y$ to the car's left, and $+z$ upward, and consider a left turn. Then $\mathbf{\Omega }=+\Omega \hat{\mathbf{z}}$. Choose the flywheel angular momentum to the car's right, ${\mathbf{L}}_f=-L_f\hat{\mathbf{y}}$. The car must applyto obtain the required precession. This gyroscopic roll torque in a turning vehicle opposes the outward roll tendency in a left turn. By the right-hand rule, the flywheel must turn counterclockwise viewed from the car's right side toward its centre, opposite to the rotation of wheels rolling forward. Reversing flywheel spin would aggravate the outward roll. Reversing the turn reverses both roll and gyroscopic torques, so the same flywheel spin remains helpful.

For comparison, the outward inertial roll moment at the stated speed is $Mh{v}^2/R_b=6173\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}$, and the limiting gravitational restoring moment is $Mga=9810\mathrm{N}\mathrm{m}$. The gyroscopic reaction is about $30\%$ of the former and $19\%$ of the latter, so it is appreciable for this large flywheel. If this ideal model is extended to include the favorable gyroscopic reaction in the wheel-lift condition, it gives $Mh{v}^2/R_b-L_{f}v/R_b=Mga$, or about $56.8\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{h}}^{-1}$ rather than $50.4\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{h}}^{-1}$. This quantifies a useful but finite increase in the rollover threshold.