Codex @codex  0

A light-emitting diode is a semiconductor diode producing electroluminescence under electric current. Forward bias injects electrons and electron holes; radiative electron-hole recombination emits photons. A double heterostructure uses band offsets to retain both charge carriers in an active layer. A sufficiently thin layer is a quantum well.^[ref]

The optical and electrical questions are different: photon energy sets a color scale, while light-emitting diode efficiency determines how much supplied energy escapes as light. The blue light-emitting diode made compact white light-emitting diodes and full-color displays practical. A modulated light-emitting diode can also supply the optical signal in a chopped-light lock-in experiment.

Efficiency has several denominators. Specify a steady electric current $I>0$, positive terminal electric potential difference $V_f$, and a simplified narrow emission spectrum with photon energy $E_{\gamma }$. Assume at most one radiative photon per injected electron and electron hole pair. Let ${\eta }_{\mathrm{inj}}$ be the fraction of the electrical pair-supply rate $I/q$ reaching the active layer, ${\eta }_{\mathrm{rad}}$ the fraction of those pairs recombining radiatively, and ${\eta }_{\mathrm{ext}}$ the fraction of internally emitted photons that escape. Then counting the successive events givesDefine internal quantum efficiency here conditionally on pairs reaching the active layer: ${\eta }_{\mathrm{IQE}}={\eta }_{\mathrm{rad}}$. The internal photon yield per electrical pair is instead ${\eta }_{\mathrm{inj}}{\eta }_{\mathrm{IQE}}$. Stating this convention matters when another definition folds injection into internal quantum efficiency. The external quantum efficiency and wall-plug efficiency areThese are photon-count and energy-flow identities for the declared model. For a broad spectrum, replace $E_{\gamma }$ by the mean escaping photon energy, weighted by photon number, when computing optical power.

A stipulated example chooses $I=20\mathrm{mA}$, $V_f=3.20\mathrm{V}$, $\lambda =450\mathrm{nm}$, ${\eta }_{\mathrm{inj}}=0.90$, ${\eta }_{\mathrm{IQE}}=0.80$ and ${\eta }_{\mathrm{ext}}=0.50$. For every 100 electrical pairs, 90 reach the active layer, 72 emit internally, and 36 photons escape. Thus ${\eta }_{\mathrm{EQE}}=0.36$, not $0.80$. Using $q=1.602176634\times 10^{-19}\mathrm{C}$ givesThe dimensional analysis is transparent: $A/C={\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, $J/s=\mathrm{W}$, and $\mathrm{CV}=\mathrm{J}$. The optical and electrical efficiencies differ because $E_{\gamma }/q=2.75520\mathrm{V}$ differs from the chosen $V_f$.

The factors suggest different improvements. Better confinement can reduce injection leakage; suppressing nonradiative recombination raises the radiative fraction; improving light extraction efficiency helps already-emitted photons escape. A photon trapped by total internal reflection has already passed the radiative step and can still be lost through absorption. Improving extraction therefore need not change the internal radiative fraction.

Shuji Nakamura's lecture cautions that why indium gallium nitride emits efficiently despite many defects was not completely settled in that account.^[ref]

As an independent consistency check on the 1994 reported values, treating its broad spectrum as monochromatic at the $450\mathrm{nm}$ peak givesThis agrees at the quoted precision with the reported $2.7\%$. Its optical/electrical power ratio is instead $1.5\mathrm{mW}/(20\mathrm{mA}\times 3.6\mathrm{V})=2.0833\%$. The first estimate uses a peak in place of a photon-number-weighted mean, so agreement is a consistency check rather than an exact reanalysis of the measured spectrum.

Connect a passive electrical load of electrical resistance $R_L>0$ from the junction to the reference. In the steady direct current model, $R_L$ and $R_2$ share the same electric potential difference and are connected in parallel. Their equivalent electrical resistance isThis is the replacement required when a voltmeter is connected across $R_2$. The inspected teaching guide explicitly models the meter this way.^[ref]

The Kirchhoff's current law proof makes the changed assumption visible:The upper resistor carries the sum of the lower and load electric currents, so the two original resistors no longer have equal electric currents. In the stipulated $R_L=10\mathrm{k\Omega }$ example, $R_p=5\mathrm{k\Omega }$, the upper current is $2/3\mathrm{mA}$, and each lower branch carries $1/3\mathrm{mA}$.

For a digital multimeter used as a voltmeter, let its input electrical resistance on the selected voltage range be $R_m$. With no other load, set $R_L=R_m$; if an intended load is also present, use $R_L\parallel R_m$ in place of $R_L$. Two instruments connected simultaneously add two branches. Their ideal indicated value equals the voltage of this altered circuit; voltmeter loading can exist even with perfect measurement calibration. Real readout additionally has measurement uncertainty, offsets, and finite resolution. Consult the actual range and input specifications rather than assigning every digital multimeter the same $R_m$.

For an oscilloscope, the resistance-only model applies to settled direct current with a compatible input coupling setting. The oscilloscope input and cable also have capacitance; changing signals can therefore have loading that depends on frequency. A probe changes the impedance seen at its tip and the relation between tip voltage and displayed voltage; use the probe-and-input combination's specification and attenuation setting. NJIT's guide models the parallel electrical resistance and capacitance and adjusts probe compensation with a square-wave readout.^[ref]

A lock-in amplifier measures the component of an input signal synchronized with a reference at a chosen frequency. It multiplies the input by a reference sinusoid, then uses a low-pass filter to retain the slowly varying product. Two references in phase quadrature recover both amplitude and phase difference. A shared timing source keeps the relative wave phase stable: this is coherent detection.^[ref]

The useful trick is to move the wanted frequency to zero before averaging. An electronic amplifier alone enlarges both the wanted signal and unwanted noise; a lock-in amplifier instead selects a component by its timing. A photodiode's electric current can first be converted to an electric potential difference, so the same calculation can measure weak modulated light. The chopped-light lock-in experiment makes this selection tangible.

Consider this original constructed input electric potential difference, with $t$ in seconds and $f_0=1\mathrm{Hz}$:The unwanted component has three times the reference frequency and more than twice the wanted peak amplitude. Nevertheless, the lock-in quadratures over $T=4/f_0=4\mathrm{s}$ are exactlyso $R=0.4\mathrm{V}$ and $atan2(Y,X)=\pi /3=60^{\circ }$. This is a peak amplitude calculation, not an SR830 display prediction.

To see why the larger component vanishes, multiply $B\cos (3\omega t+\psi )$ by each reference:Each sinusoid has zero average value of a function over a whole reference cycle. More generally, a component $B\cos (n\omega t+\psi )$ with integer $n\ge 2$ gives products at $(n-1)\omega$ and $(n+1)\omega$, whose integrals vanish over any integer number of reference cycles. This is the orthogonality behind selecting a Fourier coefficient with sinusoidal references. A nonsinusoidal reference can contain additional frequencies and need not have the same rejection property.

An unwanted component at the reference frequency survives. If $u(t)=B\cos (\omega t+\psi )$ is added to the input, its coordinate vector adds to the wanted one:For example, adding $B=0.1\mathrm{V}$ with $\psi =0$ to the wanted component gives $X=0.3\mathrm{V}$, $Y=0.2\sqrt{3}\mathrm{V}$, $R=\sqrt{0.21}\mathrm{V}\approx 0.458258\mathrm{V}$, and phase difference $atan2(0.2\sqrt{3},0.3)\approx 49.1066^{\circ }$. Longer averaging cannot separate these two synchronized contributions.

Let the input electric potential difference be $s(t)=A\cos (\omega t+\varphi )$, with peak amplitude $A\ge 0$, angular frequency $\omega >0$, and phase difference $\varphi$ relative to $\cos \omega t$. For an observation interval $[0,T]$ containing an integer number $N\ge 1$ of cycles, each lasting one period of a function, $T=2\pi N/\omega$, define the lock-in quadratures in a peak convention:These integrals average the products with dimensionless references $2\cos \omega t$ and $-2\sin \omega t$; $X$ and $Y$ have the input's units. The minus sign makes positive $\varphi$ give positive $Y$. The trigonometric functions giveThe oscillating terms have zero integral over the stated interval, proving $X=A\cos \varphi$ and $Y=A\sin \varphi$. Their orthogonality turns an oscillating signal into two constant coordinates.

Represent those coordinates as a vector, or as the complex number $Z=X+\mathrm{i}Y$. Its modulus and complex argument recover the peak amplitude and phase difference:Here $atan2(Y,X)$ selects the angle with the correct signs of both coordinates, rather than applying the arctangent to $Y/X$ and losing the quadrant. When $X=Y=0$, the amplitude is zero and the phase difference is undefined. When $\varphi =\pi /2$, $X=0$ despite a nonzero signal; measuring $Y$ prevents this blind spot. Rotating both references by a fixed angle rotates the coordinate vector but preserves $R$.

The factors of two above deliberately recover peak amplitude. The SR830 instead reports the selected sinusoidal component in root mean square units: in a calibrated, zero-offset display, $R_{\mathrm{rms}}=R/\sqrt{2}$. For $R=0.4\mathrm{V}$ this is $0.282843\mathrm{V}$, while the peak-to-peak span of that component is $0.8\mathrm{V}$. Display normalization, reference sign, gain and angle units must be checked for the particular instrument.^[ref]

A conducting conical pendulum connected to a grounded pivot develops a motional electric potential difference $B\omega r^2/2$ between the rotation axis and a bob at radius $r$. If the bob dominates the capacitance, its electric charge is $CB\omega r^2/2$. An additional uniform vertical electric field changes both the force on that charge and, while the grounding connection remains, the background electric potential entering the charging relation. These effects must be treated consistently when calculating a first-order mechanical response.

The Field Mapper Kit (PK-9023), Product Manual 012-04346D by PASCO scientific (p. 3, Parallel plate capacitor) proposes a direct investigation of the plate-length-to-gap ratio using conductive-paper electric potential mapping. Its finite straight electrodes represent a cross-section of the plates. The apparatus is a gridded resistive sheet on a corkboard, silver-ink electrodes, pushpin electrical contacts, a $5$–$20\mathrm{V}$ direct supply capable of $25\mathrm{mA}$, and a voltmeter with input electrical resistance at least $10\mathrm{M\Omega }$. The manual specifies waiting 20 minutes for the ink to reach its maximum electrical conductivity, then checking each electrode: its internal voltage drop should be no more than $1\%$ of the applied electric potential difference.^[ref]

For the readout, keep one voltmeter lead on the reference electrode and scan the other across the sheet. Mark points having the same reading to trace an equipotential. A second method holds the two probe tips at a fixed separation and pivots them to find the largest electric potential difference; a suggested separation is one centimetre. Avoid printed grid marks when making contact.^[ref]

The inference follows from the measured electric potential, rather than assuming straight electric field lines. With probe separation $\Delta s$ and direction $\hat{\mathbf{t}}$, a local finite difference givesAn arrow toward rising electric potential follows $+\nabla \varphi$, so it must be reversed to show $\mathbf{E}$. To investigate the fringing field of a capacitor, compare contours well inside the gap with contours near and beyond the ends, then repeat at a changed gap while keeping the sheet boundary and plate length fixed. Curving contours and an outside gradient establish nonuniformity in this planar setup. Compare $-E_{y}d/V$ at recorded positions to distinguish simple voltage rescaling from geometric changes; no measured values are supplied here.

Additional useful controls are repeat reference readings to detect drift, reversal of supply polarity, and repeating selected readings with reduced probe spacing. Keep contact quality and sheet edges fixed during the aspect-ratio comparison. Finite probe separation averages the gradient; reducing it improves spatial resolution but magnifies the effect of voltage uncertainty. Voltmeter loading, imperfect ink electrodes, and inhomogeneous sheet electrical conductivity can mimic distortions. These proposed checks supplement the manufacturer's electrode check, rather than claiming a completed experiment.

The sheet carries a steady electric current. For uniform electrical conductivity, Ohm's law and electric charge conservation give the two-dimensional Laplace equation away from electrodes, as explained in conductive-paper electric potential mapping. Uncontacted sheet edges have zero normal electric current, whereas the diagram model fixes zero outer electric potential. These distinct boundary conditions must be matched before a quantitative comparison. The apparatus reveals a planar electric potential map; it does not directly measure the free-space three-dimensional capacitance of metal plates.

The 1985 spectroscopy experiment used niobium-based tunnel Josephson junctions on silicon, thermally anchored with final bias low-pass filters to a dilution refrigerator. Calibrated germanium and cobalt thermometers measured temperature. A filtered coaxial cable injected microwaves; repeated switches to nonzero electric potential difference measured escape with irradiation on and off. Bias scans at fixed microwave frequency resolved separate enhancements matching calculated unequal energy level spacings. Raising temperature merged the structure toward classical response. Junction parameters were calibrated in the classical regime; reducing the superconducting critical current with a magnetic field checked thermal readout. Parameter uncertainties limited absolute resonance positions.^[ref]

The companion escape experiment mounted a tunnel Josephson junction on an attenuating coaxial cable, cold-anchored its bias filters, ramped the electric current, and counted switches to nonzero electric potential difference. Rapid current shutoff limited heating. Classical escape and microwave resonance calibrated the superconducting critical current, capacitance and environmental loading. Low-temperature escape agreed with the quantum prediction using these calibrated parameters. A magnetic field reduced the superconducting critical current to keep the same apparatus thermally activated at lower temperature, testing excess noise. Frequency-dependent loading contributed uncertainty; the predicted damping correction was smaller than combined errors, so the experiment did not resolve that correction.^[ref]

Together these tests connect spectral structure and escape of the same kind of collective coordinate. They do not constitute a demonstration of coherent gate operations on a qubit, or prove that every macroscopic coordinate retains quantum behavior under arbitrary environmental coupling. The attraction is more concrete: a fabricated electrical circuit admits both an independently measurable classical model and quantitative quantum tests of its phase dynamics.

Mass spectrometry separates and detects ions according to mass-to-charge ratio. It can distinguish isotopes which belong to the same chemical element but have different atomic masses. The instrument measures ions: interpreting the result as a neutral atomic mass requires accounting for electron removal and its ionization energy. For a singly positive ion in its ground state, $m_{+}=m_{\mathrm{a}}-m_e+I/c^2$, where $m_e$ is the electron rest mass, $I$ is the ionization energy, and $c$ is the speed of light.

For a simple illustrative analyzer, positive ions of mass $m$ and electric charge $q=ze$ gain kinetic energy $qV=m{v}^2/2$ across an electric potential difference $V$ before entering a transverse uniform magnetic field $B$. The Lorentz force supplies centripetal acceleration, soAt fixed $V$ and $B$, the measured bending radius $r$ separates mass-to-charge ratios, not masses independently of electric charge. This ideal model assumes negligible initial kinetic energy and speeds small compared with the speed of light; the historical focusing mass spectrograph used the geometry described below.

The experimental achievement is to turn invisible differences between individual ions into separated, calibrated positions. Aston velocity focusing explains how an early mass spectrograph sharpened its images; the velocity-selected magnetic mass analyzer provides an independent model whose equations can be checked directly. The magnesium isotope mass spectrum shows why position, width, and intensity carry different information.

Keep the illumination and cell temperature approximately constant. Connect an ammeter and an adjustable resistor as a series circuit across the solar cell; connect a high-resistance voltmeter across its terminals. Vary the electrical resistance and record pairs of electric potential difference $V$ and delivered electric current $I$. This measures the illuminated current-voltage characteristic.

A load close to a short circuit estimates $I_{\mathrm{sc}}$ at $V\simeq 0$. With the load disconnected, an open circuit measurement using a high-resistance voltmeter estimates $V_{\mathrm{oc}}$ at $I\simeq 0$. Neither endpoint delivers useful power: $P=VI$ vanishes there. The intermediate readings locate the maximum of $VI$ and determine the solar-cell fill factor. Holding illumination fixed matters because the photogenerated electric current changes with light intensity; holding temperature fixed matters because the diode saturation current and junction response change with it.

This experiment distinguishes producing an electric potential difference from delivering energy to a load. To determine conversion efficiency as well, measure the incident power on the illuminated area, rather than equating it to a lamp's electrical rating.

A membrane potential is an electric potential difference across a cell membrane. We use the conventionTaking the external electric potential as zero makes $V_m<0$ mean that the inside is at lower electric potential. “Negative inside” describes a difference, not an absolute electric potential, and does not imply that the entire cytosol has a large net negative electric charge.

Consider a cell membrane permeable only to potassium ions, with higher potassium concentration inside. Diffusion initially favors outward transport. If balancing negative ions cannot follow, that loss of positive electric charge produces a small inner excess of negative electric charge and an outer positive excess. The resulting electric field favors inward potassium transport. At the Nernst equilibrium potential, chemical and electrical contributions to electrochemical potential balance; ions still cross both ways, with zero net transport.^[ref]

In living biological cells, several ions can permeate and pumps maintain their concentration differences through active transport. Pumps transporting net electric charge also contribute electric current. Thus $V_m=E_{\mathrm{K}}$ is a special limit, not a universal rule; membrane potential need not always be negative.^[ref] The existing reversal potential example shows how opposing electric currents can balance without each ion reaching thermodynamic equilibrium. This makes selective permeability a way to convert chemical differences into electrical signals: changing the available ion channels changes which electrochemical gradients influence the voltage.

A gate, insulating oxide and semiconductor form a capacitor. Applied electric potential difference changes the near-surface distribution of charge carriers.

Motional electromotive force is the contribution ${\oint }_C(\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B})\cdot d\mathbf{l}$ from an electrical conductor moving with local velocity $\mathbf{v}$ through a magnetic field. The cross product comes from the magnetic part of the Lorentz force. For a straight rod of length $\ell$, perpendicular to both its velocity and a uniform magnetic field, its magnitude is $B\ell v$. The sign depends on the direction of integration along the rod. ^[ref].

For a computed example, take $\ell =0.50\mathrm{m}$, velocity $\mathbf{v}=2.0\hat{\mathbf{x}}m/s$ to the right, and magnetic field $\mathbf{B}=0.40\hat{\mathbf{z}}\mathrm{T}$ out of the page. The rod lies along $y$. ThenPositive electric charge is driven downward. For an isolated rod after charge separation has equilibrated, $\mathbf{E}=-\mathbf{v}\times \mathbf{B}$ inside it, and the electric potential difference is $V_{\mathrm{bottom}}-V_{\mathrm{top}}=+0.40\mathrm{V}$; the bottom is positive. This open-circuit statement does not imply a sustained electric current.

Close the rod's path with stationary U-shaped rails and an electrical resistance $R>0$ at the left. With out-of-page unit normal, the positive loop direction is counterclockwise, hence upward along the rod. If the rod's horizontal position is $x(t)$, the enclosed area is $A=\ell x$ and the external magnetic flux is ${\Phi }_{\mathrm{ext}}=B\ell x$. ThusHere the resistive approximation neglects self-inductance. The negative electric current is clockwise, downward along the rod, consistent with the charge-separation calculation and Lenz's law.

The closed-loop result illustrates why the moving-circuit form of Faraday's law of induction includes motional electromotive force: the magnetic field is constant in time, so the electric field circulation alone would miss this drive. Its mechanical consequence is electromagnetic braking of a sliding rod.

A multimeter combines measurements such as electric potential difference, electric current and electrical resistance in one instrument. Some models also measure capacitance; the supported functions and test conditions depend on the instrument. The dielectric laboratory example uses a multimeter in capacitance mode.

A local negative slope $dV/dI<0$ of a current-voltage characteristic, where the inverse slope exists. This differs from negative $V/I$: a tunnel diode can have positive electric potential difference and positive electric current while $dV/dI<0$.

The ohm is the SI unit of electrical resistance, one volt per ampere. A component of electrical resistance $2\Omega$ needs an electric potential difference of $2\mathrm{V}$ to carry electric current $1\mathrm{A}$ under Ohm's law. ^[ref].

Ohm's law states that an Ohmic conductor has electric current proportional to its applied electric potential difference, with constant electrical resistance under fixed material conditions:Here $V=\varphi (A)-\varphi (B)$ is the terminal electric potential difference, and positive $I$ enters at $A$ and exits at $B$. This sign convention makes $VI$ the electrical power absorbed. The straight-line relation through the origin lets one constant predict the response at many applied electric potential differences. Merely defining $R=V/I$ at one nonzero operating point does not establish Ohm's law: a component may have a ratio that varies with applied electric potential difference. Material and temperature must be specified and held fixed; many components have a nonlinear response. ^[ref].

For the ideal resistor model $R=2\Omega$ at electric potential difference $V=5\mathrm{V}$,This power is converted to internal energy by Joule heating; a watt is a joule per second. If the model holds for time $10\mathrm{s}$, the transferred energy is $125\mathrm{J}$. Doubling electric potential difference doubles electric current and quadruples power for the same fixed $R$. The model keeps material temperature fixed even while calculating Joule heating; appreciable changes in temperature may require a changing electrical resistance. ^[ref].

In 1827, Georg Ohm published his mathematical account of electrical transport in Die galvanische Kette, mathematisch bearbeitet. On printed page 36, his relation $S=A/L$ expresses electric current in terms of total driving tension and a reduced length incorporating electrical conductivity and geometry. This is historical notation: his $A$ is not the wire cross-sectional area used here, and his $L$ is not simply the wire's physical length. The striking idea is that material response and geometry can be combined into one quantity governing an electrical circuit. ^[ref].

The terminal electric potential difference with zero external electric current, when a finite value exists. A reading from a finite-input-electrical resistance voltmeter approximates it subject to voltmeter loading.

The steady electric potential differences and electric currents about which signals vary in an electrical circuit. A small-signal model approximates nearby behavior.